`fail_holding_cell_htlcs` calls through to
`fail_htlc_backwards_internal` for HTLCs that need to be
failed-backwards but opts to generate its own payment failure
events for `HTLCSource:;OutboundRoute` HTLCs. There is no reason
for that as `fail_htlc_backwards_internal` will also happily
generate (now-)equivalent events for `HTLCSource::OutboundRoute`
HTLCs.
Thus, we can drop the redundant code and always call
`fail_htlc_backwards_internal` for each HTLC in
`fail_holding_cell_htlcs`.
17e6c374c5 added the
`HTLCHandlingFailed` event, including serialization thereof,
however failed to add corresponding deserialization. This corrects
that oversight by adding said deserialization.
Thanks to @wpaulino for catching the oversight.
The `rejected_by_dest` field of the `PaymentPathFailed` event has
always been a bit of a misnomer, as its really more about retry
than where a payment failed. Now is as good a time as any to
rename it.
When our counterparty is the payment destination and we receive
an `HTLCFailReason::Reason` in `fail_htlc_backwards_internal` we
currently always set `rejected_by_dest` in the `PaymentPathFailed`
event, implying the HTLC should *not* be retried.
There are a number of cases where we use `HTLCFailReason::Reason`,
but most should reasonably be treated as retryable even if our
counterparty was the destination (i.e. `!rejected_by_dest`):
* If an HTLC times out on-chain, this doesn't imply that the
payment is no longer retryable, though the peer may well be
offline so retrying may not be very useful,
* If a commitment transaction "containing" a dust HTLC is
confirmed on-chain, this definitely does not imply the payment
is no longer retryable
* If the channel we intended to relay over was closed (or
force-closed) we should retry over another path,
* If the channel we intended to relay over did not have enough
capacity we should retry over another path,
* If we received a update_fail_malformed_htlc message from our
peer, we likely should *not* retry, however this should be
exceedingly rare, and appears to nearly never appear in practice
Thus, this commit simply disables the behavior here, opting to
treat all `HTLCFailReason::Reason` errors as retryable.
Note that prior to 93e645daf4 this
change would not have made sense as it would have resulted in us
retrying the payment over the same channel in some cases, however
we now "blame" our own channel and will avoid it when routing for
the same payment.
We've seen a bit of user confusion about the requirements for event
handling, largely because the idempotency and consistency
requirements weren't super clearly phrased. While we're at it, we
also consolidate some documentation out of the event handling
function onto the trait itself.
Fixes#1675.
Previously, we wouldn't mark a dust HTLC as permanently resolved if
the commitment transaction went on chain. This resulted in us
always considering the HTLC as pending on restart, when we load the
pending payments set from the monitors.
Fixes#1653.
If we receive a channel_update for one of our private channels, we
will not log the message at the usual TRACE log level as the
message falls into the gossip range. However, for our own channels
they aren't *just* gossip, as we store that info and it changes
how we generate invoices. Thus, we add a log in `ChannelManager`
here at the DEBUG log level.
This allows users who don't wish to block a full thread to receive
persistence events.
The `Future` added here is really just a trivial list of callbacks,
but from that we can build a (somewhat ineffecient)
std::future::Future implementation and can (at least once a mapping
for Box<dyn Trait> is added) include the future in no-std bindings
as well.
Fixes#1595
We've had some users complain that `duration_since` is panic'ing
for them. This is possible if the machine being run on is buggy and
the "monotonic clock" goes backwards, which sadly some ancient
systems can do.
Rust addressed this issue in 1.60 by forcing
`Instant::duration_since` to not panic if the machine is buggy
(and time goes backwards), but for users on older rust versions we
do the same by hand here.
Added two methods, `process_path_inflight_htlcs` and
`remove_path_inflight_htlcs`, that updates that `payment_cache` map with
path information that may have failed, succeeded, or have been given up
on.
Introduced `AccountForInflightHtlcs`, which will wrap our user-provided
scorer. We move the `S:Score` type parameterization from the `Router` to
`find_route`, so we can use our newly introduced
`AccountForInflightHtlcs`.
`AccountForInflightHtlcs` keeps track of a map of inflight HTLCs by
their short channel id, direction, and give us the value that is being
used up.
This map will in turn be populated prior to calling `find_route`, where
we’ll use `create_inflight_map`, to generate a current map of all
inflight HTLCs based on what was stored in `payment_cache`.
In this commit, we check if a peer's outbound buffer has room for onion
messages, and if so pulls them from an implementer of a new trait,
OnionMessageProvider.
Makes sure channel messages are prioritized over OMs, and OMs are prioritized
over gossip.
The onion_message module remains private until further rate limiting is added.
Adds the boilerplate needed for PeerManager and OnionMessenger to work
together, with some corresponding docs and misc updates mostly due to the
PeerManager public API changing.
This allows us to better prioritize channel messages over gossip broadcasts and
lays groundwork for rate limiting onion messages more simply, since they won't
be competing with gossip broadcasts for space in the main message queue.
If we don't currently have the preimage for an inbound HTLC, that
does not guarantee we can never claim it, but instead only that we
cannot claim it unless we receive the preimage from the channel we
forwarded the channel out on.
Thus, we cannot consider a channel to have no claimable balances if
the only remaining output on the commitment ransaction is an
inbound HTLC for which we do not have the preimage, as we may be
able to claim it in the future.
This commit addresses this issue by adding a new `Balance` variant
- `MaybePreimageClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout`, which is generated
until the HTLC output is spent.
Fixes#1620
Previously, only `log_error` and `log_trace` macros have been exported.
This change exports the macros of all log levels, which enables them to
be used downstream.
Previously, we were decoding payload lengths as a VarInt. Per the spec, this is
wrong -- it should be decoded as a BigSize. This bug also exists in our
payment payload decoding, to be fixed separately.
Upcoming reply path tests caught this bug because we hadn't encoded a payload
greater than 253 before, so we hadn't hit the problem that VarInts are encoded
as little-endian whereas BigSizes are encoded as big-endian.
If we receive a ChannelAnnouncement message but we already have the
channel, there's no reason to do a chain lookup. Instead of
immediately calling the user-provided `chain::Access` when handling
a ChannelAnnouncement, we first check if we have the corresponding
channel in the graph.
Note that if we do have the corresponding channel but it was not
previously checked against the blockchain, we should still check
with the `chain::Access` and update if necessary.
Users need to make decisions about storage sizing and we need to
have advice on the maximum size of various things users need to
store. ChannelMonitorUpdates are likely the worst case of this,
they're usually at max a few KB, but can get up to a few hundred
KB for commitment transactions that have 400+ HTLCs pending.
We had one user report an update (likely) going over 400 KiB, which
isn't immediately obvious to me is practical, but its within a few
multiples of trivially-reachable sizes, so its likely that did
occur. To be on the safe side, we simply recommend users ensure
they can support "upwards of 1 MiB" here.
The `bitcoin_key_1` and `bitcoin_key_2` fields in
`channel_announcement` messages are sorted according to node_ids
rather than the keys themselves, however the on-chain funding
script is sorted according to the bitcoin keys themselves. Thus,
with some probability, we end up checking that the on-chain script
matches the wrong script and rejecting the channel announcement.
The correct solution is to use our existing channel funding script
generation function which ensure we always match what we generate.
This was found in testing the Java bindings, where a test checks
that retunring the generated funding script in `chain::Access`
results in the constructed channel ending up in our network graph.
