Once ChannelManager supports payment retries, it will make more sense for its
current send_payment method to be named send_payment_with_route because
retrying should be the default. Here we get a head start on this by making the
rename in outbound_payment, but not changing the public interface yet.
This allows us to move a lot of outbound payment logic out of ChannelManager
and into the new outbound_payment module, and helps avoid growing
ChannelManager when we add retry logic to it in upcoming work.
We want to move all outbound payment-related things to this new module, to help
break up ChannelManager so future payment retries work doesn't increase the
size of ChannelManager.
This change follows the rationale of commit 62236c7 and addresses the
last remaining redundant local commitment broadcast.
There's no need to broadcast our local commitment transaction if we've
already seen a confirmed one as it'll be immediately rejected as a
duplicate/conflict.
This will also help prevent dispatching spurious events for bumping
commitment and HTLC transactions through anchor outputs since the
dispatch for said events follows the same flow as our usual commitment
broadcast.
Add a builder for creating refunds given a payer_id and other required
fields. Other settings are optional and duplicative settings will
override previous settings. Building produces a semantically valid
`invoice_request` message representing the refund, which then may be
communicated out of band (e.g., via QR code).
Define an interface for BOLT 12 refunds (i.e., an `invoice_request`
message without an `offer_node_id`). A refund is more generally an
"offer for money". While it is encoded using the same TLV streams as an
`invoice_request` message, it has different semantics.
Currently the `onion_message` module exposes the blinded route
object as *both* `BlindedRoute` and `BlindedPath`. This is somewhat
confusing, and given they are really paths, not routes (at least in
the sense that a route could be multi-path, though for OMs they are
not), here we unify to only call them paths.
03de0598af appeared to revert updated
docs due to a rebase error. This reverts the docs on
`generate_channel_keys` to the state they were in prior to that
commit, with one additional doc.
Its very confusing to say that LDK will call
`provide_channel_parameters` more than once - its true for a
channel, but not for a given instance. Instead, phrase the docs
with reference to a specific instance, which is much clearer.
If, after forwarding an intercepted payment to our counterparty, we
restart with a ChannelMonitor update having been persisted, but the
corresponding ChannelManager update not having been persisted,
we'll still have the intercepted HTLC in the
`pending_intercepted_htlcs` map on start (and potentially a pending
`HTLCIntercepted` event). This will cause us to allow the user to
handle the forwarded HTLC twice, potentially double-forwarding it.
This builds on 0bb87ddad7, which
provided a preemptive fix for the general relay case (though it was
not an actual issue at the time). We simply check for the HTLCs
having been forwarded on startup and remove them from the map.
Fixes#1858
If a user calls `abandon_payment`, then restarts without freshly
persisting the `ChannelManager`, the payment will still be pending
on restart. This was unclear from the docs (and the docs seemed to
imply otherwise). Because this doesn't materially impact the
usability of `abandon_payment` (users shouldn't be called
`retry_payment` on an abandoned one anyway), we simply document it.
Fixes#1804.
A BOLT 12 test vector uses an `invoice_request` message that has a
currency, which aren't supported, so using OfferBuilder::build_unchecked
is required to avoid a panic.
Add a builder for creating invoice requests for an offer given a
payer_id. Other settings may be optional depending on the offer and
duplicative settings will override previous settings. Building produces
a semantically valid `invoice_request` message for the offer, which then
can be signed for the payer_id.
When reading an offer, an `invoice_request` message is sent over the
wire. Implement Writeable for encoding the message and TryFrom for
decoding it by defining in terms of TLV streams. These streams represent
content for the payer metadata (0), reflected `offer` (1-79),
`invoice_request` (80-159), and signature (240).
Offers uses a merkle root hash construction for signature calculation
and verification. Add a submodule implementing this so that it can be
used when parsing and signing invoice_request and invoice messages.
Define an interface for BOLT 12 `invoice_request` messages. The
underlying format consists of the original bytes and the parsed
contents.
The bytes are later needed when constructing an `invoice` message. This
is because it must mirror all the `offer` and `invoice_request` TLV
records, including unknown ones, which aren't represented in the
contents.
The contents will be used in `invoice` messages to avoid duplication.
Some fields while required in a typical user-pays-merchant flow may not
be necessary in the merchant-pays-user flow (e.g., refund, ATM).
Currently `claim_funds` and `claim_funds_internal` call
`claim_funds_from_hop` and then surface and `Event` to the user
informing them of the forwarded/claimed payment based on it's
result. In both places we assume that a claim "completed" even if
a monitor update is being done async.
Instead, here we push that event generation through a
`MonitorUpdateCompletionAction` and a call to
`handle_monitor_update_completion_action`. This will allow us to
hold the event(s) until async monitor updates complete in the
future.
When `claim_funds` has to claim multiple HTLCs as a part of a
single MPP payment, it currently does so holding the
`channel_state` lock for the entire duration of the claim loop.
Here we swap that for taking the lock once for each HTLC. This
allows us to be more flexible with locks going forward, and
ultimately isn't a huge change - if our counterparty intends to
force-close a channel, us choosing to ignore it by holding the
`channel_state` lock for the duration of the claim isn't going to
result in a commitment update, it will just result in the preimage
already being in the `ChannelMonitor`.
