The function make_intro_from_plaintext() in test_introduce.c would
leak memory if we ever hit a failure from our underlying crypto
functions. This kind of failure should be impossible, but it's best
to be safe here.
Bugfix on 0.2.4.1-alpha.
Coverity is worried that we check "service" at the end of these test
functions, since it doesn't see any way to reach the cleanup code
without having first dereferenced the variable.
Removing the check would be unwise in this case: instead we add a
tt_assert check before using "service" so that coverity thinks that
the check is doing something useful.
Bugfix on 0.3.2.1-alpha.
Coverity can't see that it is not in fact going to read
uninitialized memory here, so we initialize these values
unconditionally.
Bugfix on 0.4.0.1-alpha.
And that it does something sensible with host and host:port.
Also reorder the tests into valid, invalid, and ambiguous.
And add some missing cases.
Note: tor_addr_port_lookup() handles ip, ip:port, host, and host:port.
Tests for 30721.
Fix add_onion_helper_clientauth() and add_onion_helper_keyarg() to
explicitly call the appropriate control reply abstractions instead of
allocating a string to pass to their callers.
Part of ticket 30889.
Right now, this has been done at a high level by confparse.c, but it
makes more sense to lower it.
This API is radically un-typesafe as it stands; we'll be wrapping it
in a safer API as we do #30914 and lower the struct manipulation
code as well.
Closes ticket 30864.
When we consider all circuits in "waiting for guard" state to be promoted to
an "open" state, we were considering all circuits, even the one marked for
close.
This ultiamtely triggers a "circuit_has_opened()" called on the circuit that
is marked for close which then leads to possible undesirable behaviors within
a subsystem.
For instance, the HS subsystem would be unable to find the authentication key
of the introduction point circuit leading to a BUG() warning and a duplicate
mark for close on the circuit.
This commit also adds a unit test to make sure we never select marked for
close circuits when upgrading its guard state from waiting for guard to open.
Fixes#30871
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When we consider all circuits in "waiting for guard" state to be promoted to
an "open" state, we were considering all circuits, even the one marked for
close.
This ultiamtely triggers a "circuit_has_opened()" called on the circuit that
is marked for close which then leads to possible undesirable behaviors within
a subsystem.
For instance, the HS subsystem would be unable to find the authentication key
of the introduction point circuit leading to a BUG() warning and a duplicate
mark for close on the circuit.
This commit also adds a unit test to make sure we never select marked for
close circuits when upgrading its guard state from waiting for guard to open.
Fixes#30871
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
When we consider all circuits in "waiting for guard" state to be promoted to
an "open" state, we were considering all circuits, even the one marked for
close.
This ultiamtely triggers a "circuit_has_opened()" called on the circuit that
is marked for close which then leads to possible undesirable behaviors within
a subsystem.
For instance, the HS subsystem would be unable to find the authentication key
of the introduction point circuit leading to a BUG() warning and a duplicate
mark for close on the circuit.
This commit also adds a unit test to make sure we never select marked for
close circuits when upgrading its guard state from waiting for guard to open.
Fixes#30871
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Note that the event base object is _not_ created from the initialize
function, since it is configuration-dependent. This will wait until
configuration is integrated into subsystems.
Closes ticket 30806.
Skip test_rebind when the TOR_SKIP_TEST_REBIND environmental variable
is set.
Skip test_rebind on macOS in Travis builds, because it is unreliable
on macOS on Travis.
Fixes bug 30713; bugfix on 0.3.5.1-alpha.
