Previously, our use of abort() would break anywhere that we didn't
include stdlib.h. This was especially troublesome in case where
tor_assert_nonfatal() was used with ALL_BUGS_ARE_FATAL, since that
one seldom gets tested.
As an alternative, we could have just made this header include
stdlib.h. But that seems bloaty.
Fixes bug 30189; bugfix on 0.3.4.1-alpha.
In current NSS versions, these ciphersuites don't work with
SSL_ExportKeyingMaterial(), which was causing relays to fail when
they tried to negotiate the v3 link protocol authentication.
Fixes bug 29241; bugfix on 0.4.0.1-alpha.
And fix the documentation on the function: it does produce trailing
"="s as padding.
Also remove all checks for the return value, which were redundant anyway,
because the function never failed.
Part of 29660.
... and ed25519_public_to_base64(). Also remove all checks for the return
values, which were redundant anyway, because the functions never failed.
Part of 29960.
getpid() can be really expensive sometimes, and it can fail to
detect some kind of fork+prng mistakes, so we need to avoid it if
it's safe to do so.
This patch might slow down fast_prng a lot on any old operating
system that lacks a way to prevent ram from being inherited, AND
requires a syscall for any getpid() calls. But it should make sure
that we either crash or continue safely on incorrect fork+prng usage
elsewhere in the future.
This is just in case there is some rogue platform that uses a
nonstandard value for SEEK_*, and does not define that macro in
unistd.h. I think that's unlikely, but it's conceivable.
In 9c132a5f9e we replaced "buf" with a pointer and replaced
one instance of snprintf with asprintf -- but there was still one
snprintf left over, being crashy.
Fixes bug 29967; bug not in any released Tor. This is CID 1444262.
This can't actually result in a null pointer dereference, since
pub_excl and sub_excl are only set when the corresponding smartlists
are nonempty. But coverity isn't smart enough to figure that out,
and we shouldn't really be depending on it.
Bug 29938; CID 1444257. Bug not in any released Tor.
Having the numbers in those messages makes some of the unit test
unstable, by causing them to depend on the initialization order of
the naming objects.
Based on patches and review comments by Riastradh and Catalyst.
Co-authored-by: Taylor R Campbell <campbell+tor@mumble.net>
Co-authored-by: Taylor Yu <catalyst@torproject.org>