For users who get PaymentPreimages via
`get_payment_secret_preimage`, they need to provide the
PaymentPreimage back in `claim_funds` but they aren't actually
given the preimage anywhere.
This commit gives users the PaymentPreimage in the
`PaymentReceived` event.
Like the payment_secret parameter, this paramter has been the source
of much confusion, so we just drop it.
Users should prefer to do this check when registering the payment
secret instead of at claim-time.
This allows users to store metadata about an invoice at
invoice-generation time and then index into that storage with a
general-purpose id when they call `get_payment_secret`. They will
then be provided the same index when the payment has been received.
Our current PaymentReceived API is incredibly easy to mis-use -
the "obvious" way to implement a client is to always call
`ChannelManager::claim_funds` in response to a `PaymentReceived`
event. However, users are *required* to check the payment secret
and value against the expected values before claiming in order to
avoid a number of potentially funds-losing attacks.
Instead, if we rely on payment secrets being pre-registered with
the ChannelManager before we receive HTLCs for a payment we can
simply check the payment secrets and never generate
`PaymentReceived` events if they do not match. Further, when the
user knows the value to expect in advance, we can have them
register it as well, allowing us to check it for them.
Other implementations already require payment secrets for inbound
payments, so this shouldn't materially lose compatibility.
This prepares us for requiring payment_secrets for all received
payments, by demonstrating test changes work even prior to the new
requirement.
In order to avoid needing to pipe payment secrets through to
additional places in the claim logic and then removing that
infrastructure once payment secrets are required, we use the new
payment secret storage in ChannelManager to look up the payment
secret for any given pament hash in claim and fail-back functions.
This part of the diff is reverted in the next commit.
This adds support for tracking payment secrets and (optionally)
payment preimages in ChannelManager. This potentially makes client
implementations much simper as they don't have to have external
payment preimage tracking.
This doesn't yet use such tracking anywhere.
During the block API refactor, we started calling
Channel::force_shutdown when a channel is closed due to a bogus
funding tx. However, we still set the channel's state to Shutdown
prior to doing so, leading to an assertion in force_shutdown (that
the channel is not already closed).
This removes the state-set call and adds a (long-overdue) test for
this case.
Fixes: 60b962a18e
There is a possible race condition when both the latest block hash and
height are needed. Combine these in one struct and place them behind a
single lock.
Instead of relying on the user to ensure the funding transaction is
correct (and panicing when it is confirmed), we should check it is
correct when it is generated. By taking the full funding transaciton
from the user on generation, we can also handle broadcasting for
them instead of doing so via an event.
When we force-close a channel, for whatever reason, it is nice to
send an error message to our peer. This allows them to closes the
channel on their end instead of trying to send through it and
failing. Further, it may induce them to broadcast their commitment
transaction, possibly getting that confirmed and saving us on fees.
This commit adds a few more cases where we should have been sending
error messages but weren't. It also includes an almost-global
replace in tests of the second argument in
`check_closed_broadcast!()` from false to true (indicating an error
message is expected). There are only a few exceptions, notably
those where the closure is the result of our counterparty having
sent *us* an error message.
Previously, we expected every block to be connected in-order,
allowing us to track confirmations by simply incrementing a counter
for each new block connected. In anticipation of moving to a
update-height model in the next commit, this moves to tracking
confirmations by simply storing the height at which the funding
transaction was confirmed.
This commit also corrects our "funding was reorganized out of the
best chain" heuristic, instead of a flat 6 blocks, it uses half the
confirmation count required as the point at which we force-close.
Even still, for low confirmation counts (eg 1 block), an ill-timed
reorg may still cause spurious force-closes, though that behavior
is not new in this commit.
While its not necessarily a common operation on a running node,
`get_our_node_id()` is used incredibly heavily in tests, and there
is no reason to not eat the extra ~64 bytes to just cache it.
This expands the assertions on block ordering to apply to
`#[cfg(test)]` builds in addition to normal builds, requiring that
unit and functional tests have syntactically-valid (ie the previous
block hash pointer and the heights match the blocks) blockchains.
This requires a reasonably nontrivial diff in the functional tests
however it is mostly straightforward changes.
Sadly the connected-in-order tests have to be skipped in our normal
test suite as many tests violate it. Luckily we can still enforce
it in the tests which run in other crates.
Co-authored-by: Matt Corallo <git@bluematt.me>
Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Czyz <jkczyz@gmail.com>
We allow users to configure the to_self_delay, which is analogous to
the cltv_expiry_delta in terms of its security context, so we should
allow users to specify both.
We similarly bound it on the lower end, but reduce that bound
somewhat now that it is configurable.
Useful for constructing route hints for private channels in invoices.
Co-authored-by: Valentine Wallace <vwallace@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Riard <ariard@student.42.fr>
This will be used to expose forwarding info for route hints in the next commit.
Co-authored-by: Valentine Wallace <vwallace@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Riard <ariard@student.42.fr>
`wait` doesn't capture enough of what's going on, but also Java
Java doesn't accpet methods just called `wait`, as it conflicts
with existing sync primitives on all Objects.
When a block is disconnected, the hash of the disconnected block was
used to update the last connected block. However, this amounts to a
no-op because these hashes should be equal. Successive disconnections
would update the hash but leave it one block off.
Normally, this not a problem because the last block_disconnected should
be followed by block_connected since the former is triggered by a chain
re-org. However, this assumes the user calls the API correctly and that
no failure occurs that would prevent block_connected from being called
(e.g., if fetching the connected block fails).
Instead, update the last block hash with the disconnected block's
previous block hash.
ChannelManager reads channel_state and last_block_hash while processing
funding_created and funding_signed messages. It writes these while
processing block_connected and block_disconnected events. To avoid any
potential deadlocks, have each site hold these locks independent of one
another and in a consistent order.
Additionally, use a RwLock instead of Mutex for last_block_hash since
exclusive access is not needed in funding_created / funding_signed and
cannot be guaranteed in block_connected / block_disconnected because of
the reads in the former.
ChannelMonitor keeps track of the last block connected. However, it is
initialized with the default block hash, which is a problem if the
ChannelMonitor is serialized before a block is connected. Instead, pass
ChannelManager's last_block_hash, which is initialized with a "birthday"
hash, when creating a new ChannelMonitor.
Tracking the last block was only used to de-duplicate block_connected
calls, but this is no longer required as of the previous commit.
Further, the ChannelManager can pass the latest block hash when needing
to create a ChannelMonitor rather than have each Channel maintain an
up-to-date copy. This is implemented in the next commit.
