When we removed the private keys from the signing interface we
forgot to re-add them in the public interface of our own
implementations, which users may need.
When we receive an update_fulfill_htlc message, we immediately try
to "claim" the HTLC against the HTLCSource. If there is one, this
works great, we immediately generate a `ChannelMonitorUpdate` for
the corresponding inbound HTLC and persist that before we ever get
to processing our counterparty's `commitment_signed` and persisting
the corresponding `ChannelMonitorUpdate`.
However, if there isn't one (and this is the first successful HTLC
for a payment we sent), we immediately generate a `PaymentSent`
event and queue it up for the user. Then, a millisecond later, we
receive the `commitment_signed` from our peer, removing the HTLC
from the latest local commitment transaction as a side-effect of
the `ChannelMonitorUpdate` applied.
If the user has processed the `PaymentSent` event by that point,
great, we're done. However, if they have not, and we crash prior to
persisting the `ChannelManager`, on startup we get confused about
the state of the payment. We'll force-close the channel for being
stale, and see an HTLC which was removed and is no longer present
in the latest commitment transaction (which we're broadcasting).
Because we claim corresponding inbound HTLCs before updating a
`ChannelMonitor`, we assume such HTLCs have failed - attempting to
fail after having claimed should be a noop. However, in the
sent-payment case we now generate a `PaymentFailed` event for the
user, allowing an HTLC to complete without giving the user a
preimage.
Here we address this issue by storing the payment preimages for
claimed outbound HTLCs in the `ChannelMonitor`, in addition to the
existing inbound HTLC preimages already stored there. This allows
us to fix the specific issue described by checking for a preimage
and switching the type of event generated in response. In addition,
it reduces the risk of future confusion by ensuring we don't fail
HTLCs which were claimed but not fully committed to before a crash.
It does not, however, full fix the issue here - because the
preimages are removed after the HTLC has been fully removed from
available commitment transactions if we are substantially delayed
in persisting the `ChannelManager` from the time we receive the
`update_fulfill_htlc` until after a full commitment signed dance
completes we may still hit this issue. The full fix for this issue
is to delay the persistence of the `ChannelMonitorUpdate` until
after the `PaymentSent` event has been processed. This avoids the
issue entirely, ensuring we process the event before updating the
`ChannelMonitor`, the same as we ensure the upstream HTLC has been
claimed before updating the `ChannelMonitor` for forwarded
payments.
The full solution will be implemented in a later work, however this
change still makes sense at that point as well - if we were to
delay the initial `commitment_signed` `ChannelMonitorUpdate` util
after the `PaymentSent` event has been processed (which likely
requires a database update on the users' end), we'd hold our
`commitment_signed` + `revoke_and_ack` response for two DB writes
(i.e. `fsync()` calls), making our commitment transaction
processing a full `fsync` slower. By making this change first, we
can instead delay the `ChannelMonitorUpdate` from the
counterparty's final `revoke_and_ack` message until the event has
been processed, giving us a full network roundtrip to do so and
avoiding delaying our response as long as an `fsync` is faster than
a network roundtrip.
This removes two panics from `PeerHandler` which can trivially be
`debug_assert!(false); return Err;`s, and adds another
`debug_assertion` on internal state consistency during disconnect.
In our `wakers`, if we first `notify` a future, which is then
`poll`ed complete, and then `notify` the same waker again before a
new future is fetched, that new future will be marked as
non-complete initially and wait for a third `notify`.
The fix is luckily rather trivial, when we `notify` a future, if it
is completed immediately, simply wipe the future state so that we
look at the pending-notify flag when we generate the next future.
While we could try to expose the type explicitly, we already have
alternative accessors for bindings, and mapping `Hash`, `Ord` and
the other requirements for `IndexedMap` would be a good chunk of
additional work.
When a peer has finished the noise handshake, but has not yet
completed the lightning `Init`-based handshake, they will be
present in the `node_id_to_descriptor` set, even though
`Peer::handshake_complete()` returns false. Thus, when we go to
disconnect such a peer, we must ensure that we remove it from the
descriptor set as well.
Failing to do so caused an `Inconsistent peers set state!` panic in
the C bindings network handler.
Our lockdep logic (on Windows) identifies a mutex based on which
line it was constructed on. Thus, if we have two mutexes
constructed on the same line it will generate false positives.
Taking two instances of the same mutex may be totally fine, but it
requires a total lockorder that we cannot (trivially) check. Thus,
its generally unsafe to do if we can avoid it.
To discourage doing this, here we default to panicing on such locks
in our lockorder tests, with a separate lock function added that is
clearly labeled "unsafe" to allow doing so when we can guarantee a
total lockorder.
This requires adapting a number of sites to the new API, including
fixing a bug this turned up in `ChannelMonitor`'s `PartialEq` where
no lockorder was guaranteed.
Our existing lockorder tests assume that a read lock on a thread
that is already holding the same read lock is totally fine. This
isn't at all true. The `std` `RwLock` behavior is
platform-dependent - on most platforms readers can starve writers
as readers will never block for a pending writer. However, on
platforms where this is not the case, one thread trying to take a
write lock may deadlock with another thread that both already has,
and is attempting to take again, a read lock.
