mirror of
https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning.git
synced 2025-02-26 15:42:52 +01:00
10685 lines
532 KiB
Rust
10685 lines
532 KiB
Rust
// This file is Copyright its original authors, visible in version control
|
||
// history.
|
||
//
|
||
// This file is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE
|
||
// or http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
|
||
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your option.
|
||
// You may not use this file except in accordance with one or both of these
|
||
// licenses.
|
||
|
||
//! Tests that test standing up a network of ChannelManagers, creating channels, sending
|
||
//! payments/messages between them, and often checking the resulting ChannelMonitors are able to
|
||
//! claim outputs on-chain.
|
||
|
||
use crate::chain;
|
||
use crate::chain::{ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus, Confirm, Listen, Watch};
|
||
use crate::chain::chaininterface::LowerBoundedFeeEstimator;
|
||
use crate::chain::channelmonitor;
|
||
use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID, CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS, ANTI_REORG_DELAY};
|
||
use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint;
|
||
use crate::sign::{EcdsaChannelSigner, EntropySource, SignerProvider};
|
||
use crate::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, PathFailure, PaymentPurpose, ClosureReason, HTLCDestination, PaymentFailureReason};
|
||
use crate::ln::{ChannelId, PaymentPreimage, PaymentSecret, PaymentHash};
|
||
use crate::ln::channel::{commitment_tx_base_weight, COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC, CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER, FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT, get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis, OutboundV1Channel, InboundV1Channel, COINBASE_MATURITY, ChannelPhase};
|
||
use crate::ln::channelmanager::{self, PaymentId, RAACommitmentOrder, PaymentSendFailure, RecipientOnionFields, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT, ENABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS, DISABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS, MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA};
|
||
use crate::ln::channel::{DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS, ChannelError};
|
||
use crate::ln::{chan_utils, onion_utils};
|
||
use crate::ln::chan_utils::{OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT, htlc_success_tx_weight, htlc_timeout_tx_weight, HTLCOutputInCommitment};
|
||
use crate::routing::gossip::{NetworkGraph, NetworkUpdate};
|
||
use crate::routing::router::{Path, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, get_route, RouteParameters};
|
||
use crate::ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, ChannelTypeFeatures, NodeFeatures};
|
||
use crate::ln::msgs;
|
||
use crate::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, RoutingMessageHandler, ErrorAction};
|
||
use crate::util::test_channel_signer::TestChannelSigner;
|
||
use crate::util::test_utils::{self, WatchtowerPersister};
|
||
use crate::util::errors::APIError;
|
||
use crate::util::ser::{Writeable, ReadableArgs};
|
||
use crate::util::string::UntrustedString;
|
||
use crate::util::config::{UserConfig, MaxDustHTLCExposure};
|
||
|
||
use bitcoin::hash_types::BlockHash;
|
||
use bitcoin::blockdata::script::{Builder, Script};
|
||
use bitcoin::blockdata::opcodes;
|
||
use bitcoin::blockdata::constants::ChainHash;
|
||
use bitcoin::network::constants::Network;
|
||
use bitcoin::{PackedLockTime, Sequence, Transaction, TxIn, TxOut, Witness};
|
||
use bitcoin::OutPoint as BitcoinOutPoint;
|
||
|
||
use bitcoin::secp256k1::Secp256k1;
|
||
use bitcoin::secp256k1::{PublicKey,SecretKey};
|
||
|
||
use regex;
|
||
|
||
use crate::io;
|
||
use crate::prelude::*;
|
||
use alloc::collections::BTreeSet;
|
||
use core::default::Default;
|
||
use core::iter::repeat;
|
||
use bitcoin::hashes::Hash;
|
||
use crate::sync::{Arc, Mutex, RwLock};
|
||
|
||
use crate::ln::functional_test_utils::*;
|
||
use crate::ln::chan_utils::CommitmentTransaction;
|
||
|
||
use super::channel::UNFUNDED_CHANNEL_AGE_LIMIT_TICKS;
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_insane_channel_opens() {
|
||
// Stand up a network of 2 nodes
|
||
use crate::ln::channel::TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS;
|
||
let mut cfg = UserConfig::default();
|
||
cfg.channel_handshake_limits.max_funding_satoshis = TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS + 1;
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(cfg)]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Instantiate channel parameters where we push the maximum msats given our
|
||
// funding satoshis
|
||
let channel_value_sat = 31337; // same as funding satoshis
|
||
let channel_reserve_satoshis = get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(channel_value_sat, &cfg);
|
||
let push_msat = (channel_value_sat - channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000;
|
||
|
||
// Have node0 initiate a channel to node1 with aforementioned parameters
|
||
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_sat, push_msat, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
|
||
// Extract the channel open message from node0 to node1
|
||
let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
// Test helper that asserts we get the correct error string given a mutator
|
||
// that supposedly makes the channel open message insane
|
||
let insane_open_helper = |expected_error_str: &str, message_mutator: fn(msgs::OpenChannel) -> msgs::OpenChannel| {
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &message_mutator(open_channel_message.clone()));
|
||
let msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1);
|
||
let expected_regex = regex::Regex::new(expected_error_str).unwrap();
|
||
if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref action, .. } = msg_events[0] {
|
||
match action {
|
||
&ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { .. } => {
|
||
nodes[1].logger.assert_log_regex("lightning::ln::channelmanager", expected_regex, 1);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("unexpected event!"),
|
||
}
|
||
} else { assert!(false); }
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
use crate::ln::channelmanager::MAX_LOCAL_BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT;
|
||
|
||
// Test all mutations that would make the channel open message insane
|
||
insane_open_helper(format!("Per our config, funding must be at most {}. It was {}", TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS + 1, TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS + 2).as_str(), |mut msg| { msg.funding_satoshis = TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS + 2; msg });
|
||
insane_open_helper(format!("Funding must be smaller than the total bitcoin supply. It was {}", TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS).as_str(), |mut msg| { msg.funding_satoshis = TOTAL_BITCOIN_SUPPLY_SATOSHIS; msg });
|
||
|
||
insane_open_helper("Bogus channel_reserve_satoshis", |mut msg| { msg.channel_reserve_satoshis = msg.funding_satoshis + 1; msg });
|
||
|
||
insane_open_helper(r"push_msat \d+ was larger than channel amount minus reserve \(\d+\)", |mut msg| { msg.push_msat = (msg.funding_satoshis - msg.channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000 + 1; msg });
|
||
|
||
insane_open_helper("Peer never wants payout outputs?", |mut msg| { msg.dust_limit_satoshis = msg.funding_satoshis + 1 ; msg });
|
||
|
||
insane_open_helper(r"Minimum htlc value \(\d+\) was larger than full channel value \(\d+\)", |mut msg| { msg.htlc_minimum_msat = (msg.funding_satoshis - msg.channel_reserve_satoshis) * 1000; msg });
|
||
|
||
insane_open_helper("They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period", |mut msg| { msg.to_self_delay = MAX_LOCAL_BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT + 1; msg });
|
||
|
||
insane_open_helper("0 max_accepted_htlcs makes for a useless channel", |mut msg| { msg.max_accepted_htlcs = 0; msg });
|
||
|
||
insane_open_helper("max_accepted_htlcs was 484. It must not be larger than 483", |mut msg| { msg.max_accepted_htlcs = 484; msg });
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_funding_exceeds_no_wumbo_limit() {
|
||
// Test that if a peer does not support wumbo channels, we'll refuse to open a wumbo channel to
|
||
// them.
|
||
use crate::ln::channel::MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO;
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let mut node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
*node_cfgs[1].override_init_features.borrow_mut() = Some(channelmanager::provided_init_features(&test_default_channel_config()).clear_wumbo());
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
match nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO + 1, 0, 42, None) {
|
||
Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) => {
|
||
assert_eq!(format!("funding_value must not exceed {}, it was {}", MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO, MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHIS_NO_WUMBO + 1), err);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!()
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_counterparty_no_reserve(send_from_initiator: bool) {
|
||
// A peer providing a channel_reserve_satoshis of 0 (or less than our dust limit) is insecure,
|
||
// but only for them. Because some LSPs do it with some level of trust of the clients (for a
|
||
// substantial UX improvement), we explicitly allow it. Because it's unlikely to happen often
|
||
// in normal testing, we test it explicitly here.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let default_config = UserConfig::default();
|
||
|
||
// Have node0 initiate a channel to node1 with aforementioned parameters
|
||
let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
|
||
let feerate_per_kw = 253;
|
||
let channel_type_features = ChannelTypeFeatures::only_static_remote_key();
|
||
push_amt -= feerate_per_kw as u64 * (commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 4 * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000 * 1000;
|
||
push_amt -= get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
|
||
|
||
let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, if send_from_initiator { 0 } else { push_amt }, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let mut open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
if !send_from_initiator {
|
||
open_channel_message.channel_reserve_satoshis = 0;
|
||
open_channel_message.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 100_000_000;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_message);
|
||
|
||
// Extract the channel accept message from node1 to node0
|
||
let mut accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
if send_from_initiator {
|
||
accept_channel_message.channel_reserve_satoshis = 0;
|
||
accept_channel_message.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 100_000_000;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel_message);
|
||
{
|
||
let sender_node = if send_from_initiator { &nodes[1] } else { &nodes[0] };
|
||
let counterparty_node = if send_from_initiator { &nodes[0] } else { &nodes[1] };
|
||
let mut sender_node_per_peer_lock;
|
||
let mut sender_node_peer_state_lock;
|
||
|
||
let channel_phase = get_channel_ref!(sender_node, counterparty_node, sender_node_per_peer_lock, sender_node_peer_state_lock, temp_channel_id);
|
||
match channel_phase {
|
||
ChannelPhase::UnfundedInboundV1(_) | ChannelPhase::UnfundedOutboundV1(_) => {
|
||
let chan_context = channel_phase.context_mut();
|
||
chan_context.holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis = 0;
|
||
chan_context.holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 100_000_000;
|
||
},
|
||
ChannelPhase::Funded(_) => assert!(false),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let funding_tx = sign_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 100_000, temp_channel_id);
|
||
let funding_msgs = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &funding_tx);
|
||
create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &funding_msgs.0);
|
||
|
||
// nodes[0] should now be able to send the full balance to nodes[1], violating nodes[1]'s
|
||
// security model if it ever tries to send funds back to nodes[0] (but that's not our problem).
|
||
if send_from_initiator {
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100_000_000
|
||
// Note that for outbound channels we have to consider the commitment tx fee and the
|
||
// "fee spike buffer", which is currently a multiple of the total commitment tx fee as
|
||
// well as an additional HTLC.
|
||
- FEE_SPIKE_BUFFER_FEE_INCREASE_MULTIPLE * commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, 2, &channel_type_features));
|
||
} else {
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], push_amt);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_counterparty_no_reserve() {
|
||
do_test_counterparty_no_reserve(true);
|
||
do_test_counterparty_no_reserve(false);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_async_inbound_update_fee() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
// balancing
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
|
||
|
||
// A B
|
||
// update_fee ->
|
||
// send (1) commitment_signed -.
|
||
// <- update_add_htlc/commitment_signed
|
||
// send (2) RAA (awaiting remote revoke) -.
|
||
// (1) commitment_signed is delivered ->
|
||
// .- send (3) RAA (awaiting remote revoke)
|
||
// (2) RAA is delivered ->
|
||
// .- send (4) commitment_signed
|
||
// <- (3) RAA is delivered
|
||
// send (5) commitment_signed -.
|
||
// <- (4) commitment_signed is delivered
|
||
// send (6) RAA -.
|
||
// (5) commitment_signed is delivered ->
|
||
// <- RAA
|
||
// (6) RAA is delivered ->
|
||
|
||
// First nodes[0] generates an update_fee
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
*feerate_lock += 20;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
|
||
let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events_0[0] { // (1)
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
|
||
(update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
|
||
|
||
// ...but before it's delivered, nodes[1] starts to send a payment back to nodes[0]...
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 40000);
|
||
nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
let payment_event = {
|
||
let mut events_1 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 1);
|
||
SendEvent::from_event(events_1.remove(0))
|
||
};
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_event.node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
// ...now when the messages get delivered everyone should be happy
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.commitment_msg); // (2)
|
||
let as_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// nodes[0] is awaiting nodes[1] revoke_and_ack so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
// deliver(1), generate (3):
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
|
||
let bs_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// nodes[1] is awaiting nodes[0] revoke_and_ack so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack); // deliver (2)
|
||
let bs_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(bs_update.update_add_htlcs.is_empty()); // (4)
|
||
assert!(bs_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty()); // (4)
|
||
assert!(bs_update.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty()); // (4)
|
||
assert!(bs_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty()); // (4)
|
||
assert!(bs_update.update_fee.is_none()); // (4)
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack); // deliver (3)
|
||
let as_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(as_update.update_add_htlcs.is_empty()); // (5)
|
||
assert!(as_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty()); // (5)
|
||
assert!(as_update.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty()); // (5)
|
||
assert!(as_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty()); // (5)
|
||
assert!(as_update.update_fee.is_none()); // (5)
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_update.commitment_signed); // deliver (4)
|
||
let as_second_revoke = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// only (6) so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_update.commitment_signed); // deliver (5)
|
||
let bs_second_revoke = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_revoke);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events_2 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
|
||
match events_2[0] {
|
||
Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable {..} => {}, // If we actually processed we'd receive the payment
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_second_revoke); // deliver (6)
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_fee_unordered_raa() {
|
||
// Just the intro to the previous test followed by an out-of-order RAA (which caused a
|
||
// crash in an earlier version of the update_fee patch)
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
// balancing
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
|
||
|
||
// First nodes[0] generates an update_fee
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
*feerate_lock += 20;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
|
||
let update_msg = match events_0[0] { // (1)
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, .. }, .. } => {
|
||
update_fee.as_ref()
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
|
||
|
||
// ...but before it's delivered, nodes[1] starts to send a payment back to nodes[0]...
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 40000);
|
||
nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
let payment_event = {
|
||
let mut events_1 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 1);
|
||
SendEvent::from_event(events_1.remove(0))
|
||
};
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_event.node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
// ...now when the messages get delivered everyone should be happy
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.commitment_msg); // (2)
|
||
let as_revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// nodes[0] is awaiting nodes[1] revoke_and_ack so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_msg); // deliver (2)
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
// We can't continue, sadly, because our (1) now has a bogus signature
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_multi_flight_update_fee() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
// A B
|
||
// update_fee/commitment_signed ->
|
||
// .- send (1) RAA and (2) commitment_signed
|
||
// update_fee (never committed) ->
|
||
// (3) update_fee ->
|
||
// We have to manually generate the above update_fee, it is allowed by the protocol but we
|
||
// don't track which updates correspond to which revoke_and_ack responses so we're in
|
||
// AwaitingRAA mode and will not generate the update_fee yet.
|
||
// <- (1) RAA delivered
|
||
// (3) is generated and send (4) CS -.
|
||
// Note that A cannot generate (4) prior to (1) being delivered as it otherwise doesn't
|
||
// know the per_commitment_point to use for it.
|
||
// <- (2) commitment_signed delivered
|
||
// revoke_and_ack ->
|
||
// B should send no response here
|
||
// (4) commitment_signed delivered ->
|
||
// <- RAA/commitment_signed delivered
|
||
// revoke_and_ack ->
|
||
|
||
// First nodes[0] generates an update_fee
|
||
let initial_feerate;
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
initial_feerate = *feerate_lock;
|
||
*feerate_lock = initial_feerate + 20;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
|
||
let (update_msg_1, commitment_signed_1) = match events_0[0] { // (1)
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
|
||
(update_fee.as_ref().unwrap(), commitment_signed)
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Deliver first update_fee/commitment_signed pair, generating (1) and (2):
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg_1);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed_1);
|
||
let (bs_revoke_msg, bs_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
// nodes[0] is awaiting a revoke from nodes[1] before it will create a new commitment
|
||
// transaction:
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
*feerate_lock = initial_feerate + 40;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
// Create the (3) update_fee message that nodes[0] will generate before it does...
|
||
let mut update_msg_2 = msgs::UpdateFee {
|
||
channel_id: update_msg_1.channel_id.clone(),
|
||
feerate_per_kw: (initial_feerate + 30) as u32,
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg_2);
|
||
|
||
update_msg_2.feerate_per_kw = (initial_feerate + 40) as u32;
|
||
// Deliver (3)
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg_2);
|
||
|
||
// Deliver (1), generating (3) and (4)
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_msg);
|
||
let as_second_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
assert!(as_second_update.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(as_second_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(as_second_update.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(as_second_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
// Check that the update_fee newly generated matches what we delivered:
|
||
assert_eq!(as_second_update.update_fee.as_ref().unwrap().channel_id, update_msg_2.channel_id);
|
||
assert_eq!(as_second_update.update_fee.as_ref().unwrap().feerate_per_kw, update_msg_2.feerate_per_kw);
|
||
|
||
// Deliver (2) commitment_signed
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment_signed);
|
||
let as_revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
// No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_msg);
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
// Delever (4)
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_second_update.commitment_signed);
|
||
let (bs_second_revoke, bs_second_commitment) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_revoke);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_commitment);
|
||
let as_second_revoke = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_second_revoke);
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(steps: u8) {
|
||
// Previously, we had issues deserializing channels when we hadn't connected the first block
|
||
// after creation. To catch that and similar issues, we lean on the Node::drop impl to test
|
||
// serialization round-trips and simply do steps towards opening a channel and then drop the
|
||
// Node objects.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
if steps & 0b1000_0000 != 0{
|
||
let block = create_dummy_block(nodes[0].best_block_hash(), 42, Vec::new());
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if steps & 0x0f == 0 { return; }
|
||
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
if steps & 0x0f == 1 { return; }
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel);
|
||
let accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
if steps & 0x0f == 2 { return; }
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel);
|
||
|
||
let (temporary_channel_id, tx, funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42);
|
||
|
||
if steps & 0x0f == 3 { return; }
|
||
nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
|
||
let funding_created = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
if steps & 0x0f == 4 { return; }
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created);
|
||
{
|
||
let mut added_monitors = nodes[1].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
|
||
added_monitors.clear();
|
||
}
|
||
expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
let funding_signed = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
if steps & 0x0f == 5 { return; }
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed);
|
||
{
|
||
let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
|
||
added_monitors.clear();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 0);
|
||
|
||
if steps & 0x0f == 6 { return; }
|
||
create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm_first(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &tx, 2);
|
||
|
||
if steps & 0x0f == 7 { return; }
|
||
confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[0], &tx, 2);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH);
|
||
create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm_second(&nodes[1], &nodes[0]);
|
||
expect_channel_ready_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens() {
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(0);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(0 | 0b1000_0000);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(1);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(1 | 0b1000_0000);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(2);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(2 | 0b1000_0000);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(3);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(3 | 0b1000_0000);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(4);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(4 | 0b1000_0000);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(5);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(5 | 0b1000_0000);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(6);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(6 | 0b1000_0000);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(7);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(7 | 0b1000_0000);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(8);
|
||
do_test_sanity_on_in_flight_opens(8 | 0b1000_0000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_fee_vanilla() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
*feerate_lock += 25;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
|
||
let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events_0[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id:_, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { update_add_htlcs:_, update_fulfill_htlcs:_, update_fail_htlcs:_, update_fail_malformed_htlcs:_, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
|
||
(update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
|
||
let (revoke_msg, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
|
||
let revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_fee_that_funder_cannot_afford() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let channel_value = 5000;
|
||
let push_sats = 700;
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, channel_value, push_sats * 1000);
|
||
let channel_id = chan.2;
|
||
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
|
||
let default_config = UserConfig::default();
|
||
let bs_channel_reserve_sats = get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(channel_value, &default_config);
|
||
|
||
let channel_type_features = ChannelTypeFeatures::only_static_remote_key();
|
||
|
||
// Calculate the maximum feerate that A can afford. Note that we don't send an update_fee
|
||
// CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER HTLCs before actually running out of local balance, so we
|
||
// calculate two different feerates here - the expected local limit as well as the expected
|
||
// remote limit.
|
||
let feerate = ((channel_value - bs_channel_reserve_sats - push_sats) * 1000 / (commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + CONCURRENT_INBOUND_HTLC_FEE_BUFFER as u64 * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC)) as u32;
|
||
let non_buffer_feerate = ((channel_value - bs_channel_reserve_sats - push_sats) * 1000 / commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features)) as u32;
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
*feerate_lock = feerate;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let update_msg = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg.update_fee.unwrap());
|
||
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], update_msg.commitment_signed, false);
|
||
|
||
// Confirm that the new fee based on the last local commitment txn is what we expected based on the feerate set above.
|
||
{
|
||
let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], channel_id)[0].clone();
|
||
|
||
//We made sure neither party's funds are below the dust limit and there are no HTLCs here
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_tx.output.len(), 2);
|
||
let total_fee: u64 = commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 0, &channel_type_features) / 1000;
|
||
let mut actual_fee = commitment_tx.output.iter().fold(0, |acc, output| acc + output.value);
|
||
actual_fee = channel_value - actual_fee;
|
||
assert_eq!(total_fee, actual_fee);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
// Increment the feerate by a small constant, accounting for rounding errors
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
*feerate_lock += 4;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot afford to send new feerate at {}", feerate + 4), 1);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
|
||
|
||
const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = 281474976710654;
|
||
|
||
// Get the TestChannelSigner for each channel, which will be used to (1) get the keys
|
||
// needed to sign the new commitment tx and (2) sign the new commitment tx.
|
||
let (local_revocation_basepoint, local_htlc_basepoint, local_funding) = {
|
||
let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
|
||
let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
|
||
let local_chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).map(
|
||
|phase| if let ChannelPhase::Funded(chan) = phase { Some(chan) } else { None }
|
||
).flatten().unwrap();
|
||
let chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer();
|
||
let pubkeys = chan_signer.as_ref().pubkeys();
|
||
(pubkeys.revocation_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
|
||
pubkeys.funding_pubkey)
|
||
};
|
||
let (remote_delayed_payment_basepoint, remote_htlc_basepoint,remote_point, remote_funding) = {
|
||
let per_peer_state = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
|
||
let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
|
||
let remote_chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).map(
|
||
|phase| if let ChannelPhase::Funded(chan) = phase { Some(chan) } else { None }
|
||
).flatten().unwrap();
|
||
let chan_signer = remote_chan.get_signer();
|
||
let pubkeys = chan_signer.as_ref().pubkeys();
|
||
(pubkeys.delayed_payment_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
|
||
chan_signer.as_ref().get_per_commitment_point(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1, &secp_ctx),
|
||
pubkeys.funding_pubkey)
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Assemble the set of keys we can use for signatures for our commitment_signed message.
|
||
let commit_tx_keys = chan_utils::TxCreationKeys::derive_new(&secp_ctx, &remote_point, &remote_delayed_payment_basepoint,
|
||
&remote_htlc_basepoint, &local_revocation_basepoint, &local_htlc_basepoint);
|
||
|
||
let res = {
|
||
let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
|
||
let local_chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
|
||
let local_chan = local_chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).map(
|
||
|phase| if let ChannelPhase::Funded(chan) = phase { Some(chan) } else { None }
|
||
).flatten().unwrap();
|
||
let local_chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer();
|
||
let mut htlcs: Vec<(HTLCOutputInCommitment, ())> = vec![];
|
||
let commitment_tx = CommitmentTransaction::new_with_auxiliary_htlc_data(
|
||
INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1,
|
||
push_sats,
|
||
channel_value - push_sats - commit_tx_fee_msat(non_buffer_feerate + 4, 0, &channel_type_features) / 1000,
|
||
local_funding, remote_funding,
|
||
commit_tx_keys.clone(),
|
||
non_buffer_feerate + 4,
|
||
&mut htlcs,
|
||
&local_chan.context.channel_transaction_parameters.as_counterparty_broadcastable()
|
||
);
|
||
local_chan_signer.as_ecdsa().unwrap().sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, Vec::new(), &secp_ctx).unwrap()
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
let commit_signed_msg = msgs::CommitmentSigned {
|
||
channel_id: chan.2,
|
||
signature: res.0,
|
||
htlc_signatures: res.1,
|
||
#[cfg(taproot)]
|
||
partial_signature_with_nonce: None,
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
let update_fee = msgs::UpdateFee {
|
||
channel_id: chan.2,
|
||
feerate_per_kw: non_buffer_feerate + 4,
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fee);
|
||
|
||
//While producing the commitment_signed response after handling a received update_fee request the
|
||
//check to see if the funder, who sent the update_fee request, can afford the new fee (funder_balance >= fee+channel_reserve)
|
||
//Should produce and error.
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commit_signed_msg);
|
||
nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Funding remote cannot afford proposed new fee".to_string(), 1);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: String::from("Funding remote cannot afford proposed new fee") },
|
||
[nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], channel_value);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_fee_with_fundee_update_add_htlc() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
// balancing
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
*feerate_lock += 20;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
|
||
let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events_0[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id:_, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { update_add_htlcs:_, update_fulfill_htlcs:_, update_fail_htlcs:_, update_fail_malformed_htlcs:_, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
|
||
(update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
|
||
let (revoke_msg, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, our_payment_preimage, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 800000);
|
||
|
||
// nothing happens since node[1] is in AwaitingRemoteRevoke
|
||
nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
{
|
||
let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 0);
|
||
added_monitors.clear();
|
||
}
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
// node[1] has nothing to do
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
|
||
let revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
// AwaitingRemoteRevoke ends here
|
||
|
||
let commitment_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len(), 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_update.update_fee.is_none(), true);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update.commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let (revoke, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let revoke = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[0]);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::PaymentClaimable { .. } => { },
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], our_payment_preimage);
|
||
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 800000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 800000);
|
||
close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan.2, chan.3, true);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_fee() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let channel_id = chan.2;
|
||
|
||
// A B
|
||
// (1) update_fee/commitment_signed ->
|
||
// <- (2) revoke_and_ack
|
||
// .- send (3) commitment_signed
|
||
// (4) update_fee/commitment_signed ->
|
||
// .- send (5) revoke_and_ack (no CS as we're awaiting a revoke)
|
||
// <- (3) commitment_signed delivered
|
||
// send (6) revoke_and_ack -.
|
||
// <- (5) deliver revoke_and_ack
|
||
// (6) deliver revoke_and_ack ->
|
||
// .- send (7) commitment_signed in response to (4)
|
||
// <- (7) deliver commitment_signed
|
||
// revoke_and_ack ->
|
||
|
||
// Create and deliver (1)...
|
||
let feerate;
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
feerate = *feerate_lock;
|
||
*feerate_lock = feerate + 20;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
|
||
let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events_0[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id:_, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { update_add_htlcs:_, update_fulfill_htlcs:_, update_fail_htlcs:_, update_fail_malformed_htlcs:_, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
|
||
(update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
|
||
|
||
// Generate (2) and (3):
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
|
||
let (revoke_msg, commitment_signed_0) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
// Deliver (2):
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
// Create and deliver (4)...
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
*feerate_lock = feerate + 30;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let events_0 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_0.len(), 1);
|
||
let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events_0[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id:_, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { update_add_htlcs:_, update_fulfill_htlcs:_, update_fail_htlcs:_, update_fail_malformed_htlcs:_, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
|
||
(update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
// ... creating (5)
|
||
let revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
|
||
// Handle (3), creating (6):
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed_0);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let revoke_msg_0 = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
|
||
// Deliver (5):
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
// Deliver (6), creating (7):
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg_0);
|
||
let commitment_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(commitment_update.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(commitment_update.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(commitment_update.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(commitment_update.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(commitment_update.update_fee.is_none());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
// Deliver (7)
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update.commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let revoke_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_msg);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], channel_id), feerate + 30);
|
||
assert_eq!(get_feerate!(nodes[1], nodes[0], channel_id), feerate + 30);
|
||
close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan.2, chan.3, true);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn fake_network_test() {
|
||
// Simple test which builds a network of ChannelManagers, connects them to each other, and
|
||
// tests that payments get routed and transactions broadcast in semi-reasonable ways.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
|
||
let chan_3 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3);
|
||
|
||
// Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels...
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
|
||
|
||
// Send some more payments
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 1000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[3], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[1], &nodes[0])[..], 1000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[3], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000);
|
||
|
||
// Test failure packets
|
||
let payment_hash_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], 1000000).1;
|
||
fail_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3])[..], payment_hash_1);
|
||
|
||
// Add a new channel that skips 3
|
||
let chan_4 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3);
|
||
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[3])[..], 1000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[2], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 1000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 8000000);
|
||
|
||
// Do some rebalance loop payments, simultaneously
|
||
let mut hops = Vec::with_capacity(3);
|
||
hops.push(RouteHop {
|
||
pubkey: nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(),
|
||
node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
|
||
short_channel_id: chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id,
|
||
channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(),
|
||
fee_msat: 0,
|
||
cltv_expiry_delta: chan_3.0.contents.cltv_expiry_delta as u32,
|
||
maybe_announced_channel: true,
|
||
});
|
||
hops.push(RouteHop {
|
||
pubkey: nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(),
|
||
node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
|
||
short_channel_id: chan_3.0.contents.short_channel_id,
|
||
channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(),
|
||
fee_msat: 0,
|
||
cltv_expiry_delta: chan_4.1.contents.cltv_expiry_delta as u32,
|
||
maybe_announced_channel: true,
|
||
});
|
||
hops.push(RouteHop {
|
||
pubkey: nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(),
|
||
node_features: nodes[1].node.node_features(),
|
||
short_channel_id: chan_4.0.contents.short_channel_id,
|
||
channel_features: nodes[1].node.channel_features(),
|
||
fee_msat: 1000000,
|
||
cltv_expiry_delta: TEST_FINAL_CLTV,
|
||
maybe_announced_channel: true,
|
||
});
|
||
hops[1].fee_msat = chan_4.1.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_4.1.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[2].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000;
|
||
hops[0].fee_msat = chan_3.0.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_3.0.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[1].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000;
|
||
let payment_preimage_1 = send_along_route(&nodes[1],
|
||
Route { paths: vec![Path { hops, blinded_tail: None }], route_params: None },
|
||
&vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000).0;
|
||
|
||
let mut hops = Vec::with_capacity(3);
|
||
hops.push(RouteHop {
|
||
pubkey: nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(),
|
||
node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
|
||
short_channel_id: chan_4.0.contents.short_channel_id,
|
||
channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(),
|
||
fee_msat: 0,
|
||
cltv_expiry_delta: chan_3.1.contents.cltv_expiry_delta as u32,
|
||
maybe_announced_channel: true,
|
||
});
|
||
hops.push(RouteHop {
|
||
pubkey: nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(),
|
||
node_features: NodeFeatures::empty(),
|
||
short_channel_id: chan_3.0.contents.short_channel_id,
|
||
channel_features: ChannelFeatures::empty(),
|
||
fee_msat: 0,
|
||
cltv_expiry_delta: chan_2.1.contents.cltv_expiry_delta as u32,
|
||
maybe_announced_channel: true,
|
||
});
|
||
hops.push(RouteHop {
|
||
pubkey: nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(),
|
||
node_features: nodes[1].node.node_features(),
|
||
short_channel_id: chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id,
|
||
channel_features: nodes[1].node.channel_features(),
|
||
fee_msat: 1000000,
|
||
cltv_expiry_delta: TEST_FINAL_CLTV,
|
||
maybe_announced_channel: true,
|
||
});
|
||
hops[1].fee_msat = chan_2.1.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_2.1.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[2].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000;
|
||
hops[0].fee_msat = chan_3.1.contents.fee_base_msat as u64 + chan_3.1.contents.fee_proportional_millionths as u64 * hops[1].fee_msat as u64 / 1000000;
|
||
let payment_hash_2 = send_along_route(&nodes[1],
|
||
Route { paths: vec![Path { hops, blinded_tail: None }], route_params: None },
|
||
&vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], 1000000).1;
|
||
|
||
// Claim the rebalances...
|
||
fail_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[2], &nodes[1])[..], payment_hash_2);
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
|
||
|
||
// Close down the channels...
|
||
close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan_1.2, chan_1.3, true);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
close_channel(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &chan_2.2, chan_2.3, false);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
close_channel(&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &chan_3.2, chan_3.3, true);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[3], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
close_channel(&nodes[1], &nodes[3], &chan_4.2, chan_4.3, false);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[3], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn holding_cell_htlc_counting() {
|
||
// Tests that HTLCs in the holding cell count towards the pending HTLC limits on outbound HTLCs
|
||
// to ensure we don't end up with HTLCs sitting around in our holding cell for several
|
||
// commitment dance rounds.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
|
||
|
||
// Fetch a route in advance as we will be unable to once we're unable to send.
|
||
let (route, payment_hash_1, _, payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[2], 100000);
|
||
|
||
let mut payments = Vec::new();
|
||
for _ in 0..50 {
|
||
let (route, payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[2], 100000);
|
||
nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
payments.push((payment_preimage, payment_hash));
|
||
}
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let initial_payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
|
||
assert_eq!(initial_payment_event.node_id, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
// There is now one HTLC in an outbound commitment transaction and (OUR_MAX_HTLCS - 1) HTLCs in
|
||
// the holding cell waiting on B's RAA to send. At this point we should not be able to add
|
||
// another HTLC.
|
||
{
|
||
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_1,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_1), PaymentId(payment_hash_1.0)
|
||
), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// This should also be true if we try to forward a payment.
|
||
let (route, payment_hash_2, _, payment_secret_2) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 100000);
|
||
{
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_2,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_2), PaymentId(payment_hash_2.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_event.node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
// We have to forward pending HTLCs twice - once tries to forward the payment forward (and
|
||
// fails), the second will process the resulting failure and fail the HTLC backward.
