mirror of
https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning.git
synced 2025-02-24 23:08:36 +01:00
Merge pull request #2641 from alexanderwiederin/2585-preflight-test-coverage
#2585 Preflight Test Coverage
This commit is contained in:
commit
d795e247b7
3 changed files with 168 additions and 102 deletions
|
@ -2142,6 +2142,26 @@ pub fn expect_channel_ready_event<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd>(node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, ex
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(any(test, feature = "_test_utils"))]
|
||||
pub fn expect_probe_successful_events(node: &Node, mut probe_results: Vec<(PaymentHash, PaymentId)>) {
|
||||
let mut events = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
|
||||
for event in events.drain(..) {
|
||||
match event {
|
||||
Event::ProbeSuccessful { payment_hash: ev_ph, payment_id: ev_pid, ..} => {
|
||||
let result_idx = probe_results.iter().position(|(payment_hash, payment_id)| *payment_hash == ev_ph && *payment_id == ev_pid);
|
||||
assert!(result_idx.is_some());
|
||||
|
||||
probe_results.remove(result_idx.unwrap());
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure that we received a ProbeSuccessful event for each probe result.
|
||||
assert!(probe_results.is_empty());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub struct PaymentFailedConditions<'a> {
|
||||
pub(crate) expected_htlc_error_data: Option<(u16, &'a [u8])>,
|
||||
pub(crate) expected_blamed_scid: Option<u64>,
|
||||
|
@ -2279,21 +2299,41 @@ pub fn send_along_route_with_secret<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>,
|
|||
payment_id
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn do_pass_along_path<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_path: &[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>], recv_value: u64, our_payment_hash: PaymentHash, our_payment_secret: Option<PaymentSecret>, ev: MessageSendEvent, payment_claimable_expected: bool, clear_recipient_events: bool, expected_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>) -> Option<Event> {
|
||||
fn fail_payment_along_path<'a, 'b, 'c>(expected_path: &[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>]) {
|
||||
let origin_node_id = expected_path[0].node.get_our_node_id();
|
||||
|
||||
// iterate from the receiving node to the origin node and handle update fail htlc.
|
||||
for (&node, &prev_node) in expected_path.iter().rev().zip(expected_path.iter().rev().skip(1)) {
|
||||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(node, prev_node.node.get_our_node_id());
|
||||
prev_node.node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&node.node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(prev_node, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
let is_first_hop = origin_node_id == prev_node.node.get_our_node_id();
|
||||
// We do not want to fail backwards on the first hop. All other hops should fail backwards.
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(prev_node, node, updates.commitment_signed, !is_first_hop);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn do_pass_along_path<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_path: &[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>], recv_value: u64, our_payment_hash: PaymentHash, our_payment_secret: Option<PaymentSecret>, ev: MessageSendEvent, payment_claimable_expected: bool, clear_recipient_events: bool, expected_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>, is_probe: bool) -> Option<Event> {
|
||||
let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(ev);
|
||||
let mut prev_node = origin_node;
|
||||
let mut event = None;
|
||||
|
||||
for (idx, &node) in expected_path.iter().enumerate() {
|
||||
let is_last_hop = idx == expected_path.len() - 1;
|
||||
assert_eq!(node.node.get_our_node_id(), payment_event.node_id);
|
||||
|
||||
node.node.handle_update_add_htlc(&prev_node.node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(node, 0);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(node, prev_node, payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||||
|
||||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(node);
|
||||
if is_last_hop && is_probe {
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(node, prev_node, payment_event.commitment_msg, true, true);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(node, prev_node, payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(node);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if idx == expected_path.len() - 1 && clear_recipient_events {
|
||||
if is_last_hop && clear_recipient_events {
|
||||
let events_2 = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
if payment_claimable_expected {
|
||||
assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
|
||||
|
@ -2327,7 +2367,7 @@ pub fn do_pass_along_path<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_p
|
|||
} else {
|
||||
assert!(events_2.is_empty());
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if idx != expected_path.len() - 1 {
|
||||
} else if !is_last_hop {
|
||||
let mut events_2 = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events_2.len(), 1);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(node, 1);
|
||||
|
@ -2341,16 +2381,33 @@ pub fn do_pass_along_path<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_p
