InvoiceBuilder is parameterized by a SigningPubkeyStrategy, either
ExplicitSigningPubkey and DerivedSigningPubkey. It also holds an
Option<KeyPair>, which may be None and Some for those strategies,
respectively. This leads to methods for InvoiceBuilder parameterized by
DerivedSigningPubkey needing to blindly unwrap the Option<KeyPair>.
Instead, have DerivedSigningPubkey wrap KeyPair.
The function used to sign BOLT 12 messages only takes a message digest.
This doesn't allow signers to independently verify the message before
signing nor does it allow them to derive the necessary signing keys, if
needed.
Introduce a TaggedHash wrapper for a message digest, which each unsigned
BOLT 12 message type constructs upon initialization. Change the signing
function to take AsRef<TaggedHash>, which each unsigned type implements.
This allows the signing function to take any unsigned message and obtain
its tagged hash.
Creates a new `events::ClaimedHTLC` struct that contains the relevant
information about a claimed HTLC; e.g., the channel it arrived on, its ID, the
amount of the HTLC, the overall amount of the payment, etc. Adds appropriate
serialization support.
Adds a `Vec<events::ClaimedHTLC>` to the `ClaimingPayment`
structure. Populates this when creating the struct by converting the
`payment.htlcs` (which are `ClaimingHTLC` structs) into `event::ClaimedHTLC`
structs. This is a straightforward transformation.
Adds a `Vec<events::ClaimedHTLC>` to the `events::Event::PaymentClaimed`
enum. This is populated directly from the `ClaimingPayment`'s `htlcs` vec.
Fixes#2477.
We don't bother actually parsing errors from within a blinded path, since all
errors should be wiped by the introduction node by the time it gets back to us
(the sender).
LND hasn't properly handled shutdown messages ever, and
force-closes any time we send one while HTLCs are still present.
The issue is tracked at
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/6039 and has had
multiple patches to fix it but none so far have managed to land
upstream. The issue appears to be very low priority for the LND
team despite being marked "P1".
We're not going to bother handling this in a sensible way, instead
simply repeated the Shutdown message on repeat until morale
improves.
In 0ad1f4c943 we fixed a nasty bug
where a failure to persist a `ChannelManager` faster than a
`ChannelMonitor` could result in the loss of a `PaymentSent` event,
eventually resulting in a `PaymentFailed` instead!
As noted in that commit, there's still some risk, though its been
substantially reduced - if we receive an `update_fulfill_htlc`
message for an outbound payment, and persist the initial removal
`ChannelMonitorUpdate`, then respond with our own
`commitment_signed` + `revoke_and_ack`, followed by receiving our
peer's final `revoke_and_ack`, and then persist the
`ChannelMonitorUpdate` generated from that, all prior to completing
a `ChannelManager` persistence, we'll still forget the HTLC and
eventually trigger a `PaymentFailed` rather than the correct
`PaymentSent`.
Here we fully fix the issue by delaying the final
`ChannelMonitorUpdate` persistence until the `PaymentSent` event
has been processed and document the fact that a spurious
`PaymentFailed` event can still be generated for a sent payment.
The original fix in 0ad1f4c943 is
still incredibly useful here, allowing us to avoid blocking the
first `ChannelMonitorUpdate` until the event processing completes,
as this would cause us to add event-processing delay in our general
commitment update latency. Instead, we ultimately race the user
handling the `PaymentSent` event with how long it takes our
`revoke_and_ack` + `commitment_signed` to make it to our
counterparty and receive the response `revoke_and_ack`. This should
give the user plenty of time to handle the event before we need to
make progress.
Sadly, because we change our `ChannelMonitorUpdate` semantics, this
change requires a number of test changes, avoiding checking for a
post-RAA `ChannelMonitorUpdate` until after we process a
`PaymentSent` event. Note that this does not apply to payments we
learned the preimage for on-chain - ensuring `PaymentSent` events
from such resolutions will be addressed in a future PR. Thus, tests
which resolve payments on-chain switch to a direct call to the
`expect_payment_sent` function with the claim-expected flag unset.
Commit f560320b introduced changes that require users of
`impl_writeable_tlv_based`/`impl_writeable_tlv_based_enum` to import
`_encode_varint_length_prefixed_tlv` and `alloc` separately.
Here, we take care of the necessary imports in
`_encode_varint_length_prefixed_tlv` itself, allowing users to just
import the `impl_writeable_tlv_based` variant they need.
