This is a big-ish patch, but it's very straightforward. Under this
clang warning, we're not actually allowed to have a global variable
without a previous extern declaration for it. The cases where we
violated this rule fall into three roughly equal groups:
* Stuff that should have been static.
* Stuff that was global but where the extern was local to some
other C file.
* Stuff that was only global when built for the unit tests, that
needed a conditional extern in the headers.
The first two were IMO genuine problems; the last is a wart of how
we build tests.
They are no longer "all" digests, but only the "common" digests.
Part of 17795.
This is an automated patch I made with a couple of perl one-liners:
perl -i -pe 's/crypto_digest_all/crypto_common_digests/g;' src/*/*.[ch]
perl -i -pe 's/\bdigests_t\b/common_digests_t/g;' src/*/*.[ch]
An earlier version of these tests was broken; now they're a nicer,
more robust, more black-box set of tests. The key is to have each
test check a handshake message that is wrong in _one_ way.
As OpenSSL >= 1.0.0 is now required, ECDHE is now mandatory. The group
has to be validated at runtime, because of RedHat lawyers (P224 support
is entirely missing in the OpenSSL RPM, but P256 is present and is the
default).
Resolves ticket #16140.
A new set of unit test cases are provided, as well as introducing
an alternative paradigm and macros to support it. Primarily, each test
case is given its own namespace, in order to isolate tests from each
other. We do this by in the usual fashion, by appending module and
submodule names to our symbols. New macros assist by reducing friction
for this and other tasks, like overriding a function in the global
namespace with one in the current namespace, or declaring integer
variables to assist tracking how many times a mock has been called.
A set of tests for a small-scale module has been included in this
commit, in order to highlight how the paradigm can be used. This
suite gives 100% coverage to status.c in test execution.
This implements the server-side of proposal 198 by detecting when
clients lack the magic list of ciphersuites that indicates that
they're lying faking some ciphers they don't really have. When
clients lack this list, we can choose any cipher that we'd actually
like. The newly allowed ciphersuites are, currently, "All ECDHE-RSA
ciphers that openssl supports, except for ECDHE-RSA-RC4".
The code to detect the cipher list relies on on (ab)use of
SSL_set_session_secret_cb.
In C, we technically aren't supposed to define our own things that
start with an underscore.
This is a purely machine-generated commit. First, I ran this script
on all the headers in src/{common,or,test,tools/*}/*.h :
==============================
use strict;
my %macros = ();
my %skipped = ();
FILE: for my $fn (@ARGV) {
my $f = $fn;
if ($fn !~ /^\.\//) {
$f = "./$fn";
}
$skipped{$fn} = 0;
open(F, $fn);
while (<F>) {
if (/^#ifndef ([A-Za-z0-9_]+)/) {
$macros{$fn} = $1;
next FILE;
}
}
}
print "#!/usr/bin/perl -w -i -p\n\n";
for my $fn (@ARGV) {
if (! exists $macros{$fn}) {
print "# No macro known for $fn!\n" if (!$skipped{$fn});
next;
}
if ($macros{$fn} !~ /_H_?$/) {
print "# Weird macro for $fn...\n";
}
my $goodmacro = uc $fn;
$goodmacro =~ s#.*/##;
$goodmacro =~ s#[\/\-\.]#_#g;
print "s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])$macros{$fn}(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_${goodmacro}/g;\n"
}
==============================
It produced the following output, which I then re-ran on those same files:
==============================
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_ADDRESS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_ADDRESS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_AES_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_AES_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_COMPAT_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_COMPAT_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_COMPAT_LIBEVENT_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_COMPAT_LIBEVENT_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CONTAINER_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CONTAINER_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CRYPTO_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CRYPTO_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])TOR_DI_OPS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_DI_OPS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_MEMAREA_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_MEMAREA_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_MEMPOOL_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_MEMPOOL_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])TOR_PROCMON_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_PROCMON_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_TORGZIP_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TORGZIP_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_TORINT_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TORINT_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_LOG_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TORLOG_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_TORTLS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TORTLS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_UTIL_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_UTIL_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_BUFFERS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_BUFFERS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CHANNEL_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CHANNEL_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CHANNEL_TLS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CHANNELTLS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CIRCUITBUILD_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CIRCUITBUILD_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CIRCUITLIST_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CIRCUITLIST_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CIRCUITMUX_EWMA_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CIRCUITMUX_EWMA_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CIRCUITMUX_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CIRCUITMUX_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CIRCUITUSE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CIRCUITUSE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_COMMAND_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_COMMAND_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CONFIG_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CONFIG_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])TOR_CONFPARSE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CONFPARSE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CONNECTION_EDGE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CONNECTION_EDGE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CONNECTION_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CONNECTION_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CONNECTION_OR_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CONNECTION_OR_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CONTROL_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CONTROL_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_CPUWORKER_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_CPUWORKER_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_DIRECTORY_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_DIRECTORY_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_DIRSERV_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_DIRSERV_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_DIRVOTE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_DIRVOTE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_DNS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_DNS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_DNSSERV_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_DNSSERV_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])TOR_EVENTDNS_TOR_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_EVENTDNS_TOR_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_GEOIP_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_GEOIP_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_HIBERNATE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_HIBERNATE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_MAIN_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_MAIN_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_MICRODESC_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_MICRODESC_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_NETWORKSTATUS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_NETWORKSTATUS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_NODELIST_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_NODELIST_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_NTMAIN_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_NTMAIN_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_ONION_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_ONION_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_OR_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_OR_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_POLICIES_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_POLICIES_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_REASONS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_REASONS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_RELAY_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_RELAY_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_RENDCLIENT_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_RENDCLIENT_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_RENDCOMMON_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_RENDCOMMON_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_RENDMID_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_RENDMID_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_RENDSERVICE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_RENDSERVICE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_REPHIST_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_REPHIST_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_REPLAYCACHE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_REPLAYCACHE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_ROUTER_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_ROUTER_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_ROUTERLIST_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_ROUTERLIST_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_ROUTERPARSE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_ROUTERPARSE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])TOR_ROUTERSET_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_ROUTERSET_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])TOR_STATEFILE_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_STATEFILE_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_STATUS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_STATUS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])TOR_TRANSPORTS_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TRANSPORTS_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_TEST_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TEST_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_FW_HELPER_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TOR_FW_HELPER_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_FW_HELPER_NATPMP_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TOR_FW_HELPER_NATPMP_H/g;
s/(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])_TOR_FW_HELPER_UPNP_H(?![A-Za-z0-9_])/TOR_TOR_FW_HELPER_UPNP_H/g;
==============================
Since we check for naughty renegotiations using
tor_tls_t.server_handshake_count we don't need that semi-broken
function (at least till there is a way to disable rfc5746
renegotiations too).