Worse, our in-tree `FairRwLock` exhibits this behavior explicitly
on all platforms to avoid the starvation issue.
Thus, we shouldn't have any special handling for allowing recursive
read locks, so we simply remove it here.
When handling a `ChannelMonitor` update via the new
`handle_new_monitor_update` macro, we always call the macro with
the `per_peer_state` read lock held and have the macro drop the
per-peer state lock. Then, when handling the resulting updates, we
may take the `per_peer_state` read lock again in another function.
In a coming commit, recursive read locks will be disallowed, so we
have to drop the `per_peer_state` read lock before calling
additional functions in `handle_new_monitor_update`, which we do
here.
Our existing lockorder tests assume that a read lock on a thread
that is already holding the same read lock is totally fine. This
isn't at all true. The `std` `RwLock` behavior is
platform-dependent - on most platforms readers can starve writers
as readers will never block for a pending writer. However, on
platforms where this is not the case, one thread trying to take a
write lock may deadlock with another thread that both already has,
and is attempting to take again, a read lock.
Worse, our in-tree `FairRwLock` exhibits this behavior explicitly
on all platforms to avoid the starvation issue.
Sadly, a user ended up hitting this deadlock in production in the
form of a call to `get_and_clear_pending_msg_events` which holds
the `ChannelManager::total_consistency_lock` before calling
`process_pending_monitor_events` and eventually
`channel_monitor_updated`, which tries to take the same read lock
again.
Luckily, the fix is trivial, simply remove the redundand read lock
in `channel_monitor_updated`.
Fixes#2000
We previously avoided holding the `total_consistency_lock` while
doing crypto operations to build onions. However, now that we've
abstracted out the outbound payment logic into a utility module,
ensuring the state is consistent at all times is now abstracted
away from code authors and reviewers, making it likely to break.
Further, because we now call `send_payment_along_path` both with,
and without, the `total_consistency_lock`, and because recursive
read locks may deadlock, it would now be quite difficult to figure
out which paths through `outbound_payment` need the lock and which
don't.
While it may slow writes somewhat, it's not really worth trying to
figure out this mess, instead we just hold the
`total_consistency_lock` before going into `outbound_payment`
functions.
fbc08477e8 purported to "move" the
`final_cltv_expiry_delta` field to `PaymentParamters` from
`RouteParameters`. However, for naive backwards-compatibility
reasons it left the existing on in place and only added a new,
redundant field in `PaymentParameters`.
It turns out there's really no reason for this - if we take a more
critical eye towards backwards compatibility we can figure out the
correct value in every `PaymentParameters` while deserializing.
We do this here - making `PaymentParameters` a `ReadableArgs`
taking a "default" `cltv_expiry_delta` when it goes to read. This
allows existing `RouteParameters` objects to pass the read
`final_cltv_expiry_delta` field in to be used if the new field
wasn't present.
This adds `required` support for trait-wrapped reading (e.g. for
objects read via `ReadableArgs`) as well as support for the
trait-wrapped reading syntax across the TLV struct/enum
serialization macros.
When we read a `Route` (or a list of `RouteHop`s), we should never
have zero paths or zero `RouteHop`s in a path. As such, its fine to
simply reject these at deserialization-time. Technically this could
lead to something which we can generate not round-trip'ing
serialization, but that seems okay here.
When using lower level macros such as read_tlv_stream, upgradable_required
fields have been treated as regular options. This is incorrect, they should
either be upgradable_options or treated as required fields.
This field was previous useful in manual retries for users to know when all
paths of a payment have failed and it is safe to retry. Now that we support
automatic retries in ChannelManager and no longer support manual retries, the
field is no longer useful.
For backwards compat, we now always write false for this field. If we didn't do
this, previous versions would default this field's value to true, which can be
problematic because some clients have relied on the field to indicate when a
full payment retry is safe.
An overflow can occur when multiplying the offer amount by the requested
quantity when no amount is given in the request. Return an error instead
of overflowing.
An overflow can occur when multiplying the offer amount by the requested
quantity when checking if the given amount is enough. Return an error
instead of overflowing.
In order to fuzz test Bech32Encode parsing independent of the underlying
message deserialization, the trait needs to be exposed. Conditionally
expose it only for fuzzing.
An invoice request is serialized as a TLV stream and encoded as bytes.
Add a fuzz test that parses the TLV stream and deserializes the
underlying InvoiceRequest. Then compare the original bytes with those
obtained by re-serializing the InvoiceRequest.
Forcing users to pass a genesis block hash has ended up being
error-prone largely due to byte-swapping questions for bindings
users. Further, our API is currently inconsistent - in
`ChannelManager` we take a `Bitcoin::Network` but in `NetworkGraph`
we take the genesis block hash.
Luckily `NetworkGraph` is the only remaining place where we require
users pass the genesis block hash, so swapping it for a `Network`
is a simple change.