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
let bs_fail_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_fail_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], bs_fail_updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
|
||
|
||
expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], payment_hash_2, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, false);
|
||
|
||
// Now forward all the pending HTLCs and claim them back
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &initial_payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &initial_payment_event.commitment_msg);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
|
||
let (bs_revoke_and_ack, bs_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let as_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
for ref update in as_updates.update_add_htlcs.iter() {
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), update);
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_updates.commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
let (bs_revoke_and_ack, bs_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let as_final_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_final_raa);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), payments.len());
|
||
for (event, &(_, ref hash)) in events.iter().zip(payments.iter()) {
|
||
match event {
|
||
&Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, *hash);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
for (preimage, _) in payments.drain(..) {
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2]], preimage);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1000000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn duplicate_htlc_test() {
|
||
// Test that we accept duplicate payment_hash HTLCs across the network and that
|
||
// claiming/failing them are all separate and don't affect each other
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(6);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(6, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(6, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None, None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(6, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels to route via 3 to 4/5 from 0/1/2
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 3);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 4);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 5);
|
||
|
||
let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 1000000);
|
||
|
||
*nodes[0].network_payment_count.borrow_mut() -= 1;
|
||
assert_eq!(route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], 1000000).0, payment_preimage);
|
||
|
||
*nodes[0].network_payment_count.borrow_mut() -= 1;
|
||
assert_eq!(route_payment(&nodes[2], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[5])[..], 1000000).0, payment_preimage);
|
||
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], payment_preimage);
|
||
fail_payment(&nodes[2], &vec!(&nodes[3], &nodes[5])[..], payment_hash);
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[3])[..], payment_preimage);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_duplicate_htlc_different_direction_onchain() {
|
||
// Test that ChannelMonitor doesn't generate 2 preimage txn
|
||
// when we have 2 HTLCs with same preimage that go across a node
|
||
// in opposite directions, even with the same payment secret.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
// balancing
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
|
||
|
||
let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 900_000);
|
||
|
||
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 800_000);
|
||
let node_a_payment_secret = nodes[0].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash, None, 7200, None).unwrap();
|
||
send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[0]]], 800_000, payment_hash, node_a_payment_secret);
|
||
|
||
// Provide preimage to node 0 by claiming payment
|
||
nodes[0].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, 800_000);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
// Broadcast node 1 commitment txn
|
||
let remote_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_1.2);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output.len(), 4); // 1 local, 1 remote, 1 htlc inbound, 1 htlc outbound
|
||
let mut has_both_htlcs = 0; // check htlcs match ones committed
|
||
for outp in remote_txn[0].output.iter() {
|
||
if outp.value == 800_000 / 1000 {
|
||
has_both_htlcs += 1;
|
||
} else if outp.value == 900_000 / 1000 {
|
||
has_both_htlcs += 1;
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
assert_eq!(has_both_htlcs, 2);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &remote_txn[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
|
||
|
||
let claim_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
|
||
assert_eq!(claim_txn.len(), 3);
|
||
|
||
check_spends!(claim_txn[0], remote_txn[0]); // Immediate HTLC claim with preimage
|
||
check_spends!(claim_txn[1], remote_txn[0]);
|
||
check_spends!(claim_txn[2], remote_txn[0]);
|
||
let preimage_tx = &claim_txn[0];
|
||
let (preimage_bump_tx, timeout_tx) = if claim_txn[1].input[0].previous_output == preimage_tx.input[0].previous_output {
|
||
(&claim_txn[1], &claim_txn[2])
|
||
} else {
|
||
(&claim_txn[2], &claim_txn[1])
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(preimage_tx.input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(preimage_bump_tx.input.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(preimage_tx.input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(preimage_tx.input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // HTLC 1 <--> 0, preimage tx
|
||
assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[preimage_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 800);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(timeout_tx.input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(timeout_tx.input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // HTLC 0 <--> 1, timeout tx
|
||
check_spends!(timeout_tx, remote_txn[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[timeout_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 900);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
|
||
for e in events {
|
||
match e {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { node_id, action: msgs::ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { ref msg } } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(msg.as_ref().unwrap().data, "Channel closed because commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain.");
|
||
},
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
|
||
assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_basic_channel_reserve() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
|
||
|
||
let chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
|
||
|
||
// The 2* and +1 are for the fee spike reserve.
|
||
let commit_tx_fee = 2 * commit_tx_fee_msat(get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2), 1 + 1, &get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2));
|
||
let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - commit_tx_fee;
|
||
let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) =
|
||
get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], max_can_send);
|
||
route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat += 1;
|
||
let err = nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).err().unwrap();
|
||
match err {
|
||
PaymentSendFailure::AllFailedResendSafe(ref fails) => {
|
||
if let &APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. } = &fails[0] {}
|
||
else { panic!("Unexpected error variant"); }
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected error variant"),
|
||
}
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1]], max_can_send);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_fee_spike_violation_fails_htlc() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
|
||
|
||
let (mut route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) =
|
||
get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 3460000);
|
||
route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat += 1;
|
||
// Need to manually create the update_add_htlc message to go around the channel reserve check in send_htlc()
|
||
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
|
||
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).expect("RNG is bad!");
|
||
|
||
let cur_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
|
||
|
||
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
|
||
let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0],
|
||
3460001, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
|
||
let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash).unwrap();
|
||
let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
|
||
channel_id: chan.2,
|
||
htlc_id: 0,
|
||
amount_msat: htlc_msat,
|
||
payment_hash: payment_hash,
|
||
cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
|
||
onion_routing_packet: onion_packet,
|
||
skimmed_fee_msat: None,
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
|
||
|
||
// Now manually create the commitment_signed message corresponding to the update_add
|
||
// nodes[0] just sent. In the code for construction of this message, "local" refers
|
||
// to the sender of the message, and "remote" refers to the receiver.
|
||
|
||
let feerate_per_kw = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
|
||
const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = (1 << 48) - 1;
|
||
|
||
// Get the TestChannelSigner for each channel, which will be used to (1) get the keys
|
||
// needed to sign the new commitment tx and (2) sign the new commitment tx.
|
||
let (local_revocation_basepoint, local_htlc_basepoint, local_secret, next_local_point, local_funding) = {
|
||
let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
|
||
let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
|
||
let local_chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).map(
|
||
|phase| if let ChannelPhase::Funded(chan) = phase { Some(chan) } else { None }
|
||
).flatten().unwrap();
|
||
let chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer();
|
||
// Make the signer believe we validated another commitment, so we can release the secret
|
||
chan_signer.as_ecdsa().unwrap().get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
|
||
|
||
let pubkeys = chan_signer.as_ref().pubkeys();
|
||
(pubkeys.revocation_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
|
||
chan_signer.as_ref().release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER),
|
||
chan_signer.as_ref().get_per_commitment_point(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2, &secp_ctx),
|
||
chan_signer.as_ref().pubkeys().funding_pubkey)
|
||
};
|
||
let (remote_delayed_payment_basepoint, remote_htlc_basepoint, remote_point, remote_funding) = {
|
||
let per_peer_state = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
|
||
let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
|
||
let remote_chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).map(
|
||
|phase| if let ChannelPhase::Funded(chan) = phase { Some(chan) } else { None }
|
||
).flatten().unwrap();
|
||
let chan_signer = remote_chan.get_signer();
|
||
let pubkeys = chan_signer.as_ref().pubkeys();
|
||
(pubkeys.delayed_payment_basepoint, pubkeys.htlc_basepoint,
|
||
chan_signer.as_ref().get_per_commitment_point(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1, &secp_ctx),
|
||
chan_signer.as_ref().pubkeys().funding_pubkey)
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Assemble the set of keys we can use for signatures for our commitment_signed message.
|
||
let commit_tx_keys = chan_utils::TxCreationKeys::derive_new(&secp_ctx, &remote_point, &remote_delayed_payment_basepoint,
|
||
&remote_htlc_basepoint, &local_revocation_basepoint, &local_htlc_basepoint);
|
||
|
||
// Build the remote commitment transaction so we can sign it, and then later use the
|
||
// signature for the commitment_signed message.
|
||
let local_chan_balance = 1313;
|
||
|
||
let accepted_htlc_info = chan_utils::HTLCOutputInCommitment {
|
||
offered: false,
|
||
amount_msat: 3460001,
|
||
cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
|
||
payment_hash,
|
||
transaction_output_index: Some(1),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
let commitment_number = INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1;
|
||
|
||
let res = {
|
||
let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
|
||
let local_chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
|
||
let local_chan = local_chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).map(
|
||
|phase| if let ChannelPhase::Funded(chan) = phase { Some(chan) } else { None }
|
||
).flatten().unwrap();
|
||
let local_chan_signer = local_chan.get_signer();
|
||
let commitment_tx = CommitmentTransaction::new_with_auxiliary_htlc_data(
|
||
commitment_number,
|
||
95000,
|
||
local_chan_balance,
|
||
local_funding, remote_funding,
|
||
commit_tx_keys.clone(),
|
||
feerate_per_kw,
|
||
&mut vec![(accepted_htlc_info, ())],
|
||
&local_chan.context.channel_transaction_parameters.as_counterparty_broadcastable()
|
||
);
|
||
local_chan_signer.as_ecdsa().unwrap().sign_counterparty_commitment(&commitment_tx, Vec::new(), &secp_ctx).unwrap()
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
let commit_signed_msg = msgs::CommitmentSigned {
|
||
channel_id: chan.2,
|
||
signature: res.0,
|
||
htlc_signatures: res.1,
|
||
#[cfg(taproot)]
|
||
partial_signature_with_nonce: None,
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Send the commitment_signed message to the nodes[1].
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commit_signed_msg);
|
||
let _ = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
|
||
// Send the RAA to nodes[1].
|
||
let raa_msg = msgs::RevokeAndACK {
|
||
channel_id: chan.2,
|
||
per_commitment_secret: local_secret,
|
||
next_per_commitment_point: next_local_point,
|
||
#[cfg(taproot)]
|
||
next_local_nonce: None,
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa_msg);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
// Make sure the HTLC failed in the way we expect.
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fail_htlcs, .. }, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
update_fail_htlcs[0].clone()
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(),
|
||
format!("Attempting to fail HTLC due to fee spike buffer violation in channel {}. Rebalancing is required.", raa_msg.channel_id), 1);
|
||
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_chan_reserve_violation_outbound_htlc_inbound_chan() {
|
||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
// Set the fee rate for the channel very high, to the point where the fundee
|
||
// sending any above-dust amount would result in a channel reserve violation.
|
||
// In this test we check that we would be prevented from sending an HTLC in
|
||
// this situation.
|
||
let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let default_config = UserConfig::default();
|
||
let channel_type_features = ChannelTypeFeatures::only_static_remote_key();
|
||
|
||
let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
|
||
push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64, &channel_type_features);
|
||
|
||
push_amt -= get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
|
||
|
||
let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, push_amt);
|
||
|
||
// Fetch a route in advance as we will be unable to once we're unable to send.
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 1_000_000);
|
||
// Sending exactly enough to hit the reserve amount should be accepted
|
||
for _ in 0..MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT {
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// However one more HTLC should be significantly over the reserve amount and fail.
|
||
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
|
||
), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_outbound_channel() {
|
||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let default_config = UserConfig::default();
|
||
let channel_type_features = ChannelTypeFeatures::only_static_remote_key();
|
||
|
||
// Set nodes[0]'s balance such that they will consider any above-dust received HTLC to be a
|
||
// channel reserve violation (so their balance is channel reserve (1000 sats) + commitment
|
||
// transaction fee with 0 HTLCs (183 sats)).
|
||
let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
|
||
push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64, &channel_type_features);
|
||
push_amt -= get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, push_amt);
|
||
|
||
// Send four HTLCs to cover the initial push_msat buffer we're required to include
|
||
for _ in 0..MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT {
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let (mut route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) =
|
||
get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 1000);
|
||
route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = 700_000;
|
||
// Need to manually create the update_add_htlc message to go around the channel reserve check in send_htlc()
|
||
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
|
||
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
|
||
let cur_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
|
||
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
|
||
let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0],
|
||
700_000, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
|
||
let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash).unwrap();
|
||
let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
|
||
channel_id: chan.2,
|
||
htlc_id: MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64,
|
||
amount_msat: htlc_msat,
|
||
payment_hash: payment_hash,
|
||
cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
|
||
onion_routing_packet: onion_packet,
|
||
skimmed_fee_msat: None,
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
|
||
// Check that the payment failed and the channel is closed in response to the malicious UpdateAdd.
|
||
nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Cannot accept HTLC that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value".to_string(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
|
||
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Cannot accept HTLC that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value");
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Cannot accept HTLC that would put our balance under counterparty-announced channel reserve value".to_string() },
|
||
[nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_outbound_chan() {
|
||
// Test that if we receive many dust HTLCs over an outbound channel, they don't count when
|
||
// calculating our commitment transaction fee (this was previously broken).
|
||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let default_config = UserConfig::default();
|
||
let channel_type_features = ChannelTypeFeatures::only_static_remote_key();
|
||
|
||
// Set nodes[0]'s balance such that they will consider any above-dust received HTLC to be a
|
||
// channel reserve violation (so their balance is channel reserve (1000 sats) + commitment
|
||
// transaction fee with 0 HTLCs (183 sats)).
|
||
let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
|
||
push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64, &channel_type_features);
|
||
push_amt -= get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, push_amt);
|
||
|
||
let dust_amt = crate::ln::channel::MIN_CHAN_DUST_LIMIT_SATOSHIS * 1000
|
||
+ feerate_per_kw as u64 * htlc_success_tx_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000 * 1000 - 1;
|
||
// In the previous code, routing this dust payment would cause nodes[0] to perceive a channel
|
||
// reserve violation even though it's a dust HTLC and therefore shouldn't count towards the
|
||
// commitment transaction fee.
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_amt);
|
||
|
||
// Send four HTLCs to cover the initial push_msat buffer we're required to include
|
||
for _ in 0..MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT {
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 1_000_000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// One more than the dust amt should fail, however.
|
||
let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) =
|
||
get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], dust_amt);
|
||
route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat += 1;
|
||
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
|
||
), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_chan_init_feerate_unaffordability() {
|
||
// Test that we will reject channel opens which do not leave enough to pay for any HTLCs due to
|
||
// channel reserve and feerate requirements.
|
||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let feerate_per_kw = *chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let default_config = UserConfig::default();
|
||
let channel_type_features = ChannelTypeFeatures::only_static_remote_key();
|
||
|
||
// Set the push_msat amount such that nodes[0] will not be able to afford to add even a single
|
||
// HTLC.
|
||
let mut push_amt = 100_000_000;
|
||
push_amt -= commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate_per_kw, MIN_AFFORDABLE_HTLC_COUNT as u64, &channel_type_features);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, push_amt + 1, 42, None).unwrap_err(),
|
||
APIError::APIMisuseError { err: "Funding amount (356) can't even pay fee for initial commitment transaction fee of 357.".to_string() });
|
||
|
||
// During open, we don't have a "counterparty channel reserve" to check against, so that
|
||
// requirement only comes into play on the open_channel handling side.
|
||
push_amt -= get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config) * 1000;
|
||
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, push_amt, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let mut open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
open_channel_msg.push_msat += 1;
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
|
||
|
||
let msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1);
|
||
match msg_events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id: _ } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(msg.data, "Insufficient funding amount for initial reserve");
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_chan_reserve_dust_inbound_htlcs_inbound_chan() {
|
||
// Test that if we receive many dust HTLCs over an inbound channel, they don't count when
|
||
// calculating our counterparty's commitment transaction fee (this was previously broken).
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 98000000);
|
||
|
||
let payment_amt = 46000; // Dust amount
|
||
// In the previous code, these first four payments would succeed.
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
|
||
|
||
// Then these next 5 would be interpreted by nodes[1] as violating the fee spike buffer.
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
|
||
|
||
// And this last payment previously resulted in nodes[1] closing on its inbound-channel
|
||
// counterparty, because it counted all the previous dust HTLCs against nodes[0]'s commitment
|
||
// transaction fee and therefore perceived this next payment as a channel reserve violation.
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_amt);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_chan_reserve_violation_inbound_htlc_inbound_chan() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
|
||
let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 100000, 95000000);
|
||
|
||
let feemsat = 239;
|
||
let total_routing_fee_msat = (nodes.len() - 2) as u64 * feemsat;
|
||
let chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
let channel_type_features = get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
|
||
// Add a 2* and +1 for the fee spike reserve.
|
||
let commit_tx_fee_2_htlc = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 2 + 1, &channel_type_features);
|
||
let recv_value_1 = (chan_stat.value_to_self_msat - chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat - total_routing_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_2_htlc)/2;
|
||
let amt_msat_1 = recv_value_1 + total_routing_fee_msat;
|
||
|
||
// Add a pending HTLC.
|
||
let (route_1, our_payment_hash_1, _, our_payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], amt_msat_1);
|
||
let payment_event_1 = {
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_1, our_payment_hash_1,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret_1), PaymentId(our_payment_hash_1.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_1.msgs[0]);
|
||
|
||
// Attempt to trigger a channel reserve violation --> payment failure.
|
||
let commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs = commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 2, &channel_type_features);
|
||
let recv_value_2 = chan_stat.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat_1 - chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat - total_routing_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs + 1;
|
||
let amt_msat_2 = recv_value_2 + total_routing_fee_msat;
|
||
let mut route_2 = route_1.clone();
|
||
route_2.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat = amt_msat_2;
|
||
|
||
// Need to manually create the update_add_htlc message to go around the channel reserve check in send_htlc()
|
||
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
|
||
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
|
||
let cur_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
|
||
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route_2.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
|
||
let (onion_payloads, htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(
|
||
&route_2.paths[0], recv_value_2, RecipientOnionFields::spontaneous_empty(), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
|
||
let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash_1).unwrap();
|
||
let msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
|
||
channel_id: chan.2,
|
||
htlc_id: 1,
|
||
amount_msat: htlc_msat + 1,
|
||
payment_hash: our_payment_hash_1,
|
||
cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
|
||
onion_routing_packet: onion_packet,
|
||
skimmed_fee_msat: None,
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
|
||
// Check that the payment failed and the channel is closed in response to the malicious UpdateAdd.
|
||
nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value".to_string(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
|
||
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value");
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value".to_string() },
|
||
[nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_inbound_outbound_capacity_is_not_zero() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let _ = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
|
||
let channels0 = node_chanmgrs[0].list_channels();
|
||
let channels1 = node_chanmgrs[1].list_channels();
|
||
let default_config = UserConfig::default();
|
||
assert_eq!(channels0.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(channels1.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
let reserve = get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(100_000, &default_config);
|
||
assert_eq!(channels0[0].inbound_capacity_msat, 95000000 - reserve*1000);
|
||
assert_eq!(channels1[0].outbound_capacity_msat, 95000000 - reserve*1000);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(channels0[0].outbound_capacity_msat, 100000 * 1000 - 95000000 - reserve*1000);
|
||
assert_eq!(channels1[0].inbound_capacity_msat, 100000 * 1000 - 95000000 - reserve*1000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate: u32, num_htlcs: u64, channel_type_features: &ChannelTypeFeatures) -> u64 {
|
||
(commitment_tx_base_weight(channel_type_features) + num_htlcs * COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) * feerate as u64 / 1000 * 1000
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_channel_reserve_holding_cell_htlcs() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
// When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count.
|
||
// It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here.
|
||
let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
|
||
config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 239;
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 190000, 1001);
|
||
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 190000, 1001);
|
||
|
||
let mut stat01 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2);
|
||
let mut stat11 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[0], chan_1.2);
|
||
|
||
let mut stat12 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[2], chan_2.2);
|
||
let mut stat22 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[2], nodes[1], chan_2.2);
|
||
|
||
macro_rules! expect_forward {
|
||
($node: expr) => {{
|
||
let mut events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
check_added_monitors!($node, 1);
|
||
let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0));
|
||
payment_event
|
||
}}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let feemsat = 239; // set above
|
||
let total_fee_msat = (nodes.len() - 2) as u64 * feemsat;
|
||
let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2);
|
||
let channel_type_features = get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2);
|
||
|
||
let recv_value_0 = stat01.counterparty_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat - total_fee_msat;
|
||
|
||
// attempt to send amt_msat > their_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat
|
||
{
|
||
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
|
||
.with_bolt11_features(nodes[2].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap().with_max_channel_saturation_power_of_half(0);
|
||
let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], payment_params, recv_value_0);
|
||
route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat += 1;
|
||
assert!(route.paths[0].hops.iter().rev().skip(1).all(|h| h.fee_msat == feemsat));
|
||
|
||
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
|
||
), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// channel reserve is bigger than their_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat so loop to deplete
|
||
// nodes[0]'s wealth
|
||
loop {
|
||
let amt_msat = recv_value_0 + total_fee_msat;
|
||
// 3 for the 3 HTLCs that will be sent, 2* and +1 for the fee spike reserve.
|
||
// Also, ensure that each payment has enough to be over the dust limit to
|
||
// ensure it'll be included in each commit tx fee calculation.
|
||
let commit_tx_fee_all_htlcs = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 3 + 1, &channel_type_features);
|
||
let ensure_htlc_amounts_above_dust_buffer = 3 * (stat01.counterparty_dust_limit_msat + 1000);
|
||
if stat01.value_to_self_msat < stat01.channel_reserve_msat + commit_tx_fee_all_htlcs + ensure_htlc_amounts_above_dust_buffer + amt_msat {
|
||
break;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
|
||
.with_bolt11_features(nodes[2].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap().with_max_channel_saturation_power_of_half(0);
|
||
let route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, recv_value_0).unwrap();
|
||
let (payment_preimage, ..) = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], recv_value_0);
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage);
|
||
|
||
let (stat01_, stat11_, stat12_, stat22_) = (
|
||
get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2),
|
||
get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[0], chan_1.2),
|
||
get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[2], chan_2.2),
|
||
get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[2], nodes[1], chan_2.2),
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(stat01_.value_to_self_msat, stat01.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat);
|
||
assert_eq!(stat11_.value_to_self_msat, stat11.value_to_self_msat + amt_msat);
|
||
assert_eq!(stat12_.value_to_self_msat, stat12.value_to_self_msat - (amt_msat - feemsat));
|
||
assert_eq!(stat22_.value_to_self_msat, stat22.value_to_self_msat + (amt_msat - feemsat));
|
||
stat01 = stat01_; stat11 = stat11_; stat12 = stat12_; stat22 = stat22_;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// adding pending output.
|
||
// 2* and +1 HTLCs on the commit tx fee for the fee spike reserve.
|
||
// The reason we're dividing by two here is as follows: the dividend is the total outbound liquidity
|
||
// after fees, the channel reserve, and the fee spike buffer are removed. We eventually want to
|
||
// divide this quantity into 3 portions, that will each be sent in an HTLC. This allows us
|
||
// to test channel channel reserve policy at the edges of what amount is sendable, i.e.
|
||
// cases where 1 msat over X amount will cause a payment failure, but anything less than
|
||
// that can be sent successfully. So, dividing by two is a somewhat arbitrary way of getting
|
||
// the amount of the first of these aforementioned 3 payments. The reason we split into 3 payments
|
||
// is to test the behavior of the holding cell with respect to channel reserve and commit tx fee
|
||
// policy.
|
||
let commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 2 + 1, &channel_type_features);
|
||
let recv_value_1 = (stat01.value_to_self_msat - stat01.channel_reserve_msat - total_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs)/2;
|
||
let amt_msat_1 = recv_value_1 + total_fee_msat;
|
||
|
||
let (route_1, our_payment_hash_1, our_payment_preimage_1, our_payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_1);
|
||
let payment_event_1 = {
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_1, our_payment_hash_1,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret_1), PaymentId(our_payment_hash_1.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_1.msgs[0]);
|
||
|
||
// channel reserve test with htlc pending output > 0
|
||
let recv_value_2 = stat01.value_to_self_msat - amt_msat_1 - stat01.channel_reserve_msat - total_fee_msat - commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs;
|
||
{
|
||
let mut route = route_1.clone();
|
||
route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat = recv_value_2 + 1;
|
||
let (_, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[2]);
|
||
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
|
||
), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// split the rest to test holding cell
|
||
let commit_tx_fee_3_htlcs = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 3 + 1, &channel_type_features);
|
||
let additional_htlc_cost_msat = commit_tx_fee_3_htlcs - commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs;
|
||
let recv_value_21 = recv_value_2/2 - additional_htlc_cost_msat/2;
|
||
let recv_value_22 = recv_value_2 - recv_value_21 - total_fee_msat - additional_htlc_cost_msat;
|
||
{
|
||
let stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(stat.value_to_self_msat - (stat.pending_outbound_htlcs_amount_msat + recv_value_21 + recv_value_22 + total_fee_msat + total_fee_msat + commit_tx_fee_3_htlcs), stat.channel_reserve_msat);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// now see if they go through on both sides
|
||
let (route_21, our_payment_hash_21, our_payment_preimage_21, our_payment_secret_21) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_21);
|
||
// but this will stuck in the holding cell
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_21, our_payment_hash_21,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret_21), PaymentId(our_payment_hash_21.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 0);
|
||
|
||
// test with outbound holding cell amount > 0
|
||
{
|
||
let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) =
|
||
get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_22);
|
||
route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat += 1;
|
||
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
|
||
), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let (route_22, our_payment_hash_22, our_payment_preimage_22, our_payment_secret_22) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value_22);
|
||
// this will also stuck in the holding cell
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_22, our_payment_hash_22,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret_22), PaymentId(our_payment_hash_22.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
// flush the pending htlc
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_1.commitment_msg);
|
||
let (as_revoke_and_ack, as_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
// the pending htlc should be promoted to committed
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let commitment_update_2 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_commitment_signed);
|
||
let bs_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||
|
||
let ref payment_event_11 = expect_forward!(nodes[1]);
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_11.msgs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], payment_event_11.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
|
||
expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[2], our_payment_hash_1, our_payment_secret_1, recv_value_1);
|
||
|
||
// flush the htlcs in the holding cell
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_update_2.update_add_htlcs.len(), 2);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update_2.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_update_2.update_add_htlcs[1]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], &commitment_update_2.commitment_signed, false);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||
|
||
let ref payment_event_3 = expect_forward!(nodes[1]);
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_event_3.msgs.len(), 2);
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_3.msgs[0]);
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event_3.msgs[1]);
|
||
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], &payment_event_3.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash_21, *payment_hash);
|
||
assert_eq!(recv_value_21, amount_msat);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), receiver_node_id.unwrap());
|
||
assert_eq!(via_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
|
||
match &purpose {
|
||
PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
|
||
assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
|
||
assert_eq!(our_payment_secret_21, *payment_secret);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[1] {
|
||
Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash_22, *payment_hash);
|
||
assert_eq!(recv_value_22, amount_msat);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), receiver_node_id.unwrap());
|
||
assert_eq!(via_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
|
||
match &purpose {
|
||
PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
|
||
assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
|
||
assert_eq!(our_payment_secret_22, *payment_secret);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), our_payment_preimage_1);
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), our_payment_preimage_21);
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), our_payment_preimage_22);
|
||
|
||
let commit_tx_fee_0_htlcs = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1, &channel_type_features);
|
||
let recv_value_3 = commit_tx_fee_2_htlcs - commit_tx_fee_0_htlcs - total_fee_msat;
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec![&nodes[1], &nodes[2]][..], recv_value_3);
|
||
|
||
let commit_tx_fee_1_htlc = 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1, &channel_type_features);
|
||
let expected_value_to_self = stat01.value_to_self_msat - (recv_value_1 + total_fee_msat) - (recv_value_21 + total_fee_msat) - (recv_value_22 + total_fee_msat) - (recv_value_3 + total_fee_msat);
|
||
let stat0 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_1.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(stat0.value_to_self_msat, expected_value_to_self);
|
||
assert_eq!(stat0.value_to_self_msat, stat0.channel_reserve_msat + commit_tx_fee_1_htlc);
|
||
|
||
let stat2 = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[2], nodes[1], chan_2.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(stat2.value_to_self_msat, stat22.value_to_self_msat + recv_value_1 + recv_value_21 + recv_value_22 + recv_value_3);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn channel_reserve_in_flight_removes() {
|
||
// In cases where one side claims an HTLC, it thinks it has additional available funds that it
|
||
// can send to its counterparty, but due to update ordering, the other side may not yet have
|
||
// considered those HTLCs fully removed.
|
||
// This tests that we don't count HTLCs which will not be included in the next remote
|
||
// commitment transaction towards the reserve value (as it implies no commitment transaction
|
||
// will be generated which violates the remote reserve value).
|
||
// This was broken previously, and discovered by the chanmon_fail_consistency fuzz test.
|
||
// To test this we:
|
||
// * route two HTLCs from A to B (note that, at a high level, this test is checking that, when
|
||
// you consider the values of both of these HTLCs, B may not send an HTLC back to A, but if
|
||
// you only consider the value of the first HTLC, it may not),
|
||
// * start routing a third HTLC from A to B,
|
||
// * claim the first two HTLCs (though B will generate an update_fulfill for one, and put
|
||
// the other claim in its holding cell, as it immediately goes into AwaitingRAA),
|
||
// * deliver the first fulfill from B
|
||
// * deliver the update_add and an RAA from A, resulting in B freeing the second holding cell
|
||
// claim,
|
||
// * deliver A's response CS and RAA.
|
||
// This results in A having the second HTLC in AwaitingRemovedRemoteRevoke, but B having
|
||
// removed it fully. B now has the push_msat plus the first two HTLCs in value.
|
||
// * Now B happily sends another HTLC, potentially violating its reserve value from A's point
|
||
// of view (if A counts the AwaitingRemovedRemoteRevoke HTLC).
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let b_chan_values = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[0], chan_1.2);
|
||
// Route the first two HTLCs.
|
||
let payment_value_1 = b_chan_values.channel_reserve_msat - b_chan_values.value_to_self_msat - 10000;
|
||
let (payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_value_1);
|
||
let (payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 20_000);
|
||
|
||
// Start routing the third HTLC (this is just used to get everyone in the right state).
|
||
let (route, payment_hash_3, payment_preimage_3, payment_secret_3) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
|
||
let send_1 = {
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_3,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_3), PaymentId(payment_hash_3.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Now claim both of the first two HTLCs on B's end, putting B in AwaitingRAA and generating an
|
||
// initial fulfill/CS.
|
||
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, payment_value_1);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let bs_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
// This claim goes in B's holding cell, allowing us to have a pending B->A RAA which does not
|
||
// remove the second HTLC when we send the HTLC back from B to A.
|
||
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_2);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, 20_000);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_removes.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_removes.commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
expect_payment_sent(&nodes[0], payment_preimage_1, None, false, false);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_1.msgs[0]);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_1.commitment_msg);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
// B is already AwaitingRAA, so cant generate a CS here
|
||
let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let bs_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs.commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
// The second HTLCis removed, but as A is in AwaitingRAA it can't generate a CS here, so the
|
||
// RAA that B generated above doesn't fully resolve the second HTLC from A's point of view.
|
||
// However, the RAA A generates here *does* fully resolve the HTLC from B's point of view (as A
|
||
// can no longer broadcast a commitment transaction with it and B has the preimage so can go
|
||
// on-chain as necessary).
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_cs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_cs.commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
expect_payment_sent(&nodes[0], payment_preimage_2, None, false, false);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||
expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash_3, payment_secret_3, 100000);
|
||
|
||
// Note that as this RAA was generated before the delivery of the update_fulfill it shouldn't
|
||
// resolve the second HTLC from A's point of view.
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
|
||
let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
// Now that B doesn't have the second RAA anymore, but A still does, send a payment from B back
|
||
// to A to ensure that A doesn't count the almost-removed HTLC in update_add processing.
|
||
let (route, payment_hash_4, payment_preimage_4, payment_secret_4) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 10000);
|
||
let send_2 = {
|
||
nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_4,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_4), PaymentId(payment_hash_4.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_2.msgs[0]);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_2.commitment_msg);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
// Now just resolve all the outstanding messages/HTLCs for completeness...
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs.commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
|
||
let as_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs.commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[0]);
|
||
expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[0], payment_hash_4, payment_secret_4, 10000);
|
||
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], payment_preimage_4);
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_3);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn channel_monitor_network_test() {
|
||
// Simple test which builds a network of ChannelManagers, connects them to each other, and
|
||
// tests that ChannelMonitor is able to recover from various states.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(5);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(5, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(5, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(5, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
|
||
let chan_3 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3);
|
||
let chan_4 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 4);
|
||
|
||
// Make sure all nodes are at the same starting height
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 4*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 4*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[2], 4*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[3], 4*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[3].best_block_info().1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[4], 4*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[4].best_block_info().1);
|
||
|
||
// Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels...
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4])[..], 8000000);
|
||
|
||
// Simple case with no pending HTLCs:
|
||
nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_1.2, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
{
|
||
let mut node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan_1, None, HTLCType::NONE);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &node_txn[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan_1, Some(node_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::NONE);
|
||
}
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
|
||
// One pending HTLC is discarded by the force-close:
|
||
let (payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]], 3_000_000);
|
||
|
||
// Simple case of one pending HTLC to HTLC-Timeout (note that the HTLC-Timeout is not
|
||
// broadcasted until we reach the timelock time).
|
||
nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_2.2, &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
{
|
||
let mut node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan_2, None, HTLCType::NONE);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32 + 1);
|
||
test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan_2, None, HTLCType::TIMEOUT);
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &node_txn[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[2], &chan_2, Some(node_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::NONE);
|
||
}
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
|
||
macro_rules! claim_funds {
|
||
($node: expr, $prev_node: expr, $preimage: expr, $payment_hash: expr) => {
|
||
{
|
||
$node.node.claim_funds($preimage);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!($node, $payment_hash, 3_000_000);
|
||
check_added_monitors!($node, 1);
|
||
|
||
let events = $node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, .. } } => {
|
||
assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(*node_id, $prev_node.node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// nodes[3] gets the preimage, but nodes[2] already disconnected, resulting in a nodes[2]
|
||
// HTLC-Timeout and a nodes[3] claim against it (+ its own announces)
|
||
nodes[2].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_3.2, &nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
|
||
let node2_commitment_txid;
|
||
{
|
||
let node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[2], &chan_3, None, HTLCType::NONE);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[2], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32 + 1);
|
||
test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[2], &chan_3, None, HTLCType::TIMEOUT);
|
||
node2_commitment_txid = node_txn[0].txid();
|
||
|
||
// Claim the payment on nodes[3], giving it knowledge of the preimage
|
||
claim_funds!(nodes[3], nodes[2], payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1);
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[3], &node_txn[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
|
||
check_preimage_claim(&nodes[3], &node_txn);
|
||
}
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[3], true);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[3].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[3], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
|
||
// Drop the ChannelMonitor for the previous channel to avoid it broadcasting transactions and
|
||
// confusing us in the following tests.
|
||
let chan_3_mon = nodes[3].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.remove_monitor(&OutPoint { txid: chan_3.3.txid(), index: 0 });
|
||
|
||
// One pending HTLC to time out:
|
||
let (payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[3], &[&nodes[4]], 3_000_000);
|
||
// CLTV expires at TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1 (current height) + 1 (added in send_payment for
|
||
// buffer space).
|
||
|
||
let (close_chan_update_1, close_chan_update_2) = {
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[3], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + 1);
|
||
let events = nodes[3].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||
let close_chan_update_1 = match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
|
||
msg.clone()
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
match events[1] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { .. }, node_id } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
|
||
|
||
// Clear bumped claiming txn spending node 2 commitment tx. Bumped txn are generated after reaching some height timer.
|
||
{
|
||
let mut node_txn = nodes[3].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
node_txn.retain(|tx| {
|
||
if tx.input[0].previous_output.txid == node2_commitment_txid {
|
||
false
|
||
} else { true }
|
||
});
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[3], &chan_4, None, HTLCType::TIMEOUT);
|
||
|
||
// Claim the payment on nodes[4], giving it knowledge of the preimage
|
||
claim_funds!(nodes[4], nodes[3], payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2);
|
||
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[4], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER + 2);
|
||
let events = nodes[4].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||
let close_chan_update_2 = match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
|
||
msg.clone()
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
match events[1] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { .. }, node_id } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 1);
|
||
test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[4], &chan_4, None, HTLCType::SUCCESS);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[4], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[4], &node_txn[0]);
|
||
check_preimage_claim(&nodes[4], &node_txn);
|
||
(close_chan_update_1, close_chan_update_2)
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[3].gossip_sync.handle_channel_update(&close_chan_update_2).unwrap();
|
||
nodes[4].gossip_sync.handle_channel_update(&close_chan_update_1).unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[3].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[4].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[3].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.watch_channel(OutPoint { txid: chan_3.3.txid(), index: 0 }, chan_3_mon),
|
||
Ok(ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed));
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[3], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_justice_tx_htlc_timeout() {
|
||
// Test justice txn built on revoked HTLC-Timeout tx, against both sides
|
||
let mut alice_config = UserConfig::default();
|
||
alice_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
|
||
alice_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
|
||
alice_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 5;
|
||
let mut bob_config = UserConfig::default();
|
||
bob_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
|
||
bob_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
|
||
bob_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 3;
|
||
let user_cfgs = [Some(alice_config), Some(bob_config)];
|
||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
|
||
chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &user_cfgs);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
// Create some new channels:
|
||
let chan_5 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
// A pending HTLC which will be revoked:
|
||
let payment_preimage_3 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
|
||
// Get the will-be-revoked local txn from nodes[0]
|
||
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_5.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn.len(), 2); // First commitment tx, then HTLC tx
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_5.3.txid());
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // Only HTLC and output back to 0 are present
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.txid, revoked_local_txn[0].txid());
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // HTLC-Timeout
|
||
// Revoke the old state
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_3);
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
{
|
||
let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: penalty tx
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 2); // We should claim the revoked output and the HTLC output
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
node_txn.swap_remove(0);
|
||
}
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan_5, Some(revoked_local_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::NONE);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
|
||
// Verify broadcast of revoked HTLC-timeout
|
||
let node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan_5, Some(revoked_local_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::TIMEOUT);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
// Broadcast revoked HTLC-timeout on node 1
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[1]);
|
||
test_revoked_htlc_claim_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], node_txn[1].clone(), revoked_local_txn[0].clone());
|
||
}
|
||
get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_justice_tx_htlc_success() {
|
||
// Test justice txn built on revoked HTLC-Success tx, against both sides
|
||
let mut alice_config = UserConfig::default();
|
||
alice_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
|
||
alice_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
|
||
alice_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 5;
|
||
let mut bob_config = UserConfig::default();
|
||
bob_config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
|
||
bob_config.channel_handshake_limits.force_announced_channel_preference = false;
|
||
bob_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6 * 24 * 3;
|
||
let user_cfgs = [Some(alice_config), Some(bob_config)];
|
||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
|
||
chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &user_cfgs);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
// Create some new channels:
|
||
let chan_6 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
// A pending HTLC which will be revoked:
|
||
let payment_preimage_4 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
|
||
// Get the will-be-revoked local txn from B
|
||
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_6.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn.len(), 1); // Only commitment tx
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_6.3.txid());
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // Only HTLC and output back to A are present
|
||
// Revoke the old state
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_4);
|
||
{
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
{
|
||
let mut node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: penalty tx
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1); // We claim the received HTLC output
|
||
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
node_txn.swap_remove(0);
|
||
}
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan_6, Some(revoked_local_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::NONE);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
let node_txn = test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan_6, Some(revoked_local_txn[0].clone()), HTLCType::SUCCESS);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &node_txn[1]);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
test_revoked_htlc_claim_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], node_txn[1].clone(), revoked_local_txn[0].clone());
|
||
}
|
||
get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn revoked_output_claim() {
|
||
// Simple test to ensure a node will claim a revoked output when a stale remote commitment
|
||
// transaction is broadcast by its counterparty
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
// node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim the revoked output
|
||
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
// Only output is the full channel value back to nodes[0]:
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
|
||
// Send a payment through, updating everyone's latest commitment txn
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 5000000);
|
||
|
||
// Inform nodes[1] that nodes[0] broadcast a stale tx
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: justice tx against revoked to_local output
|
||
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
|
||
// Inform nodes[0] that a watchtower cheated on its behalf, so it will force-close the chan
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_forming_justice_tx_from_monitor_updates() {
|
||
do_test_forming_justice_tx_from_monitor_updates(true);
|
||
do_test_forming_justice_tx_from_monitor_updates(false);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_forming_justice_tx_from_monitor_updates(broadcast_initial_commitment: bool) {
|
||
// Simple test to make sure that the justice tx formed in WatchtowerPersister
|
||
// is properly formed and can be broadcasted/confirmed successfully in the event
|
||
// that a revoked commitment transaction is broadcasted
|
||
// (Similar to `revoked_output_claim` test but we get the justice tx + broadcast manually)
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let destination_script0 = chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.get_destination_script().unwrap();
|
||
let destination_script1 = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_destination_script().unwrap();
|
||
let persisters = vec![WatchtowerPersister::new(destination_script0),
|
||
WatchtowerPersister::new(destination_script1)];
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs_with_persisters(2, &chanmon_cfgs, persisters.iter().collect());
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let (_, _, channel_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let funding_txo = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
|
||
|
||
if !broadcast_initial_commitment {
|
||
// Send a payment to move the channel forward
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 5_000_000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim the revoked output.
|
||
// We'll keep this commitment transaction to broadcast once it's revoked.
|
||
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], channel_id);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
let revoked_commitment_tx = &revoked_local_txn[0];
|
||
|
||
// Send another payment, now revoking the previous commitment tx
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 5_000_000);
|
||
|
||
let justice_tx = persisters[1].justice_tx(funding_txo, &revoked_commitment_tx.txid()).unwrap();
|
||
check_spends!(justice_tx, revoked_commitment_tx);
|
||
|
||
mine_transactions(&nodes[1], &[revoked_commitment_tx, &justice_tx]);
|
||
mine_transactions(&nodes[0], &[revoked_commitment_tx, &justice_tx]);
|
||
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event(&nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, false,
|
||
&[nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100_000);
|
||
get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 1, 0);
|
||
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event(&nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, false,
|
||
&[nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100_000);
|
||
|
||
// Check that the justice tx has sent the revoked output value to nodes[1]
|
||
let monitor = get_monitor!(nodes[1], channel_id);
|
||
let total_claimable_balance = monitor.get_claimable_balances().iter().fold(0, |sum, balance| {
|
||
match balance {
|
||
channelmonitor::Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { amount_satoshis, .. } => sum + amount_satoshis,
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected balance type"),
|
||
}
|
||
});
|
||
// On the first commitment, node[1]'s balance was below dust so it didn't have an output
|
||
let node1_channel_balance = if broadcast_initial_commitment { 0 } else { revoked_commitment_tx.output[0].value };
|
||
let expected_claimable_balance = node1_channel_balance + justice_tx.output[0].value;
|
||
assert_eq!(total_claimable_balance, expected_claimable_balance);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn claim_htlc_outputs_shared_tx() {
|
||
// Node revoked old state, htlcs haven't time out yet, claim them in shared justice tx
|
||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some new channel:
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
// Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8_000_000);
|
||
// node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim both offered/received HTLC outputs on top of commitment tx
|
||
let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
|
||
let (_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
|
||
|
||
// Get the will-be-revoked local txn from node[0]
|
||
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn.len(), 2); // commitment tx + 1 HTLC-Timeout tx
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.txid, revoked_local_txn[0].txid());
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // HTLC-Timeout
|
||
check_spends!(revoked_local_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
|
||
//Revoke the old state
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: penalty tx
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3); // Claim the revoked output + both revoked HTLC outputs
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
|
||
let mut witness_lens = BTreeSet::new();
|
||
witness_lens.insert(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len());
|
||
witness_lens.insert(node_txn[0].input[1].witness.last().unwrap().len());
|
||
witness_lens.insert(node_txn[0].input[2].witness.last().unwrap().len());
|
||
assert_eq!(witness_lens.len(), 3);
|
||
assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(0).next().unwrap(), 77); // revoked to_local
|
||
assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(1).next().unwrap(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked offered HTLC
|
||
assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(2).next().unwrap(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked received HTLC
|
||
|
||
// Finally, mine the penalty transaction and check that we get an HTLC failure after
|
||
// ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations.
