// This file is Copyright its original authors, visible in version control // history. // // This file is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 or the MIT license // , at your option. // You may not use this file except in accordance with one or both of these // licenses. //! Further functional tests which test blockchain reorganizations. use chain::channelmonitor::ANTI_REORG_DELAY; use ln::{PaymentPreimage, PaymentHash}; use ln::features::InitFeatures; use ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, HTLCFailChannelUpdate, ErrorAction}; use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider}; use routing::router::get_route; use bitcoin::hashes::sha256::Hash as Sha256; use bitcoin::hashes::Hash; use prelude::*; use ln::functional_test_utils::*; #[test] fn chanmon_fail_from_stale_commitment() { // If we forward an HTLC to our counterparty, but we force-closed the channel before our // counterparty provides us an updated commitment transaction, we'll end up with a commitment // transaction that does not contain the HTLC which we attempted to forward. In this case, we // need to wait `ANTI_REORG_DELAY` blocks and then fail back the HTLC as there is no way for us // to learn the preimage and the confirmed commitment transaction paid us the value of the // HTLC. // // However, previously, we did not do this, ignoring the HTLC entirely. // // This could lead to channel closure if the sender we received the HTLC from decides to go on // chain to get their HTLC back before it times out. // // Here, we check exactly this case, forwarding a payment from A, through B, to C, before B // broadcasts its latest commitment transaction, which should result in it eventually failing // the HTLC back off-chain to A. let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3); let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs); let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]); let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs); create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); let (update_a, _, chan_id_2, _) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known()); let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 1_000_000); nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)).unwrap(); check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1); let bs_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_id_2); let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()); nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]); commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], updates.commitment_signed, false); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); // Don't bother delivering the new HTLC add/commits, instead confirming the pre-HTLC commitment // transaction for nodes[1]. mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &bs_txn[0]); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true); assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty()); connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1); expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]); check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1); let fail_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()); nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]); commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates.commitment_signed, true, true); expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false); expect_payment_failure_chan_update!(nodes[0], update_a.contents.short_channel_id, true); }