Don't collect iterators to compare, minorly simplify encoding the
keysend TLV, combine the _encode_tlv_stream variants to check that the
ordering of TLVs is correct including custom TLVs.
When reloading a node in the test framework, we end up with a new
`ChannelManager` that has references to various test util structs.
In order for the tests to compile reliably in the face of unrelated
changes, those test structs need to always be initialized before
both the new but also the original `ChannelManager`.
Here we make that change.
01847277b9 switched around the logic
for inbound channel construction to assign the outbound SCID alias
after constructing the `InboundV1Channel` object. Thus, the SCID
alias argument is now unused, and we remove it here.
If we have a pending inbound un-accepted channel but receive an
error message for it from our peer, or our peer disconnects, we
should remove the pending entry, ensuring any attempts to accept
it fail.
For some reason an unrelated PR caused all our tests with
`reload_node` calls to fail to compile. This is due, in part, to
the lifetimes on `reload_node` implying that the new and original
`ChannelManager` (or some of the structs they reference) must live
for the same lifetime.
This fixes that issue by correcting the lifetimes to be consistent
across `Node` and `_reload_node`.
The ChannelMonitor::get_claimable_balances method provides a more
straightforward approach to the balance of a channel, which satisfies
most use cases. The computation of AvailableBalances::balance_msat is
complex and originally had a different purpose that is not applicable
anymore.
Create a new table in 'peer_state' to maintain unaccepted inbound
channels; i.e., a channel for which we've received an 'open_channel'
message but that user code has not yet confirmed for acceptance. When
user code accepts the channel (e.g. via 'accept_inbound_channel'),
create the channel object and as before.
Currently, the 'open_channel' message eagerly creates an
InboundV1Channel object before determining if the channel should be
accepted. Because this happens /before/ the channel has been assigned
a user identity (which happens in the handler for OpenChannelRequest),
the channel is assigned a random user identity. As part of the
creation process, the channel's cryptographic material is initialized,
which then uses this randomly generated value for the user's channel
identity e.g. in SignerProvider::generate_channel_keys_id.
By delaying the creation of the InboundV1Channel until /after/ the
channel has been accepted, we ensure that we defer cryptographic
initialization until we have given the user the opportunity to assign
an identity to the channel.
Because we don't know which custom TLV type numbers the user is
expecting (and it would be cumbersome for them to tell us), instead of
failing unknown even custom TLVs on deserialization, we accept all
custom TLVs, and pass them to the user to check whether they recognize
them and choose to fail back if they don't. However, a user may not
check for custom TLVs, in which case we should reject any even custom
TLVs as unknown.
This commit makes sure a user must explicitly accept a payment with
even custom TLVs, by (1) making the default
`ChannelManager::claim_funds` fail if the payment had even custom TLVs
and (2) adding a new function
`ChannelManager::claim_funds_with_known_custom_tlvs` that accepts them.
This commit also refactors our custom TLVs test and updates various
documentation to account for this.
When a user decodes custom TLVs, if they fail to recognize even type
numbers they should fail back with the correct failure code and fail
data. This new variant adds the proper failure variant for the user to
pass into `ChannelManager::fail_htlc_backwards_with_reason`.
Note that the enum discriminants were removed because when adding a
struct variant we can no longer make use of the discriminant through
casting like we previously did, and instead have to manually define the
associated failure code anyway.
Upon receiving multiple payment parts with custom TLVs, we fail payments
if they have any non-matching or missing even TLVs, and otherwise just
drop non-matching TLVs if they're odd.
When serialized, the TLVs in `OutboundOnionPayload`, unlike a normal
TLV stream, are prefixed with the length of the stream. To allow a user
to add arbitrary custom TLVs, we aren't able to communicate to our
serialization macros exactly which fields to expect, so this commit
adds new macro variants to allow appending an extra set of bytes (and
modifying the prefixed length accordingly).
Because the keysend preimage TLV has a type number in the custom type
range, and a user's TLVs may have type numbers above and/or below
keysend's type number, and because TLV streams must be serialized in
increasing order by type number, this commit also ensures the keysend
TLV is properly sorted/serialized amongst the custom TLVs.
Custom TLVs allow users to send extra application-specific data with
a payment. These have the additional flexibility compared to
`payment_metadata` that they don't have to reflect recipient generated
data provided in an invoice, in which `payment_metadata` could be
reused.
We ensure provided type numbers are unique, increasing, and within the
experimental range with the `RecipientOnionFields::with_custom_tlvs`
method.
This begins sender-side support for custom TLVs.
