First, this commit moves the launch_dummy_circuit_as_needed() function into
relay_find_addr.c and renames it to relay_addr_learn_from_dirauth(). This is
an attempt to centralize anything relate with address discovery in the right
module.
Second, when building a descriptor and we fail to discover our address,
immediately launch a dummy circuit to an authority in an attempt to learn our
descriptor.
It is still only done every 20 minutes even though the descriptor build is
done every minute. We ought to avoid load on the authority and if we can't
learn in the first place our address from them, chances are more things are
wrong.
Related to #40071
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Regularly, tor looks if its IP has changed. It does the entire auto discovery
process again. However, it is possible that it does not find anything.
Instead of thinking the IP changed to an unknown address, look at our cache
and see if that value has changed.
The reason for this is because if tor gets its address as a suggestion from a
directory authority, it is because the auto discovery failed and thus that
address should be consider for the IP change check.
Related to #40071
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Typos found with codespell.
Please keep in mind that this should have impact on actual code
and must be carefully evaluated:
src/core/or/lttng_circuit.inc
- ctf_enum_value("CONTROLER", CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_CONTROLLER)
+ ctf_enum_value("CONTROLLER", CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_CONTROLLER)
The option `--enable-all-bugs-are-fatal` when used with
`--disable-module-relay` caused GCC to warn about functions that
it thought should be labeled noreturn.
I've tried a couple of approaches, but disabling the warning on
these functions seems to be the best approach.
Fixed#40129; bugfix on 0.4.4.1-alpha.
We set this flag if we've launched the connection in order to
satisfy an origin circuit, or when we decide the connection _would_
satisfy an origin circuit. These are the only or_connections we
want to consider for bootstrapping: other or_connections are opened
because of client EXTEND requests, and they may succeed or fail
because of the clients' confusion or misconfiguration.
Closes#25061.
Our code was using [01] as for the key type of signed->link certs,
which was incorrect. The value should be [03], to indicate that the
value as the SHA256 of an x.509 cert.
Fortunately, nothing cares about this value, so there shouldn't be
compatibility issues.
Fixes bug 40124; bugfix on 0.2.7.2-alpha.
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
tor_cert_create tor_cert_create_ed25519
It was generated with --no-verify, so it probably breaks some commit hooks.
The commiter should be sure to fix them up in a subsequent commit.
Previously, we would treat *any* incoming circuit on a non-local
channel as meaning that our ORPort was reachable. With this patch,
we make sure that the address that the peer _says_ we have is the
same as the one we're trying to advertise right now.
Closes 20165. Bugfix on 4f5192b280 in 0.1.0.1-rc, when
reachability self-tests were first introduced.
(Unlike approaches in earlier versions of Tor, this one logs if and
only if we are launching a test, and we haven't said that we're
testing this port.)
Fixes bug 40068; bug not in any released version.
Closes#40068.
This function tried to modify an array in place, but did it in a
pretty confusing and complicated way. I've revised it to follow a
much more straightforward approach.
Fixes bug #40065.
On an IPv6 reachability failure test, if the address was configured, don't
publish the descriptor and log warn. If the address was auto discovered, still
publish the descriptor.
Closes#33247.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Enum allows us to easily compare what is being returned but also better
semantic to the code.
Related #33247
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Now support IPv4 _and_ IPv6.
This also cleans up nicely the function that was moving IPv4 addresses from
uint32_t to tor_addr_t.
Fixes#40058
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Without this fix, if an PT forgets to send a USERADDR command, that
results in a connection getting treated as local for the purposes of
rate-limiting.
If the PT _does_ use USERADDR, we still believe it.
Closes ticket 33747.
In routerconf_find_ipv6_or_ap(), we check if the returned ORPort is internal
but not for listening. This means that IPv6 [::] is considered internal.
Thus, we can't use it, we have to look directly at the configured address and
port and if they are valid, we do consider that we have a valid IPv6 ORPort
and that we can thus extend in IPv6.
Related #33246
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Now that tor automatically binds to IPv4 _and_ IPv6, in order to avoid
breaking configurations, we sanitize the parsed lists for duplicate ORPorts.
It is possible to happen because we still allow this configuration;
ORPort 9888
ORPort [4242::1]:9888
Meaning that the first ORPort value will bind to 0.0.0.0:9888 _and_ [::]:9888
which would lead to an error when attempting to bind on [4242::1]:9888.
However, that configuration is accepted today and thus we must not break it.
To remedy, we now sanitize the parsed list and prioritize an ORPort that has
an explicit address over the global one.
A warning is emitted if such configuration pattern is found. This is only for
the ORPort.
Related to #33246
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This commit makes it that if the ORPort is set with a single port, it will
bind to both global listen IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
To pin an "ORPort <PORT>" to be IPv4 or IPv6, the IPv4Only/IPv6Only flags are
honored thus this will _only_ bind on IPv6 for that port value:
ORPort 9050 IPv6Only
Results in: [::]:9050
ORPort 9051 IPv4Only
Results in: [0.0.0.0]:9051
Attempting to configure an explicit IPv4 address with IPv6Only flag is an
error and vice versa.
Closes#33246
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
These now (or_port and dir_port) now have "find" names, since they
look at the portcfg first, then at the actual ports from the
listeners.
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
router_get_advertised_or_port routerconf_find_or_port \
router_get_advertised_ipv6_or_ap routerconf_find_ipv6_or_ap \
router_has_advertised_ipv6_orport routerconf_has_ipv6_orport \
router_get_advertised_dir_port routerconf_find_dir_port
Rationale: these don't actually give the first advertised
address/port, but instead give us the first such port that we are
_configured_ to advertise. Putting them in a portconf_ namespace
therefore makes sense.
Similarly, there are no other functions that get the first
configured advertised addr/port, so the "by_type_af()" part is needless.
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
get_first_advertised_addr_by_type_af portconf_get_first_advertised_addr \
get_first_advertised_port_by_type_af portconf_get_first_advertised_port
This option controls if a tor relay will attempt address auto discovery and
thus ultimately publish an IPv6 ORPort in the descriptor.
Behavior is from proposal 312 section 3.2.6.
Closes#33245
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The ORPort can be IPv4Only which means that even if we can auto discover an
IPv6 address, we should not publish it because it would have an ORPort of 0.
Fixes#40054
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Instead of a boolean saying "cache_only" add the concept of flags so we add
semantic through out the code and allow ourselves to have more options in the
future.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