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn pass_along_path<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_path: &[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>], recv_value: u64, our_payment_hash: PaymentHash, our_payment_secret: Option<PaymentSecret>, ev: MessageSendEvent, payment_claimable_expected: bool, expected_preimage: Option<PaymentPreimage>) -> Option<Event> {
|
||||
do_pass_along_path(origin_node, expected_path, recv_value, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret, ev, payment_claimable_expected, true, expected_preimage)
|
||||
do_pass_along_path(origin_node, expected_path, recv_value, our_payment_hash, our_payment_secret, ev, payment_claimable_expected, true, expected_preimage, false)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn send_probe_along_route<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_route: &[&[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>]]) {
|
||||
let mut events = origin_node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), expected_route.len());
|
||||
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(origin_node, expected_route.len());
|
||||
|
||||
for path in expected_route.iter() {
|
||||
let ev = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&path[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
|
||||
|
||||
do_pass_along_path(origin_node, path, 0, PaymentHash([0_u8; 32]), None, ev, false, false, None, true);
|
||||
let nodes_to_fail_payment: Vec<_> = vec![origin_node].into_iter().chain(path.iter().cloned()).collect();
|
||||
|
||||
fail_payment_along_path(nodes_to_fail_payment.as_slice());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn pass_along_route<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_route: &[&[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>]], recv_value: u64, our_payment_hash: PaymentHash, our_payment_secret: PaymentSecret) {
|
||||
let mut events = origin_node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), expected_route.len());
|
||||
|
||||
for (path_idx, expected_path) in expected_route.iter().enumerate() {
|
||||
let ev = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&expected_path[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut events);
|
||||
// Once we've gotten through all the HTLCs, the last one should result in a
|
||||
// PaymentClaimable (but each previous one should not!), .
|
||||
// PaymentClaimable (but each previous one should not!).
|
||||
let expect_payment = path_idx == expected_route.len() - 1;
|
||||
pass_along_path(origin_node, expected_path, recv_value, our_payment_hash.clone(), Some(our_payment_secret), ev, expect_payment, None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1278,48 +1278,17 @@ fn successful_probe_yields_event() {
|
|||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2);
|
||||
|
||||
let (route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(&nodes[0], nodes[2], 100_000);
|
||||
let recv_value = 100_000;
|
||||
let (route, payment_hash, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(&nodes[0], nodes[2], recv_value);
|
||||
|
||||
let (payment_hash, payment_id) = nodes[0].node.send_probe(route.paths[0].clone()).unwrap();
|
||||
let res = nodes[0].node.send_probe(route.paths[0].clone()).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// node[0] -- update_add_htlcs -> node[1]
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||||
let probe_event = SendEvent::from_commitment_update(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), updates);
|
||||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &probe_event.msgs[0]);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], probe_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||||
let expected_route: &[&[&Node]] = &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]];
|
||||
|
||||
// node[1] -- update_add_htlcs -> node[2]
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||||
let probe_event = SendEvent::from_commitment_update(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), updates);
|
||||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &probe_event.msgs[0]);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 0);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], probe_event.commitment_msg, true, true);
|
||||
send_probe_along_route(&nodes[0], expected_route);
|
||||
|
||||
// node[1] <- update_fail_htlcs -- node[2]
|
||||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[2], updates.commitment_signed, true);
|
||||
expect_probe_successful_events(&nodes[0], vec![res]);
|
||||
|
||||
// node[0] <- update_fail_htlcs -- node[1]
|
||||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], updates.commitment_signed, false);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
match events.drain(..).next().unwrap() {
|
||||
crate::events::Event::ProbeSuccessful { payment_id: ev_pid, payment_hash: ev_ph, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_id, ev_pid);
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, ev_ph);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
assert!(!nodes[0].node.has_pending_payments());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1424,6 +1393,94 @@ fn onchain_failed_probe_yields_event() {
|
|||
assert!(!nodes[0].node.has_pending_payments());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn preflight_probes_yield_event_skip_private_hop() {
|
||||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(5);
|
||||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(5, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||||
|
||||
// We alleviate the HTLC max-in-flight limit, as otherwise we'd always be limited through that.