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, false);
|
||
}
|
||
get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn claim_htlc_outputs_single_tx() {
|
||
// Node revoked old state, htlcs have timed out, claim each of them in separated justice tx
|
||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
// Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8_000_000);
|
||
// node[0] is gonna to revoke an old state thus node[1] should be able to claim both offered/received HTLC outputs on top of commitment tx, but this
|
||
// time as two different claim transactions as we're gonna to timeout htlc with given a high current height
|
||
let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
|
||
let (_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
|
||
|
||
// Get the will-be-revoked local txn from node[0]
|
||
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
|
||
|
||
//Revoke the old state
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0], 100);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0], 100);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[0], events[0..1], true);
|
||
match events.last().unwrap() {
|
||
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
|
||
|
||
// Check the pair local commitment and HTLC-timeout broadcast due to HTLC expiration
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], chan_1.3);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
|
||
let witness_script = node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(witness_script.len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); //Spending an offered htlc output
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[1], node_txn[0]);
|
||
|
||
// Filter out any non justice transactions.
|
||
node_txn.retain(|tx| tx.input[0].previous_output.txid == revoked_local_txn[0].txid());
|
||
assert!(node_txn.len() > 3);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[2], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
|
||
let mut witness_lens = BTreeSet::new();
|
||
witness_lens.insert(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len());
|
||
witness_lens.insert(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len());
|
||
witness_lens.insert(node_txn[2].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len());
|
||
assert_eq!(witness_lens.len(), 3);
|
||
assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(0).next().unwrap(), 77); // revoked to_local
|
||
assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(1).next().unwrap(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked offered HTLC
|
||
assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(2).next().unwrap(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked received HTLC
|
||
|
||
// Finally, mine the penalty transactions and check that we get an HTLC failure after
|
||
// ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations.
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[1]);
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[2]);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, false);
|
||
}
|
||
get_announce_close_broadcast_events(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_htlc_on_chain_success() {
|
||
// Test that in case of a unilateral close onchain, we detect the state of output and pass
|
||
// the preimage backward accordingly. So here we test that ChannelManager is
|
||
// broadcasting the right event to other nodes in payment path.
|
||
// We test with two HTLCs simultaneously as that was not handled correctly in the past.
|
||
// A --------------------> B ----------------------> C (preimage)
|
||
// First, C should claim the HTLC outputs via HTLC-Success when its own latest local
|
||
// commitment transaction was broadcast.
|
||
// Then, B should learn the preimage from said transactions, attempting to claim backwards
|
||
// towards B.
|
||
// B should be able to claim via preimage if A then broadcasts its local tx.
|
||
// Finally, when A sees B's latest local commitment transaction it should be able to claim
|
||
// the HTLC outputs via the preimage it learned (which, once confirmed should generate a
|
||
// PaymentSent event).
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
|
||
|
||
// Ensure all nodes are at the same height
|
||
let node_max_height = nodes.iter().map(|node| node.blocks.lock().unwrap().len()).max().unwrap() as u32;
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_max_height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_max_height - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[2], node_max_height - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
|
||
|
||
// Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels...
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
|
||
|
||
let (our_payment_preimage, payment_hash_1, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3_000_000);
|
||
let (our_payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3_000_000);
|
||
|
||
// Broadcast legit commitment tx from C on B's chain
|
||
// Broadcast HTLC Success transaction by C on received output from C's commitment tx on B's chain
|
||
let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_tx.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_2.3);
|
||
nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], payment_hash_1, 3_000_000);
|
||
nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage_2);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], payment_hash_2, 3_000_000);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 2);
|
||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone(); // ChannelMonitor: 2 (2 * HTLC-Success tx)
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[1], commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
assert!(node_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
|
||
assert!(node_txn[1].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].lock_time.0, 0);
|
||
|
||
// Verify that B's ChannelManager is able to extract preimage from HTLC Success tx and pass it backward
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![commitment_tx[0].clone(), node_txn[0].clone(), node_txn[1].clone()]));
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
|
||
{
|
||
let mut added_monitors = nodes[1].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0.txid, chan_2.3.txid());
|
||
added_monitors.clear();
|
||
}
|
||
let forwarded_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(forwarded_events.len(), 3);
|
||
match forwarded_events[0] {
|
||
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
let chan_id = Some(chan_1.2);
|
||
match forwarded_events[1] {
|
||
Event::PaymentForwarded { fee_earned_msat, prev_channel_id, claim_from_onchain_tx, next_channel_id, outbound_amount_forwarded_msat } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(fee_earned_msat, Some(1000));
|
||
assert_eq!(prev_channel_id, chan_id);
|
||
assert_eq!(claim_from_onchain_tx, true);
|
||
assert_eq!(next_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
|
||
assert_eq!(outbound_amount_forwarded_msat, Some(3000000));
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!()
|
||
}
|
||
match forwarded_events[2] {
|
||
Event::PaymentForwarded { fee_earned_msat, prev_channel_id, claim_from_onchain_tx, next_channel_id, outbound_amount_forwarded_msat } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(fee_earned_msat, Some(1000));
|
||
assert_eq!(prev_channel_id, chan_id);
|
||
assert_eq!(claim_from_onchain_tx, true);
|
||
assert_eq!(next_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
|
||
assert_eq!(outbound_amount_forwarded_msat, Some(3000000));
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!()
|
||
}
|
||
let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
{
|
||
let mut added_monitors = nodes[1].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 2);
|
||
assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
|
||
assert_eq!(added_monitors[1].0.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
|
||
added_monitors.clear();
|
||
}
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
|
||
|
||
let nodes_2_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
|
||
let nodes_0_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
|
||
|
||
match nodes_2_event {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { .. }, node_id: _ } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
match nodes_0_event {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
|
||
assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Ensure that the last remaining message event is the BroadcastChannelUpdate msg for chan_2
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
macro_rules! check_tx_local_broadcast {
|
||
($node: expr, $htlc_offered: expr, $commitment_tx: expr) => { {
|
||
let mut node_txn = $node.tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2);
|
||
// Node[1]: 2 * HTLC-timeout tx
|
||
// Node[0]: 2 * HTLC-timeout tx
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], $commitment_tx);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[1], $commitment_tx);
|
||
assert_ne!(node_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0);
|
||
assert_ne!(node_txn[1].lock_time.0, 0);
|
||
if $htlc_offered {
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
assert!(node_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
|
||
assert!(node_txn[1].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
assert!(node_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
|
||
assert!(node_txn[1].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
|
||
}
|
||
node_txn.clear();
|
||
} }
|
||
}
|
||
// nodes[1] now broadcasts its own timeout-claim of the output that nodes[2] just claimed via success.
|
||
check_tx_local_broadcast!(nodes[1], false, commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
|
||
// Broadcast legit commitment tx from A on B's chain
|
||
// Broadcast preimage tx by B on offered output from A commitment tx on A's chain
|
||
let node_a_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
|
||
check_spends!(node_a_commitment_tx[0], chan_1.3);
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_a_commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
|
||
assert!(node_txn.len() == 1 || node_txn.len() == 3); // HTLC-Success, 2* RBF bumps of above HTLC txn
|
||
let commitment_spend =
|
||
if node_txn.len() == 1 {
|
||
&node_txn[0]
|
||
} else {
|
||
// Certain `ConnectStyle`s will cause RBF bumps of the previous HTLC transaction to be broadcast.
|
||
// FullBlockViaListen
|
||
if node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid == node_a_commitment_tx[0].txid() {
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[1], commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[2], commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
assert_ne!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout, node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output.vout);
|
||
&node_txn[0]
|
||
} else {
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[1], commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout, node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout);
|
||
&node_txn[2]
|
||
}
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
check_spends!(commitment_spend, node_a_commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_spend.input.len(), 2);
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_spend.input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_spend.input[1].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_spend.lock_time.0, nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
|
||
assert!(commitment_spend.output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
|
||
// We don't bother to check that B can claim the HTLC output on its commitment tx here as
|
||
// we already checked the same situation with A.
|
||
|
||
// Verify that A's ChannelManager is able to extract preimage from preimage tx and generate PaymentSent
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[0], &create_dummy_block(nodes[0].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![node_a_commitment_tx[0].clone(), commitment_spend.clone()]));
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 5);
|
||
let mut first_claimed = false;
|
||
for event in events {
|
||
match event {
|
||
Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
if payment_preimage == our_payment_preimage && payment_hash == payment_hash_1 {
|
||
assert!(!first_claimed);
|
||
first_claimed = true;
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_preimage, our_payment_preimage_2);
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_2);
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } => {},
|
||
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
check_tx_local_broadcast!(nodes[0], true, node_a_commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_htlc_on_chain_timeout(connect_style: ConnectStyle) {
|
||
// Test that in case of a unilateral close onchain, we detect the state of output and
|
||
// timeout the HTLC backward accordingly. So here we test that ChannelManager is
|
||
// broadcasting the right event to other nodes in payment path.
|
||
// A ------------------> B ----------------------> C (timeout)
|
||
// B's commitment tx C's commitment tx
|
||
// \ \
|
||
// B's HTLC timeout tx B's timeout tx
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
*nodes[0].connect_style.borrow_mut() = connect_style;
|
||
*nodes[1].connect_style.borrow_mut() = connect_style;
|
||
*nodes[2].connect_style.borrow_mut() = connect_style;
|
||
|
||
// Create some intial channels
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
|
||
|
||
// Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment thorugh all the channels...
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
|
||
|
||
let (_payment_preimage, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), 3000000);
|
||
|
||
// Broadcast legit commitment tx from C on B's chain
|
||
let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
|
||
check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_2.3);
|
||
nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 0);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash.clone() }]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
|
||
assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(!update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 0);
|
||
|
||
// Broadcast timeout transaction by B on received output from C's commitment tx on B's chain
|
||
// Verify that B's ChannelManager is able to detect that HTLC is timeout by its own tx and react backward in consequence
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
check_closed_event!(&nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, false
|
||
, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 200 - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
|
||
let timeout_tx = {
|
||
let mut txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
|
||
if nodes[1].connect_style.borrow().skips_blocks() {
|
||
assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1);
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert_eq!(txn.len(), 3); // Two extra fee bumps for timeout transaction
|
||
}
|
||
txn.iter().for_each(|tx| check_spends!(tx, commitment_tx[0]));
|
||
assert_eq!(txn[0].clone().input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
txn.remove(0)
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &timeout_tx);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
|
||
assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(!update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Broadcast legit commitment tx from B on A's chain
|
||
let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_1.2);
|
||
check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_1.3);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
|
||
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone(); // 1 timeout tx
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].clone().input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_htlc_on_chain_timeout() {
|
||
do_test_htlc_on_chain_timeout(ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirstSkippingBlocks);
|
||
do_test_htlc_on_chain_timeout(ConnectStyle::TransactionsFirstSkippingBlocks);
|
||
do_test_htlc_on_chain_timeout(ConnectStyle::FullBlockViaListen);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_simple_commitment_revoked_fail_backward() {
|
||
// Test that in case of a revoked commitment tx, we detect the resolution of output by justice tx
|
||
// and fail backward accordingly.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
|
||
|
||
let (payment_preimage, _payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3000000);
|
||
// Get the will-be-revoked local txn from nodes[2]
|
||
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
|
||
// Revoke the old state
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage);
|
||
|
||
let (_, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3000000);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref commitment_signed, .. } } => {
|
||
assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, false, true);
|
||
expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, true);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(deliver_bs_raa: bool, use_dust: bool, no_to_remote: bool) {
|
||
// Test that if our counterparty broadcasts a revoked commitment transaction we fail all
|
||
// pending HTLCs on that channel backwards even if the HTLCs aren't present in our latest
|
||
// commitment transaction anymore.
|
||
// To do this, we have the peer which will broadcast a revoked commitment transaction send
|
||
// a number of update_fail/commitment_signed updates without ever sending the RAA in
|
||
// response to our commitment_signed. This is somewhat misbehavior-y, though not
|
||
// technically disallowed and we should probably handle it reasonably.
|
||
// Note that this is pretty exhaustive as an outbound HTLC which we haven't yet
|
||
// failed/fulfilled backwards must be in at least one of the latest two remote commitment
|
||
// transactions:
|
||
// * Once we move it out of our holding cell/add it, we will immediately include it in a
|
||
// commitment_signed (implying it will be in the latest remote commitment transaction).
|
||
// * Once they remove it, we will send a (the first) commitment_signed without the HTLC,
|
||
// and once they revoke the previous commitment transaction (allowing us to send a new
|
||
// commitment_signed) we will be free to fail/fulfill the HTLC backwards.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
|
||
|
||
let (payment_preimage, _payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], if no_to_remote { 10_000 } else { 3_000_000 });
|
||
// Get the will-be-revoked local txn from nodes[2]
|
||
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), if no_to_remote { 1 } else { 2 });
|
||
// Revoke the old state
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage);
|
||
|
||
let value = if use_dust {
|
||
// The dust limit applied to HTLC outputs considers the fee of the HTLC transaction as
|
||
// well, so HTLCs at exactly the dust limit will not be included in commitment txn.
|
||
nodes[2].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap().get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id())
|
||
.unwrap().lock().unwrap().channel_by_id.get(&chan_2.2).unwrap().context().holder_dust_limit_satoshis * 1000
|
||
} else { 3000000 };
|
||
|
||
let (_, first_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], value);
|
||
let (_, second_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], value);
|
||
let (_, third_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], value);
|
||
|
||
nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&first_payment_hash);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: first_payment_hash }]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
let bs_raa = commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[2], updates.commitment_signed, false, true, false, true);
|
||
// Drop the last RAA from 3 -> 2
|
||
|
||
nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&second_payment_hash);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: second_payment_hash }]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
// Note that nodes[1] is in AwaitingRAA, so won't send a CS
|
||
let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[2].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&third_payment_hash);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: third_payment_hash }]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
// At this point first_payment_hash has dropped out of the latest two commitment
|
||
// transactions that nodes[1] is tracking...
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
// Note that nodes[1] is (still) in AwaitingRAA, so won't send a CS
|
||
let as_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
|
||
// Add a fourth HTLC, this one will get sequestered away in nodes[1]'s holding cell waiting
|
||
// on nodes[2]'s RAA.
|
||
let (route, fourth_payment_hash, _, fourth_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[2], 1000000);
|
||
nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, fourth_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(fourth_payment_secret), PaymentId(fourth_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
|
||
|
||
if deliver_bs_raa {
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_raa);
|
||
// One monitor for the new revocation preimage, no second on as we won't generate a new
|
||
// commitment transaction for nodes[0] until process_pending_htlc_forwards().
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
match events[1] {
|
||
Event::HTLCHandlingFailed { .. } => { },
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
// Deliberately don't process the pending fail-back so they all fail back at once after
|
||
// block connection just like the !deliver_bs_raa case
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let mut failed_htlcs = HashSet::new();
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), if deliver_bs_raa { 3 + nodes.len() - 1 } else { 4 + nodes.len() });
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => { },
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[1] {
|
||
Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, fourth_payment_hash);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[2] {
|
||
Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, fourth_payment_hash);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), if deliver_bs_raa { 4 } else { 3 });
|
||
|
||
if deliver_bs_raa {
|
||
let nodes_2_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
|
||
match nodes_2_event {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
|
||
assert_eq!(update_add_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let nodes_2_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
|
||
match nodes_2_event {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { msg: Some(msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id, ref data }) }, node_id: _ } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(channel_id, chan_2.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(data.as_str(), "Channel closed because commitment or closing transaction was confirmed on chain.");
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let nodes_0_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
|
||
match nodes_0_event {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref commitment_signed, .. } } => {
|
||
assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(update_fail_htlcs.len(), 3);
|
||
assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[1]);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[2]);
|
||
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, false, true);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 6);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref failure, .. } => {
|
||
assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
|
||
// If we delivered B's RAA we got an unknown preimage error, not something
|
||
// that we should update our routing table for.
|
||
if !deliver_bs_raa {
|
||
if let PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(_) } = failure { } else { panic!("Unexpected path failure") }
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[1] {
|
||
Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, first_payment_hash);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[2] {
|
||
Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, failure: PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(_) }, .. } => {
|
||
assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[3] {
|
||
Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, second_payment_hash);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[4] {
|
||
Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, failure: PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(_) }, .. } => {
|
||
assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[5] {
|
||
Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, third_payment_hash);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Ensure that the last remaining message event is the BroadcastChannelUpdate msg for chan_2
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { msg: msgs::ChannelUpdate { .. } } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
assert!(failed_htlcs.contains(&first_payment_hash.0));
|
||
assert!(failed_htlcs.contains(&second_payment_hash.0));
|
||
assert!(failed_htlcs.contains(&third_payment_hash.0));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive_a() {
|
||
do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(false, true, false);
|
||
do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(true, true, false);
|
||
do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(false, false, false);
|
||
do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(true, false, false);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive_b() {
|
||
do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(false, true, true);
|
||
do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(true, true, true);
|
||
do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(false, false, true);
|
||
do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(true, false, true);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn fail_backward_pending_htlc_upon_channel_failure() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 500_000_000);
|
||
|
||
// Alice -> Bob: Route a payment but without Bob sending revoke_and_ack.
|
||
{
|
||
let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 50_000);
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret),
|
||
PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let payment_event = {
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
|
||
};
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_event.node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Alice -> Bob: Route another payment but now Alice waits for Bob's earlier revoke_and_ack.
|
||
let (route, failed_payment_hash, _, failed_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 50_000);
|
||
{
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, failed_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(failed_payment_secret), PaymentId(failed_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
|
||
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Alice <- Bob: Send a malformed update_add_htlc so Alice fails the channel.
|
||
{
|
||
let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 50_000);
|
||
|
||
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
|
||
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
|
||
let current_height = nodes[1].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
|
||
let (onion_payloads, _amount_msat, cltv_expiry) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(
|
||
&route.paths[0], 50_000, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), current_height, &None).unwrap();
|
||
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&secp_ctx, &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
|
||
let onion_routing_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &payment_hash).unwrap();
|
||
|
||
// Send a 0-msat update_add_htlc to fail the channel.
|
||
let update_add_htlc = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
|
||
channel_id: chan.2,
|
||
htlc_id: 0,
|
||
amount_msat: 0,
|
||
payment_hash,
|
||
cltv_expiry,
|
||
onion_routing_packet,
|
||
skimmed_fee_msat: None,
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_add_htlc);
|
||
}
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
|
||
// Check that Alice fails backward the pending HTLC from the second payment.
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, failed_payment_hash);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[1] {
|
||
Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, failed_payment_hash);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[2] {
|
||
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::ProcessingError { ref err }, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(err, "Remote side tried to send a 0-msat HTLC");
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event {:?}", events[1]),
|
||
}
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_htlc_ignore_latest_remote_commitment() {
|
||
// Test that HTLC transactions spending the latest remote commitment transaction are simply
|
||
// ignored if we cannot claim them. This originally tickled an invalid unwrap().
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
if *nodes[1].connect_style.borrow() == ConnectStyle::FullBlockViaListen {
|
||
// We rely on the ability to connect a block redundantly, which isn't allowed via
|
||
// `chain::Listen`, so we never run the test if we randomly get assigned that
|
||
// connect_style.
|
||
return;
|
||
}
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 10000000);
|
||
nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&nodes[0].node.list_channels()[0].channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + 1);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 3);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].txid(), node_txn[1].txid());
|
||
|
||
let block = create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![node_txn[0].clone(), node_txn[1].clone()]);
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
|
||
// Duplicate the connect_block call since this may happen due to other listeners
|
||
// registering new transactions
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_force_close_fail_back() {
|
||
// Check which HTLCs are failed-backwards on channel force-closure
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
|
||
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, our_payment_preimage, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 1000000);
|
||
|
||
let mut payment_event = {
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||
|
||
let mut events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
|
||
payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events_2.remove(0));
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.commitment_msg);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
let (_, _) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
// nodes[2] now has the latest commitment transaction, but hasn't revoked its previous
|
||
// state or updated nodes[1]' state. Now force-close and broadcast that commitment/HTLC
|
||
// transaction and ensure nodes[1] doesn't fail-backwards (this was originally a bug!).
|
||
|
||
nodes[2].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&payment_event.commitment_msg.channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
let tx = {
|
||
let mut node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
// Note that we don't bother broadcasting the HTLC-Success transaction here as we don't
|
||
// have a use for it unless nodes[2] learns the preimage somehow, the funds will go
|
||
// back to nodes[1] upon timeout otherwise.
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
node_txn.remove(0)
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &tx);
|
||
|
||
// Note no UpdateHTLCs event here from nodes[1] to nodes[0]!
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
|
||
// Now check that if we add the preimage to ChannelMonitor it broadcasts our HTLC-Success..
|
||
{
|
||
get_monitor!(nodes[2], payment_event.commitment_msg.channel_id)
|
||
.provide_payment_preimage(&our_payment_hash, &our_payment_preimage, &node_cfgs[2].tx_broadcaster, &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(node_cfgs[2].fee_estimator), &node_cfgs[2].logger);
|
||
}
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &tx);
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, tx.txid());
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0); // Must be an HTLC-Success
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.len(), 5); // Must be an HTLC-Success
|
||
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], tx);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_dup_events_on_peer_disconnect() {
|
||
// Test that if we receive a duplicative update_fulfill_htlc message after a reconnect we do
|
||
// not generate a corresponding duplicative PaymentSent event. This did not use to be the case
|
||
// as we used to generate the event immediately upon receipt of the payment preimage in the
|
||
// update_fulfill_htlc message.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 1_000_000);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let claim_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &claim_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
|
||
expect_payment_sent(&nodes[0], payment_preimage, None, false, false);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
|
||
reconnect_args.pending_htlc_claims.0 = 1;
|
||
reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
|
||
expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_peer_disconnected_before_funding_broadcasted() {
|
||
// Test that channels are closed with `ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer` if the peer disconnects
|
||
// before the funding transaction has been broadcasted.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Open a channel between `nodes[0]` and `nodes[1]`, for which the funding transaction is never
|
||
// broadcasted, even though it's created by `nodes[0]`.
|
||
let expected_temporary_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 500_000_000, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel);
|
||
let accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel);
|
||
|
||
let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 42);
|
||
assert_eq!(temporary_channel_id, expected_temporary_channel_id);
|
||
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).is_ok());
|
||
|
||
let funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(funding_created_msg.temporary_channel_id, expected_temporary_channel_id);
|
||
|
||
// Even though the funding transaction is created by `nodes[0]`, the `FundingCreated` msg is
|
||
// never sent to `nodes[1]`, and therefore the tx is never signed by either party nor
|
||
// broadcasted.
|
||
{
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 0);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Ensure that the channel is closed with `ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer` when the peers are
|
||
// disconnected before the funding transaction was broadcasted.
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
check_closed_event!(&nodes[0], 2, ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer, true
|
||
, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
|
||
check_closed_event!(&nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::DisconnectedPeer, false
|
||
, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_simple_peer_disconnect() {
|
||
// Test that we can reconnect when there are no lost messages
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
|
||
reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
|
||
reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
|
||
|
||
let payment_preimage_1 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).0;
|
||
let payment_hash_2 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).1;
|
||
fail_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_hash_2);
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_preimage_1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
|
||
|
||
let (payment_preimage_3, payment_hash_3, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000);
|
||
let payment_preimage_4 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).0;
|
||
let payment_hash_5 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).1;
|
||
let payment_hash_6 = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 1000000).1;
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]], true, payment_preimage_3);
|
||
fail_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]], true, payment_hash_5);
|
||
|
||
let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
|
||
reconnect_args.pending_cell_htlc_fails.0 = 1;
|
||
reconnect_args.pending_cell_htlc_claims.0 = 1;
|
||
reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
|
||
{
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_preimage, payment_preimage_3);
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_3);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[1] {
|
||
Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[2] {
|
||
Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, payment_failed_permanently, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_5);
|
||
assert!(payment_failed_permanently);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[3] {
|
||
Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_5);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_preimage_4);
|
||
fail_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2]), payment_hash_6);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(messages_delivered: u8, simulate_broken_lnd: bool) {
|
||
// Test that we can reconnect when in-flight HTLC updates get dropped
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let mut as_channel_ready = None;
|
||
let channel_id = if messages_delivered == 0 {
|
||
let (channel_ready, chan_id, _) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_a(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 100000, 10001);
|
||
as_channel_ready = Some(channel_ready);
|
||
// nodes[1] doesn't receive the channel_ready message (it'll be re-sent on reconnect)
|
||
// Note that we store it so that if we're running with `simulate_broken_lnd` we can deliver
|
||
// it before the channel_reestablish message.
|
||
chan_id
|
||
} else {
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).2
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
let (route, payment_hash_1, payment_preimage_1, payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1_000_000);
|
||
|
||
let payment_event = {
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_1,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_1), PaymentId(payment_hash_1.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
|
||
};
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), payment_event.node_id);
|
||
|
||
if messages_delivered < 2 {
|
||
// Drop the payment_event messages, and let them get re-generated in reconnect_nodes!
|
||
} else {
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
if messages_delivered >= 3 {
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.commitment_msg);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let (bs_revoke_and_ack, bs_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
if messages_delivered >= 4 {
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
if messages_delivered >= 5 {
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_commitment_signed);
|
||
let as_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
if messages_delivered >= 6 {
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack);
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
if messages_delivered < 3 {
|
||
if simulate_broken_lnd {
|
||
// lnd has a long-standing bug where they send a channel_ready prior to a
|
||
// channel_reestablish if you reconnect prior to channel_ready time.
|
||
//
|
||
// Here we simulate that behavior, delivering a channel_ready immediately on
|
||
// reconnect. Note that we don't bother skipping the now-duplicate channel_ready sent
|
||
// in `reconnect_nodes` but we currently don't fail based on that.
|
||
//
|
||
// See-also <https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/4006>
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_channel_ready(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_channel_ready.as_ref().unwrap().0);
|
||
}
|
||
// Even if the channel_ready messages get exchanged, as long as nothing further was
|
||
// received on either side, both sides will need to resend them.
|
||
let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
|
||
reconnect_args.send_channel_ready = (true, true);
|
||
reconnect_args.pending_htlc_adds.1 = 1;
|
||
reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
|
||
} else if messages_delivered == 3 {
|
||
// nodes[0] still wants its RAA + commitment_signed
|
||
let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
|
||
reconnect_args.pending_responding_commitment_signed.0 = true;
|
||
reconnect_args.pending_raa.0 = true;
|
||
reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
|
||
} else if messages_delivered == 4 {
|
||
// nodes[0] still wants its commitment_signed
|
||
let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
|
||
reconnect_args.pending_responding_commitment_signed.0 = true;
|
||
reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
|
||
} else if messages_delivered == 5 {
|
||
// nodes[1] still wants its final RAA
|
||
let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
|
||
reconnect_args.pending_raa.1 = true;
|
||
reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
|
||
} else if messages_delivered == 6 {
|
||
// Everything was delivered...
|
||
reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let events_1 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
if messages_delivered == 0 {
|
||
assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 2);
|
||
match events_1[0] {
|
||
Event::ChannelReady { .. } => { },
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
match events_1[1] {
|
||
Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 1);
|
||
match events_1[0] {
|
||
Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
|
||
|
||
let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
|
||
match events_2[0] {
|
||
Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, amount_msat, receiver_node_id, via_channel_id, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_hash_1, *payment_hash);
|
||
assert_eq!(amount_msat, 1_000_000);
|
||
assert_eq!(receiver_node_id.unwrap(), nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(via_channel_id, Some(channel_id));
|
||
match &purpose {
|
||
PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
|
||
assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_secret_1, *payment_secret);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, 1_000_000);
|
||
|
||
let events_3 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1);
|
||
let (update_fulfill_htlc, commitment_signed) = match events_3[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, ref updates } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
|
||
(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0].clone(), updates.commitment_signed.clone())
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
if messages_delivered >= 1 {
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fulfill_htlc);
|
||
|
||
let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
|
||
match events_4[0] {
|
||
Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_preimage_1, *payment_preimage);
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_hash_1, *payment_hash);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if messages_delivered >= 2 {
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let (as_revoke_and_ack, as_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
if messages_delivered >= 3 {
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack);
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
if messages_delivered >= 4 {
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_commitment_signed);
|
||
let bs_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
if messages_delivered >= 5 {
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
if messages_delivered < 2 {
|
||
let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
|
||
reconnect_args.pending_htlc_claims.0 = 1;
|
||
reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
|
||
if messages_delivered < 1 {
|
||
expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
} else if messages_delivered == 2 {
|
||
// nodes[0] still wants its RAA + commitment_signed
|
||
let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
|
||
reconnect_args.pending_responding_commitment_signed.1 = true;
|
||
reconnect_args.pending_raa.1 = true;
|
||
reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
|
||
} else if messages_delivered == 3 {
|
||
// nodes[0] still wants its commitment_signed
|
||
let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
|
||
reconnect_args.pending_responding_commitment_signed.1 = true;
|
||
reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
|
||
} else if messages_delivered == 4 {
|
||
// nodes[1] still wants its final RAA
|
||
let mut reconnect_args = ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
|
||
reconnect_args.pending_raa.0 = true;
|
||
reconnect_nodes(reconnect_args);
|
||
} else if messages_delivered == 5 {
|
||
// Everything was delivered...
|
||
reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if messages_delivered == 1 || messages_delivered == 2 {
|
||
expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
|
||
}
|
||
if messages_delivered <= 5 {
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
}
|
||
reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
|
||
|
||
if messages_delivered > 2 {
|
||
expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Channel should still work fine...
|
||
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
|
||
let payment_preimage_2 = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 1000000).0;
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect_a() {
|
||
do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(0, true);
|
||
do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(0, false);
|
||
do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(1, false);
|
||
do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(2, false);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect_b() {
|
||
do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(3, false);
|
||
do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(4, false);
|
||
do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(5, false);
|
||
do_test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect(6, false);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_channel_ready_without_best_block_updated() {
|
||
// Previously, if we were offline when a funding transaction was locked in, and then we came
|
||
// back online, calling best_block_updated once followed by transactions_confirmed, we'd not
|
||
// generate a channel_ready until a later best_block_updated. This tests that we generate the
|
||
// channel_ready immediately instead.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
*nodes[0].connect_style.borrow_mut() = ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirstSkippingBlocks;
|
||
|
||
let funding_tx = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_init(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 1_000_000, 0);
|
||
|
||
let conf_height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 1;
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH);
|
||
let block_txn = [funding_tx];
|
||
let conf_txn: Vec<_> = block_txn.iter().enumerate().collect();
|
||
let conf_block_header = nodes[0].get_block_header(conf_height);
|
||
nodes[0].node.transactions_confirmed(&conf_block_header, &conf_txn[..], conf_height);
|
||
|
||
// Ensure nodes[0] generates a channel_ready after the transactions_confirmed
|
||
let as_channel_ready = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReady, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_channel_ready(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_channel_ready);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_channel_monitor_skipping_block_when_channel_manager_is_leading() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Let channel_manager get ahead of chain_monitor by 1 block.
|
||
// This is to emulate race-condition where newly added channel_monitor skips processing 1 block,
|
||
// in case where client calls block_connect on channel_manager first and then on chain_monitor.
|
||
let height_1 = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 1;
|
||
let mut block_1 = create_dummy_block(nodes[0].best_block_hash(), height_1, Vec::new());
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].blocks.lock().unwrap().push((block_1.clone(), height_1));
|
||
nodes[0].node.block_connected(&block_1, height_1);
|
||
|
||
// Create channel, and it gets added to chain_monitor in funding_created.
|
||
let funding_tx = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_init(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 1_000_000, 0);
|
||
|
||
// Now, newly added channel_monitor in chain_monitor hasn't processed block_1,
|
||
// but it's best_block is block_1, since that was populated by channel_manager, and channel_manager
|
||
// was running ahead of chain_monitor at the time of funding_created.
|
||
// Later on, subsequent blocks are connected to both channel_manager and chain_monitor.
|
||
// Hence, this channel's channel_monitor skipped block_1, directly tries to process subsequent blocks.
|
||
confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[0], &funding_tx, nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH);
|
||
|
||
// Ensure nodes[0] generates a channel_ready after the transactions_confirmed
|
||
let as_channel_ready = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReady, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_channel_ready(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_channel_ready);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_channel_monitor_skipping_block_when_channel_manager_is_lagging() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Let chain_monitor get ahead of channel_manager by 1 block.
