We already do this for libevent; let's do it for openssl too.
For now, I'm making it always a warn, since this has caused some
problems in the past. Later, we can see about making it less severe.
Add handle_fw_helper_output(), a function responsible for parsing the
output of tor-fw-helper. Refactor tor_check_port_forwarding() and
run_scheduled_events() accordingly too.
We now issue warnings when we get control output from tor-fw-helper,
and we log the verbose output of tor-fw-helper in LOG_INFO.
Conflicts:
src/common/util.c
get_lines_from_handle() is a multiplatform function which drains lines
from a stream and stuffs it into a smartlist. It's useful for
line-based protocols, like the one managed proxy and the tor-fw-helper
protocols.
Apparently, (void)writev is not enough to suppress the "you are
ignoring the return value!" warnings on Linux. Instead, remove the
whole warning/error logic when compiling openbsd_malloc for Tor: we
can't use it.
The warning fixes are:
- Only define issetugid if it's missing.
- Explicitly ignore the return value of writev.
- Explicitly cast the retval of readlink() to int.
The 64-bit problems are related to just storing a size_t in an int. Not cool! Use a size_t instead.
Fix for bug 6379. Bugfix on 0.2.0.20-rc, which introduced openbsd-malloc.
This should make our preferred solution to #6538 easier to
implement, avoid a bunch of potential nastiness with excessive
int-vs-double math, and generally make the code there a little less
scary.
"But wait!" you say. "Is it really safe to do this? Won't the
results come out differently?"
Yes, but not much. We now round every weighted bandwidth to the
nearest byte before computing on it. This will make every node that
had a fractional part of its weighted bandwidth before either
slighty more likely or slightly less likely. Further, the rand_bw
value was only ever set with integer precision, so it can't
accurately sample routers with tiny fractional bandwidth values
anyway. Finally, doing repeated double-vs-uint64 comparisons is
just plain sad; it will involve an implicit cast to double, which is
never a fun thing.
This gives us a few benefits:
1) make -j clean all
this will start working, as it should. It currently doesn't.
2) increased parallel build
recursive make will max out at number of files in a directory,
non-recursive make doesn't have such a limitation
3) Removal of duplicate information in make files,
less error prone
I've also slightly updated how we call AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, as the way
that was used was not only deprecated but will be *removed* in the next
major automake release (1.13).... so probably best that we can continue
to bulid tor without requiring old automake.
(see http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Public-Macros.html )
For more reasons why, see resources such as:
http://miller.emu.id.au/pmiller/books/rmch/
The SMARTLIST_FOREACH macro is more convenient than BEGIN/END when
you have a nice short loop body, but using it for long bodies makes
your preprocessor tell the compiler that all the code is on the same
line. That causes grief, since compiler warnings and debugger lines
will all refer to that one line.
So, here's a new style rule: SMARTLIST_FOREACH blocks need to be
short.
With glibc 2.15 and clang 3.0, I get warnings from where we use the
strcpsn implementation in the header as strcspn(string, "="). This
is apparently because clang sees that part of the strcspn macro
expands to "="[2], and doesn't realize that that part of the macro
is only evaluated when "="[1] != 0.
We can treat this case as an EAGAIN (probably because of an
unexpected internal NUL) rather than a crash-worthy problem.
Fixes bug 6225, again. Bug not in any released version of Tor.
