mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-19 09:50:29 +01:00
another todo item, a half-written tor-design intro
svn:r543
This commit is contained in:
parent
b51d2c05a0
commit
e826873ac6
2
doc/TODO
2
doc/TODO
@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
|
||||
|
||||
use times(2) rather than gettimeofday to measure how long it takes to process a cell
|
||||
|
||||
Legend:
|
||||
SPEC!! - Not specified
|
||||
SPEC - Spec not finalized
|
||||
|
@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ Paul Syverson \\ Naval Research Lab \\ syverson@itd.nrl.navy.mil}
|
||||
\thispagestyle{empty}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{abstract}
|
||||
We present Tor, a connection-based anonymous communication system based
|
||||
on onion routing.
|
||||
We present Tor, a connection-based low-latency anonymous communication
|
||||
system which addresses many flaws in the original onion routing design.
|
||||
Tor works in a real-world Internet environment,
|
||||
requires little synchronization or coordination between nodes, and
|
||||
protects against known anonymity-breaking attacks as well
|
||||
@ -59,27 +59,54 @@ as or better than other systems with similar design parameters.
|
||||
\Section{Overview}
|
||||
\label{sec:intro}
|
||||
|
||||
Onion routing is a TCP-based anonymous communication system
|
||||
The onion routing project published a number of papers several years
|
||||
ago \cite{x,y,z}, but because the only implementation was a fragile
|
||||
proof-of-concept that ran on a single machine, many critical design issues
|
||||
were not considered or addressed. Here we describe Tor, a protocol for
|
||||
asynchronous, loosely federated onion routers that provides the following
|
||||
improvements over the old onion routing design:
|
||||
Onion routing is a distributed overlay network designed to anonymize
|
||||
low-latency TCP-based applications such as web browsing, secure
|
||||
shell, and instant messaging. Users choose a path through the
|
||||
network and build a \emph{virtual circuit}, in which each node in
|
||||
the path knows its predecessor and successor, but no others. Traffic
|
||||
flowing down the circuit is unwrapped by a symmetric key at each
|
||||
node which reveals the downstream node. The original onion routing
|
||||
project published several design and analysis papers several years
|
||||
ago \cite{or-journal,or-discex,or-ih,or-pet}, but because the only
|
||||
implementation was a fragile proof-of-concept that ran on a single
|
||||
machine, many critical design and deployment issues were not considered
|
||||
or addressed. Here we describe Tor, a protocol for asynchronous, loosely
|
||||
federated onion routers that provides the following improvements over
|
||||
the old onion routing design:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Congestion control:} Foo
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{No mixing or traffic shaping:}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Applications talk to the onion proxy via Socks:}
|
||||
The original onion routing design required a separate proxy for each
|
||||
supported application protocol, resulting in a lot of extra code (most
|
||||
of which was never written) and also meaning that a lot of TCP-based
|
||||
applications were not supported. Tor uses the unified and standard Socks
|
||||
\cite{socks4,socks5} interface, allowing us to support any TCP-based
|
||||
program without modification.
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Applications talk to the onion proxy via socks:}
|
||||
\item \textbf{No mixing or traffic shaping:} The original onion routing
|
||||
design called for full link padding both between onion routers and between
|
||||
onion proxies (that is, users) and onion routers \cite{or-journal}. The
|
||||
later analysis paper \cite{or-pet} suggested \emph{traffic shaping}
|
||||
schemes that would provide similar protection but use less bandwidth,
|
||||
but did not go into detail. However, recent research \cite{econymics}
|
||||
and deployment experience \cite{freedom2-arch} indicate that this level
|
||||
of resource use is not practical or economical, especially if.
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Directory servers:} Traditional link state
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Congestion control:} Traditional flow control solutions
|
||||
Our decentralized ack-based congestion control
|
||||
allows nodes at the edges of the network to detect incidental congestion
|
||||
or flooding attacks and send less data until the congestion subsides.
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Directory servers:}
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Forward security:}
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Many applications can share one circuit:}
|
||||
|
||||
leaky pipes
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{End-to-end integrity checking:}
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Robustness to node failure:} router twins
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user