|
||
// This is to emulate race-condition where newly added channel_monitor skips processing 1 block,
|
||
// in case where client calls block_connect on chain_monitor first and then on channel_manager.
|
||
let height_1 = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 1;
|
||
let mut block_1 = create_dummy_block(nodes[0].best_block_hash(), height_1, Vec::new());
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].blocks.lock().unwrap().push((block_1.clone(), height_1));
|
||
nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.block_connected(&block_1, height_1);
|
||
|
||
// Create channel, and it gets added to chain_monitor in funding_created.
|
||
let funding_tx = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_init(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 1_000_000, 0);
|
||
|
||
// channel_manager can't really skip block_1, it should get it eventually.
|
||
nodes[0].node.block_connected(&block_1, height_1);
|
||
|
||
// Now, newly added channel_monitor in chain_monitor hasn't processed block_1, it's best_block is
|
||
// the block before block_1, since that was populated by channel_manager, and channel_manager was
|
||
// running behind at the time of funding_created.
|
||
// Later on, subsequent blocks are connected to both channel_manager and chain_monitor.
|
||
// Hence, this channel's channel_monitor skipped block_1, directly tries to process subsequent blocks.
|
||
confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[0], &funding_tx, nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH);
|
||
|
||
// Ensure nodes[0] generates a channel_ready after the transactions_confirmed
|
||
let as_channel_ready = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReady, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_channel_ready(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_channel_ready);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_drop_messages_peer_disconnect_dual_htlc() {
|
||
// Test that we can handle reconnecting when both sides of a channel have pending
|
||
// commitment_updates when we disconnect.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let (payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000);
|
||
|
||
// Now try to send a second payment which will fail to send
|
||
let (route, payment_hash_2, payment_preimage_2, payment_secret_2) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_2,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_2), PaymentId(payment_hash_2.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events_1 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 1);
|
||
match events_1[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { .. } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, 1_000_000);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
|
||
match events_2[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fee.is_none());
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
|
||
let events_3 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1);
|
||
match events_3[0] {
|
||
Event::PaymentSent { ref payment_preimage, ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*payment_preimage, payment_preimage_1);
|
||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, payment_hash_1);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
|
||
let _ = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
|
||
features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
|
||
}, true).unwrap();
|
||
let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
|
||
assert_eq!(reestablish_1.len(), 1);
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
|
||
features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
|
||
}, false).unwrap();
|
||
let reestablish_2 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(reestablish_2.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_2[0]);
|
||
let as_resp = handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[0]);
|
||
let bs_resp = handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
|
||
|
||
assert!(as_resp.0.is_none());
|
||
assert!(bs_resp.0.is_none());
|
||
|
||
assert!(bs_resp.1.is_none());
|
||
assert!(bs_resp.2.is_none());
|
||
|
||
assert!(as_resp.3 == RAACommitmentOrder::CommitmentFirst);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_add_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_fee.is_none());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_resp.2.as_ref().unwrap().commitment_signed);
|
||
let bs_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), as_resp.1.as_ref().unwrap());
|
||
let bs_second_commitment_signed = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(bs_second_commitment_signed.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(bs_second_commitment_signed.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(bs_second_commitment_signed.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(bs_second_commitment_signed.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(bs_second_commitment_signed.update_fee.is_none());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
|
||
let as_commitment_signed = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(as_commitment_signed.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(as_commitment_signed.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(as_commitment_signed.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(as_commitment_signed.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(as_commitment_signed.update_fee.is_none());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_commitment_signed.commitment_signed);
|
||
let as_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_commitment_signed.commitment_signed);
|
||
let bs_second_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
// No commitment_signed so get_event_msg's assert(len == 1) passes
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack);
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||
|
||
let events_5 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_5.len(), 1);
|
||
match events_5[0] {
|
||
Event::PaymentClaimable { ref payment_hash, ref purpose, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2, *payment_hash);
|
||
match &purpose {
|
||
PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, payment_secret, .. } => {
|
||
assert!(payment_preimage.is_none());
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_secret_2, *payment_secret);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_revoke_and_ack);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage_2);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_htlc_timeout(send_partial_mpp: bool) {
|
||
// If the user fails to claim/fail an HTLC within the HTLC CLTV timeout we fail it for them
|
||
// to avoid our counterparty failing the channel.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let our_payment_hash = if send_partial_mpp {
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(&nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
|
||
// Use the utility function send_payment_along_path to send the payment with MPP data which
|
||
// indicates there are more HTLCs coming.
|
||
let cur_height = CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1; // route_payment calls send_payment, which adds 1 to the current height. So we do the same here to match.
|
||
let payment_id = PaymentId([42; 32]);
|
||
let session_privs = nodes[0].node.test_add_new_pending_payment(our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), payment_id, &route).unwrap();
|
||
nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[0], &our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), 200_000, cur_height, payment_id,
|
||
&None, session_privs[0]).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
// Now do the relevant commitment_signed/RAA dances along the path, noting that the final
|
||
// hop should *not* yet generate any PaymentClaimable event(s).
|
||
pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100000, our_payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), events.drain(..).next().unwrap(), false, None);
|
||
our_payment_hash
|
||
} else {
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100000).1
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
let mut block = create_dummy_block(nodes[0].best_block_hash(), 42, Vec::new());
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
|
||
let block_count = TEST_FINAL_CLTV + CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 2 - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER - LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS;
|
||
for _ in CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 2..block_count {
|
||
block.header.prev_blockhash = block.block_hash();
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
|
||
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let htlc_timeout_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(htlc_timeout_updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(htlc_timeout_updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(htlc_timeout_updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(htlc_timeout_updates.update_fee.is_none());
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &htlc_timeout_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], htlc_timeout_updates.commitment_signed, false);
|
||
// 100_000 msat as u64, followed by the height at which we failed back above
|
||
let mut expected_failure_data = (100_000 as u64).to_be_bytes().to_vec();
|
||
expected_failure_data.extend_from_slice(&(block_count - 1).to_be_bytes());
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, 0x4000 | 15, &expected_failure_data[..]);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_htlc_timeout() {
|
||
do_test_htlc_timeout(true);
|
||
do_test_htlc_timeout(false);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_holding_cell_htlc_add_timeouts(forwarded_htlc: bool) {
|
||
// Tests that HTLCs in the holding cell are timed out after the requisite number of blocks.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
|
||
|
||
// Make sure all nodes are at the same starting height
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 2*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 2*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[2], 2*CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
|
||
|
||
// Route a first payment to get the 1 -> 2 channel in awaiting_raa...
|
||
let (route, first_payment_hash, _, first_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[2], 100000);
|
||
nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, first_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(first_payment_secret), PaymentId(first_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().len(), 1);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
// Now attempt to route a second payment, which should be placed in the holding cell
|
||
let sending_node = if forwarded_htlc { &nodes[0] } else { &nodes[1] };
|
||
let (route, second_payment_hash, _, second_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(sending_node, nodes[2], 100000);
|
||
sending_node.node.send_payment_with_route(&route, second_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(second_payment_secret), PaymentId(second_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
if forwarded_htlc {
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().remove(0));
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||
}
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
|
||
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS);
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
if forwarded_htlc {
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let fail_commit = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(fail_commit.len(), 1);
|
||
match fail_commit[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fail_htlcs, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, true, true);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||
}
|
||
expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], second_payment_hash, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, false);
|
||
} else {
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], second_payment_hash, false);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_holding_cell_htlc_add_timeouts() {
|
||
do_test_holding_cell_htlc_add_timeouts(false);
|
||
do_test_holding_cell_htlc_add_timeouts(true);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
macro_rules! check_spendable_outputs {
|
||
($node: expr, $keysinterface: expr) => {
|
||
{
|
||
let mut events = $node.chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
let mut txn = Vec::new();
|
||
let mut all_outputs = Vec::new();
|
||
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
|
||
for event in events.drain(..) {
|
||
match event {
|
||
Event::SpendableOutputs { mut outputs, channel_id: _ } => {
|
||
for outp in outputs.drain(..) {
|
||
txn.push($keysinterface.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&[&outp], Vec::new(), Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, None, &secp_ctx).unwrap());
|
||
all_outputs.push(outp);
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
}
|
||
if all_outputs.len() > 1 {
|
||
if let Ok(tx) = $keysinterface.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&all_outputs.iter().map(|a| a).collect::<Vec<_>>(), Vec::new(), Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, None, &secp_ctx) {
|
||
txn.push(tx);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
txn
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_claim_sizeable_push_msat() {
|
||
// Incidentally test SpendableOutput event generation due to detection of to_local output on commitment tx
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 98_000_000);
|
||
nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan.2, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], chan.3);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // We can't force trimming of to_remote output as channel_reserve_satoshis block us to do so at channel opening
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 - 1);
|
||
|
||
let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input[0].sequence.0, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_claim_on_remote_sizeable_push_msat() {
|
||
// Same test as previous, just test on remote commitment tx, as per_commitment_point registration changes following you're funder/fundee and
|
||
// to_remote output is encumbered by a P2WPKH
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 98_000_000);
|
||
nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan.2, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], chan.3);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 2); // We can't force trimming of to_remote output as channel_reserve_satoshis block us to do so at channel opening
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
|
||
let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[0]);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_claim_on_remote_revoked_sizeable_push_msat() {
|
||
// Same test as previous, just test on remote revoked commitment tx, as per_commitment_point registration changes following you're funder/fundee and
|
||
// to_remote output is encumbered by a P2WPKH
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 59000000);
|
||
let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
|
||
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
|
||
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
|
||
let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 3);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]); // to_remote output on revoked remote commitment_tx
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[1], node_txn[0]);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[2], revoked_local_txn[0], node_txn[0]); // Both outputs
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_static_spendable_outputs_preimage_tx() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000);
|
||
|
||
let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_tx[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_tx[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
|
||
|
||
// Settle A's commitment tx on B's chain
|
||
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 3_000_000);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { .. } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[1] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Check B's monitor was able to send back output descriptor event for preimage tx on A's commitment tx
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone(); // ChannelMonitor: preimage tx
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
|
||
let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[0]);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_static_spendable_outputs_timeout_tx() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
// Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels ...
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
|
||
|
||
let (_, our_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3_000_000);
|
||
|
||
let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_tx[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_tx[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
|
||
|
||
// Settle A's commitment tx on B' chain
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
|
||
|
||
// Check B's monitor was able to send back output descriptor event for timeout tx on A's commitment tx
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // ChannelMonitor: timeout tx
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0].clone());
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, false);
|
||
|
||
let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 3); // SpendableOutput: remote_commitment_tx.to_remote, timeout_tx.output
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[1], node_txn[0]);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[2], node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]); // All outputs
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_commitment_tx() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
|
||
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
|
||
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 2);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
|
||
let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[0]);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_htlc_timeout_tx() {
|
||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
|
||
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
|
||
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
|
||
|
||
// A will generate HTLC-Timeout from revoked commitment tx
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
|
||
|
||
let revoked_htlc_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
check_spends!(revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
assert_ne!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0); // HTLC-Timeout
|
||
|
||
// B will generate justice tx from A's revoked commitment/HTLC tx
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone(), revoked_htlc_txn[0].clone()]));
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2); // ChannelMonitor: bogus justice tx, justice tx on revoked outputs
|
||
// The first transaction generated is bogus - it spends both outputs of revoked_local_txn[0]
|
||
// including the one already spent by revoked_htlc_txn[1]. That's OK, we'll spend with valid
|
||
// transactions next...
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[0]);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 2);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[0]);
|
||
if node_txn[1].input[1].previous_output.txid == revoked_htlc_txn[0].txid() {
|
||
assert_ne!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.txid, revoked_htlc_txn[0].txid());
|
||
assert_ne!(node_txn[1].input[1].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[1]);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
|
||
// Check B's ChannelMonitor was able to generate the right spendable output descriptor
|
||
let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[1]);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_htlc_success_tx() {
|
||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
|
||
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_1.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan_1.3.txid());
|
||
|
||
// The to-be-revoked commitment tx should have one HTLC and one to_remote output
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output.len(), 2);
|
||
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
|
||
|
||
// B will generate HTLC-Success from revoked commitment tx
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
let revoked_htlc_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
check_spends!(revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
|
||
// Check that the unspent (of two) outputs on revoked_local_txn[0] is a P2WPKH:
|
||
let unspent_local_txn_output = revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize ^ 1;
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].output[unspent_local_txn_output].script_pubkey.len(), 2 + 20); // P2WPKH
|
||
|
||
// A will generate justice tx from B's revoked commitment/HTLC tx
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[0], &create_dummy_block(nodes[0].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone(), revoked_htlc_txn[0].clone()]));
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2); // ChannelMonitor: justice tx on revoked commitment, justice tx on revoked HTLC-success
|
||
|
||
// The first transaction generated is bogus - it spends both outputs of revoked_local_txn[0]
|
||
// including the one already spent by revoked_htlc_txn[0]. That's OK, we'll spend with valid
|
||
// transactions next...
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 2);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[0]);
|
||
if node_txn[0].input[1].previous_output.txid == revoked_htlc_txn[0].txid() {
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, revoked_htlc_txn[0].txid());
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[1].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[1], revoked_htlc_txn[0]);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &node_txn[1]);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
|
||
// Note that nodes[0]'s tx_broadcaster is still locked, so if we get here the channelmonitor
|
||
// didn't try to generate any new transactions.
|
||
|
||
// Check A's ChannelMonitor was able to generate the right spendable output descriptor
|
||
let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[0], node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 3);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]); // spending to_remote output from revoked local tx
|
||
assert_ne!(spend_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[1], node_txn[1]); // spending justice tx output on the htlc success tx
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[2], revoked_local_txn[0], node_txn[1]); // Both outputs
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_onchain_to_onchain_claim() {
|
||
// Test that in case of channel closure, we detect the state of output and claim HTLC
|
||
// on downstream peer's remote commitment tx.
|
||
// First, have C claim an HTLC against its own latest commitment transaction.
|
||
// Then, broadcast these to B, which should update the monitor downstream on the A<->B
|
||
// channel.
|
||
// Finally, check that B will claim the HTLC output if A's latest commitment transaction
|
||
// gets broadcast.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
|
||
|
||
// Ensure all nodes are at the same height
|
||
let node_max_height = nodes.iter().map(|node| node.blocks.lock().unwrap().len()).max().unwrap() as u32;
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_max_height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_max_height - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[2], node_max_height - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
|
||
|
||
// Rebalance the network a bit by relaying one payment through all the channels ...
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1], &nodes[2])[..], 8000000);
|
||
|
||
let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3_000_000);
|
||
let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
|
||
check_spends!(commitment_tx[0], chan_2.3);
|
||
nodes[2].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], payment_hash, 3_000_000);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
|
||
let c_txn = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone(); // ChannelMonitor: 1 (HTLC-Success tx)
|
||
assert_eq!(c_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(c_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(c_txn[0].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
assert!(c_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh()); // revokeable output
|
||
assert_eq!(c_txn[0].lock_time.0, 0); // Success tx
|
||
|
||
// So we broadcast C's commitment tx and HTLC-Success on B's chain, we should successfully be able to extract preimage and update downstream monitor
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![commitment_tx[0].clone(), c_txn[0].clone()]));
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[1] {
|
||
Event::PaymentForwarded { fee_earned_msat, prev_channel_id, claim_from_onchain_tx, next_channel_id, outbound_amount_forwarded_msat } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(fee_earned_msat, Some(1000));
|
||
assert_eq!(prev_channel_id, Some(chan_1.2));
|
||
assert_eq!(claim_from_onchain_tx, true);
|
||
assert_eq!(next_channel_id, Some(chan_2.2));
|
||
assert_eq!(outbound_amount_forwarded_msat, Some(3000000));
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let mut msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 3);
|
||
let nodes_2_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut msg_events);
|
||
let nodes_0_event = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut msg_events);
|
||
|
||
match nodes_2_event {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { .. }, node_id: _ } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
match nodes_0_event {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, .. } } => {
|
||
assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), *node_id);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Ensure that the last remaining message event is the BroadcastChannelUpdate msg for chan_2
|
||
match msg_events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Broadcast A's commitment tx on B's chain to see if we are able to claim inbound HTLC with our HTLC-Success tx
|
||
let commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
let b_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
|
||
// ChannelMonitor: HTLC-Success tx
|
||
assert_eq!(b_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(b_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(b_txn[0].input[0].witness.clone().last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
assert!(b_txn[0].output[0].script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wpkh()); // direct payment
|
||
assert_eq!(b_txn[0].lock_time.0, nodes[1].best_block_info().1); // Success tx
|
||
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_duplicate_payment_hash_one_failure_one_success() {
|
||
// Topology : A --> B --> C --> D
|
||
// We route 2 payments with same hash between B and C, one will be timeout, the other successfully claim
|
||
// Note that because C will refuse to generate two payment secrets for the same payment hash,
|
||
// we forward one of the payments onwards to D.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
// When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count.
|
||
// It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here.
|
||
let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
|
||
config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196;
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs,
|
||
&[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3);
|
||
|
||
let node_max_height = nodes.iter().map(|node| node.blocks.lock().unwrap().len()).max().unwrap() as u32;
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_max_height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_max_height - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[2], node_max_height - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[3], node_max_height - nodes[3].best_block_info().1);
|
||
|
||
let (our_payment_preimage, duplicate_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 900_000);
|
||
|
||
let payment_secret = nodes[3].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(duplicate_payment_hash, None, 7200, None).unwrap();
|
||
// We reduce the final CLTV here by a somewhat arbitrary constant to keep it under the one-byte
|
||
// script push size limit so that the below script length checks match
|
||
// ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT.
|
||
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 40)
|
||
.with_bolt11_features(nodes[3].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
|
||
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[3], payment_params, 800_000);
|
||
send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[0], route, &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], 800_000, duplicate_payment_hash, payment_secret);
|
||
|
||
let commitment_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[2], chan_2.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(commitment_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(commitment_txn[0], chan_2.3);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &commitment_txn[0]);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 40 + MIN_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA as u32); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
|
||
|
||
let htlc_timeout_tx;
|
||
{ // Extract one of the two HTLC-Timeout transaction
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
// ChannelMonitor: timeout tx * 2-or-3
|
||
assert!(node_txn.len() == 2 || node_txn.len() == 3);
|
||
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], commitment_txn[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
if node_txn.len() > 2 {
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[1], commitment_txn[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].output.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
|
||
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[2], commitment_txn[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[2].output.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output);
|
||
} else {
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[1], commitment_txn[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].output.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
// Assign htlc_timeout_tx to the forwarded HTLC (with value ~800 sats). The received HTLC
|
||
// (with value 900 sats) will be claimed in the below `claim_funds` call.
|
||
if node_txn.len() > 2 {
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
htlc_timeout_tx = if node_txn[2].output[0].value < 900 { node_txn[2].clone() } else { node_txn[0].clone() };
|
||
} else {
|
||
htlc_timeout_tx = if node_txn[0].output[0].value < 900 { node_txn[1].clone() } else { node_txn[0].clone() };
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[2].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], duplicate_payment_hash, 900_000);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &commitment_txn[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 2);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[2], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { .. } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[1] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
let htlc_success_txn: Vec<_> = nodes[2].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
|
||
assert_eq!(htlc_success_txn.len(), 2); // ChannelMonitor: HTLC-Success txn (*2 due to 2-HTLC outputs)
|
||
check_spends!(htlc_success_txn[0], commitment_txn[0]);
|
||
check_spends!(htlc_success_txn[1], commitment_txn[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(htlc_success_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(htlc_success_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
assert_eq!(htlc_success_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(htlc_success_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
assert_ne!(htlc_success_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, htlc_success_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
|
||
assert_ne!(htlc_success_txn[1].input[0].previous_output, htlc_timeout_tx.input[0].previous_output);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &htlc_timeout_tx);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
|
||
let htlc_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(htlc_updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
let first_htlc_id = htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0].htlc_id;
|
||
assert!(htlc_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(htlc_updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
{
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], &htlc_updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
|
||
}
|
||
expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], duplicate_payment_hash, false, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, true);
|
||
|
||
// Solve 2nd HTLC by broadcasting on B's chain HTLC-Success Tx from C
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &htlc_success_txn[1]);
|
||
expect_payment_forwarded!(nodes[1], nodes[0], nodes[2], Some(196), true, true);
|
||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_ne!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0].htlc_id, first_htlc_id);
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], &updates.commitment_signed, false);
|
||
expect_payment_sent(&nodes[0], our_payment_preimage, None, true, true);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_dynamic_spendable_outputs_local_htlc_success_tx() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 9_000_000);
|
||
let local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_1.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(local_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(local_txn[0], chan_1.3);
|
||
|
||
// Give B knowledge of preimage to be able to generate a local HTLC-Success Tx
|
||
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 9_000_000);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { .. } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[1] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { .. } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
let node_tx = {
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], local_txn[0]);
|
||
node_txn[0].clone()
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_tx);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 - 1);
|
||
|
||
// Verify that B is able to spend its own HTLC-Success tx thanks to spendable output event given back by its ChannelMonitor
|
||
let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_tx);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn[0].input[0].sequence.0, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(deliver_last_raa: bool, announce_latest: bool) {
|
||
// Test that we fail backwards the full set of HTLCs we need to when remote broadcasts an
|
||
// unrevoked commitment transaction.
|
||
// This includes HTLCs which were below the dust threshold as well as HTLCs which were awaiting
|
||
// a remote RAA before they could be failed backwards (and combinations thereof).
|
||
// We also test duplicate-hash HTLCs by adding two nodes on each side of the target nodes which
|
||
// use the same payment hashes.
|
||
// Thus, we use a six-node network:
|
||
//
|
||
// A \ / E
|
||
// - C - D -
|
||
// B / \ F
|
||
// And test where C fails back to A/B when D announces its latest commitment transaction
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(6);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(6, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
// When this test was written, the default base fee floated based on the HTLC count.
|
||
// It is now fixed, so we simply set the fee to the expected value here.
|
||
let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
|
||
config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 196;
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(6, &node_cfgs,
|
||
&[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(6, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let _chan_0_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2);
|
||
let _chan_1_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
|
||
let chan_2_3 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3);
|
||
let chan_3_4 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 4);
|
||
let chan_3_5 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 3, 5);
|
||
|
||
// Rebalance and check output sanity...
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 500000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]], 500000);
|
||
assert_eq!(get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2)[0].output.len(), 2);
|
||
|
||
let ds_dust_limit = nodes[3].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap().get(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id())
|
||
.unwrap().lock().unwrap().channel_by_id.get(&chan_2_3.2).unwrap().context().holder_dust_limit_satoshis;
|
||
// 0th HTLC:
|
||
let (_, payment_hash_1, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], ds_dust_limit*1000); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
|
||
// 1st HTLC:
|
||
let (_, payment_hash_2, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], ds_dust_limit*1000); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
|
||
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], ds_dust_limit*1000);
|
||
// 2nd HTLC:
|
||
send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_1, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_1, None, 7200, None).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
|
||
// 3rd HTLC:
|
||
send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_2, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_2, None, 7200, None).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
|
||
// 4th HTLC:
|
||
let (_, payment_hash_3, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000);
|
||
// 5th HTLC:
|
||
let (_, payment_hash_4, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000);
|
||
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], 1000000);
|
||
// 6th HTLC:
|
||
send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_3, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_3, None, 7200, None).unwrap());
|
||
// 7th HTLC:
|
||
send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_4, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_4, None, 7200, None).unwrap());
|
||
|
||
// 8th HTLC:
|
||
let (_, payment_hash_5, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], 1000000);
|
||
// 9th HTLC:
|
||
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], ds_dust_limit*1000);
|
||
send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], ds_dust_limit*1000, payment_hash_5, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_5, None, 7200, None).unwrap()); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
|
||
|
||
// 10th HTLC:
|
||
let (_, payment_hash_6, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[4]], ds_dust_limit*1000); // not added < dust limit + HTLC tx fee
|
||
// 11th HTLC:
|
||
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[5], 1000000);
|
||
send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[1], route, &[&[&nodes[2], &nodes[3], &nodes[5]]], 1000000, payment_hash_6, nodes[5].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(payment_hash_6, None, 7200, None).unwrap());
|
||
|
||
// Double-check that six of the new HTLC were added
|
||
// We now have six HTLCs pending over the dust limit and six HTLCs under the dust limit (ie,
|
||
// with to_local and to_remote outputs, 8 outputs and 6 HTLCs not included).
|
||
assert_eq!(get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2).len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2)[0].output.len(), 8);
|
||
|
||
// Now fail back three of the over-dust-limit and three of the under-dust-limit payments in one go.
|
||
// Fail 0th below-dust, 4th above-dust, 8th above-dust, 10th below-dust HTLCs
|
||
nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_1);
|
||
nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_3);
|
||
nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_5);
|
||
nodes[4].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_6);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 0);
|
||
|
||
let failed_destinations = vec![
|
||
HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_1 },
|
||
HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_3 },
|
||
HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_5 },
|
||
HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_6 },
|
||
];
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[4], failed_destinations);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 1);
|
||
|
||
let four_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[4], nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id(), &four_removes.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id(), &four_removes.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
|
||
nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id(), &four_removes.update_fail_htlcs[2]);
|
||
nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id(), &four_removes.update_fail_htlcs[3]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[3], nodes[4], four_removes.commitment_signed, false);
|
||
|
||
// Fail 3rd below-dust and 7th above-dust HTLCs
|
||
nodes[5].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_2);
|
||
nodes[5].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_4);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[5], 0);
|
||
|
||
let failed_destinations_2 = vec![
|
||
HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_2 },
|
||
HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_4 },
|
||
];
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[5], failed_destinations_2);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[5], 1);
|
||
|
||
let two_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[5], nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[5].node.get_our_node_id(), &two_removes.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
nodes[3].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[5].node.get_our_node_id(), &two_removes.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[3], nodes[5], two_removes.commitment_signed, false);
|
||
|
||
let ds_prev_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2);
|
||
|
||
// After 4 and 2 removes respectively above in nodes[4] and nodes[5], nodes[3] should receive 6 PaymentForwardedFailed events
|
||
let failed_destinations_3 = vec![
|
||
HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_4.2 },
|
||
HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_4.2 },
|
||
HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_4.2 },
|
||
HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_4.2 },
|
||
HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[5].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_5.2 },
|
||
HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[5].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_3_5.2 },
|
||
];
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[3], failed_destinations_3);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
|
||
let six_removes = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[3], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[2]);
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[3]);
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[4]);
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &six_removes.update_fail_htlcs[5]);
|
||
if deliver_last_raa {
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[3], six_removes.commitment_signed, false);
|
||
} else {
|
||
let _cs_last_raa = commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[3], six_removes.commitment_signed, false, true, false, true);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// D's latest commitment transaction now contains 1st + 2nd + 9th HTLCs (implicitly, they're
|
||
// below the dust limit) and the 5th + 6th + 11th HTLCs. It has failed back the 0th, 3rd, 4th,
|
||
// 7th, 8th, and 10th, but as we haven't yet delivered the final RAA to C, the fails haven't
|
||
// propagated back to A/B yet (and D has two unrevoked commitment transactions).
|
||
//
|
||
// We now broadcast the latest commitment transaction, which *should* result in failures for
|
||
// the 0th, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th HTLCs, ie all the below-dust HTLCs and
|
||
// the non-broadcast above-dust HTLCs.
|
||
//
|
||
// Alternatively, we may broadcast the previous commitment transaction, which should only
|
||
// result in failures for the below-dust HTLCs, ie the 0th, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 9th, and 10th HTLCs.
|
||
let ds_last_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[3], chan_2_3.2);
|
||
|
||
if announce_latest {
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &ds_last_commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
} else {
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[2], &ds_prev_commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
}
|
||
let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
let close_event = if deliver_last_raa {
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2 + 6);
|
||
events.last().clone().unwrap()
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
events.last().clone().unwrap()
|
||
};
|
||
match close_event {
|
||
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[2], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[2], true);
|
||
if deliver_last_raa {
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[2], events[0..1], true);
|
||
|
||
let expected_destinations: Vec<HTLCDestination> = repeat(HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }).take(3).collect();
|
||
expect_htlc_handling_failed_destinations!(nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_events(), expected_destinations);
|
||
} else {
|
||
let expected_destinations: Vec<HTLCDestination> = if announce_latest {
|
||
repeat(HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }).take(9).collect()
|
||
} else {
|
||
repeat(HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }).take(6).collect()
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], expected_destinations);
|
||
}
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 3);
|
||
|
||
let cs_msgs = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(cs_msgs.len(), 2);
|
||
let mut a_done = false;
|
||
for msg in cs_msgs {
|
||
match msg {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, ref updates } => {
|
||
// Both under-dust HTLCs and the one above-dust HTLC that we had already failed
|
||
// should be failed-backwards here.
|
||
let target = if *node_id == nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id() {
|
||
// If announce_latest, expect 0th, 1st, 4th, 8th, 10th HTLCs, else only 0th, 1st, 10th below-dust HTLCs
|
||
for htlc in &updates.update_fail_htlcs {
|
||
assert!(htlc.htlc_id == 1 || htlc.htlc_id == 2 || htlc.htlc_id == 6 || if announce_latest { htlc.htlc_id == 3 || htlc.htlc_id == 5 } else { false });
|
||
}
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), if announce_latest { 5 } else { 3 });
|
||
assert!(!a_done);
|
||
a_done = true;
|
||
&nodes[0]
|
||
} else {
|
||
// If announce_latest, expect 2nd, 3rd, 7th, 9th HTLCs, else only 2nd, 3rd, 9th below-dust HTLCs
|
||
for htlc in &updates.update_fail_htlcs {
|
||
assert!(htlc.htlc_id == 1 || htlc.htlc_id == 2 || htlc.htlc_id == 5 || if announce_latest { htlc.htlc_id == 4 } else { false });
|
||
}
|
||
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), if announce_latest { 4 } else { 3 });
|
||
&nodes[1]
|
||
};
|
||
target.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
target.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
|
||
target.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[2]);
|
||
if announce_latest {
|
||
target.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[3]);
|
||
if *node_id == nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id() {
|
||
target.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[4]);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(target, nodes[2], updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let as_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(as_events.len(), if announce_latest { 10 } else { 6 });
|
||
let mut as_failds = HashSet::new();
|
||
let mut as_updates = 0;
|
||
for event in as_events.iter() {
|
||
if let &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref payment_failed_permanently, ref failure, .. } = event {
|
||
assert!(as_failds.insert(*payment_hash));
|
||
if *payment_hash != payment_hash_2 {
|
||
assert_eq!(*payment_failed_permanently, deliver_last_raa);
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert!(!payment_failed_permanently);
|
||
}
|
||
if let PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(_) } = failure {
|
||
as_updates += 1;
|
||
}
|
||
} else if let &Event::PaymentFailed { .. } = event {
|
||
} else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
|
||
}
|
||
assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_1));
|
||
assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_2));
|
||
if announce_latest {
|
||
assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_3));
|
||
assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_5));
|
||
}
|
||
assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_6));
|
||
|
||
let bs_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(bs_events.len(), if announce_latest { 8 } else { 6 });
|
||
let mut bs_failds = HashSet::new();
|
||
let mut bs_updates = 0;
|
||
for event in bs_events.iter() {
|
||
if let &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref payment_failed_permanently, ref failure, .. } = event {
|
||
assert!(bs_failds.insert(*payment_hash));
|
||
if *payment_hash != payment_hash_1 && *payment_hash != payment_hash_5 {
|
||
assert_eq!(*payment_failed_permanently, deliver_last_raa);
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert!(!payment_failed_permanently);
|
||
}
|
||
if let PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(_) } = failure {
|
||
bs_updates += 1;
|
||
}
|
||
} else if let &Event::PaymentFailed { .. } = event {
|
||
} else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
|
||
}
|
||
assert!(bs_failds.contains(&payment_hash_1));
|
||
assert!(bs_failds.contains(&payment_hash_2));
|
||
if announce_latest {
|
||
assert!(bs_failds.contains(&payment_hash_4));
|
||
}
|
||
assert!(bs_failds.contains(&payment_hash_5));
|
||
|
||
// For each HTLC which was not failed-back by normal process (ie deliver_last_raa), we should
|
||
// get a NetworkUpdate. A should have gotten 4 HTLCs which were failed-back due to
|
||
// unknown-preimage-etc, B should have gotten 2. Thus, in the
|
||
// announce_latest && deliver_last_raa case, we should have 5-4=1 and 4-2=2 NetworkUpdates.
|
||
assert_eq!(as_updates, if deliver_last_raa { 1 } else if !announce_latest { 3 } else { 5 });
|
||
assert_eq!(bs_updates, if deliver_last_raa { 2 } else if !announce_latest { 3 } else { 4 });
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_fail_backwards_latest_remote_announce_a() {
|
||
do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(false, true);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_fail_backwards_latest_remote_announce_b() {
|
||
do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(true, true);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_fail_backwards_previous_remote_announce() {
|
||
do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(false, false);
|
||
// Note that true, true doesn't make sense as it implies we announce a revoked state, which is
|
||
// tested for in test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive()
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_dynamic_spendable_outputs_local_htlc_timeout_tx() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let (_, our_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 9000000);
|
||
let local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(local_txn[0], chan_1.3);
|
||
|
||
// Timeout HTLC on A's chain and so it can generate a HTLC-Timeout tx
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
|
||
|
||
let htlc_timeout = {
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], local_txn[0]);
|
||
node_txn[0].clone()
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &htlc_timeout);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 - 1);
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false);
|
||
|
||
// Verify that A is able to spend its own HTLC-Timeout tx thanks to spendable output event given back by its ChannelMonitor
|
||
let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[0], node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 3);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], local_txn[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[1], htlc_timeout);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn[1].input[0].sequence.0, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn[2].input.len(), 2);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[2], local_txn[0], htlc_timeout);
|
||
assert!(spend_txn[2].input[0].sequence.0 == BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 ||
|
||
spend_txn[2].input[1].sequence.0 == BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_key_derivation_params() {
|
||
// This test is a copy of test_dynamic_spendable_outputs_local_htlc_timeout_tx, with a key
|
||
// manager rotation to test that `channel_keys_id` returned in
|
||
// [`SpendableOutputDescriptor::DelayedPaymentOutput`] let us re-derive the channel key set to
|
||
// then derive a `delayed_payment_key`.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
|
||
// We manually create the node configuration to backup the seed.
|
||
let seed = [42; 32];
|
||
let keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&seed, Network::Testnet);
|
||
let chain_monitor = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chanmon_cfgs[0].chain_source), &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &chanmon_cfgs[0].persister, &keys_manager);
|
||
let network_graph = Arc::new(NetworkGraph::new(Network::Testnet, &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger));
|
||
let scorer = RwLock::new(test_utils::TestScorer::new());
|
||
let router = test_utils::TestRouter::new(network_graph.clone(), &scorer);
|
||
let node = NodeCfg { chain_source: &chanmon_cfgs[0].chain_source, logger: &chanmon_cfgs[0].logger, tx_broadcaster: &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, fee_estimator: &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, router, chain_monitor, keys_manager: &keys_manager, network_graph, node_seed: seed, override_init_features: alloc::rc::Rc::new(core::cell::RefCell::new(None)) };
|
||
let mut node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
node_cfgs.remove(0);
|
||
node_cfgs.insert(0, node);
|
||
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
// Create a dummy channel to advance index by one and thus test re-derivation correctness
|
||
// for node 0
|
||
let chan_0 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2);
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
assert_ne!(chan_0.3.output[0].script_pubkey, chan_1.3.output[0].script_pubkey);
|
||
|
||
// Ensure all nodes are at the same height
|
||
let node_max_height = nodes.iter().map(|node| node.blocks.lock().unwrap().len()).max().unwrap() as u32;
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_max_height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_max_height - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[2], node_max_height - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
|
||
|
||
let (_, our_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 9000000);
|
||
let local_txn_0 = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_0.2);
|
||
let local_txn_1 = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(local_txn_1[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(local_txn_1[0], chan_1.3);
|
||
|
||
// We check funding pubkey are unique
|
||
let (from_0_funding_key_0, from_0_funding_key_1) = (PublicKey::from_slice(&local_txn_0[0].input[0].witness.to_vec()[3][2..35]), PublicKey::from_slice(&local_txn_0[0].input[0].witness.to_vec()[3][36..69]));
|
||
let (from_1_funding_key_0, from_1_funding_key_1) = (PublicKey::from_slice(&local_txn_1[0].input[0].witness.to_vec()[3][2..35]), PublicKey::from_slice(&local_txn_1[0].input[0].witness.to_vec()[3][36..69]));
|
||
if from_0_funding_key_0 == from_1_funding_key_0
|
||
|| from_0_funding_key_0 == from_1_funding_key_1
|
||
|| from_0_funding_key_1 == from_1_funding_key_0
|
||
|| from_0_funding_key_1 == from_1_funding_key_1 {
|
||
panic!("Funding pubkeys aren't unique");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Timeout HTLC on A's chain and so it can generate a HTLC-Timeout tx
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &local_txn_1[0]);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
|
||
let htlc_timeout = {
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], local_txn_1[0]);
|
||
node_txn[0].clone()
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &htlc_timeout);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 - 1);
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false);
|
||
|
||
// Verify that A is able to spend its own HTLC-Timeout tx thanks to spendable output event given back by its ChannelMonitor
|
||
let new_keys_manager = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&seed, Network::Testnet);
|
||
let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[0], new_keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 3);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], local_txn_1[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[1], htlc_timeout);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn[1].input[0].sequence.0, BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn[2].input.len(), 2);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[2], local_txn_1[0], htlc_timeout);
|
||
assert!(spend_txn[2].input[0].sequence.0 == BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32 ||
|
||
spend_txn[2].input[1].sequence.0 == BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_static_output_closing_tx() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 8000000);
|
||
let closing_tx = close_channel(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &chan.2, chan.3, true).2;
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &closing_tx);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
|
||
let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[0], node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], closing_tx);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &closing_tx);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
|
||
let spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(spend_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], closing_tx);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_htlc_claim_local_commitment_only(use_dust: bool) {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3_000_000 });
|
||
|
||
// Claim the payment, but don't deliver A's commitment_signed, resulting in the HTLC only being
|
||
// present in B's local commitment transaction, but none of A's commitment transactions.
|
||
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3_000_000 });
|
||
|
||
let bs_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
|
||
expect_payment_sent(&nodes[0], payment_preimage, None, false, false);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let as_updates = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_updates.0);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
let starting_block = nodes[1].best_block_info();
|
||
let mut block = create_dummy_block(starting_block.0, 42, Vec::new());
|
||
for _ in starting_block.1 + 1..TEST_FINAL_CLTV - CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER + starting_block.1 + 2 {
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[1], &block);
|
||
block.header.prev_blockhash = block.block_hash();
|
||
}
|
||
test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[1], &chan, None, if use_dust { HTLCType::NONE } else { HTLCType::SUCCESS });
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_htlc_claim_current_remote_commitment_only(use_dust: bool) {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3000000 });
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let _as_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
// As far as A is concerned, the HTLC is now present only in the latest remote commitment
|
||
// transaction, however it is not in A's latest local commitment, so we can just broadcast that
|
||
// to "time out" the HTLC.
|
||
|
||
let starting_block = nodes[1].best_block_info();
|
||
let mut block = create_dummy_block(starting_block.0, 42, Vec::new());
|
||
|
||
for _ in starting_block.1 + 1..TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + starting_block.1 + 2 {
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
|
||
block.header.prev_blockhash = block.block_hash();
|
||
}
|
||
test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan, None, HTLCType::NONE);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(use_dust: bool, check_revoke_no_close: bool) {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
// Fail the payment, but don't deliver A's final RAA, resulting in the HTLC only being present
|
||
// in B's previous (unrevoked) commitment transaction, but none of A's commitment transactions.
|
||
// Also optionally test that we *don't* fail the channel in case the commitment transaction was
|
||
// actually revoked.
|
||
let htlc_value = if use_dust { 50000 } else { 3000000 };
|
||
let (_, our_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], htlc_value);
|
||
nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
let bs_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_updates.commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let as_updates = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_updates.0);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_updates.1);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let bs_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
if check_revoke_no_close {
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_revoke_and_ack);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let starting_block = nodes[1].best_block_info();
|
||
let mut block = create_dummy_block(starting_block.0, 42, Vec::new());
|
||
for _ in starting_block.1 + 1..TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS + CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 2 {
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
|
||
block.header.prev_blockhash = block.block_hash();
|
||
}
|
||
if !check_revoke_no_close {
|
||
test_txn_broadcast(&nodes[0], &chan, None, HTLCType::NONE);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
} else {
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Test that we close channels on-chain when broadcastable HTLCs reach their timeout window.
|
||
// There are only a few cases to test here:
|
||
// * its not really normative behavior, but we test that below-dust HTLCs "included" in
|
||
// broadcastable commitment transactions result in channel closure,
|
||
// * its included in an unrevoked-but-previous remote commitment transaction,
|
||
// * its included in the latest remote or local commitment transactions.
|
||
// We test each of the three possible commitment transactions individually and use both dust and
|
||
// non-dust HTLCs.
|
||
// Note that we don't bother testing both outbound and inbound HTLC failures for each case, and we
|
||
// assume they are handled the same across all six cases, as both outbound and inbound failures are
|
||
// tested for at least one of the cases in other tests.