|
||||
let mut no_htlc_limit_config = test_default_channel_config();
|
||||
no_htlc_limit_config.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 100;
|
||||
|
||||
let user_configs = std::iter::repeat(no_htlc_limit_config).take(5).map(|c| Some(c)).collect::<Vec<Option<UserConfig>>>();
|
||||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(5, &node_cfgs, &user_configs);
|
||||
let nodes = create_network(5, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||||
|
||||
// Setup channel topology:
|
||||
// N0 -(1M:0)- N1 -(1M:0)- N2 -(70k:0)- N3 -(50k:0)- N4
|
||||
|
||||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 0);
|
||||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 1_000_000, 0);
|
||||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 3, 70_000, 0);
|
||||
create_unannounced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 3, 4, 50_000, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut invoice_features = Bolt11InvoiceFeatures::empty();
|
||||
invoice_features.set_basic_mpp_optional();
|
||||
|
||||
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
|
||||
.with_bolt11_features(invoice_features).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let recv_value = 50_000_000;
|
||||
let route_params = RouteParameters::from_payment_params_and_value(payment_params, recv_value);
|
||||
let res = nodes[0].node.send_preflight_probes(route_params, None).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let expected_route: &[&[&Node]] = &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[3]]];
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(res.len(), expected_route.len());
|
||||
|
||||
send_probe_along_route(&nodes[0], expected_route);
|
||||
|
||||
expect_probe_successful_events(&nodes[0], res.clone());
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(!nodes[0].node.has_pending_payments());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn preflight_probes_yield_event() {
|
||||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
|
||||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(4, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||||
|
||||
// We alleviate the HTLC max-in-flight limit, as otherwise we'd always be limited through that.
|
||||
let mut no_htlc_limit_config = test_default_channel_config();
|
||||
no_htlc_limit_config.channel_handshake_config.max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel = 100;
|
||||
|
||||
let user_configs = std::iter::repeat(no_htlc_limit_config).take(4).map(|c| Some(c)).collect::<Vec<Option<UserConfig>>>();
|
||||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(4, &node_cfgs, &user_configs);
|
||||
let nodes = create_network(4, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||||
|
||||
// Setup channel topology:
|
||||
// (1M:0)- N1 -(30k:0)
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// N0 N4
|
||||
// \ /
|
||||
// (1M:0)- N2 -(70k:0)
|
||||
//
|
||||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 0);
|
||||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 2, 1_000_000, 0);
|
||||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 3, 30_000, 0);
|
||||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 3, 70_000, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut invoice_features = Bolt11InvoiceFeatures::empty();
|
||||
invoice_features.set_basic_mpp_optional();
|
||||
|
||||
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
|
||||
.with_bolt11_features(invoice_features).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let recv_value = 50_000_000;
|
||||
let route_params = RouteParameters::from_payment_params_and_value(payment_params, recv_value);
|
||||
let res = nodes[0].node.send_preflight_probes(route_params, None).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let expected_route: &[&[&Node]] = &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]];
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(res.len(), expected_route.len());
|
||||
|
||||
send_probe_along_route(&nodes[0], expected_route);
|
||||
|
||||
expect_probe_successful_events(&nodes[0], res.clone());
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(!nodes[0].node.has_pending_payments());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn preflight_probes_yield_event_and_skip() {
|
||||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(5);
|
||||
|
@ -1444,7 +1501,7 @@ fn preflight_probes_yield_event_and_skip() {
|
|||
// \ /
|
||||
// (70k:0)- N3 -(1M:0)
|
||||
//
|
||||
let first_chan_update = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 0).0;
|
||||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 100_000, 0);
|
||||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 2, 30_000, 0);
|
||||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 1, 3, 70_000, 0);
|
||||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 2, 4, 1_000_000, 0);
|
||||
|
@ -1453,70 +1510,22 @@ fn preflight_probes_yield_event_and_skip() {
|
|||
let mut invoice_features = Bolt11InvoiceFeatures::empty();
