Before, when parsing memunits, if overflow occured it failed silently.
Use nowrap u64 math to detect overflow, compare to INT64_MAX and if
greater tell user and fail accordingly.
15000000.5 TB fails double check as it a greater floating number than
(double)INT64_MAX
8388608.1 TB passes double check because it falls in the same value as
(double)INT64_MAX (which is 2^63), but will fail the int check because
(uint64_t)d, which is 2^63, is strictly greater than 2^63-1 (INT64_MAX).
Fixes#30920
Signed-off-by: José M. Guisado <guigom@riseup.net>
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
confparse.h confmgt.h \
confparse.c confmgt.c \
CONFPARSE_PRIVATE CONFMGT_PRIVATE \
TOR_CONFPARSE_H TOR_CONFMGT_H
options_validate_cb() derives DataDirectory (which we use) from
DataDirectory_option (which the user sets). I want to add a test
that will call options_validate_cb(), but it will fail unless it
derives the same value.
The current API of this callback mixes responsibilities, including:
* validation
* transition checking
* processing (modifying) the configuration object.
These will have to be disentangled piece by piece, so for now, we'll
have "legacy" validate functions as well.
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
validate_fn_t legacy_validate_fn_t \
validate_fn legacy_validate_fn
This input was inessential, and none of the tests actually depended
on it or tested anything about it (as can be seen from the fact that
tests all still pass when it's removed).
I tried to generate this commit with a coccinelle script, but it had
trouble parsing a lot of options_validate as it stands. Instead, I
did a search-and-replace to replace "tdata->old_opt," with "NULL,".
Only use the HS circuit map to know if an introduction circuit is established
or not. No need for a flag to keep state of something we already have in the
circuit map. Furthermore, the circuit map gets cleaned up properly so it will
always have the "latest truth".
This commit also removes a unit test that was testing specifically that flag
but now we rely solely on the HS circuit map which is also tested few lines
below the removed test.
Fixes#32094
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
There was one that it could not find because it was in a macro definition.
I used the following semantic patch:
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5;
@@
options_validate(e1,
e2,
- e3,
- e4,
e5)
Conflicts:
src/feature/dirparse/authcert_parse.c
src/feature/dirparse/ns_parse.c
src/feature/hs/hs_service.c
src/lib/conf/conftesting.h
src/lib/log/log.h
src/lib/thread/threads.h
src/test/test_options.c
These conflicts were mostly related to autostyle improvements, with
one or two due to doxygen fixes.
Two things needed to be changed. First, we used to set quiet_level
to the default (QUIET_NONE) when running tests, since we would not
call anything that acted based upon it. But since we sometimes call
options_init_logs(), we need to pre-set quiet_level to QUIET_SILENT
in the logs so that we don't add the default logs. This did not
cause test failure: just unwanted logs.
Second, we had a test that checked whether options_validate was
messing with options->Logs correctly. Since options_validate no
longer messes with the logs, we no longer want a test for this.
This finally became the empty string, since we no longer have to do
anything in individual test_options.c tests to make "" be a valid
set of options. Now we can remove it at last.
Now that ConnLimit is set to the default value in the
testing helper functions, the individual tests don't all need to
make sure it is set to something valid.
Several of our tests assumed that ConnLimit would be set to 0 by
default, causing the default options not to be parseable. These
tests had nothing to do with ConnLimit.
Now that MaxClientCircuitsPending is set to the default value in the
testing helper functions, the individual tests don't all need to
make sure it is set to something valid.
Several of our tests assumed that MaxClientCircuitsPending would be
set to 0 by default, causing the default options not to be
parseable. These tests had nothing to do with
MaxClientCircuitsPending.
Now that KeepalivePeriod is set to the default value in the testing
helper functions, the individual tests don't all need to make sure
it is set to something valid.
Several of our tests assumed that KeepalivePeriod would be set to 0
by default, causing the default options not to be parseable. These
tests had nothing to do with KeepalivePeriod.
This macro used to have a big list of "default" values that we
needed to set in the test_options tests in order to have reasonable
behavior. But now that we initialize options objects to the default
settings in these tests, we no longer need such a long list of
things to replace.
Previously, we just used options set to all 0s, but this causes some
pretty severe workarounds throughout the code, as our options fail
to validate, or count as "default" for the wrong reasons.
Note that in some places, we stop getting spurious warnings or
failures which the tests previously demanded. In these cases, I've
changed the test behavior.
Fixes 32175.