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn htlc_claim_single_commitment_only_a() {
|
||
do_htlc_claim_local_commitment_only(true);
|
||
do_htlc_claim_local_commitment_only(false);
|
||
|
||
do_htlc_claim_current_remote_commitment_only(true);
|
||
do_htlc_claim_current_remote_commitment_only(false);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn htlc_claim_single_commitment_only_b() {
|
||
do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(true, false);
|
||
do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(false, false);
|
||
do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(true, true);
|
||
do_htlc_claim_previous_remote_commitment_only(false, true);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
#[should_panic]
|
||
fn bolt2_open_channel_sending_node_checks_part1() { //This test needs to be on its own as we are catching a panic
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
// Force duplicate randomness for every get-random call
|
||
for node in nodes.iter() {
|
||
*node.keys_manager.override_random_bytes.lock().unwrap() = Some([0; 32]);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must ensure temporary_channel_id is unique from any other channel ID with the same peer.
|
||
let channel_value_satoshis=10000;
|
||
let push_msat=10001;
|
||
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let node0_to_1_send_open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node0_to_1_send_open_channel);
|
||
get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
// Create a second channel with the same random values. This used to panic due to a colliding
|
||
// channel_id, but now panics due to a colliding outbound SCID alias.
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_err());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn bolt2_open_channel_sending_node_checks_part2() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set funding_satoshis to less than 2^24 satoshis
|
||
let channel_value_satoshis=2^24;
|
||
let push_msat=10001;
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_err());
|
||
|
||
// BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set push_msat to equal or less than 1000 * funding_satoshis
|
||
let channel_value_satoshis=10000;
|
||
// Test when push_msat is equal to 1000 * funding_satoshis.
|
||
let push_msat=1000*channel_value_satoshis+1;
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_err());
|
||
|
||
// BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set set channel_reserve_satoshis greater than or equal to dust_limit_satoshis
|
||
let channel_value_satoshis=10000;
|
||
let push_msat=10001;
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).is_ok()); //Create a valid channel
|
||
let node0_to_1_send_open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(node0_to_1_send_open_channel.channel_reserve_satoshis>=node0_to_1_send_open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis);
|
||
|
||
// BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set undefined bits in channel_flags to 0
|
||
// Only the least-significant bit of channel_flags is currently defined resulting in channel_flags only having one of two possible states 0 or 1
|
||
assert!(node0_to_1_send_open_channel.channel_flags<=1);
|
||
|
||
// BOLT #2 spec: Sending node should set to_self_delay sufficient to ensure the sender can irreversibly spend a commitment transaction output, in case of misbehaviour by the receiver.
|
||
assert!(BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT>0);
|
||
assert!(node0_to_1_send_open_channel.to_self_delay==BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT);
|
||
|
||
// BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must ensure the chain_hash value identifies the chain it wishes to open the channel within.
|
||
let chain_hash = ChainHash::using_genesis_block(Network::Testnet);
|
||
assert_eq!(node0_to_1_send_open_channel.chain_hash, chain_hash);
|
||
|
||
// BOLT #2 spec: Sending node must set funding_pubkey, revocation_basepoint, htlc_basepoint, payment_basepoint, and delayed_payment_basepoint to valid DER-encoded, compressed, secp256k1 pubkeys.
|
||
assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.funding_pubkey.serialize()).is_ok());
|
||
assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.revocation_basepoint.serialize()).is_ok());
|
||
assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.htlc_basepoint.serialize()).is_ok());
|
||
assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.payment_point.serialize()).is_ok());
|
||
assert!(PublicKey::from_slice(&node0_to_1_send_open_channel.delayed_payment_basepoint.serialize()).is_ok());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn bolt2_open_channel_sane_dust_limit() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let channel_value_satoshis=1000000;
|
||
let push_msat=10001;
|
||
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let mut node0_to_1_send_open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
node0_to_1_send_open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis = 547;
|
||
node0_to_1_send_open_channel.channel_reserve_satoshis = 100001;
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node0_to_1_send_open_channel);
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
let err_msg = match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id: _ } => {
|
||
msg.clone()
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "dust_limit_satoshis (547) is greater than the implementation limit (546)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Test that if we fail to send an HTLC that is being freed from the holding cell, and the HTLC
|
||
// originated from our node, its failure is surfaced to the user. We trigger this failure to
|
||
// free the HTLC by increasing our fee while the HTLC is in the holding cell such that the HTLC
|
||
// is no longer affordable once it's freed.
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
|
||
|
||
// First nodes[0] generates an update_fee, setting the channel's
|
||
// pending_update_fee.
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
*feerate_lock += 20;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
|
||
(update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
|
||
|
||
let mut chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
|
||
let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
let channel_type_features = get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
|
||
// 2* and +1 HTLCs on the commit tx fee calculation for the fee spike reserve.
|
||
let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1, &channel_type_features);
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], max_can_send);
|
||
|
||
// Send a payment which passes reserve checks but gets stuck in the holding cell.
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, max_can_send);
|
||
|
||
// Flush the pending fee update.
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
|
||
let (as_revoke_and_ack, _) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_revoke_and_ack);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
// Upon receipt of the RAA, there will be an attempt to resend the holding cell
|
||
// HTLC, but now that the fee has been raised the payment will now fail, causing
|
||
// us to surface its failure to the user.
|
||
chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, 0);
|
||
nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Freeing holding cell with 1 HTLC updates in channel {}", chan.2), 1);
|
||
|
||
// Check that the payment failed to be sent out.
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||
match &events[0] {
|
||
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_id, ref payment_hash, ref payment_failed_permanently, failure: PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: None }, ref short_channel_id, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0), *payment_id.as_ref().unwrap());
|
||
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
|
||
assert_eq!(*payment_failed_permanently, false);
|
||
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, Some(route.paths[0].hops[0].short_channel_id));
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match &events[1] {
|
||
&Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Test that if multiple HTLCs are released from the holding cell and one is
|
||
// valid but the other is no longer valid upon release, the valid HTLC can be
|
||
// successfully completed while the other one fails as expected.
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
|
||
|
||
// First nodes[0] generates an update_fee, setting the channel's
|
||
// pending_update_fee.
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
*feerate_lock += 200;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
|
||
(update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
|
||
|
||
let mut chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
|
||
let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
let channel_type_features = get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
|
||
// 2* and +1 HTLCs on the commit tx fee calculation for the fee spike reserve.
|
||
let amt_1 = 20000;
|
||
let amt_2 = 5000000 - channel_reserve - 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 2 + 1, &channel_type_features) - amt_1;
|
||
let (route_1, payment_hash_1, payment_preimage_1, payment_secret_1) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], amt_1);
|
||
let (route_2, payment_hash_2, _, payment_secret_2) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], amt_2);
|
||
|
||
// Send 2 payments which pass reserve checks but get stuck in the holding cell.
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_1, payment_hash_1,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_1), PaymentId(payment_hash_1.0)).unwrap();
|
||
chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, amt_1);
|
||
let payment_id_2 = PaymentId(nodes[0].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes());
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route_2, payment_hash_2,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_2), payment_id_2).unwrap();
|
||
chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, amt_1 + amt_2);
|
||
|
||
// Flush the pending fee update.
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
|
||
let (revoke_and_ack, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &revoke_and_ack);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 2);
|
||
|
||
// Upon receipt of the RAA, there will be an attempt to resend the holding cell HTLCs,
|
||
// but now that the fee has been raised the second payment will now fail, causing us
|
||
// to surface its failure to the user. The first payment should succeed.
|
||
chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, 0);
|
||
nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Freeing holding cell with 2 HTLC updates in channel {}", chan.2), 1);
|
||
|
||
// Check that the second payment failed to be sent out.
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||
match &events[0] {
|
||
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_id, ref payment_hash, ref payment_failed_permanently, failure: PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: None }, ref short_channel_id, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_id_2, *payment_id.as_ref().unwrap());
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
|
||
assert_eq!(*payment_failed_permanently, false);
|
||
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, Some(route_2.paths[0].hops[0].short_channel_id));
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match &events[1] {
|
||
&Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Complete the first payment and the RAA from the fee update.
|
||
let (payment_event, send_raa_event) = {
|
||
let mut msgs = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(msgs.len(), 2);
|
||
(SendEvent::from_event(msgs.remove(0)), msgs.remove(0))
|
||
};
|
||
let raa = match send_raa_event {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { msg, .. } => msg,
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::PaymentClaimable { .. } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_1);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_1, amt_1);
|
||
|
||
let update_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], update_msgs.commitment_signed, false, true);
|
||
expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Test that if we fail to forward an HTLC that is being freed from the holding cell that the
|
||
// HTLC is failed backwards. We trigger this failure to forward the freed HTLC by increasing
|
||
// our fee while the HTLC is in the holding cell such that the HTLC is no longer affordable
|
||
// once it's freed.
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free_multihop() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
// Avoid having to include routing fees in calculations
|
||
let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
|
||
config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_base_msat = 0;
|
||
config.channel_config.forwarding_fee_proportional_millionths = 0;
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone()), Some(config.clone())]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan_0_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
|
||
let chan_1_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 100000, 95000000);
|
||
|
||
// First nodes[1] generates an update_fee, setting the channel's
|
||
// pending_update_fee.
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
*feerate_lock += 20;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[1].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let (update_msg, commitment_signed) = match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
|
||
(update_fee.as_ref(), commitment_signed)
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msg.unwrap());
|
||
|
||
let mut chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_0_1.2);
|
||
let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
|
||
let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_0_1.2);
|
||
let channel_type_features = get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_0_1.2);
|
||
|
||
// Send a payment which passes reserve checks but gets stuck in the holding cell.
|
||
let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - 2*commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1, &channel_type_features);
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], max_can_send);
|
||
let payment_event = {
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||
|
||
chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[2], chan_1_2.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(chan_stat.holding_cell_outbound_amount_msat, max_can_send);
|
||
|
||
// Flush the pending fee update.
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), commitment_signed);
|
||
let (raa, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
|
||
|
||
// A final RAA message is generated to finalize the fee update.
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
let raa_msg = match &events[0] {
|
||
&MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref msg, .. } => {
|
||
msg.clone()
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa_msg);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
assert!(nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
// nodes[1]'s ChannelManager will now signal that we have HTLC forwards to process.
|
||
let process_htlc_forwards_event = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(process_htlc_forwards_event.len(), 2);
|
||
match &process_htlc_forwards_event[0] {
|
||
&Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// In response, we call ChannelManager's process_pending_htlc_forwards
|
||
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
// This causes the HTLC to be failed backwards.
|
||
let fail_event = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(fail_event.len(), 1);
|
||
let (fail_msg, commitment_signed) = match &fail_event[0] {
|
||
&MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref updates, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.update_add_htlcs.len(), 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len(), 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
(updates.update_fail_htlcs[0].clone(), updates.commitment_signed.clone())
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Pass the failure messages back to nodes[0].
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_msg);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
|
||
|
||
// Complete the HTLC failure+removal process.
|
||
let (raa, commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
|
||
let final_raa_event = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(final_raa_event.len(), 1);
|
||
let raa = match &final_raa_event[0] {
|
||
&MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref msg, .. } => msg.clone(),
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &raa);
|
||
expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false, chan_1_2.0.contents.short_channel_id, false);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// BOLT 2 Requirements for the Sender when constructing and sending an update_add_htlc message.
|
||
// BOLT 2 Requirement: MUST NOT offer amount_msat it cannot pay for in the remote commitment transaction at the current feerate_per_kw (see "Updating Fees") while maintaining its channel reserve.
|
||
//TODO: I don't believe this is explicitly enforced when sending an HTLC but as the Fee aspect of the BOLT specs is in flux leaving this as a TODO.
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_value_below_minimum_msat() {
|
||
//BOLT2 Requirement: MUST NOT offer amount_msat below the receiving node's htlc_minimum_msat (same validation check catches both of these)
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
|
||
|
||
let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
|
||
route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = 100;
|
||
|
||
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
|
||
), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_zero_value_msat() {
|
||
//BOLT2 Requirement: MUST offer amount_msat greater than 0.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
|
||
|
||
let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
|
||
route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = 0;
|
||
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)),
|
||
true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { ref err },
|
||
assert_eq!(err, "Cannot send 0-msat HTLC"));
|
||
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", "Cannot send 0-msat HTLC", 1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_zero_value_msat() {
|
||
//BOLT2 Requirement: MUST offer amount_msat greater than 0.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
|
||
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
updates.update_add_htlcs[0].amount_msat = 0;
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
||
nodes[1].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channelmanager".to_string(), "Remote side tried to send a 0-msat HTLC".to_string(), 1);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Remote side tried to send a 0-msat HTLC".to_string() },
|
||
[nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_cltv_expiry_too_high() {
|
||
//BOLT 2 Requirement: MUST set cltv_expiry less than 500000000.
|
||
//It is enforced when constructing a route.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 0);
|
||
|
||
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 0)
|
||
.with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
|
||
let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], payment_params, 100000000);
|
||
route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().cltv_expiry_delta = 500000001;
|
||
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
|
||
), true, APIError::InvalidRoute { ref err },
|
||
assert_eq!(err, &"Channel CLTV overflowed?"));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_exceed_max_htlc_num_and_htlc_id_increment() {
|
||
//BOLT 2 Requirement: if result would be offering more than the remote's max_accepted_htlcs HTLCs, in the remote commitment transaction: MUST NOT add an HTLC.
|
||
//BOLT 2 Requirement: for the first HTLC it offers MUST set id to 0.
|
||
//BOLT 2 Requirement: MUST increase the value of id by 1 for each successive offer.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 0);
|
||
let max_accepted_htlcs = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap().get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id())
|
||
.unwrap().lock().unwrap().channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap().context().counterparty_max_accepted_htlcs as u64;
|
||
|
||
// Fetch a route in advance as we will be unable to once we're unable to send.
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
|
||
for i in 0..max_accepted_htlcs {
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100000);
|
||
let payment_event = {
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
if let MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate{ update_add_htlcs: ref htlcs, .. }, } = events[0] {
|
||
assert_eq!(htlcs[0].htlc_id, i);
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert!(false);
|
||
}
|
||
SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||
expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret, 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
|
||
), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
|
||
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_sender_exceed_max_htlc_value_in_flight() {
|
||
//BOLT 2 Requirement: if the sum of total offered HTLCs would exceed the remote's max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat: MUST NOT add an HTLC.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let channel_value = 100000;
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, channel_value, 0);
|
||
let max_in_flight = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2).counterparty_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat;
|
||
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], max_in_flight);
|
||
|
||
let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], max_in_flight);
|
||
// Manually create a route over our max in flight (which our router normally automatically
|
||
// limits us to.
|
||
route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = max_in_flight + 1;
|
||
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)
|
||
), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], max_in_flight);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// BOLT 2 Requirements for the Receiver when handling an update_add_htlc message.
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_amount_received_more_than_min() {
|
||
//BOLT2 Requirement: receiving an amount_msat equal to 0, OR less than its own htlc_minimum_msat -> SHOULD fail the channel.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
|
||
let htlc_minimum_msat: u64;
|
||
{
|
||
let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
|
||
let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
|
||
let channel = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap();
|
||
htlc_minimum_msat = channel.context().get_holder_htlc_minimum_msat();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], htlc_minimum_msat);
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
updates.update_add_htlcs[0].amount_msat = htlc_minimum_msat-1;
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
||
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
|
||
assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote side tried to send less than our minimum HTLC value\. Lower limit: \(\d+\)\. Actual: \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_sender_can_afford_amount_sent() {
|
||
//BOLT2 Requirement: receiving an amount_msat that the sending node cannot afford at the current feerate_per_kw (while maintaining its channel reserve): SHOULD fail the channel
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
|
||
|
||
let chan_stat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
let channel_reserve = chan_stat.channel_reserve_msat;
|
||
let feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
let channel_type_features = get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
// The 2* and +1 are for the fee spike reserve.
|
||
let commit_tx_fee_outbound = 2 * commit_tx_fee_msat(feerate, 1 + 1, &channel_type_features);
|
||
|
||
let max_can_send = 5000000 - channel_reserve - commit_tx_fee_outbound;
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], max_can_send);
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
// Even though channel-initiator senders are required to respect the fee_spike_reserve,
|
||
// at this time channel-initiatee receivers are not required to enforce that senders
|
||
// respect the fee_spike_reserve.
|
||
updates.update_add_htlcs[0].amount_msat = max_can_send + commit_tx_fee_outbound + 1;
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
||
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
||
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote HTLC add would put them under remote reserve value");
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_max_htlc_limit() {
|
||
//BOLT 2 Requirement: if a sending node adds more than its max_accepted_htlcs HTLCs to its local commitment transaction: SHOULD fail the channel
|
||
//BOLT 2 Requirement: MUST allow multiple HTLCs with the same payment_hash.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
|
||
|
||
let send_amt = 3999999;
|
||
let (mut route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) =
|
||
get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000);
|
||
route.paths[0].hops[0].fee_msat = send_amt;
|
||
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
|
||
let cur_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height() + 1;
|
||
let onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::signing_only(), &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
|
||
let (onion_payloads, _htlc_msat, htlc_cltv) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(
|
||
&route.paths[0], send_amt, RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), cur_height, &None).unwrap();
|
||
let onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash).unwrap();
|
||
|
||
let mut msg = msgs::UpdateAddHTLC {
|
||
channel_id: chan.2,
|
||
htlc_id: 0,
|
||
amount_msat: 1000,
|
||
payment_hash: our_payment_hash,
|
||
cltv_expiry: htlc_cltv,
|
||
onion_routing_packet: onion_packet.clone(),
|
||
skimmed_fee_msat: None,
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
for i in 0..50 {
|
||
msg.htlc_id = i as u64;
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
|
||
}
|
||
msg.htlc_id = (50) as u64;
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msg);
|
||
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
||
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
|
||
assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to push more than our max accepted HTLCs \(\d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_max_in_flight_msat() {
|
||
//OR adds more than its max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat worth of offered HTLCs to its local commitment transaction: SHOULD fail the channel
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 1000000);
|
||
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
updates.update_add_htlcs[0].amount_msat = get_channel_value_stat!(nodes[1], nodes[0], chan.2).counterparty_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat + 1;
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
||
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
||
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
|
||
assert!(regex::Regex::new("Remote HTLC add would put them over our max HTLC value").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_cltv_expiry() {
|
||
//BOLT2 Requirement: if sending node sets cltv_expiry to greater or equal to 500000000: SHOULD fail the channel.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 95000000);
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
updates.update_add_htlcs[0].cltv_expiry = 500000000;
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
||
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
||
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(err_msg.data,"Remote provided CLTV expiry in seconds instead of block height");
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_add_htlc_bolt2_receiver_check_repeated_id_ignore() {
|
||
//BOLT 2 requirement: if the sender did not previously acknowledge the commitment of that HTLC: MUST ignore a repeated id value after a reconnection.
|
||
// We test this by first testing that that repeated HTLCs pass commitment signature checks
|
||
// after disconnect and that non-sequential htlc_ids result in a channel failure.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
||
|
||
//Disconnect and Reconnect
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
|
||
features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
|
||
}, true).unwrap();
|
||
let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
|
||
assert_eq!(reestablish_1.len(), 1);
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
|
||
features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
|
||
}, false).unwrap();
|
||
let reestablish_2 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(reestablish_2.len(), 1);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_2[0]);
|
||
handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[0]);
|
||
handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
|
||
|
||
//Resend HTLC
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.commitment_signed.htlc_signatures.len(), 1);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let _bs_responses = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
||
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
||
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap();
|
||
assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote skipped HTLC ID \(skipped ID: \d+\)").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fulfill_htlc_before_commitment() {
|
||
//BOLT 2 Requirement: until the corresponding HTLC is irrevocably committed in both sides' commitment transactions: MUST NOT send an update_fulfill_htlc, update_fail_htlc, or update_fail_malformed_htlc.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, our_payment_preimage, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
||
|
||
let update_msg = msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC{
|
||
channel_id: chan.2,
|
||
htlc_id: 0,
|
||
payment_preimage: our_payment_preimage,
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
|
||
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
||
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
|
||
assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fail_htlc_before_commitment() {
|
||
//BOLT 2 Requirement: until the corresponding HTLC is irrevocably committed in both sides' commitment transactions: MUST NOT send an update_fulfill_htlc, update_fail_htlc, or update_fail_malformed_htlc.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
||
|
||
let update_msg = msgs::UpdateFailHTLC{
|
||
channel_id: chan.2,
|
||
htlc_id: 0,
|
||
reason: msgs::OnionErrorPacket { data: Vec::new()},
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
|
||
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
||
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
|
||
assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_update_fail_malformed_htlc_before_commitment() {
|
||
//BOLT 2 Requirement: until the corresponding HTLC is irrevocably committed in both sides' commitment transactions: MUST NOT send an update_fulfill_htlc, update_fail_htlc, or update_fail_malformed_htlc.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
||
let update_msg = msgs::UpdateFailMalformedHTLC{
|
||
channel_id: chan.2,
|
||
htlc_id: 0,
|
||
sha256_of_onion: [1; 32],
|
||
failure_code: 0x8000,
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_malformed_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
|
||
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
||
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
|
||
assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill/fail HTLC \(\d+\) before it had been committed").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_incorrect_htlc_id() {
|
||
//BOLT 2 Requirement: A receiving node: if the id does not correspond to an HTLC in its current commitment transaction MUST fail the channel.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100_000);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, 100_000);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let mut update_fulfill_msg: msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC = {
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, .. } } => {
|
||
assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fee.is_none());
|
||
update_fulfill_htlcs[0].clone()
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
update_fulfill_msg.htlc_id = 1;
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fulfill_msg);
|
||
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
||
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Remote tried to fulfill/fail an HTLC we couldn't find");
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_wrong_preimage() {
|
||
//BOLT 2 Requirement: A receiving node: if the payment_preimage value in update_fulfill_htlc doesn't SHA256 hash to the corresponding HTLC payment_hash MUST fail the channel.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 100_000);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, 100_000);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let mut update_fulfill_msg: msgs::UpdateFulfillHTLC = {
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, .. } } => {
|
||
assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fee.is_none());
|
||
update_fulfill_htlcs[0].clone()
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
update_fulfill_msg.payment_preimage = PaymentPreimage([1; 32]);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fulfill_msg);
|
||
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
||
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
|
||
assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Remote tried to fulfill HTLC \(\d+\) with an incorrect preimage").unwrap().is_match(err_msg.data.as_str()));
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_missing_badonion_bit_for_malformed_htlc_message() {
|
||
//BOLT 2 Requirement: A receiving node: if the BADONION bit in failure_code is not set for update_fail_malformed_htlc MUST fail the channel.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 1000000);
|
||
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000000);
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let mut updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
updates.update_add_htlcs[0].onion_routing_packet.version = 1; //Produce a malformed HTLC message
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
|
||
let mut update_msg: msgs::UpdateFailMalformedHTLC = {
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, .. } } => {
|
||
assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(update_fee.is_none());
|
||
update_fail_malformed_htlcs[0].clone()
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
};
|
||
update_msg.failure_code &= !0x8000;
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_malformed_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
|
||
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
||
let err_msg = check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true).unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(err_msg.data, "Got update_fail_malformed_htlc with BADONION not set");
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: err_msg.data }, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_fulfill_htlc_bolt2_after_malformed_htlc_message_must_forward_update_fail_htlc() {
|
||
//BOLT 2 Requirement: a receiving node which has an outgoing HTLC canceled by update_fail_malformed_htlc:
|
||
// * MUST return an error in the update_fail_htlc sent to the link which originally sent the HTLC, using the failure_code given and setting the data to sha256_of_onion.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 1000000);
|
||
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 1000000, 1000000);
|
||
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 100000);
|
||
|
||
//First hop
|
||
let mut payment_event = {
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0))
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||
let mut events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events_2.remove(0));
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
//Second Hop
|
||
payment_event.msgs[0].onion_routing_packet.version = 1; //Produce a malformed HTLC message
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 0);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], payment_event.commitment_msg, false, true);
|
||
|
||
let events_3 = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1);
|
||
let update_msg : (msgs::UpdateFailMalformedHTLC, msgs::CommitmentSigned) = {
|
||
match events_3[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
|
||
assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(update_fee.is_none());
|
||
(update_fail_malformed_htlcs[0].clone(), commitment_signed.clone())
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_malformed_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg.0);
|
||
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[2], update_msg.1, false, true);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
|
||
let events_4 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
//Confirm that handlinge the update_malformed_htlc message produces an update_fail_htlc message to be forwarded back along the route
|
||
match events_4[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, .. } } => {
|
||
assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fee.is_none());
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_channel_failed_after_message_with_badonion_node_perm_bits_set() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
|
||
|
||
let (route, our_payment_hash, _, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 100_000);
|
||
|
||
// First hop
|
||
let mut payment_event = {
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
SendEvent::from_node(&nodes[0])
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
payment_event = SendEvent::from_node(&nodes[1]);
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
// Second Hop
|
||
payment_event.msgs[0].onion_routing_packet.version = 1; // Trigger an invalid_onion_version error
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 0);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], payment_event.commitment_msg, false, true);
|
||
|
||
let events_3 = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_3.len(), 1);
|
||
match events_3[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref updates, .. } => {
|
||
let mut update_msg = updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs[0].clone();
|
||
// Set the NODE bit (BADONION and PERM already set in invalid_onion_version error)
|
||
update_msg.failure_code |= 0x2000;
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_malformed_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msg);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[2], updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1],
|
||
vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel {
|
||
node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2.2 }]);
|
||
let events_4 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 1);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
match events_4[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref updates, .. } => {
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let events_5 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_5.len(), 2);
|
||
|
||
// Expect a PaymentPathFailed event with a ChannelFailure network update for the channel between
|
||
// the node originating the error to its next hop.
|
||
match events_5[0] {
|
||
Event::PaymentPathFailed { error_code, failure: PathFailure::OnPath { network_update: Some(NetworkUpdate::ChannelFailure { short_channel_id, is_permanent }) }, ..
|
||
} => {
|
||
assert_eq!(short_channel_id, chan_2.0.contents.short_channel_id);
|
||
assert!(is_permanent);
|
||
assert_eq!(error_code, Some(0x8000|0x4000|0x2000|4));
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events_5[1] {
|
||
Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, our_payment_hash);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TODO: Test actual removal of channel from NetworkGraph when it's implemented.
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_failure_delay_dust_htlc_local_commitment(announce_latest: bool) {
|
||
// Dust-HTLC failure updates must be delayed until failure-trigger tx (in this case local commitment) reach ANTI_REORG_DELAY
|
||
// We can have at most two valid local commitment tx, so both cases must be covered, and both txs must be checked to get them all as
|
||
// HTLC could have been removed from lastest local commitment tx but still valid until we get remote RAA
|
||
|
||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
chanmon_cfgs[0].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan =create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let bs_dust_limit = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap().get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id())
|
||
.unwrap().lock().unwrap().channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap().context().holder_dust_limit_satoshis;
|
||
|
||
// We route 2 dust-HTLCs between A and B
|
||
let (_, payment_hash_1, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], bs_dust_limit*1000);
|
||
let (_, payment_hash_2, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], bs_dust_limit*1000);
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000);
|
||
|
||
// Cache one local commitment tx as previous
|
||
let as_prev_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
|
||
|
||
// Fail one HTLC to prune it in the will-be-latest-local commitment tx
|
||
nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&payment_hash_2);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_2 }]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
let remove = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &remove.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &remove.commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
// Cache one local commitment tx as lastest
|
||
let as_last_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { node_id, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[1] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
assert_ne!(as_prev_commitment_tx, as_last_commitment_tx);
|
||
// Fail the 2 dust-HTLCs, move their failure in maturation buffer (htlc_updated_waiting_threshold_conf)
|
||
if announce_latest {
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_last_commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
} else {
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_prev_commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
// Only 2 PaymentPathFailed events should show up, over-dust HTLC has to be failed by timeout tx
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
|
||
let mut first_failed = false;
|
||
for event in events {
|
||
match event {
|
||
Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||
if payment_hash == payment_hash_1 {
|
||
assert!(!first_failed);
|
||
first_failed = true;
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_2);
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
Event::PaymentFailed { .. } => {}
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_failure_delay_dust_htlc_local_commitment() {
|
||
do_test_failure_delay_dust_htlc_local_commitment(true);
|
||
do_test_failure_delay_dust_htlc_local_commitment(false);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update(revoked: bool, local: bool) {
|
||
// Outbound HTLC-failure updates must be cancelled if we get a reorg before we reach ANTI_REORG_DELAY.
|
||
// Broadcast of revoked remote commitment tx, trigger failure-update of dust/non-dust HTLCs
|
||
// Broadcast of remote commitment tx, trigger failure-update of dust-HTLCs
|
||
// Broadcast of timeout tx on remote commitment tx, trigger failure-udate of non-dust HTLCs
|
||
// Broadcast of local commitment tx, trigger failure-update of dust-HTLCs
|
||
// Broadcast of HTLC-timeout tx on local commitment tx, trigger failure-update of non-dust HTLCs
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let bs_dust_limit = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap().get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id())
|
||
.unwrap().lock().unwrap().channel_by_id.get(&chan.2).unwrap().context().holder_dust_limit_satoshis;
|
||
|
||
let (_payment_preimage_1, dust_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], bs_dust_limit*1000);
|
||
let (_payment_preimage_2, non_dust_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000);
|
||
|
||
let as_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
|
||
let bs_commitment_tx = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
|
||
// We revoked bs_commitment_tx
|
||
if revoked {
|
||
let (payment_preimage_3, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000000);
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_3);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let mut timeout_tx = Vec::new();
|
||
if local {
|
||
// We fail dust-HTLC 1 by broadcast of local commitment tx
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], dust_hash, false);
|
||
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS - ANTI_REORG_DELAY);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
|
||
timeout_tx.push(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap()[0].clone());
|
||
assert_eq!(timeout_tx[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
// We fail non-dust-HTLC 2 by broadcast of local HTLC-timeout tx on local commitment tx
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &timeout_tx[0]);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], non_dust_hash, false);
|
||
} else {
|
||
// We fail dust-HTLC 1 by broadcast of remote commitment tx. If revoked, fail also non-dust HTLC
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &bs_commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
|
||
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
|
||
timeout_tx = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().drain(..)
|
||
.filter(|tx| tx.input[0].previous_output.txid == bs_commitment_tx[0].txid()).collect();
|
||
check_spends!(timeout_tx[0], bs_commitment_tx[0]);
|
||
// For both a revoked or non-revoked commitment transaction, after ANTI_REORG_DELAY the
|
||
// dust HTLC should have been failed.
