This should please coverity, and fix CID 1415721. It didn't
understand that networkstatus_get_param() always returns a value
between its minimum and maximum values.
This should please coverity, and fix CID 1415722. It didn't
understand that networkstatus_get_param() always returns a value
between its minimum and maximum values.
This should please coverity, and fix CID 1415723. It didn't understand
that networkstatus_get_param() always returns a value between its
minimum and maximum values.
And fix the documentation on the function: it does produce trailing
"="s as padding.
Also remove all checks for the return value, which were redundant anyway,
because the function never failed.
Part of 29660.
... and ed25519_public_to_base64(). Also remove all checks for the return
values, which were redundant anyway, because the functions never failed.
Part of 29960.
When we fixed 28614, our answer was "if we failed to load the
consensus on windows and it had a CRLF, retry it." But we logged
the failure at "warn", and we only logged the retry at "info".
Now we log the retry at "notice", with more useful information.
Fixes bug 30004.
Previously we used time(NULL) to set the Expires: header in our HTTP
responses. This made the actual contents of that header untestable,
since the unit tests have no good way to override time(), or to see
what time() was at the exact moment of the call to time() in
dircache.c.
This gave us a race in dir_handle_get/status_vote_next_bandwidth,
where the time() call in dircache.c got one value, and the call in
the tests got another value.
I'm applying our regular solution here: using approx_time() so that
the value stays the same between the code and the test. Since
approx_time() is updated on every event callback, we shouldn't be
losing any accuracy here.
Fixes bug 30001. Bug introduced in fb4a40c32c4a7e5; not in any
released Tor.
When a directory authority is using a bandwidth file to obtain the
bandwidth values that will be included in the next vote, serve this
bandwidth file at /tor/status-vote/next/bandwidth.z.
This is something we should think about harder, but we probably want dormant
mode to be more powerful than padding in case a client has been inactive for a
day or so. After all, there are probably no circuits open at this point and
dormant mode will not allow the client to open more circuits.
Furthermore, padding should not block dormant mode from being activated, since
dormant mode relies on SocksPort activity, and circuit padding does not mess
with that.
