Because the test is adding entries to the "rend_cache" directly, the
rend_cache_increment_allocation() was never called which made the
rend_cache_clean() call trigger that underflow warning:
rend_cache/clean: [forking] Nov 29 09:55:04.024 [warn] rend_cache_decrement_allocation(): Bug: Underflow in rend_cache_decrement_allocation (on Tor 0.4.0.0-alpha-dev 2240fe63feb9a8cf)
The test is still good and valid.
Fixes#28660
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The code checked for sysctl being available and HW_PHYSMEM being
defined, but HW_USERMEM was actually being used with sysctl instead
of HW_PHYSMEM.
The case for OpenBSD, etc. use HW_PHYSMEM64 (which is obviously a
64-bit variant of HW_PHYSMEM) and the case for OSX uses HW_MEMSIZE
(which appears to be a 64-bit variant of HW_PHYSMEM).
Signed-off-by: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn@gmail.com>
When cleaning up after an error in process_unix_exec, the stdin
pipe was being double closed instead of closing both the stdin
and stdout pipes. This occurred in two places.
Signed-off-by: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn@gmail.com>
NOTE: This commit breaks the build, because there was a mistake in an
earlier change of exactly the sort that this is meant to detect! I'm
leaving it broken for illustration.
Test exactly what the geometric sampler returns, because that's what
the downstream callers of it are going to use.
While here, also assert that the geometric sampler returns a positive
integer. (Our geometric distribution is the one suported on {1, 2,
3, ...} that returns the number of trials before the first success,
not the one supported on {0, 1, 2, ...} that returns the number of
failures before the first success.)
In file included from ./src/core/or/or_circuit_st.h:12:0,
from src/core/or/circuitlist.c:112:
./src/core/or/circuit_st.h:15:39: error: redefinition of typedef ‘circpad_machine_spec_t’
./src/core/or/circuitpadding.h:572:3: note: previous declaration of ‘circpad_machine_spec_t’ was here
./src/core/or/circuit_st.h:16:40: error: redefinition of typedef ‘circpad_machine_state_t’
./src/core/or/circuitpadding.h:517:3: note: previous declaration of ‘circpad_machine_state_t’ was here
In file included from src/core/or/connection_edge.c:70:0:
./src/core/or/circuitpadding.h:16:26: error: redefinition of typedef ‘circuit_t’
./src/core/or/or.h:930:26: note: previous declaration of ‘circuit_t’ was here
./src/core/or/circuitpadding.h:17:33: error: redefinition of typedef ‘origin_circuit_t’
./src/core/or/or.h:931:33: note: previous declaration of ‘origin_circuit_t’ was here
./src/core/or/circuitpadding.h:18:23: error: redefinition of typedef ‘cell_t’
./src/core/or/or.h:628:23: note: previous declaration of ‘cell_t’ was here
typedef doesn't work for forward declarations, but plain struct
without a typedef wrapper does (and unlike the _t type aliases makes
it clearer for everyone whether you're talking about the struct or
the pointer).
Prior to this commit, the testsuite was failing on OpenBSD. After
this commit the testsuite runs fine on OpenBSD.
It was previously decided to test for the OpenBSD macro (rather than
__OpenBSD__, etc.) because OpenBSD forks seem to have the former
macro defined. sys/param.h must be included for the OpenBSD macro
definition; however, many files tested for the OpenBSD macro without
having this header included.
This commit includes sys/param.h in the files where the OpenBSD macro
is used (and sys/param.h is not already included), and it also
changes some instances of the __OpenBSD__ macro to OpenBSD.
See commit 27df23abb6 which changed
everything to use OpenBSD instead of __OpenBSD__ or OPENBSD. See
also tickets #6982 and #20980 (the latter ticket is where it was
decided to use the OpenBSD macro).
Signed-off-by: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn@gmail.com>