|
||||
invoice_features.set_basic_mpp_optional();
|
||||
|
||||
let mut payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
|
||||
let payment_params = PaymentParameters::from_node_id(nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id(), TEST_FINAL_CLTV)
|
||||
.with_bolt11_features(invoice_features).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let route_params = RouteParameters::from_payment_params_and_value(payment_params, 80_000_000);
|
||||
let recv_value = 80_000_000;
|
||||
let route_params = RouteParameters::from_payment_params_and_value(payment_params, recv_value);
|
||||
let res = nodes[0].node.send_preflight_probes(route_params, None).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let expected_route : &[&[&Node]] = &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2], &nodes[4]]];
|
||||
|
||||
// We check that only one probe was sent, the other one was skipped due to limited liquidity.
|
||||
assert_eq!(res.len(), 1);
|
||||
let log_msg = format!("Skipped sending payment probe to avoid putting channel {} under the liquidity limit.",
|
||||
first_chan_update.contents.short_channel_id);
|
||||
node_cfgs[0].logger.assert_log_contains("lightning::ln::channelmanager", &log_msg, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
let (payment_hash, payment_id) = res.first().unwrap();
|
||||
send_probe_along_route(&nodes[0], expected_route);
|
||||
|
||||
// node[0] -- update_add_htlcs -> node[1]
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||||
let probe_event = SendEvent::from_node(&nodes[0]);
|
||||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &probe_event.msgs[0]);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], probe_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||||
expect_probe_successful_events(&nodes[0], res.clone());
|
||||
|
||||
// node[1] -- update_add_htlcs -> node[2]
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||||
let probe_event = SendEvent::from_node(&nodes[1]);
|
||||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &probe_event.msgs[0]);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 0);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[1], probe_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[2]);
|
||||
|
||||
// node[2] -- update_add_htlcs -> node[4]
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||||
let probe_event = SendEvent::from_node(&nodes[2]);
|
||||
nodes[4].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &probe_event.msgs[0]);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[4], 0);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[4], nodes[2], probe_event.commitment_msg, true, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// node[2] <- update_fail_htlcs -- node[4]
|
||||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[4], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[4].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 0);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[2], nodes[4], updates.commitment_signed, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// node[1] <- update_fail_htlcs -- node[2]
|
||||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[2], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[2], updates.commitment_signed, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// node[0] <- update_fail_htlcs -- node[1]
|
||||
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 0);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], updates.commitment_signed, false);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
match events.drain(..).next().unwrap() {
|
||||
crate::events::Event::ProbeSuccessful { payment_id: ev_pid, payment_hash: ev_ph, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_id, ev_pid);
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, ev_ph);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
assert!(!nodes[0].node.has_pending_payments());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -747,8 +747,8 @@ fn do_test_partial_claim_before_restart(persist_both_monitors: bool) {
|
|||
assert_eq!(send_events.len(), 2);
|
||||
let node_1_msgs = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut send_events);
|
||||
let node_2_msgs = remove_first_msg_event_to_node(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &mut send_events);
|
||||
do_pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), node_1_msgs, true, false, None);
|
||||
do_pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), node_2_msgs, true, false, None);
|
||||
do_pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), node_1_msgs, true, false, None, false);
|
||||
do_pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), node_2_msgs, true, false, None, false);
|
||||
|
||||
// Now that we have an MPP payment pending, get the latest encoded copies of nodes[3]'s
|
||||
// monitors and ChannelManager, for use later, if we don't want to persist both monitors.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue