In other words, if PublishServerDescriptor is set to 0 and AssumeReachable to
1, then allow a relay to hold a RFC1918 address.
Reasons for this are documented in #40208Fixes#40208
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Handle the EOF situation for a metrics connection. Furthermore, if we failed
to fetch the data from the inbuf properly, mark the socket as closed because
the caller, connection_process_inbuf(), assumes that we did so on error.
Fixes#40257
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
While trying to resolve our CI issues, the Windows build broke with an
unused function error:
src/test/test_switch_id.c:37:1: error: ‘unprivileged_port_range_start’
defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
We solve this by moving the `#if !defined(_WIN32)` test above the
`unprivileged_port_range_start()` function defintion such that it is
included in its body.
This is an unreviewed commit.
See: tor#40275
We currently assume that the only way for Tor to listen on ports in the
privileged port range (1 to 1023), on Linux, is if we are granted the
NET_BIND_SERVICE capability. Today on Linux, it's possible to specify
the beginning of the unprivileged port range using a sysctl
configuration option. Docker (and thus the CI service Tor uses) recently
changed this sysctl value to 0, which causes our tests to fail as they
assume that we should NOT be able to bind to a privileged port *without*
the NET_BIND_SERVICE capability.
In this patch, we read the value of the sysctl value via the /proc/sys/
filesystem iff it's present, otherwise we assume the default
unprivileged port range begins at port 1024.
See: tor#40275
In other words, if we don't have an ORPort configured for a specific family
(IPv4/v6), we don't bother doing address discovery.
Related to #40254
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
We used to actually discard ORPorts that were the same port and same family
but they could have different address.
Instead, we need to keep all different ORPorts so we can bind a listener on
each of them. We will publish only one of these in our descriptor though.
Related to #40246
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Some days before this commit, the network experienced a DDoS on the directory
authorities that prevented them to generate a consensus for more than 5 hours
straight.
That in turn entirely disabled onion service v3, client and service side, due
to the subsystem requiring a live consensus to function properly.
We know require a reasonably live consensus which means that the HSv3
subsystem will to its job for using the best consensus tor can find. If the
entire network is using an old consensus, than this should be alright.
If the service happens to use a live consensus while a client is not, it
should still work because the client will use the current SRV it sees which
might be the previous SRV for the service for which it still publish
descriptors for.
If the service is using an old one and somehow can't get a new one while
clients are on a new one, then reachability issues might arise. However, this
is a situation we already have at the moment since the service will simply not
work if it doesn't have a live consensus while a client has one.
Fixes#40237
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The previous parser only considered stats files _starting_ with the
timestamp tag, not stats files having the timestamp tag in a later
position. While this applies to all current stats files, a future
stats file might look differently. Better to fix the function now than
be surprised in another 9 years from now.
This commit also adds a test case for such future stats, and it fixes
stats file paths in newly added unit tests.
It turns out that 9 years ago, we stopped appending data into stats file and
rather overwrite everytime we have new stats (see commit
a6a127c833)
The load_stats_file() function was still thinking that we could have the same
line many times in the file which turns out to be false since 9 years ago.
However, that did not cause problem until IPv6 connection stats came along
which introduced a new line in conn-stats: "ipv6-conn-bi-direct ...".
Before, that file contained a single line starting with the tag
"conn-bi-direct". That very tag appears also in the IPv6 tag (see above) so
the load_stats_file() function would consider that the IPv6 line as the last
tag to be appeneded to the file and fail to report the line above (for IPv4).
It would actually truncate the IPv6 line and report it (removing the "ipv6-"
part).
In other words, "conn-bi-direct" was not reported and instead
"ipv6-conn-bi-direct" was used without the "ipv6-" part.
This commit refactors the entire function so that now it looks for a
"timestamp tag" to validate and then if everything is fine, returns the entire
content of the file. The refactor simplifies the function, adds logging in
case of failures and modernize it in terms of coding standard.
Unit tests are also added that makes sure the loaded content matches the
entire file if timestamp validation passes.
Fixes#40226
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Commit c3a0f75796 added this feature for ORPort
that we ignore any port that is not the family of our default address when
parsing the port. So if port_parse_config() was called with an IPv4 default
address, all IPv6 address would be ignored.
That makes sense for ORPort since we call twice port_parse_config() for
0.0.0.0 and [::] but for the rest of the ports, it is not good since a
perfectly valid configuration can be:
SocksPort 9050
SocksPort [::1]:9050
Any non-ORPort only binds by default to an IPv4 except the ORPort that binds
to both IPv4 and IPv6 by default.
The fix here is to always parse all ports within port_parse_config() and then,
specifically for ORPort, remove the duplicates or superseding ones. The
warning is only emitted when a port supersedes another.
A unit tests is added to make sure SocksPort of different family always exists
together.
Fixes#40183
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Typos found with codespell.
Please keep in mind that this should have impact on actual code
and must be carefully evaluated:
src/core/or/lttng_circuit.inc
- ctf_enum_value("CONTROLER", CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_CONTROLLER)
+ ctf_enum_value("CONTROLLER", CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_CONTROLLER)
Previously, hashlib.shake_256 was a class (if present); now it can
also be a function. This change invalidated our old
compatibility/workaround code, and made one of our tests fail.
Fixes bug 40179; bugfix on 0.3.1.6-rc when the workaround code was
added.
