Add `derive_minimum_depth()` and `derive_maximum_minimum_depth()` and hide
CONF_TARGET constant behind these functions.
Replace `DisconnectPeer` error with `HandleError` with `ErrorAction::SendErrorMessage`
Sha256 in fuzztarget was updated some time ago to use XOR instead
of the first byte of a real SHA256 run and somehow received and
sent payments got crossed in full_stack_target.
Implement error, warn, info, debug and trace macros, internally calling
an instance of Logger, and passing it to every main structures
Build-time or client-side filtering.
Issue #54
We had a TODO to handle "lost confirmation" in block_connected,
which we recently did in block_disconnected (calling force_shutdown
in case we get too many blocks disconnected) but didn't handle the
case where we had a simple reorg through the block that resulted in
us generating a funding_locked.
This should have no effect in a real system but was causing the
full_stack_target fuzz test to fail due to a block with a null hash
being disconnected.
This patch got a bit bigger than I'd intended, but primarily this
unifies force_shutdown() handling so all the callsites at least
look similar. It also fails backwards any HTLCs which were
completely pending (ie hadn't been committed to) and ensures we
broadcast our local commitment transaction. It also adds a
force_close_channel method to ChannelManager to expose
force-closure.
In case we are in AwaitingRemoteRevoke and we go to claim an HTLC
(at which point we've already given up the money to the next hop in
the payment) we just write it to holding_cell_htlc_updates.
However, we should be ensuring we *also* write it to our
channel_monitor as we need to make sure we can still claim it after
a force_shutdown() or otherwise after hitting the chain.
We don't bother doing anything smart, we just return an Err in
case we have a pending outbound HTLC with the payment_hash provided
for the send.
This doesn't resolve the TODO as users can still send duplicative
payments that have the same payment_hash as was already sent,
though the docs are updated and hopefully users do so on their own.
For some reason we were only setting "announce_publicly" when
Channel::new_from_req had announce_publicly set to true and the
open_channel message had the relevant flag set. However, this
resulted in us rejecting peers for sending unsolicited
announcement_signatures messages, despite them having indicated,
and us having accepted, their announce-bit-set open_channel.
