This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
router_skip_orport_reachability_check router_should_skip_orport_reachability_check \
router_skip_dirport_reachability_check router_should_skip_dirport_reachability_check \
router_connect_assume_or_reachable client_or_conn_should_skip_reachable_address_check \
router_connect_assume_dir_reachable client_dir_conn_should_skip_reachable_address_check
It was generated with --no-verify, so it probably breaks some commit hooks.
The commiter should be sure to fix them up in a subsequent commit.
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
(In order to avoid conflicts, I'm applying this script separately to
each maint branch. This is the 0.4.3 version.)
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
#!/usr/bin/perl -i -p
s#/\* *falls? ?thr.*?\*/#FALLTHROUGH;#i;
Move a series of function from config.c into that new file which is related to
address resolving.
Part of #33789
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Allow relays and bridges to send IPv4 or IPv6 extend cells.
But keep restricting clients to IPv4 extend cells, because sending IPv6
extend cells would be an obvious version distinguisher.
Part of 33222.
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
check_whether_orport_reachable router_skip_orport_reachability_check \
check_whether_dirport_reachable router_skip_dirport_reachability_check
It was generated with --no-verify, so it probably breaks some commit hooks.
The commiter should be sure to fix them up in a subsequent commit.
Part of 33222.
Allow clients and relays to send dual-stack and IPv6-only EXTEND2 cells.
Parse dual-stack and IPv6-only EXTEND2 cells on relays.
Relays do not make connections or extend circuits via IPv6: that's the
next step.
Closes ticket 33901.
Log IPv6 addresses on connections where this relay is the responder.
Previously, responding relays would replace the remote IPv6 address with
the IPv4 address from the consensus.
(The port is replaced with the IPv6 ORPort from the consensus, we will
resolve this issue in 33898.)
Fixes bug 33899; bugfix on 0.3.1.1-alpha.
Consider IPv6 addresses when checking if a connection is canonical.
In 17604, relays assumed that a remote relay could consider an IPv6
connection canonical, but did not set the canonical flag on their side
of the connection.
Fixes bug 33899; bugfix on 0.3.1.1-alpha.