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], dust_hash, false);
|
||
|
||
if !revoked {
|
||
assert_eq!(timeout_tx[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert_eq!(timeout_tx[0].lock_time.0, 11);
|
||
}
|
||
// We fail non-dust-HTLC 2 by broadcast of local timeout/revocation-claim tx
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &timeout_tx[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], non_dust_hash, false);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update() {
|
||
do_test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update(false, true);
|
||
do_test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update(false, false);
|
||
do_test_sweep_outbound_htlc_failure_update(true, false);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() {
|
||
// We test our channel constructors yield errors when we pass them absurd csv delay
|
||
|
||
let mut low_our_to_self_config = UserConfig::default();
|
||
low_our_to_self_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 6;
|
||
let mut high_their_to_self_config = UserConfig::default();
|
||
high_their_to_self_config.channel_handshake_limits.their_to_self_delay = 100;
|
||
let user_cfgs = [Some(high_their_to_self_config.clone()), None];
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &user_cfgs);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// We test config.our_to_self > BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT is enforced in OutboundV1Channel::new()
|
||
if let Err(error) = OutboundV1Channel::new(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }),
|
||
&nodes[0].keys_manager, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[1].node.init_features(), 1000000, 1000000, 0,
|
||
&low_our_to_self_config, 0, 42)
|
||
{
|
||
match error {
|
||
APIError::APIMisuseError { err } => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
} else { assert!(false) }
|
||
|
||
// We test config.our_to_self > BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT is enforced in InboundV1Channel::new()
|
||
nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
open_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
|
||
if let Err(error) = InboundV1Channel::new(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }),
|
||
&nodes[0].keys_manager, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[0].node.channel_type_features(), &nodes[1].node.init_features(), &open_channel, 0,
|
||
&low_our_to_self_config, 0, &nodes[0].logger, /*is_0conf=*/false)
|
||
{
|
||
match error {
|
||
ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
} else { assert!(false); }
|
||
|
||
// We test msg.to_self_delay <= config.their_to_self_delay is enforced in Chanel::accept_channel()
|
||
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
|
||
let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
accept_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel);
|
||
let reason_msg;
|
||
if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref action, .. } = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events()[0] {
|
||
match action {
|
||
&ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg } => {
|
||
assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period\. Upper limit: \d+\. Actual: \d+").unwrap().is_match(msg.data.as_str()));
|
||
reason_msg = msg.data.clone();
|
||
},
|
||
_ => { panic!(); }
|
||
}
|
||
} else { panic!(); }
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: reason_msg }, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
|
||
|
||
// We test msg.to_self_delay <= config.their_to_self_delay is enforced in InboundV1Channel::new()
|
||
nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 1000000, 1000000, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
open_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
|
||
if let Err(error) = InboundV1Channel::new(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }),
|
||
&nodes[0].keys_manager, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[0].node.channel_type_features(), &nodes[1].node.init_features(), &open_channel, 0,
|
||
&high_their_to_self_config, 0, &nodes[0].logger, /*is_0conf=*/false)
|
||
{
|
||
match error {
|
||
ChannelError::Close(err) => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"They wanted our payments to be delayed by a needlessly long period\. Upper limit: \d+\. Actual: \d+").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
} else { assert!(false); }
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_check_htlc_underpaying() {
|
||
// Send payment through A -> B but A is maliciously
|
||
// sending a probe payment (i.e less than expected value0
|
||
// to B, B should refuse payment.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::new();
|
||
let random_seed_bytes = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
|
||
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
|
||
.with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
|
||
let route_params = RouteParameters::from_payment_params_and_value(payment_params, 10_000);
|
||
let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &route_params, &nodes[0].network_graph.read_only(),
|
||
None, nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &Default::default(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
|
||
let (_, our_payment_hash, _) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[0]);
|
||
let our_payment_secret = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment_for_hash(our_payment_hash, Some(100_000), 7200, None).unwrap();
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
|
||
// Note that we first have to wait a random delay before processing the receipt of the HTLC,
|
||
// and then will wait a second random delay before failing the HTLC back:
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
|
||
|
||
// Node 3 is expecting payment of 100_000 but received 10_000,
|
||
// it should fail htlc like we didn't know the preimage.
|
||
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let (update_fail_htlc, commitment_signed) = match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _ , updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_add_htlcs, ref update_fulfill_htlcs, ref update_fail_htlcs, ref update_fail_malformed_htlcs, ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed } } => {
|
||
assert!(update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(update_fee.is_none());
|
||
(update_fail_htlcs[0].clone(), commitment_signed)
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlc);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, false, true);
|
||
|
||
// 10_000 msat as u64, followed by a height of CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH as u32
|
||
let mut expected_failure_data = (10_000 as u64).to_be_bytes().to_vec();
|
||
expected_failure_data.extend_from_slice(&CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH.to_be_bytes());
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, 0x4000|15, &expected_failure_data[..]);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_announce_disable_channels() {
|
||
// Create 2 channels between A and B. Disconnect B. Call timer_tick_occurred and check for generated
|
||
// ChannelUpdate. Reconnect B, reestablish and check there is non-generated ChannelUpdate.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 0);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
|
||
// Disconnect peers
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
for _ in 0..DISABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS + 1 {
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
}
|
||
let msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 3);
|
||
let mut chans_disabled = HashMap::new();
|
||
for e in msg_events {
|
||
match e {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & (1<<1), 1<<1); // The "channel disabled" bit should be set
|
||
// Check that each channel gets updated exactly once
|
||
if chans_disabled.insert(msg.contents.short_channel_id, msg.contents.timestamp).is_some() {
|
||
panic!("Generated ChannelUpdate for wrong chan!");
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
// Reconnect peers
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
|
||
features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
|
||
}, true).unwrap();
|
||
let reestablish_1 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
|
||
assert_eq!(reestablish_1.len(), 3);
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
|
||
features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
|
||
}, false).unwrap();
|
||
let reestablish_2 = get_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(reestablish_2.len(), 3);
|
||
|
||
// Reestablish chan_1
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_2[0]);
|
||
handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[0]);
|
||
handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
|
||
// Reestablish chan_2
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_2[1]);
|
||
handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[1]);
|
||
handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
|
||
// Reestablish chan_3
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_2[2]);
|
||
handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1]);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &reestablish_1[2]);
|
||
handle_chan_reestablish_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0]);
|
||
|
||
for _ in 0..ENABLE_GOSSIP_TICKS {
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
}
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
let msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 3);
|
||
for e in msg_events {
|
||
match e {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & (1<<1), 0); // The "channel disabled" bit should be off
|
||
match chans_disabled.remove(&msg.contents.short_channel_id) {
|
||
// Each update should have a higher timestamp than the previous one, replacing
|
||
// the old one.
|
||
Some(prev_timestamp) => assert!(msg.contents.timestamp > prev_timestamp),
|
||
None => panic!("Generated ChannelUpdate for wrong chan!"),
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
// Check that each channel gets updated exactly once
|
||
assert!(chans_disabled.is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_commitment() {
|
||
// In case of penalty txn with too low feerates for getting into mempools, RBF-bump them to be sure
|
||
// we're able to claim outputs on revoked commitment transaction before timelocks expiration
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000);
|
||
|
||
let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3000000).0;
|
||
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 30)
|
||
.with_bolt11_features(nodes[0].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
|
||
let (route,_, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_params, 3000000);
|
||
send_along_route(&nodes[1], route, &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3000000);
|
||
|
||
let revoked_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
|
||
// Revoked commitment txn with 4 outputs : to_local, to_remote, 1 outgoing HTLC, 1 incoming HTLC
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_txn[0].output.len(), 4);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
|
||
let revoked_txid = revoked_txn[0].txid();
|
||
|
||
let mut penalty_sum = 0;
|
||
for outp in revoked_txn[0].output.iter() {
|
||
if outp.script_pubkey.is_v0_p2wsh() {
|
||
penalty_sum += outp.value;
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Connect blocks to change height_timer range to see if we use right soonest_timelock
|
||
let header_114 = connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 14);
|
||
|
||
// Actually revoke tx by claiming a HTLC
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(header_114, 42, vec![revoked_txn[0].clone()]));
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
// One or more justice tx should have been broadcast, check it
|
||
let penalty_1;
|
||
let feerate_1;
|
||
{
|
||
let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1); // justice tx (broadcasted from ChannelMonitor)
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3); // Penalty txn claims to_local, offered_htlc and received_htlc outputs
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_txn[0]);
|
||
let fee_1 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
|
||
feerate_1 = fee_1 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
|
||
penalty_1 = node_txn[0].txid();
|
||
node_txn.clear();
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// After exhaustion of height timer, a new bumped justice tx should have been broadcast, check it
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 15);
|
||
let mut penalty_2 = penalty_1;
|
||
let mut feerate_2 = 0;
|
||
{
|
||
let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
if node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid == revoked_txid {
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3); // Penalty txn claims to_local, offered_htlc and received_htlc outputs
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_txn[0]);
|
||
penalty_2 = node_txn[0].txid();
|
||
// Verify new bumped tx is different from last claiming transaction, we don't want spurrious rebroadcast
|
||
assert_ne!(penalty_2, penalty_1);
|
||
let fee_2 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
|
||
feerate_2 = fee_2 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
|
||
// Verify 25% bump heuristic
|
||
assert!(feerate_2 * 100 >= feerate_1 * 125);
|
||
node_txn.clear();
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
assert_ne!(feerate_2, 0);
|
||
|
||
// After exhaustion of height timer for a 2nd time, a new bumped justice tx should have been broadcast, check it
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let penalty_3;
|
||
let mut feerate_3 = 0;
|
||
{
|
||
let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
if node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid == revoked_txid {
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 3); // Penalty txn claims to_local, offered_htlc and received_htlc outputs
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].output.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_txn[0]);
|
||
penalty_3 = node_txn[0].txid();
|
||
// Verify new bumped tx is different from last claiming transaction, we don't want spurrious rebroadcast
|
||
assert_ne!(penalty_3, penalty_2);
|
||
let fee_3 = penalty_sum - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
|
||
feerate_3 = fee_3 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
|
||
// Verify 25% bump heuristic
|
||
assert!(feerate_3 * 100 >= feerate_2 * 125);
|
||
node_txn.clear();
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
assert_ne!(feerate_3, 0);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_revoked_htlcs() {
|
||
// In case of penalty txn with too low feerates for getting into mempools, RBF-bump them to sure
|
||
// we're able to claim outputs on revoked HTLC transactions before timelocks expiration
|
||
|
||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000);
|
||
// Lock HTLC in both directions (using a slightly lower CLTV delay to provide timely RBF bumps)
|
||
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 50).with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
|
||
let scorer = test_utils::TestScorer::new();
|
||
let random_seed_bytes = chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.get_secure_random_bytes();
|
||
let route_params = RouteParameters::from_payment_params_and_value(payment_params, 3_000_000);
|
||
let route = get_route(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &route_params, &nodes[0].network_graph.read_only(), None,
|
||
nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &Default::default(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
|
||
let payment_preimage = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route, &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
|
||
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 50)
|
||
.with_bolt11_features(nodes[0].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
|
||
let route_params = RouteParameters::from_payment_params_and_value(payment_params, 3_000_000);
|
||
let route = get_route(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &route_params, &nodes[1].network_graph.read_only(), None,
|
||
nodes[0].logger, &scorer, &Default::default(), &random_seed_bytes).unwrap();
|
||
send_along_route(&nodes[1], route, &[&nodes[0]], 3_000_000);
|
||
|
||
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
|
||
|
||
// Revoke local commitment tx
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
|
||
|
||
// B will generate both revoked HTLC-timeout/HTLC-preimage txn from revoked commitment tx
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone()]));
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 50); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires (note CLTV was explicitly 50 above)
|
||
|
||
let revoked_htlc_txn = {
|
||
let txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.unique_txn_broadcast();
|
||
assert_eq!(txn.len(), 2);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
assert_eq!(txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(txn[1].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
assert_eq!(txn[1].output.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
|
||
txn
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Broadcast set of revoked txn on A
|
||
let hash_128 = connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 40);
|
||
let block_11 = create_dummy_block(hash_128, 42, vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone()]);
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[0], &block_11);
|
||
let block_129 = create_dummy_block(block_11.block_hash(), 42, vec![revoked_htlc_txn[0].clone(), revoked_htlc_txn[1].clone()]);
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[0], &block_129);
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_from_events!(nodes[0], events[0..1], true);
|
||
match events.last().unwrap() {
|
||
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => {}
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
let first;
|
||
let feerate_1;
|
||
let penalty_txn;
|
||
{
|
||
let mut node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 4); // 3 penalty txn on revoked commitment tx + 1 penalty tnx on revoked HTLC txn
|
||
// Verify claim tx are spending revoked HTLC txn
|
||
|
||
// node_txn 0-2 each spend a separate revoked output from revoked_local_txn[0]
|
||
// Note that node_txn[0] and node_txn[1] are bogus - they double spend the revoked_htlc_txn
|
||
// which are included in the same block (they are broadcasted because we scan the
|
||
// transactions linearly and generate claims as we go, they likely should be removed in the
|
||
// future).
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[2], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
|
||
// Each of the three justice transactions claim a separate (single) output of the three
|
||
// available, which we check here:
|
||
assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
|
||
assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output);
|
||
assert_ne!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output, revoked_htlc_txn[0].input[0].previous_output);
|
||
|
||
// node_txn[3] spends the revoked outputs from the revoked_htlc_txn (which only have one
|
||
// output, checked above).
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[3].input.len(), 2);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[3].output.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[3], revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[1]);
|
||
|
||
first = node_txn[3].txid();
|
||
// Store both feerates for later comparison
|
||
let fee_1 = revoked_htlc_txn[0].output[0].value + revoked_htlc_txn[1].output[0].value - node_txn[3].output[0].value;
|
||
feerate_1 = fee_1 * 1000 / node_txn[3].weight() as u64;
|
||
penalty_txn = vec![node_txn[2].clone()];
|
||
node_txn.clear();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Connect one more block to see if bumped penalty are issued for HTLC txn
|
||
let block_130 = create_dummy_block(block_129.block_hash(), 42, penalty_txn);
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[0], &block_130);
|
||
let block_131 = create_dummy_block(block_130.block_hash(), 42, Vec::new());
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[0], &block_131);
|
||
|
||
// Few more blocks to confirm penalty txn
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 4);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
|
||
let header_144 = connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 9);
|
||
let node_txn = {
|
||
let mut node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 2);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_htlc_txn[1]);
|
||
// Verify bumped tx is different and 25% bump heuristic
|
||
assert_ne!(first, node_txn[0].txid());
|
||
let fee_2 = revoked_htlc_txn[0].output[0].value + revoked_htlc_txn[1].output[0].value - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
|
||
let feerate_2 = fee_2 * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
|
||
assert!(feerate_2 * 100 > feerate_1 * 125);
|
||
let txn = vec![node_txn[0].clone()];
|
||
node_txn.clear();
|
||
txn
|
||
};
|
||
// Broadcast claim txn and confirm blocks to avoid further bumps on this outputs
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[0], &create_dummy_block(header_144, 42, node_txn));
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 20);
|
||
{
|
||
let mut node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
// We verify than no new transaction has been broadcast because previously
|
||
// we were buggy on this exact behavior by not tracking for monitoring remote HTLC outputs (see #411)
|
||
// which means we wouldn't see a spend of them by a justice tx and bumped justice tx
|
||
// were generated forever instead of safe cleaning after confirmation and ANTI_REORG_SAFE_DELAY blocks.
|
||
// Enforce spending of revoked htlc output by claiming transaction remove request as expected and dry
|
||
// up bumped justice generation.
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 0);
|
||
node_txn.clear();
|
||
}
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_bump_penalty_txn_on_remote_commitment() {
|
||
// In case of claim txn with too low feerates for getting into mempools, RBF-bump them to be sure
|
||
// we're able to claim outputs on remote commitment transaction before timelocks expiration
|
||
|
||
// Create 2 HTLCs
|
||
// Provide preimage for one
|
||
// Check aggregation
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000);
|
||
let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000);
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 3000000).0;
|
||
|
||
// Remote commitment txn with 4 outputs : to_local, to_remote, 1 outgoing HTLC, 1 incoming HTLC
|
||
let remote_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output.len(), 4);
|
||
assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
|
||
|
||
// Claim a HTLC without revocation (provide B monitor with preimage)
|
||
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 3_000_000);
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &remote_txn[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // Confirm blocks until the HTLC expires
|
||
|
||
// One or more claim tx should have been broadcast, check it
|
||
let timeout;
|
||
let preimage;
|
||
let preimage_bump;
|
||
let feerate_timeout;
|
||
let feerate_preimage;
|
||
{
|
||
let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
// 3 transactions including:
|
||
// preimage and timeout sweeps from remote commitment + preimage sweep bump
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 3);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[2].input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], remote_txn[0]);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[1], remote_txn[0]);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[2], remote_txn[0]);
|
||
|
||
preimage = node_txn[0].txid();
|
||
let index = node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout;
|
||
let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
|
||
feerate_preimage = fee * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
|
||
|
||
let (preimage_bump_tx, timeout_tx) = if node_txn[2].input[0].previous_output == node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output {
|
||
(node_txn[2].clone(), node_txn[1].clone())
|
||
} else {
|
||
(node_txn[1].clone(), node_txn[2].clone())
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
preimage_bump = preimage_bump_tx;
|
||
check_spends!(preimage_bump, remote_txn[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, preimage_bump.input[0].previous_output);
|
||
|
||
timeout = timeout_tx.txid();
|
||
let index = timeout_tx.input[0].previous_output.vout;
|
||
let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - timeout_tx.output[0].value;
|
||
feerate_timeout = fee * 1000 / timeout_tx.weight() as u64;
|
||
|
||
node_txn.clear();
|
||
};
|
||
assert_ne!(feerate_timeout, 0);
|
||
assert_ne!(feerate_preimage, 0);
|
||
|
||
// After exhaustion of height timer, new bumped claim txn should have been broadcast, check it
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
|
||
{
|
||
let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(preimage_bump.input.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], remote_txn[0]);
|
||
check_spends!(preimage_bump, remote_txn[0]);
|
||
|
||
let index = preimage_bump.input[0].previous_output.vout;
|
||
let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - preimage_bump.output[0].value;
|
||
let new_feerate = fee * 1000 / preimage_bump.weight() as u64;
|
||
assert!(new_feerate * 100 > feerate_timeout * 125);
|
||
assert_ne!(timeout, preimage_bump.txid());
|
||
|
||
let index = node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout;
|
||
let fee = remote_txn[0].output[index as usize].value - node_txn[0].output[0].value;
|
||
let new_feerate = fee * 1000 / node_txn[0].weight() as u64;
|
||
assert!(new_feerate * 100 > feerate_preimage * 125);
|
||
assert_ne!(preimage, node_txn[0].txid());
|
||
|
||
node_txn.clear();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_counterparty_raa_skip_no_crash() {
|
||
// Previously, if our counterparty sent two RAAs in a row without us having provided a
|
||
// commitment transaction, we would have happily carried on and provided them the next
|
||
// commitment transaction based on one RAA forward. This would probably eventually have led to
|
||
// channel closure, but it would not have resulted in funds loss. Still, our
|
||
// TestChannelSigner would have panicked as it doesn't like jumps into the future. Here, we
|
||
// check simply that the channel is closed in response to such an RAA, but don't check whether
|
||
// we decide to punish our counterparty for revoking their funds (as we don't currently
|
||
// implement that).
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let channel_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).2;
|
||
|
||
let per_commitment_secret;
|
||
let next_per_commitment_point;
|
||
{
|
||
let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
|
||
let mut guard = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
|
||
let keys = guard.channel_by_id.get_mut(&channel_id).map(
|
||
|phase| if let ChannelPhase::Funded(chan) = phase { Some(chan) } else { None }
|
||
).flatten().unwrap().get_signer();
|
||
|
||
const INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER: u64 = (1 << 48) - 1;
|
||
|
||
// Make signer believe we got a counterparty signature, so that it allows the revocation
|
||
keys.as_ecdsa().unwrap().get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
|
||
per_commitment_secret = keys.as_ref().release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER);
|
||
|
||
// Must revoke without gaps
|
||
keys.as_ecdsa().unwrap().get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
|
||
keys.as_ref().release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 1);
|
||
|
||
keys.as_ecdsa().unwrap().get_enforcement_state().last_holder_commitment -= 1;
|
||
next_per_commitment_point = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&Secp256k1::new(),
|
||
&SecretKey::from_slice(&keys.as_ref().release_commitment_secret(INITIAL_COMMITMENT_NUMBER - 2)).unwrap());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(),
|
||
&msgs::RevokeAndACK {
|
||
channel_id,
|
||
per_commitment_secret,
|
||
next_per_commitment_point,
|
||
#[cfg(taproot)]
|
||
next_local_nonce: None,
|
||
});
|
||
assert_eq!(check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true).unwrap().data, "Received an unexpected revoke_and_ack");
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: "Received an unexpected revoke_and_ack".to_string() }
|
||
, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_bump_txn_sanitize_tracking_maps() {
|
||
// Sanitizing pendning_claim_request and claimable_outpoints used to be buggy,
|
||
// verify we clean then right after expiration of ANTI_REORG_DELAY.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1000000, 59000000);
|
||
// Lock HTLC in both directions
|
||
let (payment_preimage_1, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 9_000_000);
|
||
let (_, payment_hash_2, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[0])[..], 9_000_000);
|
||
|
||
let revoked_local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(revoked_local_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, chan.3.txid());
|
||
|
||
// Revoke local commitment tx
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage_1);
|
||
|
||
// Broadcast set of revoked txn on A
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 2 - CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[0], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: payment_hash_2 }]);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 0);
|
||
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
|
||
let penalty_txn = {
|
||
let mut node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 3); //ChannelMonitor: justice txn * 3
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[2], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||
let penalty_txn = vec![node_txn[0].clone(), node_txn[1].clone(), node_txn[2].clone()];
|
||
node_txn.clear();
|
||
penalty_txn
|
||
};
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[0], &create_dummy_block(nodes[0].best_block_hash(), 42, penalty_txn));
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
{
|
||
let monitor = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(OutPoint { txid: chan.3.txid(), index: 0 }).unwrap();
|
||
assert!(monitor.inner.lock().unwrap().onchain_tx_handler.pending_claim_requests.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(monitor.inner.lock().unwrap().onchain_tx_handler.claimable_outpoints.is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_channel_conf_timeout() {
|
||
// Tests that, for inbound channels, we give up on them if the funding transaction does not
|
||
// confirm within 2016 blocks, as recommended by BOLT 2.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let _funding_tx = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_init(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 1_000_000, 100_000);
|
||
|
||
// The outbound node should wait forever for confirmation:
|
||
// This matches `channel::FUNDING_CONF_DEADLINE_BLOCKS` and BOLT 2's suggested timeout, thus is
|
||
// copied here instead of directly referencing the constant.
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 2016);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
// The inbound node should fail the channel after exactly 2016 blocks
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 2015);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::FundingTimedOut, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
|
||
let close_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(close_ev.len(), 1);
|
||
match close_ev[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { ref msg }, ref node_id } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(msg.as_ref().unwrap().data, "Channel closed because funding transaction failed to confirm within 2016 blocks");
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_override_channel_config() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Node0 initiates a channel to node1 using the override config.
|
||
let mut override_config = UserConfig::default();
|
||
override_config.channel_handshake_config.our_to_self_delay = 200;
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 16_000_000, 12_000_000, 42, Some(override_config)).unwrap();
|
||
|
||
// Assert the channel created by node0 is using the override config.
|
||
let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(res.channel_flags, 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(res.to_self_delay, 200);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_override_0msat_htlc_minimum() {
|
||
let mut zero_config = UserConfig::default();
|
||
zero_config.channel_handshake_config.our_htlc_minimum_msat = 0;
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(zero_config.clone())]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 16_000_000, 12_000_000, 42, Some(zero_config)).unwrap();
|
||
let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(res.htlc_minimum_msat, 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &res);
|
||
let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(res.htlc_minimum_msat, 1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_channel_update_has_correct_htlc_maximum_msat() {
|
||
// Tests that the `ChannelUpdate` message has the correct values for `htlc_maximum_msat` set.
|
||
// Bolt 7 specifies that if present `htlc_maximum_msat`:
|
||
// 1. MUST be set to less than or equal to the channel capacity. In LDK, this is capped to
|
||
// 90% of the `channel_value`.
|
||
// 2. MUST be set to less than or equal to the `max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat` received from the peer.
|
||
|
||
let mut config_30_percent = UserConfig::default();
|
||
config_30_percent.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
|
||
config_30_percent.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 30;
|
||
let mut config_50_percent = UserConfig::default();
|
||
config_50_percent.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
|
||
config_50_percent.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 50;
|
||
let mut config_95_percent = UserConfig::default();
|
||
config_95_percent.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
|
||
config_95_percent.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 95;
|
||
let mut config_100_percent = UserConfig::default();
|
||
config_100_percent.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = true;
|
||
config_100_percent.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 100;
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config_30_percent), Some(config_50_percent), Some(config_95_percent), Some(config_100_percent)]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let channel_value_satoshis = 100000;
|
||
let channel_value_msat = channel_value_satoshis * 1000;
|
||
let channel_value_30_percent_msat = (channel_value_msat as f64 * 0.3) as u64;
|
||
let channel_value_50_percent_msat = (channel_value_msat as f64 * 0.5) as u64;
|
||
let channel_value_90_percent_msat = (channel_value_msat as f64 * 0.9) as u64;
|
||
|
||
let (node_0_chan_update, node_1_chan_update, _, _) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, channel_value_satoshis, 10001);
|
||
let (node_2_chan_update, node_3_chan_update, _, _) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 3, channel_value_satoshis, 10001);
|
||
|
||
// Assert that `node[0]`'s `ChannelUpdate` is capped at 50 percent of the `channel_value`, as
|
||
// that's the value of `node[1]`'s `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat`.
|
||
assert_eq!(node_0_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, channel_value_50_percent_msat);
|
||
// Assert that `node[1]`'s `ChannelUpdate` is capped at 30 percent of the `channel_value`, as
|
||
// that's the value of `node[0]`'s `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat`.
|
||
assert_eq!(node_1_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, channel_value_30_percent_msat);
|
||
|
||
// Assert that `node[2]`'s `ChannelUpdate` is capped at 90 percent of the `channel_value`, as
|
||
// the value of `node[3]`'s `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat` (100%), exceeds 90% of the
|
||
// `channel_value`.
|
||
assert_eq!(node_2_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, channel_value_90_percent_msat);
|
||
// Assert that `node[3]`'s `ChannelUpdate` is capped at 90 percent of the `channel_value`, as
|
||
// the value of `node[2]`'s `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat` (95%), exceeds 90% of the
|
||
// `channel_value`.
|
||
assert_eq!(node_3_chan_update.contents.htlc_maximum_msat, channel_value_90_percent_msat);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_manually_accept_inbound_channel_request() {
|
||
let mut manually_accept_conf = UserConfig::default();
|
||
manually_accept_conf.manually_accept_inbound_channels = true;
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(manually_accept_conf.clone())]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, Some(manually_accept_conf)).unwrap();
|
||
let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &res);
|
||
|
||
// Assert that `nodes[1]` has no `MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel` in `msg_events` before
|
||
// accepting the inbound channel request.
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::OpenChannelRequest { temporary_channel_id, .. } => {
|
||
nodes[1].node.accept_inbound_channel(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 23).unwrap();
|
||
}
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let accept_msg_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(accept_msg_ev.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
match accept_msg_ev[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel { ref node_id, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
}
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&temp_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
|
||
|
||
let close_msg_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(close_msg_ev.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::ChannelClosed { user_channel_id, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(user_channel_id, 23);
|
||
}
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_manually_reject_inbound_channel_request() {
|
||
let mut manually_accept_conf = UserConfig::default();
|
||
manually_accept_conf.manually_accept_inbound_channels = true;
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(manually_accept_conf.clone())]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, Some(manually_accept_conf)).unwrap();
|
||
let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &res);
|
||
|
||
// Assert that `nodes[1]` has no `MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel` in `msg_events` before
|
||
// rejecting the inbound channel request.
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::OpenChannelRequest { temporary_channel_id, .. } => {
|
||
nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
|
||
}
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let close_msg_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(close_msg_ev.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
match close_msg_ev[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { ref node_id, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
}
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// There should be no more events to process, as the channel was never opened.
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_can_not_accept_inbound_channel_twice() {
|
||
let mut manually_accept_conf = UserConfig::default();
|
||
manually_accept_conf.manually_accept_inbound_channels = true;
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, Some(manually_accept_conf.clone())]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, Some(manually_accept_conf)).unwrap();
|
||
let res = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &res);
|
||
|
||
// Assert that `nodes[1]` has no `MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel` in `msg_events` before
|
||
// accepting the inbound channel request.
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::OpenChannelRequest { temporary_channel_id, .. } => {
|
||
nodes[1].node.accept_inbound_channel(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 0).unwrap();
|
||
let api_res = nodes[1].node.accept_inbound_channel(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 0);
|
||
match api_res {
|
||
Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) => {
|
||
assert_eq!(err, "No such channel awaiting to be accepted.");
|
||
},
|
||
Ok(_) => panic!("Channel shouldn't be possible to be accepted twice"),
|
||
Err(e) => panic!("Unexpected Error {:?}", e),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Ensure that the channel wasn't closed after attempting to accept it twice.
|
||
let accept_msg_ev = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(accept_msg_ev.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
match accept_msg_ev[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel { ref node_id, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
}
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_can_not_accept_unknown_inbound_channel() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfg = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfg = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfg);
|
||
let node_chanmgr = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfg, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfg, &node_chanmgr);
|
||
|
||
let unknown_channel_id = ChannelId::new_zero();
|
||
let api_res = nodes[0].node.accept_inbound_channel(&unknown_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 0);
|
||
match api_res {
|
||
Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) => {
|
||
assert_eq!(err, "No such channel awaiting to be accepted.");
|
||
},
|
||
Ok(_) => panic!("It shouldn't be possible to accept an unkown channel"),
|
||
Err(e) => panic!("Unexpected Error: {:?}", e),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_onion_value_mpp_set_calculation() {
|
||
// Test that we use the onion value `amt_to_forward` when
|
||
// calculating whether we've reached the `total_msat` of an MPP
|
||
// by having a routing node forward more than `amt_to_forward`
|
||
// and checking that the receiving node doesn't generate
|
||
// a PaymentClaimable event too early
|
||
let node_count = 4;
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(node_count);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(node_count, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(node_count, &node_cfgs, &vec![None; node_count]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(node_count, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let chan_1_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).0.contents.short_channel_id;
|
||
let chan_2_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2).0.contents.short_channel_id;
|
||
let chan_3_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3).0.contents.short_channel_id;
|
||
let chan_4_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3).0.contents.short_channel_id;
|
||
|
||
let total_msat = 100_000;
|
||
let expected_paths: &[&[&Node]] = &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]];
|
||
let (mut route, our_payment_hash, our_payment_preimage, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(&nodes[0], nodes[3], total_msat);
|
||
let sample_path = route.paths.pop().unwrap();
|
||
|
||
let mut path_1 = sample_path.clone();
|
||
path_1.hops[0].pubkey = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
|
||
path_1.hops[0].short_channel_id = chan_1_id;
|
||
path_1.hops[1].pubkey = nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id();
|
||
path_1.hops[1].short_channel_id = chan_3_id;
|
||
path_1.hops[1].fee_msat = 100_000;
|
||
route.paths.push(path_1);
|
||
|
||
let mut path_2 = sample_path.clone();
|
||
path_2.hops[0].pubkey = nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id();
|
||
path_2.hops[0].short_channel_id = chan_2_id;
|
||
path_2.hops[1].pubkey = nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id();
|
||
path_2.hops[1].short_channel_id = chan_4_id;
|
||
path_2.hops[1].fee_msat = 1_000;
|
||
route.paths.push(path_2);
|
||
|
||
// Send payment
|
||
let payment_id = PaymentId(nodes[0].keys_manager.backing.get_secure_random_bytes());
|
||
let onion_session_privs = nodes[0].node.test_add_new_pending_payment(our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), payment_id, &route).unwrap();
|
||
nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_internal(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), None, payment_id, Some(total_msat), onion_session_privs).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], expected_paths.len());
|
||
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), expected_paths.len());
|
||
|
||
// First path
|
||
let ev = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&expected_paths[0][0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
|
||
let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(ev);
|
||
let mut prev_node = &nodes[0];
|
||
|
||
for (idx, &node) in expected_paths[0].iter().enumerate() {
|
||
assert_eq!(node.node.get_our_node_id(), payment_event.node_id);
|
||
|
||
if idx == 0 { // routing node
|
||
let session_priv = [3; 32];
|
||
let height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1;
|
||
let session_priv = SecretKey::from_slice(&session_priv).unwrap();
|
||
let mut onion_keys = onion_utils::construct_onion_keys(&Secp256k1::new(), &route.paths[0], &session_priv).unwrap();
|
||
let (mut onion_payloads, _, _) = onion_utils::build_onion_payloads(&route.paths[0], 100_000,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), height + 1, &None).unwrap();
|
||
// Edit amt_to_forward to simulate the sender having set
|
||
// the final amount and the routing node taking less fee
|
||
if let msgs::OutboundOnionPayload::Receive { ref mut amt_msat, .. } = onion_payloads[1] {
|
||
*amt_msat = 99_000;
|
||
} else { panic!() }
|
||
let new_onion_packet = onion_utils::construct_onion_packet(onion_payloads, onion_keys, [0; 32], &our_payment_hash).unwrap();
|
||
payment_event.msgs[0].onion_routing_packet = new_onion_packet;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
node.node.handle_update_add_htlc(&prev_node.node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(node, 0);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(node, prev_node, payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(node);
|
||
|
||
if idx == 0 {
|
||
let mut events_2 = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(node, 1);
|
||
payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events_2.remove(0));
|
||
assert_eq!(payment_event.msgs.len(), 1);
|
||
} else {
|
||
let events_2 = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert!(events_2.is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
prev_node = node;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Second path
|
||
let ev = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&expected_paths[1][0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
|
||
pass_along_path(&nodes[0], expected_paths[1], 101_000, our_payment_hash.clone(), Some(our_payment_secret), ev, true, None);
|
||
|
||
claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], expected_paths, false, our_payment_preimage);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_overshoot_mpp(msat_amounts: &[u64], total_msat: u64) {
|
||
|
||
let routing_node_count = msat_amounts.len();
|
||
let node_count = routing_node_count + 2;
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(node_count);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(node_count, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(node_count, &node_cfgs, &vec![None; node_count]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(node_count, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let src_idx = 0;
|
||
let dst_idx = 1;
|
||
|
||
// Create channels for each amount
|
||
let mut expected_paths = Vec::with_capacity(routing_node_count);
|
||
let mut src_chan_ids = Vec::with_capacity(routing_node_count);
|
||
let mut dst_chan_ids = Vec::with_capacity(routing_node_count);
|
||
for i in 0..routing_node_count {
|
||
let routing_node = 2 + i;
|
||
let src_chan_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, src_idx, routing_node).0.contents.short_channel_id;
|
||
src_chan_ids.push(src_chan_id);
|
||
let dst_chan_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, routing_node, dst_idx).0.contents.short_channel_id;
|
||
dst_chan_ids.push(dst_chan_id);
|
||
let path = vec![&nodes[routing_node], &nodes[dst_idx]];
|
||
expected_paths.push(path);
|
||
}
|
||
let expected_paths: Vec<&[&Node]> = expected_paths.iter().map(|route| route.as_slice()).collect();
|
||
|
||
// Create a route for each amount
|
||
let example_amount = 100000;
|
||
let (mut route, our_payment_hash, our_payment_preimage, our_payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(&nodes[src_idx], nodes[dst_idx], example_amount);
|
||
let sample_path = route.paths.pop().unwrap();
|
||
for i in 0..routing_node_count {
|
||
let routing_node = 2 + i;
|
||
let mut path = sample_path.clone();
|
||
path.hops[0].pubkey = nodes[routing_node].node.get_our_node_id();
|
||
path.hops[0].short_channel_id = src_chan_ids[i];
|
||
path.hops[1].pubkey = nodes[dst_idx].node.get_our_node_id();
|
||
path.hops[1].short_channel_id = dst_chan_ids[i];
|
||
path.hops[1].fee_msat = msat_amounts[i];
|
||
route.paths.push(path);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Send payment with manually set total_msat
|
||
let payment_id = PaymentId(nodes[src_idx].keys_manager.backing.get_secure_random_bytes());
|
||
let onion_session_privs = nodes[src_idx].node.test_add_new_pending_payment(our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), payment_id, &route).unwrap();
|
||
nodes[src_idx].node.test_send_payment_internal(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), None, payment_id, Some(total_msat), onion_session_privs).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[src_idx], expected_paths.len());
|
||
|
||
let mut events = nodes[src_idx].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), expected_paths.len());
|
||
let mut amount_received = 0;
|
||
for (path_idx, expected_path) in expected_paths.iter().enumerate() {
|
||
let ev = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&expected_path[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
|
||
|
||
let current_path_amount = msat_amounts[path_idx];
|
||
amount_received += current_path_amount;
|
||
let became_claimable_now = amount_received >= total_msat && amount_received - current_path_amount < total_msat;
|
||
pass_along_path(&nodes[src_idx], expected_path, amount_received, our_payment_hash.clone(), Some(our_payment_secret), ev, became_claimable_now, None);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[src_idx], &expected_paths, false, our_payment_preimage);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_overshoot_mpp() {
|
||
do_test_overshoot_mpp(&[100_000, 101_000], 200_000);
|
||
do_test_overshoot_mpp(&[100_000, 10_000, 100_000], 200_000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_simple_mpp() {
|
||
// Simple test of sending a multi-path payment.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let chan_1_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).0.contents.short_channel_id;
|
||
let chan_2_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2).0.contents.short_channel_id;
|
||
let chan_3_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 3).0.contents.short_channel_id;
|
||
let chan_4_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 3).0.contents.short_channel_id;
|
||
|
||
let (mut route, payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(&nodes[0], nodes[3], 100000);
|
||
let path = route.paths[0].clone();
|
||
route.paths.push(path);
|
||
route.paths[0].hops[0].pubkey = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
|
||
route.paths[0].hops[0].short_channel_id = chan_1_id;
|
||
route.paths[0].hops[1].short_channel_id = chan_3_id;
|
||
route.paths[1].hops[0].pubkey = nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id();
|
||
route.paths[1].hops[0].short_channel_id = chan_2_id;
|
||
route.paths[1].hops[1].short_channel_id = chan_4_id;
|
||
send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[0], route, &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], 200_000, payment_hash, payment_secret);
|
||
claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, payment_preimage);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_preimage_storage() {
|
||
// Simple test of payment preimage storage allowing no client-side storage to claim payments
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).0.contents.short_channel_id;
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
let (payment_hash, payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 7200, None).unwrap();
|
||
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100_000);
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
}
|
||
// Note that after leaving the above scope we have no knowledge of any arguments or return
|
||
// values from previous calls.
