We removed HSIntro=3 and HSDir=1 that are v2 specific. Since 0.3.5.17,
we do not support introducing or being a directory for onion service v2.
Closes#40509
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This also moves the warnings and add some theatrical effect around the
code so anyone modifying those list should notice the warnings signs and
read the comment accordingly.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This proposal implements part of Prop335; it's based on a patch
from Neel Chauhan.
When configured to do so, authorities will assign a MiddleOnly flag
to certain relays. Any relay which an authority gives this flag
will not get Exit, V2Dir, Guard, or HSDir, and might get BadExit if
the authority votes for that one.
When we looked, this was the third most frequent message at
PROTOCOL_WARN, and doesn't actually tell us what to do about it.
Now:
* we just log it at info
* we log it only once per circuit
* we report, in the heartbeat, how many times it happens, how many
cells it happens with per circuit, and how long these circuits
have been alive (on average).
Fixes the final part of #40400.
This means that at this commit, tor will stop logging that v2 is
deprecated and treat a v2 address as a bad hostname that we can't use.
Part of #40476
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This effectively turns off the ability of tor to use HSv2 as a client by
invalidating the v2 onion hostname passed through a SOCKS request.
Part of #40476
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
This one happens every time we get a failure from
circuit_receive_relay_cell -- but for all the relevant failing cases
in that function, we already log in that function.
This resolves one case of #40400. Two cases remain.
Coverity report: CID 1492322
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
*** CID 1492322: Integer handling issues (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN)
/src/core/or/congestion_control_flow.c: 399 in circuit_process_stream_xon()
393 }
394
395 log_info(LD_EDGE, "Got XON: %d", xon->kbps_ewma);
396
397 /* Adjust the token bucket of this edge connection with the drain rate in
398 * the XON. Rate is in bytes from kilobit (kpbs). */
>>> CID 1492322: Integer handling issues (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN)
>>> Potentially overflowing expression "xon_cell_get_kbps_ewma(xon) * 1000U" with type "unsigned int" (32 bits, unsigned) is evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic, and then used in a context that expects an expression of type "uint64_t" (64 bits, unsigned).
399 uint64_t rate = xon_cell_get_kbps_ewma(xon) * 1000;
400 if (rate == 0 || INT32_MAX < rate) {
401 /* No rate. */
402 rate = INT32_MAX;
403 }
404 token_bucket_rw_adjust(&conn->bucket, (uint32_t) rate, (uint32_t) rate);
Fixes#40478
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
The connection_ap_attach_pending() function processes all pending
streams in the pending_entry_connections list. It first copy the pointer
and then allocates a brand new empty list.
It then iterates over that copy pointer to try to attach entry
connections onto any fitting circuits using
connection_ap_handshake_attach_circuit().
That very function, for onion service, can lead to flagging _all_
streams of the same onion service to be put in state RENDDESC_WAIT from
CIRCUIT_WAIT. By doing so, it also tries to remove them from the
pending_entry_connections but at that point it is already empty.
Problem is that the we are iterating over the previous
pending_entry_connections which contains the streams that have just
changed state and are no longer in CIRCUIT_WAIT.
This lead to this bug warning occuring a lot on busy services:
May 01 08:55:43.000 [warn] connection_ap_attach_pending(): Bug:
0x55d8764ae550 is no longer in circuit_wait. Its current state is
waiting for rendezvous desc. Why is it on pending_entry_connections?
(on Tor 0.4.4.0-alpha-dev )
This fix is minimal and basically allow a state to be not CIRCUIT_WAIT
and move on to the next one without logging a warning. Because the
pending_entry_connections is emptied before processing, there is no
chance for a streams to be stuck there forever thus it is OK to ignore
streams not in the right state.
Fixes#34083
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
We only need to rate limit reading on edges for flow control, as per the rate
that comes in the XON from the other side. When we rate limit reading from the
edge source to this rate, we will only deliver that fast to the other side,
thus satisfying its rate request.
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
