mirror of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor.git
synced 2024-11-20 02:09:24 +01:00
rewrite rendezvous spec so normal people can follow it
svn:r344
This commit is contained in:
parent
e9254430e2
commit
4fc9478937
@ -1,22 +1,48 @@
|
||||
How to make rendezvous points work
|
||||
1-11Jun2003
|
||||
How to make rendezvous points work with tor
|
||||
|
||||
0. Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Rendezvous points are an implementation of server anonymity /
|
||||
location-hidden servers in the onion routing network. There are
|
||||
three components needed for rendezvous points:
|
||||
Rendezvous points are an implementation of location-hidden services
|
||||
(server anonymity) in the onion routing network. Location-hidden
|
||||
services means Bob can offer a tcp service (say, a webserver) via the
|
||||
onion routing network, without revealing the IP of that service.
|
||||
|
||||
A) A means for the client ("Alice") to tell a server ("Bob") where
|
||||
to contact her in order to establish a connection. (Introduction)
|
||||
B) A means for Bob to contact Alice to actually establish the
|
||||
connection, and for them to communicate later. (Meeting)
|
||||
C) Necessary glue code so that Alice can view webpages on a
|
||||
location-hidden webserver, and Bob can run a location-hidden
|
||||
server with minimal invasive changes. (Application)
|
||||
The basic idea is to provide censorship resistance for Bob by allowing
|
||||
him to advertise a variety of onion routers as his public location
|
||||
(nodes known as his Introduction Points, see Section 1). Alice,
|
||||
the client, chooses a node known as a Meeting Point (see Section
|
||||
2). This extra level of indirection is needed so Bob doesn't serve
|
||||
files directly from his public locations (so these nodes don't open
|
||||
themselves up to abuse, eg from serving Nazi propaganda in France). The
|
||||
extra level of indirection also allows Bob to choose which requests
|
||||
to respond to, and which to ignore.
|
||||
|
||||
We'll tackle these in order. In all cases, we'll assume that both
|
||||
Alice and Bob run local OPs.
|
||||
We also provide the necessary glue code so that Alice can view webpages
|
||||
on a location-hidden webserver, and Bob can run a location-hidden
|
||||
server, with minimal invasive changes (see Section 3). Both Alice
|
||||
and Bob must run local onion proxies (OPs).
|
||||
|
||||
The big picture follows. We direct the reader to the rest of the
|
||||
document for more details and explanation.
|
||||
|
||||
1) Bob chooses some Introduction Points, and advertises them on a DHT.
|
||||
2) Bob establishes onion routing connections to each of his
|
||||
Introduction Points, and waits.
|
||||
3) Alice learns about Bob's service out of band (perhaps Bob gave her
|
||||
a pointer, or she found it on a website). She looks up the details
|
||||
of Bob's service from the DHT.
|
||||
4) Alice chooses and establishes a Meeting Point for this transaction.
|
||||
5) Alice goes to one of Bob's Introduction Points, and gives it a blob
|
||||
(encrypted for Bob) which tells him about herself and the Meeting
|
||||
Point she chose.
|
||||
6) IP sends the blob to Bob.
|
||||
7) Bob chooses whether to ignore the blob, or to onion route to MP.
|
||||
8) MP plugs together Alice and Bob. Note that MP doesn't know (or care)
|
||||
who Alice is, or who Bob is; and it can't read anything they
|
||||
transmit either, because they share a session key.
|
||||
9) Alice sends a 'begin' cell along the circuit. It makes its way
|
||||
to Bob's onion proxy. Bob's onion proxy connects to Bob's webserver.
|
||||
10) Data goes back and forth as usual.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Introduction service
|
||||
|
||||
@ -27,11 +53,11 @@
|
||||
|
||||
When establishing such an introduction point, Bob provides the onion
|
||||
router with a public "introduction" key. The hash of this public
|
||||
key uniquely identifies Bob, and prevents anybody else from
|
||||
usurping Bob's introduction point in the future. Additionally, Bob
|
||||
can use the same public key to establish an introduction point on
|
||||
another OR, and Alice can still be confident that Bob is the same
|
||||
server.
