Integrate more feedback from IRC

- For now we are only talking about moving clients to be bridges

- Some questions on how we should inform users
This commit is contained in:
Steven Murdoch 2010-03-15 17:50:50 +00:00 committed by Roger Dingledine
parent d3d411533c
commit ac55247350

View File

@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ Target:
preferences. The proposal also defines the new controller messages
and options which will control this process.
Note that for the moment, only transitions between client and
bridge are being considered. Transitions to public relay will
be considered at a future date, but will use the same
infrastructure for measuring capacity and reliability.
2. Motivation and history
Tor has a growing user-base and one of the major impediments to the
@ -108,3 +113,11 @@ Target:
- Perhaps the bridge authority should tell potential bridges
whether to enable themselves, by taking into account whether
their IP address is blocked
- How do we explain the possible risks of running a bridge/relay
* Use of bandwidth/congestion
* Publication of IP address
* Blocking from IRC (even for non-exit relays)
- What feedback should we give to bridge relays, to encourage then
e.g. number of recent users (what about reserve bridges)?