Fixes bug 29922; bugfix on 0.2.9.3-alpha when we tried to capture
all these warnings. No need to backport any farther than 0.3.5,
though -- these warnings don't cause test failures before then.
This one was tricky to find because apparently it only happened on
_some_ windows builds.
This test was disabled in 0.4.0 and later, but the fix in #29298 was only
merged to 0.4.1. So this test will never be re-enabled in 0.4.0.
Part of 29500.
Our monotime mocking forces us to call monotime_init() *before* we set the
mocked time value. monotime_init() thus stores the first ratchet value at
whatever the platform is at, and then we set fake mocked time to some later
value.
If monotime_init() gets a value from the host that is greater than what we
choose to mock time at for our unittests, all subsequent monotime_abosolute()
calls return zero, which breaks all unittests that depend on time moving
forward by updating mocked monotime values.
So, we need to adjust our mocked time to take the weird monotime_init() time
into account, when we set fake time.
Previously we used time(NULL) to set the Expires: header in our HTTP
responses. This made the actual contents of that header untestable,
since the unit tests have no good way to override time(), or to see
what time() was at the exact moment of the call to time() in
dircache.c.
This gave us a race in dir_handle_get/status_vote_next_bandwidth,
where the time() call in dircache.c got one value, and the call in
the tests got another value.
I'm applying our regular solution here: using approx_time() so that
the value stays the same between the code and the test. Since
approx_time() is updated on every event callback, we shouldn't be
losing any accuracy here.
Fixes bug 30001. Bug introduced in fb4a40c32c4a7e5; not in any
released Tor.
When a directory authority is using a bandwidth file to obtain the
bandwidth values that will be included in the next vote, serve this
bandwidth file at /tor/status-vote/next/bandwidth.z.
so that the relays that would be "excluded" from the bandwidth
file because of something failed can be included to diagnose what
failed, without still including these relays in the bandwidth
authorities vote.
Closes#29806.
Check if the new pointer is the same as the old one: if it is, it's
probably a bug:
* the caller may have confused current and previous, or
* they may have forgotten to sr_srv_dup().
Putting NULL multiple times is allowed.
Part of 29706.
Refactor the shared random state's memory management so that it actually
takes ownership of the shared random value pointers.
Fixes bug 29706; bugfix on 0.2.9.1-alpha.
Stop leaking parts of the shared random state in the shared-random unit
tests. The previous fix in 29599 was incomplete.
Fixes bug 29706; bugfix on 0.2.9.1-alpha.