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::PaymentClaimable { ref purpose, .. } => {
|
||
match &purpose {
|
||
PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment { payment_preimage, .. } => {
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], payment_preimage.unwrap());
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("expected PaymentPurpose::InvoicePayment")
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_bad_secret_hash() {
|
||
// Simple test of unregistered payment hash/invalid payment secret handling
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).0.contents.short_channel_id;
|
||
|
||
let random_payment_hash = PaymentHash([42; 32]);
|
||
let random_payment_secret = PaymentSecret([43; 32]);
|
||
let (our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(100_000), 2, None).unwrap();
|
||
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 100_000);
|
||
|
||
// All the below cases should end up being handled exactly identically, so we macro the
|
||
// resulting events.
|
||
macro_rules! handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data {
|
||
($payment_hash: expr) => {
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
|
||
// We have to forward pending HTLCs once to process the receipt of the HTLC and then
|
||
// again to process the pending backwards-failure of the HTLC
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment{ payment_hash: $payment_hash }]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
// We should fail the payment back
|
||
let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
match events.pop().unwrap() {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { node_id: _, updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { update_fail_htlcs, commitment_signed, .. } } => {
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, false);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let expected_error_code = 0x4000|15; // incorrect_or_unknown_payment_details
|
||
// Error data is the HTLC value (100,000) and current block height
|
||
let expected_error_data = [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0x86, 0xa0, 0, 0, 0, CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH as u8];
|
||
|
||
// Send a payment with the right payment hash but the wrong payment secret
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(random_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!(our_payment_hash);
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, expected_error_code, expected_error_data);
|
||
|
||
// Send a payment with a random payment hash, but the right payment secret
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, random_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(random_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!(random_payment_hash);
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], random_payment_hash, true, expected_error_code, expected_error_data);
|
||
|
||
// Send a payment with a random payment hash and random payment secret
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, random_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(random_payment_secret), PaymentId(random_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
handle_unknown_invalid_payment_data!(random_payment_hash);
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], random_payment_hash, true, expected_error_code, expected_error_data);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_update_err_monitor_lockdown() {
|
||
// Our monitor will lock update of local commitment transaction if a broadcastion condition
|
||
// has been fulfilled (either force-close from Channel or block height requiring a HTLC-
|
||
// timeout). Trying to update monitor after lockdown should return a ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus
|
||
// error.
|
||
//
|
||
// This scenario may happen in a watchtower setup, where watchtower process a block height
|
||
// triggering a timeout while a slow-block-processing ChannelManager receives a local signed
|
||
// commitment at same time.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channel
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let outpoint = OutPoint { txid: chan_1.3.txid(), index: 0 };
|
||
|
||
// Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 10_000_000);
|
||
|
||
// Route a HTLC from node 0 to node 1 (but don't settle)
|
||
let (preimage, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 9_000_000);
|
||
|
||
// Copy ChainMonitor to simulate a watchtower and update block height of node 0 until its ChannelMonitor timeout HTLC onchain
|
||
let chain_source = test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet);
|
||
let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::with_id(format!("node {}", 0));
|
||
let persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
|
||
let watchtower = {
|
||
let new_monitor = {
|
||
let monitor = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(outpoint).unwrap();
|
||
let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor<TestChannelSigner>)>::read(
|
||
&mut io::Cursor::new(&monitor.encode()), (nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[0].keys_manager)).unwrap().1;
|
||
assert!(new_monitor == *monitor);
|
||
new_monitor
|
||
};
|
||
let watchtower = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster, &logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &persister, &node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(watchtower.watch_channel(outpoint, new_monitor), Ok(ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed));
|
||
watchtower
|
||
};
|
||
let block = create_dummy_block(BlockHash::all_zeros(), 42, Vec::new());
|
||
// Make the tx_broadcaster aware of enough blocks that it doesn't think we're violating
|
||
// transaction lock time requirements here.
|
||
chanmon_cfgs[0].tx_broadcaster.blocks.lock().unwrap().resize(200, (block.clone(), 200));
|
||
watchtower.chain_monitor.block_connected(&block, 200);
|
||
|
||
// Try to update ChannelMonitor
|
||
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(preimage);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], payment_hash, 9_000_000);
|
||
|
||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
|
||
{
|
||
let mut node_0_per_peer_lock;
|
||
let mut node_0_peer_state_lock;
|
||
if let ChannelPhase::Funded(ref mut channel) = get_channel_ref!(nodes[0], nodes[1], node_0_per_peer_lock, node_0_peer_state_lock, chan_1.2) {
|
||
if let Ok(Some(update)) = channel.commitment_signed(&updates.commitment_signed, &node_cfgs[0].logger) {
|
||
assert_eq!(watchtower.chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
|
||
} else { assert!(false); }
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert!(false);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
// Our local monitor is in-sync and hasn't processed yet timeout
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_concurrent_monitor_claim() {
|
||
// Watchtower A receives block, broadcasts state N, then channel receives new state N+1,
|
||
// sending it to both watchtowers, Bob accepts N+1, then receives block and broadcasts
|
||
// the latest state N+1, Alice rejects state N+1, but Bob has already broadcast it,
|
||
// state N+1 confirms. Alice claims output from state N+1.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channel
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let outpoint = OutPoint { txid: chan_1.3.txid(), index: 0 };
|
||
|
||
// Rebalance the network to generate htlc in the two directions
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 10_000_000);
|
||
|
||
// Route a HTLC from node 0 to node 1 (but don't settle)
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 9_000_000).0;
|
||
|
||
// Copy ChainMonitor to simulate watchtower Alice and update block height her ChannelMonitor timeout HTLC onchain
|
||
let chain_source = test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet);
|
||
let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::with_id(format!("node {}", "Alice"));
|
||
let persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
|
||
let alice_broadcaster = test_utils::TestBroadcaster::with_blocks(
|
||
Arc::new(Mutex::new(nodes[0].blocks.lock().unwrap().clone())),
|
||
);
|
||
let watchtower_alice = {
|
||
let new_monitor = {
|
||
let monitor = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(outpoint).unwrap();
|
||
let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor<TestChannelSigner>)>::read(
|
||
&mut io::Cursor::new(&monitor.encode()), (nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[0].keys_manager)).unwrap().1;
|
||
assert!(new_monitor == *monitor);
|
||
new_monitor
|
||
};
|
||
let watchtower = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &alice_broadcaster, &logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &persister, &node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(watchtower.watch_channel(outpoint, new_monitor), Ok(ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed));
|
||
watchtower
|
||
};
|
||
let block = create_dummy_block(BlockHash::all_zeros(), 42, Vec::new());
|
||
// Make Alice aware of enough blocks that it doesn't think we're violating transaction lock time
|
||
// requirements here.
|
||
const HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST: u32 = CHAN_CONFIRM_DEPTH + 1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS;
|
||
alice_broadcaster.blocks.lock().unwrap().resize((HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST) as usize, (block.clone(), HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST));
|
||
watchtower_alice.chain_monitor.block_connected(&block, HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST);
|
||
|
||
// Watchtower Alice should have broadcast a commitment/HTLC-timeout
|
||
let alice_state = {
|
||
let mut txn = alice_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
|
||
assert_eq!(txn.len(), 2);
|
||
txn.remove(0)
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Copy ChainMonitor to simulate watchtower Bob and make it receive a commitment update first.
|
||
let chain_source = test_utils::TestChainSource::new(Network::Testnet);
|
||
let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::with_id(format!("node {}", "Bob"));
|
||
let persister = test_utils::TestPersister::new();
|
||
let bob_broadcaster = test_utils::TestBroadcaster::with_blocks(Arc::clone(&alice_broadcaster.blocks));
|
||
let watchtower_bob = {
|
||
let new_monitor = {
|
||
let monitor = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(outpoint).unwrap();
|
||
let new_monitor = <(BlockHash, channelmonitor::ChannelMonitor<TestChannelSigner>)>::read(
|
||
&mut io::Cursor::new(&monitor.encode()), (nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[0].keys_manager)).unwrap().1;
|
||
assert!(new_monitor == *monitor);
|
||
new_monitor
|
||
};
|
||
let watchtower = test_utils::TestChainMonitor::new(Some(&chain_source), &bob_broadcaster, &logger, &chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator, &persister, &node_cfgs[0].keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(watchtower.watch_channel(outpoint, new_monitor), Ok(ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed));
|
||
watchtower
|
||
};
|
||
watchtower_bob.chain_monitor.block_connected(&create_dummy_block(BlockHash::all_zeros(), 42, Vec::new()), HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST - 1);
|
||
|
||
// Route another payment to generate another update with still previous HTLC pending
|
||
let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 3000000);
|
||
nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.update_add_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
||
{
|
||
let mut node_0_per_peer_lock;
|
||
let mut node_0_peer_state_lock;
|
||
if let ChannelPhase::Funded(ref mut channel) = get_channel_ref!(nodes[0], nodes[1], node_0_per_peer_lock, node_0_peer_state_lock, chan_1.2) {
|
||
if let Ok(Some(update)) = channel.commitment_signed(&updates.commitment_signed, &node_cfgs[0].logger) {
|
||
// Watchtower Alice should already have seen the block and reject the update
|
||
assert_eq!(watchtower_alice.chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress);
|
||
assert_eq!(watchtower_bob.chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.update_channel(outpoint, &update), ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed);
|
||
} else { assert!(false); }
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert!(false);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
// Our local monitor is in-sync and hasn't processed yet timeout
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
//// Provide one more block to watchtower Bob, expect broadcast of commitment and HTLC-Timeout
|
||
watchtower_bob.chain_monitor.block_connected(&create_dummy_block(BlockHash::all_zeros(), 42, Vec::new()), HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST);
|
||
|
||
// Watchtower Bob should have broadcast a commitment/HTLC-timeout
|
||
let bob_state_y;
|
||
{
|
||
let mut txn = bob_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
|
||
assert_eq!(txn.len(), 2);
|
||
bob_state_y = txn.remove(0);
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// We confirm Bob's state Y on Alice, she should broadcast a HTLC-timeout
|
||
let height = HTLC_TIMEOUT_BROADCAST + 1;
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast(&nodes[0], 1, true);
|
||
check_closed_event!(&nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, false,
|
||
[nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
watchtower_alice.chain_monitor.block_connected(&create_dummy_block(BlockHash::all_zeros(), 42, vec![bob_state_y.clone()]), height);
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
|
||
{
|
||
let htlc_txn = alice_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
|
||
assert_eq!(htlc_txn.len(), 2);
|
||
check_spends!(htlc_txn[0], bob_state_y);
|
||
// Alice doesn't clean up the old HTLC claim since it hasn't seen a conflicting spend for
|
||
// it. However, she should, because it now has an invalid parent.
|
||
check_spends!(htlc_txn[1], alice_state);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_pre_lockin_no_chan_closed_update() {
|
||
// Test that if a peer closes a channel in response to a funding_created message we don't
|
||
// generate a channel update (as the channel cannot appear on chain without a funding_signed
|
||
// message).
|
||
//
|
||
// Doing so would imply a channel monitor update before the initial channel monitor
|
||
// registration, violating our API guarantees.
|
||
//
|
||
// Previously, full_stack_target managed to hit this case by opening then closing a channel,
|
||
// then opening a second channel with the same funding output as the first (which is not
|
||
// rejected because the first channel does not exist in the ChannelManager) and closing it
|
||
// before receiving funding_signed.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create an initial channel
|
||
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let mut open_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg);
|
||
let accept_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_chan_msg);
|
||
|
||
// Move the first channel through the funding flow...
|
||
let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
|
||
|
||
let funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
let channel_id = crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_created_msg.funding_txid, index: funding_created_msg.funding_output_index }.to_channel_id();
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id, data: "Hi".to_owned() });
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 2, ClosureReason::CounterpartyForceClosed { peer_msg: UntrustedString("Hi".to_string()) }, true,
|
||
[nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(); 2], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_htlc_no_detection() {
|
||
// This test is a mutation to underscore the detection logic bug we had
|
||
// before #653. HTLC value routed is above the remaining balance, thus
|
||
// inverting HTLC and `to_remote` output. HTLC will come second and
|
||
// it wouldn't be seen by pre-#653 detection as we were enumerate()'ing
|
||
// on a watched outputs vector (Vec<TxOut>) thus implicitly relying on
|
||
// outputs order detection for correct spending children filtring.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
|
||
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 1_000_000);
|
||
let (_, our_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 2_000_000);
|
||
let local_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_1.2);
|
||
assert_eq!(local_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(local_txn[0].output.len(), 3);
|
||
check_spends!(local_txn[0], chan_1.3);
|
||
|
||
// Timeout HTLC on A's chain and so it can generate a HTLC-Timeout tx
|
||
let block = create_dummy_block(nodes[0].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![local_txn[0].clone()]);
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[0], &block);
|
||
// We deliberately connect the local tx twice as this should provoke a failure calling
|
||
// this test before #653 fix.
|
||
chain::Listen::block_connected(&nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor, &block, nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 1);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV);
|
||
|
||
let htlc_timeout = {
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], local_txn[0]);
|
||
node_txn[0].clone()
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[0], &create_dummy_block(nodes[0].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![htlc_timeout.clone()]));
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], our_payment_hash, false);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(broadcast_alice: bool, go_onchain_before_fulfill: bool) {
|
||
// If we route an HTLC, then learn the HTLC's preimage after the upstream channel has been
|
||
// force-closed, we must claim that HTLC on-chain. (Given an HTLC forwarded from Alice --> Bob -->
|
||
// Carol, Alice would be the upstream node, and Carol the downstream.)
|
||
//
|
||
// Steps of the test:
|
||
// 1) Alice sends a HTLC to Carol through Bob.
|
||
// 2) Carol doesn't settle the HTLC.
|
||
// 3) If broadcast_alice is true, Alice force-closes her channel with Bob. Else Bob force closes.
|
||
// Steps 4 and 5 may be reordered depending on go_onchain_before_fulfill.
|
||
// 4) Bob sees the Alice's commitment on his chain or vice versa. An offered output is present
|
||
// but can't be claimed as Bob doesn't have yet knowledge of the preimage.
|
||
// 5) Carol release the preimage to Bob off-chain.
|
||
// 6) Bob claims the offered output on the broadcasted commitment.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
let chan_ab = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 100000, 10001);
|
||
|
||
// Steps (1) and (2):
|
||
// Send an HTLC Alice --> Bob --> Carol, but Carol doesn't settle the HTLC back.
|
||
let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 3_000_000);
|
||
|
||
// Check that Alice's commitment transaction now contains an output for this HTLC.
|
||
let alice_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_ab.2);
|
||
check_spends!(alice_txn[0], chan_ab.3);
|
||
assert_eq!(alice_txn[0].output.len(), 2);
|
||
check_spends!(alice_txn[1], alice_txn[0]); // 2nd transaction is a non-final HTLC-timeout
|
||
assert_eq!(alice_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||
assert_eq!(alice_txn.len(), 2);
|
||
|
||
// Steps (3) and (4):
|
||
// If `go_onchain_before_fufill`, broadcast the relevant commitment transaction and check that Bob
|
||
// responds by (1) broadcasting a channel update and (2) adding a new ChannelMonitor.
|
||
let mut force_closing_node = 0; // Alice force-closes
|
||
let mut counterparty_node = 1; // Bob if Alice force-closes
|
||
|
||
// Bob force-closes
|
||
if !broadcast_alice {
|
||
force_closing_node = 1;
|
||
counterparty_node = 0;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[force_closing_node].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_ab.2, &nodes[counterparty_node].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[force_closing_node], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[force_closing_node], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[force_closing_node], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[counterparty_node].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
if go_onchain_before_fulfill {
|
||
let txn_to_broadcast = match broadcast_alice {
|
||
true => alice_txn.clone(),
|
||
false => get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_ab.2)
|
||
};
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![txn_to_broadcast[0].clone()]));
|
||
if broadcast_alice {
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Step (5):
|
||
// Carol then claims the funds and sends an update_fulfill message to Bob, and they go through the
|
||
// process of removing the HTLC from their commitment transactions.
|
||
nodes[2].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], payment_hash, 3_000_000);
|
||
|
||
let carol_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(carol_updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(carol_updates.update_fail_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(carol_updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(carol_updates.update_fee.is_none());
|
||
assert_eq!(carol_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &carol_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
|
||
let went_onchain = go_onchain_before_fulfill || force_closing_node == 1;
|
||
expect_payment_forwarded!(nodes[1], nodes[0], nodes[2], if went_onchain { None } else { Some(1000) }, went_onchain, false);
|
||
// If Alice broadcasted but Bob doesn't know yet, here he prepares to tell her about the preimage.
|
||
if !go_onchain_before_fulfill && broadcast_alice {
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &carol_updates.commitment_signed);
|
||
// One monitor update for the preimage to update the Bob<->Alice channel, one monitor update
|
||
// Carol<->Bob's updated commitment transaction info.
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 2);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||
let bob_revocation = match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
(*msg).clone()
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
let bob_updates = match events[1] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref node_id, ref updates } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
(*updates).clone()
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_revocation);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_updates.commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let carol_revocation = match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK { ref node_id, ref msg } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
(*msg).clone()
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &carol_revocation);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
// If this test requires the force-closed channel to not be on-chain until after the fulfill,
|
||
// here's where we put said channel's commitment tx on-chain.
|
||
let mut txn_to_broadcast = alice_txn.clone();
|
||
if !broadcast_alice { txn_to_broadcast = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_ab.2); }
|
||
if !go_onchain_before_fulfill {
|
||
connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![txn_to_broadcast[0].clone()]));
|
||
// If Bob was the one to force-close, he will have already passed these checks earlier.
|
||
if broadcast_alice {
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
let mut bob_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||
if broadcast_alice {
|
||
assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(bob_txn[0], txn_to_broadcast[0]);
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 2);
|
||
check_spends!(bob_txn[0], chan_ab.3);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Step (6):
|
||
// Finally, check that Bob broadcasted a preimage-claiming transaction for the HTLC output on the
|
||
// broadcasted commitment transaction.
|
||
{
|
||
let script_weight = match broadcast_alice {
|
||
true => OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT,
|
||
false => ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT
|
||
};
|
||
// If Alice force-closed, Bob only broadcasts a HTLC-output-claiming transaction. Otherwise,
|
||
// Bob force-closed and broadcasts the commitment transaction along with a
|
||
// HTLC-output-claiming transaction.
|
||
let bob_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
|
||
if broadcast_alice {
|
||
assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
check_spends!(bob_txn[0], txn_to_broadcast[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(bob_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), script_weight);
|
||
} else {
|
||
assert_eq!(bob_txn.len(), 2);
|
||
check_spends!(bob_txn[1], txn_to_broadcast[0]);
|
||
assert_eq!(bob_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), script_weight);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close() {
|
||
do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(true, true);
|
||
do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(false, true); // Technically redundant, but may as well
|
||
do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(true, false);
|
||
do_test_onchain_htlc_settlement_after_close(false, false);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_duplicate_temporary_channel_id_from_different_peers() {
|
||
// Tests that we can accept two different `OpenChannel` requests with the same
|
||
// `temporary_channel_id`, as long as they are from different peers.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create an first channel channel
|
||
nodes[1].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let mut open_chan_msg_chan_1_0 = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
// Create an second channel
|
||
nodes[2].node.create_channel(nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 43, None).unwrap();
|
||
let mut open_chan_msg_chan_2_0 = get_event_msg!(nodes[2], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
// Modify the `OpenChannel` from `nodes[2]` to `nodes[0]` to ensure that it uses the same
|
||
// `temporary_channel_id` as the `OpenChannel` from nodes[1] to nodes[0].
|
||
open_chan_msg_chan_2_0.temporary_channel_id = open_chan_msg_chan_1_0.temporary_channel_id;
|
||
|
||
// Assert that `nodes[0]` can accept both `OpenChannel` requests, even though they use the same
|
||
// `temporary_channel_id` as they are from different peers.
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg_chan_1_0);
|
||
{
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match &events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel { node_id, msg } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(node_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(msg.temporary_channel_id, open_chan_msg_chan_1_0.temporary_channel_id);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg_chan_2_0);
|
||
{
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match &events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel { node_id, msg } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(node_id, &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(msg.temporary_channel_id, open_chan_msg_chan_1_0.temporary_channel_id);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_duplicate_chan_id() {
|
||
// Test that if a given peer tries to open a channel with the same channel_id as one that is
|
||
// already open we reject it and keep the old channel.
|
||
//
|
||
// Previously, full_stack_target managed to figure out that if you tried to open two channels
|
||
// with the same funding output (ie post-funding channel_id), we'd create a monitor update for
|
||
// the existing channel when we detect the duplicate new channel, screwing up our monitor
|
||
// updating logic for the existing channel.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create an initial channel
|
||
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let mut open_chan_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
|
||
|
||
// Try to create a second channel with the same temporary_channel_id as the first and check
|
||
// that it is rejected.
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg);
|
||
{
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
|
||
// Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both the
|
||
// first (valid) and second (invalid) channels are closed, given they both have
|
||
// the same non-temporary channel_id. However, currently we do not, so we just
|
||
// move forward with it.
|
||
assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Move the first channel through the funding flow...
|
||
let (temporary_channel_id, tx, funding_output) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
|
||
|
||
let mut funding_created_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created_msg);
|
||
{
|
||
let mut added_monitors = nodes[1].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
|
||
added_monitors.clear();
|
||
}
|
||
expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
let funding_signed_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
let funding_outpoint = crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_created_msg.funding_txid, index: funding_created_msg.funding_output_index };
|
||
let channel_id = funding_outpoint.to_channel_id();
|
||
|
||
// Now we have the first channel past funding_created (ie it has a txid-based channel_id, not a
|
||
// temporary one).
|
||
|
||
// First try to open a second channel with a temporary channel id equal to the txid-based one.
|
||
// Technically this is allowed by the spec, but we don't support it and there's little reason
|
||
// to. Still, it shouldn't cause any other issues.
|
||
open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id = channel_id;
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_msg);
|
||
{
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
|
||
// Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both
|
||
// channels are closed, but currently we do not, so we just move forward with it.
|
||
assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, open_chan_msg.temporary_channel_id);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Now try to create a second channel which has a duplicate funding output.
|
||
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let open_chan_2_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_chan_2_msg);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
|
||
create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42); // Get and check the FundingGenerationReady event
|
||
|
||
let (_, funding_created) = {
|
||
let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
|
||
let mut a_peer_state = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
|
||
// Once we call `get_funding_created` the channel has a duplicate channel_id as
|
||
// another channel in the ChannelManager - an invalid state. Thus, we'd panic later when we
|
||
// try to create another channel. Instead, we drop the channel entirely here (leaving the
|
||
// channelmanager in a possibly nonsense state instead).
|
||
match a_peer_state.channel_by_id.remove(&open_chan_2_msg.temporary_channel_id).unwrap() {
|
||
ChannelPhase::UnfundedOutboundV1(chan) => {
|
||
let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
|
||
chan.get_funding_created(tx.clone(), funding_outpoint, false, &&logger).map_err(|_| ()).unwrap()
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected ChannelPhase variant"),
|
||
}
|
||
};
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created);
|
||
// At this point we'll look up if the channel_id is present and immediately fail the channel
|
||
// without trying to persist the `ChannelMonitor`.
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
|
||
|
||
// ...still, nodes[1] will reject the duplicate channel.
|
||
{
|
||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id } => {
|
||
// Technically, at this point, nodes[1] would be justified in thinking both
|
||
// channels are closed, but currently we do not, so we just move forward with it.
|
||
assert_eq!(msg.channel_id, channel_id);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// finally, finish creating the original channel and send a payment over it to make sure
|
||
// everything is functional.
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed_msg);
|
||
{
|
||
let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(added_monitors.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(added_monitors[0].0, funding_output);
|
||
added_monitors.clear();
|
||
}
|
||
expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
let events_4 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_4.len(), 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap()[0], tx);
|
||
|
||
let (channel_ready, _) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &tx);
|
||
let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &channel_ready);
|
||
update_nodes_with_chan_announce(&nodes, 0, 1, &announcement, &as_update, &bs_update);
|
||
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 8000000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_error_chans_closed() {
|
||
// Test that we properly handle error messages, closing appropriate channels.
|
||
//
|
||
// Prior to #787 we'd allow a peer to make us force-close a channel we had with a different
|
||
// peer. The "real" fix for that is to index channels with peers_ids, however in the mean time
|
||
// we can test various edge cases around it to ensure we don't regress.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Create some initial channels
|
||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
|
||
let chan_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
|
||
let chan_3 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 2, 100000, 10001);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 3);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 2);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[2].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
// Closing a channel from a different peer has no effect
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: chan_3.2, data: "ERR".to_owned() });
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 3);
|
||
|
||
// Closing one channel doesn't impact others
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: chan_2.2, data: "ERR".to_owned() });
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], false);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CounterpartyForceClosed { peer_msg: UntrustedString("ERR".to_string()) },
|
||
[nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0).len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 2);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[0].channel_id == chan_1.2 || nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[1].channel_id == chan_1.2);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[0].channel_id == chan_3.2 || nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[1].channel_id == chan_3.2);
|
||
|
||
// A null channel ID should close all channels
|
||
let _chan_4 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_error(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::ErrorMessage { channel_id: ChannelId::new_zero(), data: "ERR".to_owned() });
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 2);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 2, ClosureReason::CounterpartyForceClosed { peer_msg: UntrustedString("ERR".to_string()) },
|
||
[nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(); 2], 100000);
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & 2, 2);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
match events[1] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::BroadcastChannelUpdate { ref msg } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & 2, 2);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
// Note that at this point users of a standard PeerHandler will end up calling
|
||
// peer_disconnected.
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[0].channel_id == chan_3.2);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels().len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_usable_channels()[0].channel_id == chan_3.2);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_invalid_funding_tx() {
|
||
// Test that we properly handle invalid funding transactions sent to us from a peer.
|
||
//
|
||
// Previously, all other major lightning implementations had failed to properly sanitize
|
||
// funding transactions from their counterparties, leading to a multi-implementation critical
|
||
// security vulnerability (though we always sanitized properly, we've previously had
|
||
// un-released crashes in the sanitization process).
|
||
//
|
||
// Further, if the funding transaction is consensus-valid, confirms, and is later spent, we'd
|
||
// previously have crashed in `ChannelMonitor` even though we closed the channel as bogus and
|
||
// gave up on it. We test this here by generating such a transaction.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 10_000, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
|
||
|
||
let (temporary_channel_id, mut tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 42);
|
||
|
||
// Create a witness program which can be spent by a 4-empty-stack-elements witness and which is
|
||
// 136 bytes long. This matches our "accepted HTLC preimage spend" matching, previously causing
|
||
// a panic as we'd try to extract a 32 byte preimage from a witness element without checking
|
||
// its length.
|
||
let mut wit_program: Vec<u8> = channelmonitor::deliberately_bogus_accepted_htlc_witness_program();
|
||
let wit_program_script: Script = wit_program.into();
|
||
for output in tx.output.iter_mut() {
|
||
// Make the confirmed funding transaction have a bogus script_pubkey
|
||
output.script_pubkey = Script::new_v0_p2wsh(&wit_program_script.wscript_hash());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated_unchecked(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone(), 0).unwrap();
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
let events_1 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_1.len(), 0);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap()[0], tx);
|
||
nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clear();
|
||
|
||
let expected_err = "funding tx had wrong script/value or output index";
|
||
confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[1], &tx, 1);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError { err: expected_err.to_string() },
|
||
[nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let events_2 = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
|
||
if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { node_id, action } = &events_2[0] {
|
||
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
if let msgs::ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { msg } = action {
|
||
assert_eq!(msg.as_ref().unwrap().data, "Channel closed because of an exception: ".to_owned() + expected_err);
|
||
} else { panic!(); }
|
||
} else { panic!(); }
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
|
||
|
||
// Now confirm a spend of the (bogus) funding transaction. As long as the witness is 5 elements
|
||
// long the ChannelMonitor will try to read 32 bytes from the second-to-last element, panicing
|
||
// as its not 32 bytes long.
|
||
let mut spend_tx = Transaction {
|
||
version: 2i32, lock_time: PackedLockTime::ZERO,
|
||
input: tx.output.iter().enumerate().map(|(idx, _)| TxIn {
|
||
previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint {
|
||
txid: tx.txid(),
|
||
vout: idx as u32,
|
||
},
|
||
script_sig: Script::new(),
|
||
sequence: Sequence::ENABLE_RBF_NO_LOCKTIME,
|
||
witness: Witness::from_vec(channelmonitor::deliberately_bogus_accepted_htlc_witness())
|
||
}).collect(),
|
||
output: vec![TxOut {
|
||
value: 1000,
|
||
script_pubkey: Script::new(),
|
||
}]
|
||
};
|
||
check_spends!(spend_tx, tx);
|
||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &spend_tx);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_coinbase_funding_tx() {
|
||
// Miners are able to fund channels directly from coinbase transactions, however
|
||
// by consensus rules, outputs of a coinbase transaction are encumbered by a 100
|
||
// block maturity timelock. To ensure that a (non-0conf) channel like this is enforceable
|
||
// on-chain, the minimum depth is updated to 100 blocks for coinbase funding transactions.
|
||
//
|
||
// Note that 0conf channels with coinbase funding transactions are unaffected and are
|
||
// immediately operational after opening.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel);
|
||
let accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel);
|
||
|
||
// Create the coinbase funding transaction.
|
||
let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _) = create_coinbase_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 42);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
|
||
let funding_created = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
let funding_signed = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
// Starting at height 0, we "confirm" the coinbase at height 1.
|
||
confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[0], &tx, 1);
|
||
// We connect 98 more blocks to have 99 confirmations for the coinbase transaction.
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], COINBASE_MATURITY - 2);
|
||
// Check that we have no pending message events (we have not queued a `channel_ready` yet).
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
// Now connect one more block which results in 100 confirmations of the coinbase transaction.
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 1);
|
||
// There should now be a `channel_ready` which can be handled.
|
||
let _ = &nodes[1].node.handle_channel_ready(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(&nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReady, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
|
||
|
||
confirm_transaction_at(&nodes[1], &tx, 1);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], COINBASE_MATURITY - 2);
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
|
||
expect_channel_ready_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm_second(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(test_height_before_timelock: bool) {
|
||
// In the first version of the chain::Confirm interface, after a refactor was made to not
|
||
// broadcast CSV-locked transactions until their CSV lock is up, we wouldn't reliably broadcast
|
||
// transactions after a `transactions_confirmed` call. Specifically, if the chain, provided via
|
||
// `best_block_updated` is at height N, and a transaction output which we wish to spend at
|
||
// height N-1 (due to a CSV to height N-1) is provided at height N, we will not broadcast the
|
||
// spending transaction until height N+1 (or greater). This was due to the way
|
||
// `ChannelMonitor::transactions_confirmed` worked, only checking if we should broadcast a
|
||
// spending transaction at the height the input transaction was confirmed at, not whether we
|
||
// should broadcast a spending transaction at the current height.
|
||
// A second, similar, issue involved failing HTLCs backwards - because we only provided the
|
||
// height at which transactions were confirmed to `OnchainTx::update_claims_view`, it wasn't
|
||
// aware that the anti-reorg-delay had, in fact, already expired, waiting to fail-backwards
|
||
// until we learned about an additional block.
|
||
//
|
||
// As an additional check, if `test_height_before_timelock` is set, we instead test that we
|
||
// aren't broadcasting transactions too early (ie not broadcasting them at all).
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
*nodes[0].connect_style.borrow_mut() = ConnectStyle::BestBlockFirstSkippingBlocks;
|
||
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||
let (chan_announce, _, channel_id, _) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
|
||
let (_, payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1_000_000);
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[2].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&channel_id, &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
|
||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
let conf_height = nodes[1].best_block_info().1;
|
||
if !test_height_before_timelock {
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 24 * 6);
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.transactions_confirmed(
|
||
&nodes[1].get_block_header(conf_height), &[(0, &node_txn[0])], conf_height);
|
||
if test_height_before_timelock {
|
||
// If we confirmed the close transaction, but timelocks have not yet expired, we should not
|
||
// generate any events or broadcast any transactions
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().is_empty());
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
||
} else {
|
||
// We should broadcast an HTLC transaction spending our funding transaction first
|
||
let spending_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
|
||
assert_eq!(spending_txn.len(), 2);
|
||
assert_eq!(spending_txn[0].txid(), node_txn[0].txid());
|
||
check_spends!(spending_txn[1], node_txn[0]);
|
||
// We should also generate a SpendableOutputs event with the to_self output (as its
|
||
// timelock is up).
|
||
let descriptor_spend_txn = check_spendable_outputs!(nodes[1], node_cfgs[1].keys_manager);
|
||
assert_eq!(descriptor_spend_txn.len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
// If we also discover that the HTLC-Timeout transaction was confirmed some time ago, we
|
||
// should immediately fail-backwards the HTLC to the previous hop, without waiting for an
|
||
// additional block built on top of the current chain.
|
||
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.transactions_confirmed(
|
||
&nodes[1].get_block_header(conf_height + 1), &[(0, &spending_txn[1])], conf_height + 1);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: channel_id }]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert_eq!(updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||
assert!(updates.update_fee.is_none());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], updates.commitment_signed, true, true);
|
||
expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false, chan_announce.contents.short_channel_id, true);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast() {
|
||
do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(false);
|
||
do_test_tx_confirmed_skipping_blocks_immediate_broadcast(true);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(test_for_second_fail_panic: bool) {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let _chan = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100000, 10001);
|
||
|
||
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
|
||
.with_bolt11_features(nodes[1].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
|
||
let route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, 10_000).unwrap();
|
||
|
||
let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[1]);
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
}
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||
expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret, 10_000);
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
// Note that we use a different PaymentId here to allow us to duplicativly pay
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), PaymentId(our_payment_secret.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
// At this point, nodes[1] would notice it has too much value for the payment. It will
|
||
// assume the second is a privacy attack (no longer particularly relevant
|
||
// post-payment_secrets) and fail back the new HTLC. Previously, it'd also have failed back
|
||
// the first HTLC delivered above.
