Certain users may not care how their UTXOs are selected, or their wallet
may not expose enough controls to fully implement the
`CoinSelectionSource` trait. As an alternative, we introduce another
trait `WalletSource` they could opt to implement instead, which is much
simpler as it just returns the set of confirmed UTXOs that may be used.
This trait implementation is then consumed into a wrapper `Wallet` which
implements the `CoinSelectionSource` trait using a "smallest
above-dust-after-spend first" coin selection algorithm.
This allows users to bump their commitments and HTLC transactions
without having to worry about all the little details to do so. Instead,
we'll just require that they implement the `CoinSelectionSource` trait
over their wallet/UTXO source, granting the event handler permission to
spend confirmed UTXOs for the transactions it'll produce.
While the event handler should in most cases produce valid transactions,
assuming the provided confirmed UTXOs are valid, it may not produce
relayable transactions due to not satisfying certain Replace-By-Fee
(RBF) mempool policy requirements. Some of these require that the
replacement transactions have a higher feerate and absolute fee than the
conflicting transactions it aims to replace. To make sure we adhere to
these requirements, we'd have to persist some state for all transactions
the event handler has produced, greatly increasing its complexity. While
we may consider implementing so in the future, we choose to go with a
simple initial version that relies on the OnchainTxHandler's bumping
frequency. For each new bumping attempt, the OnchainTxHandler proposes a
25% feerate increase to ensure transactions can propagate under
constrained mempool circumstances.
In a future commit, we plan to expand `BumpTransactionEvent` variants to
include the unique identifier assigned to pending output claims by the
`OnchainTxHandler` when a commitment is broadcast/confirmed. This
requires making it public in our API. We also choose to rename it to
`ClaimId` for the benefit of users, as the previous `PackageID` term
could be interpreted to be the ID of a BIP-331 transaction package.
While the previous way of computing the identifier was safe, it wouldn't
have been in certain scenarios if we considered splitting aggregated
packages. While this type of splitting has yet to be implemented, it may
come in the near future. To ensure we're prepared to handle such, we
opt to instead commit to all of the HTLCs to claim in the request.
This commit also adds two new maps to `PeerState` for keeping track
of `OutboundV1Channel`s and `InboundV1Channel`s so that further
commits are a bit easier to review.
To reduce interleaving in commits, we introduce a `context` variable
in methods to be moved in upcoming commits so there is minimal change
with the moves.
This is one of a series of commits to make sure methods are moved by
chunks so they are easily reviewable in diffs. Unfortunately they are
not purely move-only as fields to be updated for things to
compile, but these should be quite clear.
This commit also uses the `context` field where needed for compilation
and tests to pass due to the above change.
f s/tarcontext.get_/target_/
This is one of a series of commits to make sure methods are moved by
chunks so they are easily reviewable in diffs. Unfortunately they are
not purely move-only as fields need to be updated for things to
compile, but these should be quite clear.
This commit also uses the `context` field where needed for compilation
and tests to pass due to the above change.
This is one of a series of commits to make sure methods are moved by
chunks so they are easily reviewable in diffs. Unfortunately they are
not purely move-only as fields need to be updated for things to
compile, but these should be quite clear.
This commit also uses the `context` field where needed for compilation
and tests to pass due to the above change.
This is one of a series of commits to make sure methods are moved by
chunks so they are easily reviewable in diffs. Unfortunately they are
not purely move-only as fields need to be updated for things to
compile, but these should be quite clear.
This commit also uses the `context` field where needed for compilation
and tests to pass due to the above change.
This is one of a series of commits to make sure methods are moved by
chunks so they are easily reviewable in diffs. Unfortunately they are
not purely move-only as fields need to be updated for things to
compile, but these should be quite clear.
This commit also uses these methods through the `context` field where
needed for compilation and tests to pass due to the above change.
This is one of a series of commits to make sure methods are moved by
chunks so they are easily reviewable in diffs. Unfortunately they are
not purely move-only as fields need to be updated for things to
compile, but these should be quite clear.
This is a first step for simplifying the channel state and introducing
new unfunded channel types that hold similar state before being promoted
to funded channels.
Essentially, we want the outer `Channel` type (and upcoming channel types)
to wrap the context so we can apply typestate patterns to the that wrapper
while also deduplicating code for common state and other internal fields.
Add a trait for finding routes for onion messages and parameterize
OnionMessenger with it. This allows OnionMessenger to reply to messages
that it handles via one of its handlers (e.g., OffersMessageHandler).
To avoid confusion in the upcoming MessageRouter trait, introduce an
OnionMessagePath struct that wraps the intermediate nodes and the
destination. Use this in OnionMessenger::send_onion_message.
Add a trait for handling BOLT 12 Offers messages to OnionMessenger and a
skeleton implementation of it for ChannelManager. This allows users to
either provide their own custom handling Offers messages or rely on a
version provided by LDK using stateless verification.
BOLT 12 Offers makes use of onion messages to request and respond with
invoices. Add these types and an error type to OnionMessageContents
along with the necessary parsing and encoding.
In an upcoming commit, messages for BOLT 12 offers are read from the
onion payload. Passing a logger allows for logging semantic errors when
parsing the messages.
If an InvoiceRequest or an Invoice delivered via an onion message cannot
be handled, the recipient should reply with an InvoiceError if a reply
path was given. Define the message and conversion from SemanticError.
Since we're breaking downgrade compatibility to LDK version 0.0.103
and before, we might as well go ahead and remove other code we have
for compatibility.
0.0.103 is now downright ancient, and certainly shouldn't exist in
production anywhere today. Thus, it seems fine to remove the
ability to create legacy stateful inbound payment entries.
Users downgrading to 0.0.103 will thus not be able to claim any
payments created on modern LDK, though we still retain the ability
to claim such payments at least for one more release.
The logic has been changed around duplicate keysend payments such that
it's no longer explicitly clear that we reject duplicate keysend
payments now that we handle receiving multi-part keysends. This test
catches that. Note that this also tests that we reject MPP keysends when
our config states we should, and that we reject MPP keysends without
payemnt secrets when our config states we support MPP keysends.
This commit refactors a significant portion of the receive validation in
`ChannelManager::process_pending_htlc_forwards` now that we repurpose
previous MPP validation logic to accomodate keysends. This also removes
a previous restriction on claiming, as well as tests sending and
receiving MPP keysends.