|
||||
key identifies a unique Bob, and (since Bob is required to sign his
|
||||
messages) prevents anybody else from usurping Bob's introduction
|
||||
point in the future. Additionally, Bob can use the same public key
|
||||
to establish an introduction point on another onion router (OR),
|
||||
and Alice can still be confident that Bob is the same server.
|
||||
|
||||
(The set-up-an-introduction-point command should come via a
|
||||
RELAY_BIND_INTRODUCTION cell. This cell creates a new stream on the
|
||||
@ -54,13 +80,12 @@
|
||||
[98 bytes] g^x part 1 (inside the RSA)
|
||||
[30 bytes] g^x part 2 (symmetrically encrypted)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The meeting point and meeting cookie allow Bob to contact Alice and
|
||||
prove his identity; the end-to-end authentication enables Bob to
|
||||
prove his identity; the end-to-end authentication enables Bob to
|
||||
decide whether to talk to Alice; the initial authentication enables
|
||||
the meeting point to pre-screen introduction requests before
|
||||
sending them to Bob. (See 3 for a discussion of meeting points;
|
||||
see 2.1 for a proposed authentication mechanism.)
|
||||
the meeting point to pre-screen introduction requests before sending
|
||||
them to Bob. (See Section 2 for a discussion of meeting points;
|
||||
see Section 1.1 for an example authentication mechanism.)
|
||||
|
||||
The authentication steps are the appropriate places for the
|
||||
introduction server or Bob to do replay prevention, if desired.
|
||||
@ -82,6 +107,10 @@
|
||||
|
||||
[Maybe] Each 'A' has an expiration time built in to it.
|
||||
|
||||
In reality, we'll want to pick a scheme that (a) wasn't invented from
|
||||
scratch in an evening, and (b) doesn't require Alice to remember this
|
||||
many bits (see section 3.2).
|
||||
|
||||
2. Meeting points
|
||||
|
||||
For Bob to actually reply to Alice, Alice first establishes a
|
||||
@ -130,21 +159,23 @@
|
||||
We assume the existence of a robust decentralized efficient lookup
|
||||
system (call it "DHT"). Bob publishes
|
||||
* Bob's Public Key for that service
|
||||
* Timestamp
|
||||
* Expiration date ("don't use after")
|
||||
* Introduction server 0 ... Introduction server N
|
||||
(All signed by Bob's Public Key)
|
||||
into DHT, indexed by the hash of Bob's Public Key. Bob should
|
||||
periodically republish his introduction information with a new
|
||||
timestamp (and possibly with new/different introduction servers if
|
||||
he wants), so Alice can trust that DHT is giving her an up-to-date
|
||||
version.
|
||||
expiration date (and possibly with new/different introduction servers
|
||||
if he wants), so Alice can trust that DHT is giving her an up-to-date
|
||||
version. The Chord CFS paper describes a sample DHT that allows
|
||||
authenticated updating.
|
||||
|
||||
3.2. Application interface: client side
|
||||
|
||||
We require that the client interface remain a SOCKS proxy, and we
|
||||
require that Alice shouldn't have to modify her applications. Thus
|
||||
we encode all of the necessary information into the hostname that
|
||||
Alice uses (eg when clicking on a url in her browser, etc).
|
||||
we encode all of the necessary information into the hostname (more
|
||||
correctly, fqdn) that Alice uses, eg when clicking on a url in her
|
||||
browser.
|
||||
|
||||
To establish a connection to Bob, Alice needs to know an Introduction
|
||||
point, Bob's PK, and some authentication cookie. Because encoding this
|
||||
@ -161,7 +192,6 @@
|
||||
13 characters.
|
||||
|
||||
Alice's onion proxy examines hostnames and recognizes when they're
|
||||
destined for a hidden server. If so, it decodes the PK, looks it up in
|
||||
the DHT, chooses and connects to a meeting place, chooses and connects
|
||||
to one of Bob's introduction servers, and then waits to hear from Bob.
|
||||
destined for a hidden server. If so, it decodes the PK and performs
|
||||
the steps in Section 0 above.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user