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[1]);
|
||
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
|
||
|
||
if test_for_second_fail_panic {
|
||
// Now we go fail back the first HTLC from the user end.
|
||
nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&our_payment_hash);
|
||
|
||
let expected_destinations = vec![
|
||
HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash },
|
||
HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash },
|
||
];
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[1], expected_destinations);
|
||
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
|
||
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
assert_eq!(fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 2);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[1]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
|
||
|
||
let failure_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(failure_events.len(), 4);
|
||
if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[0] {} else { panic!(); }
|
||
if let Event::PaymentFailed { .. } = failure_events[1] {} else { panic!(); }
|
||
if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[2] {} else { panic!(); }
|
||
if let Event::PaymentFailed { .. } = failure_events[3] {} else { panic!(); }
|
||
} else {
|
||
// Let the second HTLC fail and claim the first
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
|
||
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
|
||
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
|
||
|
||
expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new());
|
||
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], our_payment_preimage);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_dup_htlc_second_fail_panic() {
|
||
// Previously, if we received two HTLCs back-to-back, where the second overran the expected
|
||
// value for the payment, we'd fail back both HTLCs after generating a `PaymentClaimable` event.
|
||
// Then, if the user failed the second payment, they'd hit a "tried to fail an already failed
|
||
// HTLC" debug panic. This tests for this behavior, checking that only one HTLC is auto-failed.
|
||
do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(true);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_dup_htlc_second_rejected() {
|
||
// Test that if we receive a second HTLC for an MPP payment that overruns the payment amount we
|
||
// simply reject the second HTLC but are still able to claim the first HTLC.
|
||
do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(false);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_inconsistent_mpp_params() {
|
||
// Test that if we recieve two HTLCs with different payment parameters we fail back the first
|
||
// such HTLC and allow the second to stay.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 0);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 2, 100_000, 0);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 3, 100_000, 0);
|
||
let chan_2_3 =create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 3, 100_000, 0);
|
||
|
||
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
|
||
.with_bolt11_features(nodes[3].node.bolt11_invoice_features()).unwrap();
|
||
let mut route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_params, 15_000_000).unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
|
||
route.paths.sort_by(|path_a, _| {
|
||
// Sort the path so that the path through nodes[1] comes first
|
||
if path_a.hops[0].pubkey == nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id() {
|
||
core::cmp::Ordering::Less } else { core::cmp::Ordering::Greater }
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(&nodes[3]);
|
||
|
||
let cur_height = nodes[0].best_block_info().1;
|
||
let payment_id = PaymentId([42; 32]);
|
||
|
||
let session_privs = {
|
||
// We create a fake route here so that we start with three pending HTLCs, which we'll
|
||
// ultimately have, just not right away.
|
||
let mut dup_route = route.clone();
|
||
dup_route.paths.push(route.paths[1].clone());
|
||
nodes[0].node.test_add_new_pending_payment(our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), payment_id, &dup_route).unwrap()
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[0], &our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), 15_000_000, cur_height, payment_id,
|
||
&None, session_privs[0]).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, our_payment_hash, Some(our_payment_secret), events.pop().unwrap(), false, None);
|
||
}
|
||
assert!(nodes[3].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[1], &our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), 14_000_000, cur_height, payment_id, &None, session_privs[1]).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
|
||
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
|
||
let mut events = nodes[2].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
|
||
|
||
nodes[3].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 0);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[3], nodes[2], payment_event.commitment_msg, true, true);
|
||
|
||
// At this point, nodes[3] should notice the two HTLCs don't contain the same total payment
|
||
// amount. It will assume the second is a privacy attack (no longer particularly relevant
|
||
// post-payment_secrets) and fail back the new HTLC.
|
||
}
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_ignore!(nodes[3]);
|
||
nodes[3].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[3], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
|
||
nodes[3].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
|
||
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
|
||
|
||
let fail_updates_1 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[3], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[3], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
|
||
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[2], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_2_3.2 }]);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
|
||
let fail_updates_2 = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_2.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[2], fail_updates_2.commitment_signed, false);
|
||
|
||
expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain());
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.test_send_payment_along_path(&route.paths[1], &our_payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(our_payment_secret), 15_000_000, cur_height, payment_id,
|
||
&None, session_privs[2]).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, our_payment_hash, Some(our_payment_secret), events.pop().unwrap(), true, None);
|
||
|
||
do_claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, our_payment_preimage);
|
||
expect_payment_sent(&nodes[0], our_payment_preimage, Some(None), true, true);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_double_partial_claim() {
|
||
// Test what happens if a node receives a payment, generates a PaymentClaimable event, the HTLCs
|
||
// time out, the sender resends only some of the MPP parts, then the user processes the
|
||
// PaymentClaimable event, ensuring they don't inadvertently claim only part of the full payment
|
||
// amount.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 0);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 2, 100_000, 0);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 3, 100_000, 0);
|
||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 3, 100_000, 0);
|
||
|
||
let (mut route, payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[3], 15_000_000);
|
||
assert_eq!(route.paths.len(), 2);
|
||
route.paths.sort_by(|path_a, _| {
|
||
// Sort the path so that the path through nodes[1] comes first
|
||
if path_a.hops[0].pubkey == nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id() {
|
||
core::cmp::Ordering::Less } else { core::cmp::Ordering::Greater }
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
send_along_route_with_secret(&nodes[0], route.clone(), &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], 15_000_000, payment_hash, payment_secret);
|
||
// nodes[3] has now received a PaymentClaimable event...which it will take some (exorbitant)
|
||
// amount of time to respond to.
|
||
|
||
// Connect some blocks to time out the payment
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[3], TEST_FINAL_CLTV);
|
||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV); // To get the same height for sending later
|
||
|
||
let failed_destinations = vec![
|
||
HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash },
|
||
HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash },
|
||
];
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[3], failed_destinations);
|
||
|
||
pass_failed_payment_back(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, payment_hash, PaymentFailureReason::RecipientRejected);
|
||
|
||
// nodes[1] now retries one of the two paths...
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 2);
|
||
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||
let node_1_msgs = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
|
||
pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), node_1_msgs, false, None);
|
||
|
||
// At this point nodes[3] has received one half of the payment, and the user goes to handle
|
||
// that PaymentClaimable event they got hours ago and never handled...we should refuse to claim.
|
||
nodes[3].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 0);
|
||
assert!(nodes[3].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// The possible events which may trigger a `max_dust_htlc_exposure` breach
|
||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq)]
|
||
enum ExposureEvent {
|
||
/// Breach occurs at HTLC forwarding (see `send_htlc`)
|
||
AtHTLCForward,
|
||
/// Breach occurs at HTLC reception (see `update_add_htlc`)
|
||
AtHTLCReception,
|
||
/// Breach occurs at outbound update_fee (see `send_update_fee`)
|
||
AtUpdateFeeOutbound,
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(dust_outbound_balance: bool, exposure_breach_event: ExposureEvent, on_holder_tx: bool, multiplier_dust_limit: bool) {
|
||
// Test that we properly reject dust HTLC violating our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`
|
||
// policy.
|
||
//
|
||
// At HTLC forward (`send_payment()`), if the sum of the trimmed-to-dust HTLC inbound and
|
||
// trimmed-to-dust HTLC outbound balance and this new payment as included on next
|
||
// counterparty commitment are above our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`, we'll reject the
|
||
// update. At HTLC reception (`update_add_htlc()`), if the sum of the trimmed-to-dust HTLC
|
||
// inbound and trimmed-to-dust HTLC outbound balance and this new received HTLC as included
|
||
// on next counterparty commitment are above our `max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat`, we'll fail
|
||
// the update. Note, we return a `temporary_channel_failure` (0x1000 | 7), as the channel
|
||
// might be available again for HTLC processing once the dust bandwidth has cleared up.
|
||
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let mut config = test_default_channel_config();
|
||
config.channel_config.max_dust_htlc_exposure = if multiplier_dust_limit {
|
||
// Default test fee estimator rate is 253 sat/kw, so we set the multiplier to 5_000_000 / 253
|
||
// to get roughly the same initial value as the default setting when this test was
|
||
// originally written.
|
||
MaxDustHTLCExposure::FeeRateMultiplier(5_000_000 / 253)
|
||
} else { MaxDustHTLCExposure::FixedLimitMsat(5_000_000) }; // initial default setting value
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(config), None]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 500_000_000, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let mut open_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
open_channel.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat = 50_000_000;
|
||
open_channel.max_accepted_htlcs = 60;
|
||
if on_holder_tx {
|
||
open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis = 546;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel);
|
||
let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel);
|
||
|
||
let channel_type_features = ChannelTypeFeatures::only_static_remote_key();
|
||
|
||
let (temporary_channel_id, tx, _) = create_funding_transaction(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 1_000_000, 42);
|
||
|
||
if on_holder_tx {
|
||
let mut node_0_per_peer_lock;
|
||
let mut node_0_peer_state_lock;
|
||
match get_channel_ref!(nodes[0], nodes[1], node_0_per_peer_lock, node_0_peer_state_lock, temporary_channel_id) {
|
||
ChannelPhase::UnfundedOutboundV1(chan) => {
|
||
chan.context.holder_dust_limit_satoshis = 546;
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected ChannelPhase variant"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temporary_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).unwrap();
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()));
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()));
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
let (channel_ready, channel_id) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_confirm(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &tx);
|
||
let (announcement, as_update, bs_update) = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_b(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], &channel_ready);
|
||
update_nodes_with_chan_announce(&nodes, 0, 1, &announcement, &as_update, &bs_update);
|
||
|
||
// Fetch a route in advance as we will be unable to once we're unable to send.
|
||
let (mut route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) =
|
||
get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 1000);
|
||
|
||
let (dust_buffer_feerate, max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat) = {
|
||
let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
|
||
let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
|
||
let chan = chan_lock.channel_by_id.get(&channel_id).unwrap();
|
||
(chan.context().get_dust_buffer_feerate(None) as u64,
|
||
chan.context().get_max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator(nodes[0].fee_estimator)))
|
||
};
|
||
let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_timeout_tx_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000 + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000;
|
||
let dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
|
||
|
||
let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat: u64 = (dust_buffer_feerate * htlc_success_tx_weight(&channel_type_features) / 1000 + open_channel.dust_limit_satoshis - 1) * 1000;
|
||
let dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx: u64 = max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
|
||
|
||
let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx: u64 = 4;
|
||
let dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat: u64 = max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat / dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx;
|
||
|
||
if on_holder_tx {
|
||
if dust_outbound_balance {
|
||
// Outbound dust threshold: 2223 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + holder's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
|
||
// Outbound dust balance: 4372 sats
|
||
// Note, we need sent payment to be above outbound dust threshold on counterparty_tx of 2132 sats
|
||
for _ in 0..dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx {
|
||
let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat);
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
}
|
||
} else {
|
||
// Inbound dust threshold: 2324 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_SUCCESS_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + holder's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
|
||
// Inbound dust balance: 4372 sats
|
||
// Note, we need sent payment to be above outbound dust threshold on counterparty_tx of 2031 sats
|
||
for _ in 0..dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx {
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
} else {
|
||
if dust_outbound_balance {
|
||
// Outbound dust threshold: 2132 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + counteparty's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
|
||
// Outbound dust balance: 5000 sats
|
||
for _ in 0..dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx - 1 {
|
||
let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat);
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
}
|
||
} else {
|
||
// Inbound dust threshold: 2031 sats (`dust_buffer_feerate` * HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX_WEIGHT / 1000 + counteparty's `dust_limit_satoshis`)
|
||
// Inbound dust balance: 5000 sats
|
||
for _ in 0..dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx - 1 {
|
||
route_payment(&nodes[1], &[&nodes[0]], dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward {
|
||
route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat =
|
||
if on_holder_tx { dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat + 1 };
|
||
// With default dust exposure: 5000 sats
|
||
if on_holder_tx {
|
||
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)
|
||
), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
|
||
} else {
|
||
unwrap_send_err!(nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)
|
||
), true, APIError::ChannelUnavailable { .. }, {});
|
||
}
|
||
} else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception {
|
||
let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], if on_holder_tx { dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat } else { dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat + 4 });
|
||
nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
let mut events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.remove(0));
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
// With default dust exposure: 5000 sats
|
||
if on_holder_tx {
|
||
// Outbound dust balance: 6399 sats
|
||
let dust_inbound_overflow = dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * (dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + 1);
|
||
let dust_outbound_overflow = dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat * dust_outbound_htlc_on_holder_tx + dust_inbound_htlc_on_holder_tx_msat;
|
||
nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(), format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on holder commitment tx", if dust_outbound_balance { dust_outbound_overflow } else { dust_inbound_overflow }, max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
|
||
} else {
|
||
// Outbound dust balance: 5200 sats
|
||
nodes[0].logger.assert_log("lightning::ln::channel".to_string(),
|
||
format!("Cannot accept value that would put our exposure to dust HTLCs at {} over the limit {} on counterparty commitment tx",
|
||
dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat * (dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx - 1) + dust_htlc_on_counterparty_tx_msat + 4,
|
||
max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat), 1);
|
||
}
|
||
} else if exposure_breach_event == ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound {
|
||
route.paths[0].hops.last_mut().unwrap().fee_msat = 2_500_000;
|
||
// For the multiplier dust exposure limit, since it scales with feerate,
|
||
// we need to add a lot of HTLCs that will become dust at the new feerate
|
||
// to cross the threshold.
|
||
for _ in 0..20 {
|
||
let (_, payment_hash, payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash(&nodes[1], Some(1_000), None);
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
}
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
*feerate_lock = *feerate_lock * 10;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
nodes[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channel", "Cannot afford to send new feerate at 2530 without infringing max dust htlc exposure", 1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let _ = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
let mut added_monitors = nodes[0].chain_monitor.added_monitors.lock().unwrap();
|
||
added_monitors.clear();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(multiplier_dust_limit: bool) {
|
||
do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
|
||
do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
|
||
do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
|
||
do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
|
||
do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
|
||
do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
|
||
do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCReception, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
|
||
do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtHTLCForward, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
|
||
do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
|
||
do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(true, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
|
||
do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, false, multiplier_dust_limit);
|
||
do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure(false, ExposureEvent::AtUpdateFeeOutbound, true, multiplier_dust_limit);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_max_dust_htlc_exposure() {
|
||
do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(false);
|
||
do_test_max_dust_htlc_exposure_by_threshold_type(true);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_non_final_funding_tx() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_message);
|
||
let accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel_message);
|
||
|
||
let best_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
|
||
|
||
let chan_id = *nodes[0].network_chan_count.borrow();
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
let input = TxIn { previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint::null(), script_sig: bitcoin::Script::new(), sequence: Sequence(1), witness: Witness::from_vec(vec!(vec!(1))) };
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let mut tx = match events[0] {
|
||
Event::FundingGenerationReady { ref channel_value_satoshis, ref output_script, .. } => {
|
||
// Timelock the transaction _beyond_ the best client height + 1.
|
||
Transaction { version: chan_id as i32, lock_time: PackedLockTime(best_height + 2), input: vec![input], output: vec![TxOut {
|
||
value: *channel_value_satoshis, script_pubkey: output_script.clone(),
|
||
}]}
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
// Transaction should fail as it's evaluated as non-final for propagation.
|
||
match nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temp_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()) {
|
||
Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { err }) => {
|
||
assert_eq!(format!("Funding transaction absolute timelock is non-final"), err);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!()
|
||
}
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::ChannelClosed { channel_id, .. } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(channel_id, temp_channel_id);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_non_final_funding_tx_within_headroom() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_message);
|
||
let accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel_message);
|
||
|
||
let best_height = nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
|
||
|
||
let chan_id = *nodes[0].network_chan_count.borrow();
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
let input = TxIn { previous_output: BitcoinOutPoint::null(), script_sig: bitcoin::Script::new(), sequence: Sequence(1), witness: Witness::from_vec(vec!(vec!(1))) };
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let mut tx = match events[0] {
|
||
Event::FundingGenerationReady { ref channel_value_satoshis, ref output_script, .. } => {
|
||
// Timelock the transaction within a +1 headroom from the best block.
|
||
Transaction { version: chan_id as i32, lock_time: PackedLockTime(best_height + 1), input: vec![input], output: vec![TxOut {
|
||
value: *channel_value_satoshis, script_pubkey: output_script.clone(),
|
||
}]}
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Transaction should be accepted if it's in a +1 headroom from best block.
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.funding_transaction_generated(&temp_channel_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), tx.clone()).is_ok());
|
||
get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingCreated, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn accept_busted_but_better_fee() {
|
||
// If a peer sends us a fee update that is too low, but higher than our previous channel
|
||
// feerate, we should accept it. In the future we may want to consider closing the channel
|
||
// later, but for now we only accept the update.
|
||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
create_chan_between_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
|
||
|
||
// Set nodes[1] to expect 5,000 sat/kW.
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[1].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
*feerate_lock = 5000;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// If nodes[0] increases their feerate, even if its not enough, nodes[1] should accept it.
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
*feerate_lock = 1000;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_fee.as_ref().unwrap());
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], commitment_signed, false);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// If nodes[0] increases their feerate further, even if its not enough, nodes[1] should accept
|
||
// it.
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
*feerate_lock = 2000;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, ref commitment_signed, .. }, .. } => {
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_fee.as_ref().unwrap());
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], commitment_signed, false);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// However, if nodes[0] decreases their feerate, nodes[1] should reject it and close the
|
||
// channel.
|
||
{
|
||
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
|
||
*feerate_lock = 1000;
|
||
}
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { updates: msgs::CommitmentUpdate { ref update_fee, .. }, .. } => {
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_fee.as_ref().unwrap());
|
||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::ProcessingError {
|
||
err: "Peer's feerate much too low. Actual: 1000. Our expected lower limit: 5000 (- 250)".to_owned() },
|
||
[nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(valid_delta: bool, use_user_hash: bool) {
|
||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
let min_final_cltv_expiry_delta = 120;
|
||
let final_cltv_expiry_delta = if valid_delta { min_final_cltv_expiry_delta + 2 } else {
|
||
min_final_cltv_expiry_delta - 2 };
|
||
let recv_value = 100_000;
|
||
|
||
create_chan_between_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
|
||
|
||
let payment_parameters = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), final_cltv_expiry_delta as u32);
|
||
let (payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = if use_user_hash {
|
||
let (payment_preimage, payment_hash, payment_secret) = get_payment_preimage_hash!(nodes[1],
|
||
Some(recv_value), Some(min_final_cltv_expiry_delta));
|
||
(payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret)
|
||
} else {
|
||
let (payment_hash, payment_secret) = nodes[1].node.create_inbound_payment(Some(recv_value), 7200, Some(min_final_cltv_expiry_delta)).unwrap();
|
||
(payment_hash, nodes[1].node.get_payment_preimage(payment_hash, payment_secret).unwrap(), payment_secret)
|
||
};
|
||
let route = get_route!(nodes[0], payment_parameters, recv_value).unwrap();
|
||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||
|
||
if valid_delta {
|
||
expect_payment_claimable!(nodes[1], payment_hash, payment_secret, recv_value, if use_user_hash {
|
||
None } else { Some(payment_preimage) }, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
|
||
} else {
|
||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash }]);
|
||
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
let fail_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
|
||
|
||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, true);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_payment_with_custom_min_cltv_expiry_delta() {
|
||
do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(false, false);
|
||
do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(false, true);
|
||
do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(true, false);
|
||
do_payment_with_custom_min_final_cltv_expiry(true, true);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_disconnects_peer_awaiting_response_ticks() {
|
||
// Tests that nodes which are awaiting on a response critical for channel responsiveness
|
||
// disconnect their counterparty after `DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`.
|
||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Asserts a disconnect event is queued to the user.
|
||
let check_disconnect_event = |node: &Node, should_disconnect: bool| {
|
||
let disconnect_event = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().iter().find_map(|event|
|
||
if let MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action, .. } = event {
|
||
if let msgs::ErrorAction::DisconnectPeerWithWarning { .. } = action {
|
||
Some(())
|
||
} else {
|
||
None
|
||
}
|
||
} else {
|
||
None
|
||
}
|
||
);
|
||
assert_eq!(disconnect_event.is_some(), should_disconnect);
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Fires timer ticks ensuring we only attempt to disconnect peers after reaching
|
||
// `DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`.
|
||
let check_disconnect = |node: &Node| {
|
||
// No disconnect without any timer ticks.
|
||
check_disconnect_event(node, false);
|
||
|
||
// No disconnect with 1 timer tick less than required.
|
||
for _ in 0..DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS - 1 {
|
||
node.node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_disconnect_event(node, false);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Disconnect after reaching the required ticks.
|
||
node.node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_disconnect_event(node, true);
|
||
|
||
// Disconnect again on the next tick if the peer hasn't been disconnected yet.
|
||
node.node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_disconnect_event(node, true);
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
create_chan_between_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]);
|
||
|
||
// We'll start by performing a fee update with Alice (nodes[0]) on the channel.
|
||
*nodes[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap() *= 2;
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_added_monitors!(&nodes[0], 1);
|
||
let alice_fee_update = get_htlc_update_msgs(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), alice_fee_update.update_fee.as_ref().unwrap());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &alice_fee_update.commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(&nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
// This will prompt Bob (nodes[1]) to respond with his `CommitmentSigned` and `RevokeAndACK`.
|
||
let (bob_revoke_and_ack, bob_commitment_signed) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(&nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_revoke_and_ack);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(&nodes[0], 1);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_commitment_signed);
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
// Alice then needs to send her final `RevokeAndACK` to complete the commitment dance. We
|
||
// pretend Bob hasn't received the message and check whether he'll disconnect Alice after
|
||
// reaching `DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`.
|
||
let alice_revoke_and_ack = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
check_disconnect(&nodes[1]);
|
||
|
||
// Now, we'll reconnect them to test awaiting a `ChannelReestablish` message.
|
||
//
|
||
// Note that since the commitment dance didn't complete above, Alice is expected to resend her
|
||
// final `RevokeAndACK` to Bob to complete it.
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
let bob_init = msgs::Init {
|
||
features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_init, true).unwrap();
|
||
let alice_init = msgs::Init {
|
||
features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
|
||
};
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &alice_init, true).unwrap();
|
||
|
||
// Upon reconnection, Alice sends her `ChannelReestablish` to Bob. Alice, however, hasn't
|
||
// received Bob's yet, so she should disconnect him after reaching
|
||
// `DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`.
|
||
let alice_channel_reestablish = get_event_msg!(
|
||
nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()
|
||
);
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &alice_channel_reestablish);
|
||
check_disconnect(&nodes[0]);
|
||
|
||
// Bob now sends his `ChannelReestablish` to Alice to resume the channel and consider it "live".
|
||
let bob_channel_reestablish = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().iter().find_map(|event|
|
||
if let MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish { node_id, msg } = event {
|
||
assert_eq!(*node_id, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
Some(msg.clone())
|
||
} else {
|
||
None
|
||
}
|
||
).unwrap();
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bob_channel_reestablish);
|
||
|
||
// Sanity check that Alice won't disconnect Bob since she's no longer waiting for any messages.
|
||
for _ in 0..DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS {
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_disconnect_event(&nodes[0], false);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// However, Bob is still waiting on Alice's `RevokeAndACK`, so he should disconnect her after
|
||
// reaching `DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS`.
|
||
check_disconnect(&nodes[1]);
|
||
|
||
// Finally, have Bob process the last message.
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &alice_revoke_and_ack);
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
// At this point, neither node should attempt to disconnect each other, since they aren't
|
||
// waiting on any messages.
|
||
for node in &nodes {
|
||
for _ in 0..DISCONNECT_PEER_AWAITING_RESPONSE_TICKS {
|
||
node.node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_disconnect_event(node, false);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_remove_expired_outbound_unfunded_channels() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_message);
|
||
let accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel_message);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::FundingGenerationReady { .. } => (),
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Asserts the outbound channel has been removed from a nodes[0]'s peer state map.
|
||
let check_outbound_channel_existence = |should_exist: bool| {
|
||
let per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
|
||
let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(chan_lock.channel_by_id.contains_key(&temp_channel_id), should_exist);
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Channel should exist without any timer ticks.
|
||
check_outbound_channel_existence(true);
|
||
|
||
// Channel should exist with 1 timer tick less than required.
|
||
for _ in 0..UNFUNDED_CHANNEL_AGE_LIMIT_TICKS - 1 {
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_outbound_channel_existence(true)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Remove channel after reaching the required ticks.
|
||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_outbound_channel_existence(false);
|
||
|
||
let msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1);
|
||
match msg_events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id: _ } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(msg.data, "Force-closing pending channel due to timeout awaiting establishment handshake");
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
check_closed_event(&nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, false, &[nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_remove_expired_inbound_unfunded_channels() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let temp_channel_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100_000, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
|
||
let open_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_open_channel(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_message);
|
||
let accept_channel_message = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &accept_channel_message);
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||
match events[0] {
|
||
Event::FundingGenerationReady { .. } => (),
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Asserts the inbound channel has been removed from a nodes[1]'s peer state map.
|
||
let check_inbound_channel_existence = |should_exist: bool| {
|
||
let per_peer_state = nodes[1].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
|
||
let chan_lock = per_peer_state.get(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap().lock().unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(chan_lock.channel_by_id.contains_key(&temp_channel_id), should_exist);
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// Channel should exist without any timer ticks.
|
||
check_inbound_channel_existence(true);
|
||
|
||
// Channel should exist with 1 timer tick less than required.
|
||
for _ in 0..UNFUNDED_CHANNEL_AGE_LIMIT_TICKS - 1 {
|
||
nodes[1].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_inbound_channel_existence(true)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Remove channel after reaching the required ticks.
|
||
nodes[1].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||
check_inbound_channel_existence(false);
|
||
|
||
let msg_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1);
|
||
match msg_events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage { ref msg }, node_id: _ } => {
|
||
assert_eq!(msg.data, "Force-closing pending channel due to timeout awaiting establishment handshake");
|
||
},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
check_closed_event(&nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, false, &[nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_multi_post_event_actions(do_reload: bool) {
|
||
// Tests handling multiple post-Event actions at once.
|
||
// There is specific code in ChannelManager to handle channels where multiple post-Event
|
||
// `ChannelMonitorUpdates` are pending at once. This test exercises that code.
|
||
//
|
||
// Specifically, we test calling `get_and_clear_pending_events` while there are two
|
||
// PaymentSents from different channels and one channel has two pending `ChannelMonitorUpdate`s
|
||
// - one from an RAA and one from an inbound commitment_signed.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let (persister, chain_monitor);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes_0_deserialized;
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let chan_id = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1).2;
|
||
let chan_id_2 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 2).2;
|
||
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000);
|
||
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2]], 1_000_000);
|
||
|
||
let (our_payment_preimage, our_payment_hash, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1_000_000);
|
||
let (payment_preimage_2, payment_hash_2, ..) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2]], 1_000_000);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(our_payment_preimage);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[1], our_payment_hash, 1_000_000);
|
||
|
||
nodes[2].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_2);
|
||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||
expect_payment_claimed!(nodes[2], payment_hash_2, 1_000_000);
|
||
|
||
for dest in &[1, 2] {
|
||
let htlc_fulfill_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[*dest], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[*dest].node.get_our_node_id(), &htlc_fulfill_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
|
||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[*dest], htlc_fulfill_updates.commitment_signed, false);
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 0);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let (route, payment_hash_3, _, payment_secret_3) =
|
||
get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[1], nodes[0], 100_000);
|
||
let payment_id = PaymentId(payment_hash_3.0);
|
||
nodes[1].node.send_payment_with_route(&route, payment_hash_3,
|
||
RecipientOnionFields::secret_only(payment_secret_3), payment_id).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[1], 1);
|
||
|
||
let send_event = SendEvent::from_node(&nodes[1]);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_event.msgs[0]);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &send_event.commitment_msg);
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||
|
||
if do_reload {
|
||
let nodes_0_serialized = nodes[0].node.encode();
|
||
let chan_0_monitor_serialized = get_monitor!(nodes[0], chan_id).encode();
|
||
let chan_1_monitor_serialized = get_monitor!(nodes[0], chan_id_2).encode();
|
||
reload_node!(nodes[0], test_default_channel_config(), &nodes_0_serialized, &[&chan_0_monitor_serialized, &chan_1_monitor_serialized], persister, chain_monitor, nodes_0_deserialized);
|
||
|
||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[2].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[1]));
|
||
reconnect_nodes(ReconnectArgs::new(&nodes[0], &nodes[2]));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
|
||
if let Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, .. } = events[0] {
|
||
assert!(payment_preimage == our_payment_preimage || payment_preimage == payment_preimage_2);
|
||
} else { panic!(); }
|
||
if let Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, .. } = events[1] {
|
||
assert!(payment_preimage == our_payment_preimage || payment_preimage == payment_preimage_2);
|
||
} else { panic!(); }
|
||
if let Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } = events[2] {} else { panic!(); }
|
||
if let Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } = events[3] {} else { panic!(); }
|
||
|
||
// After the events are processed, the ChannelMonitorUpdates will be released and, upon their
|
||
// completion, we'll respond to nodes[1] with an RAA + CS.
|
||
get_revoke_commit_msgs(&nodes[0], &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 3);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_multi_post_event_actions() {
|
||
do_test_multi_post_event_actions(true);
|
||
do_test_multi_post_event_actions(false);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_batch_channel_open() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Initiate channel opening and create the batch channel funding transaction.
|
||
let (tx, funding_created_msgs) = create_batch_channel_funding(&nodes[0], &[
|
||
(&nodes[1], 100_000, 0, 42, None),
|
||
(&nodes[2], 200_000, 0, 43, None),
|
||
]);
|
||
|
||
// Go through the funding_created and funding_signed flow with node 1.
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created_msgs[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[1], 1);
|
||
expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
let funding_signed_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed_msg);
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
// The transaction should not have been broadcast before all channels are ready.
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().len(), 0);
|
||
|
||
// Go through the funding_created and funding_signed flow with node 2.
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created_msgs[1]);
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[2], 1);
|
||
expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[2], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
let funding_signed_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[2], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
chanmon_cfgs[0].persister.set_update_ret(ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed_msg);
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
// The transaction should not have been broadcast before persisting all monitors has been
|
||
// completed.
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast().len(), 0);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().len(), 0);
|
||
|
||
// Complete the persistence of the monitor.
|
||
nodes[0].chain_monitor.complete_sole_pending_chan_update(
|
||
&OutPoint { txid: tx.txid(), index: 1 }.to_channel_id()
|
||
);
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
|
||
// The transaction should only have been broadcast now.
|
||
let broadcasted_txs = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
|
||
assert_eq!(broadcasted_txs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(broadcasted_txs[0], tx);
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||
assert!(events.iter().any(|e| matches!(
|
||
*e,
|
||
crate::events::Event::ChannelPending {
|
||
ref counterparty_node_id,
|
||
..
|
||
} if counterparty_node_id == &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(),
|
||
)));
|
||
assert!(events.iter().any(|e| matches!(
|
||
*e,
|
||
crate::events::Event::ChannelPending {
|
||
ref counterparty_node_id,
|
||
..
|
||
} if counterparty_node_id == &nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(),
|
||
)));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_disconnect_in_funding_batch() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Initiate channel opening and create the batch channel funding transaction.
|
||
let (tx, funding_created_msgs) = create_batch_channel_funding(&nodes[0], &[
|
||
(&nodes[1], 100_000, 0, 42, None),
|
||
(&nodes[2], 200_000, 0, 43, None),
|
||
]);
|
||
|
||
// Go through the funding_created and funding_signed flow with node 1.
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created_msgs[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[1], 1);
|
||
expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
let funding_signed_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed_msg);
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
// The transaction should not have been broadcast before all channels are ready.
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast().len(), 0);
|
||
|
||
// The remaining peer in the batch disconnects.
|
||
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
// The channels in the batch will close immediately.
|
||
let channel_id_1 = OutPoint { txid: tx.txid(), index: 0 }.to_channel_id();
|
||
let channel_id_2 = OutPoint { txid: tx.txid(), index: 1 }.to_channel_id();
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
|
||
assert!(events.iter().any(|e| matches!(
|
||
e,
|
||
Event::ChannelClosed {
|
||
channel_id,
|
||
..
|
||
} if channel_id == &channel_id_1
|
||
)));
|
||
assert!(events.iter().any(|e| matches!(
|
||
e,
|
||
Event::ChannelClosed {
|
||
channel_id,
|
||
..
|
||
} if channel_id == &channel_id_2
|
||
)));
|
||
assert_eq!(events.iter().filter(|e| matches!(
|
||
e,
|
||
Event::DiscardFunding { .. },
|
||
)).count(), 2);
|
||
|
||
// The monitor should become closed.
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
|
||
{
|
||
let mut monitor_updates = nodes[0].chain_monitor.monitor_updates.lock().unwrap();
|
||
let monitor_updates_1 = monitor_updates.get(&channel_id_1).unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(monitor_updates_1.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(monitor_updates_1[0].update_id, CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// The funding transaction should not have been broadcast, and therefore, we don't need
|
||
// to broadcast a force-close transaction for the closed monitor.
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast().len(), 0);
|
||
|
||
// Ensure the channels don't exist anymore.
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_batch_funding_close_after_funding_signed() {
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||
let nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
// Initiate channel opening and create the batch channel funding transaction.
|
||
let (tx, funding_created_msgs) = create_batch_channel_funding(&nodes[0], &[
|
||
(&nodes[1], 100_000, 0, 42, None),
|
||
(&nodes[2], 200_000, 0, 43, None),
|
||
]);
|
||
|
||
// Go through the funding_created and funding_signed flow with node 1.
|
||
nodes[1].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created_msgs[0]);
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[1], 1);
|
||
expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[1], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
let funding_signed_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed_msg);
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
// Go through the funding_created and funding_signed flow with node 2.
|
||
nodes[2].node.handle_funding_created(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_created_msgs[1]);
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[2], 1);
|
||
expect_channel_pending_event(&nodes[2], &nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
|
||
let funding_signed_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[2], MessageSendEvent::SendFundingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||
chanmon_cfgs[0].persister.set_update_ret(ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress);
|
||
nodes[0].node.handle_funding_signed(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &funding_signed_msg);
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
|
||
|
||
// The transaction should not have been broadcast before all channels are ready.
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast().len(), 0);
|
||
|
||
// Force-close the channel for which we've completed the initial monitor.
|
||
let channel_id_1 = OutPoint { txid: tx.txid(), index: 0 }.to_channel_id();
|
||
let channel_id_2 = OutPoint { txid: tx.txid(), index: 1 }.to_channel_id();
|
||
nodes[0].node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&channel_id_1, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
|
||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 2);
|
||
{
|
||
let mut monitor_updates = nodes[0].chain_monitor.monitor_updates.lock().unwrap();
|
||
let monitor_updates_1 = monitor_updates.get(&channel_id_1).unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(monitor_updates_1.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(monitor_updates_1[0].update_id, CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID);
|
||
let monitor_updates_2 = monitor_updates.get(&channel_id_2).unwrap();
|
||
assert_eq!(monitor_updates_2.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(monitor_updates_2[0].update_id, CLOSED_CHANNEL_UPDATE_ID);
|
||
}
|
||
let msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
match msg_events[0] {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { .. } => (),
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected message."),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// We broadcast the commitment transaction as part of the force-close.
|
||
{
|
||
let broadcasted_txs = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
|
||
assert_eq!(broadcasted_txs.len(), 1);
|
||
assert!(broadcasted_txs[0].txid() != tx.txid());
|
||
assert_eq!(broadcasted_txs[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(broadcasted_txs[0].input[0].previous_output.txid, tx.txid());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// All channels in the batch should close immediately.
|
||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
|
||
assert!(events.iter().any(|e| matches!(
|
||
e,
|
||
Event::ChannelClosed {
|
||
channel_id,
|
||
..
|
||
} if channel_id == &channel_id_1
|
||
)));
|
||
assert!(events.iter().any(|e| matches!(
|
||
e,
|
||
Event::ChannelClosed {
|
||
channel_id,
|
||
..
|
||
} if channel_id == &channel_id_2
|
||
)));
|
||
assert_eq!(events.iter().filter(|e| matches!(
|
||
e,
|
||
Event::DiscardFunding { .. },
|
||
)).count(), 2);
|
||
|
||
// Ensure the channels don't exist anymore.
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn do_test_funding_and_commitment_tx_confirm_same_block(confirm_remote_commitment: bool) {
|
||
// Tests that a node will forget the channel (when it only requires 1 confirmation) if the
|
||
// funding and commitment transaction confirm in the same block.
|
||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||
let mut min_depth_1_block_cfg = test_default_channel_config();
|
||
min_depth_1_block_cfg.channel_handshake_config.minimum_depth = 1;
|
||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(min_depth_1_block_cfg), Some(min_depth_1_block_cfg)]);
|
||
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||
|
||
let funding_tx = create_chan_between_nodes_with_value_init(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], 1_000_000, 0);
|
||
let chan_id = chain::transaction::OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 }.to_channel_id();
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
|
||
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
|
||
|
||
let (closing_node, other_node) = if confirm_remote_commitment {
|
||
(&nodes[1], &nodes[0])
|
||
} else {
|
||
(&nodes[0], &nodes[1])
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
closing_node.node.force_close_broadcasting_latest_txn(&chan_id, &other_node.node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
|
||
let mut msg_events = closing_node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1);
|
||
match msg_events.pop().unwrap() {
|
||
MessageSendEvent::HandleError { action: msgs::ErrorAction::DisconnectPeer { .. }, .. } => {},
|
||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||
}
|
||
check_added_monitors(closing_node, 1);
|
||
check_closed_event(closing_node, 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, false, &[other_node.node.get_our_node_id()], 1_000_000);
|
||
|
||
let commitment_tx = {
|
||
let mut txn = closing_node.tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
|
||
assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1);
|
||
let commitment_tx = txn.pop().unwrap();
|
||
check_spends!(commitment_tx, funding_tx);
|
||
commitment_tx
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
mine_transactions(&nodes[0], &[&funding_tx, &commitment_tx]);
|
||
mine_transactions(&nodes[1], &[&funding_tx, &commitment_tx]);
|
||
|
||
check_closed_broadcast(other_node, 1, true);
|
||
check_added_monitors(other_node, 1);
|
||
check_closed_event(other_node, 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, false, &[closing_node.node.get_our_node_id()], 1_000_000);
|
||
|
||
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
||
assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn test_funding_and_commitment_tx_confirm_same_block() {
|
||
do_test_funding_and_commitment_tx_confirm_same_block(false);
|
||
do_test_funding_and_commitment_tx_confirm_same_block(true);
|
||
}
|