mirrors/rust-lightning
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning.git synced 2025-02-24 15:02:20 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #3305 from TheBlueMatt/2024-09-no-redundant-gossip-validation

Browse source 
Avoid redundant `{channel,node}_announcement` signature checks
This commit is contained in:
valentinewallace 2024-09-10 12:49:06 -04:00 • committed by GitHub
commit a6dea2f154
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 70 additions and 45 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

115
lightning/src/routing/gossip.rs
View file

@ -1720,6 +1720,15 @@ impl<L: Deref> NetworkGraph<L> where L::Target: Logger {
/// RoutingMessageHandler implementation to call it indirectly. This may be useful to accept
/// routing messages from a source using a protocol other than the lightning P2P protocol.
pub fn update_node_from_announcement(&self, msg: &msgs::NodeAnnouncement) -> Result<(), LightningError> {
// First check if we have the announcement already to avoid the CPU cost of validating a
// redundant announcement.
if let Some(node) = self.nodes.read().unwrap().get(&msg.contents.node_id) {
if let Some(node_info) = node.announcement_info.as_ref() {
if node_info.last_update() == msg.contents.timestamp {
return Err(LightningError{err: "Update had the same timestamp as last processed update".to_owned(), action: ErrorAction::IgnoreDuplicateGossip});
}
}
}
verify_node_announcement(msg, &self.secp_ctx)?;
self.update_node_from_announcement_intern(&msg.contents, Some(&msg))
}
@ -1788,6 +1797,7 @@ impl<L: Deref> NetworkGraph<L> where L::Target: Logger {
where
U::Target: UtxoLookup,
{
self.pre_channel_announcement_validation_check(&msg.contents, utxo_lookup)?;
verify_channel_announcement(msg, &self.secp_ctx)?;
self.update_channel_from_unsigned_announcement_intern(&msg.contents, Some(msg), utxo_lookup)
}
@ -1817,6 +1827,7 @@ impl<L: Deref> NetworkGraph<L> where L::Target: Logger {
where
U::Target: UtxoLookup,
{
self.pre_channel_announcement_validation_check(&msg, utxo_lookup)?;
self.update_channel_from_unsigned_announcement_intern(msg, None, utxo_lookup)
}
@ -1911,6 +1922,52 @@ impl<L: Deref> NetworkGraph<L> where L::Target: Logger {
Ok(())
}
/// If we already have all the information for a channel that we're gonna get, there's no
/// reason to redundantly process it.
///
/// In those cases, this will return an `Err` that we can return immediately. Otherwise it will
/// return an `Ok(())`.
fn pre_channel_announcement_validation_check<U: Deref>(
&self, msg: &msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement, utxo_lookup: &Option<U>,
) -> Result<(), LightningError> where U::Target: UtxoLookup {
let channels = self.channels.read().unwrap();
if let Some(chan) = channels.get(&msg.short_channel_id) {
if chan.capacity_sats.is_some() {
// If we'd previously looked up the channel on-chain and checked the script
// against what appears on-chain, ignore the duplicate announcement.
//
// Because a reorg could replace one channel with another at the same SCID, if
// the channel appears to be different, we re-validate. This doesn't expose us
// to any more DoS risk than not, as a peer can always flood us with
// randomly-generated SCID values anyway.
//
// We use the Node IDs rather than the bitcoin_keys to check for "equivalence"
// as we didn't (necessarily) store the bitcoin keys, and we only really care
// if the peers on the channel changed anyway.
if msg.node_id_1 == chan.node_one && msg.node_id_2 == chan.node_two {
return Err(LightningError {
err: "Already have chain-validated channel".to_owned(),
action: ErrorAction::IgnoreDuplicateGossip
});
}
} else if utxo_lookup.is_none() {
// Similarly, if we can't check the chain right now anyway, ignore the
// duplicate announcement without bothering to take the channels write lock.
return Err(LightningError {
err: "Already have non-chain-validated channel".to_owned(),
action: ErrorAction::IgnoreDuplicateGossip
});
}
}
Ok(())
}
/// Update channel information from a received announcement.
///
/// Generally [`Self::pre_channel_announcement_validation_check`] should have been called
/// first.
fn update_channel_from_unsigned_announcement_intern<U: Deref>(
&self, msg: &msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement, full_msg: Option<&msgs::ChannelAnnouncement>, utxo_lookup: &Option<U>
) -> Result<(), LightningError>
@ -1928,39 +1985,6 @@ impl<L: Deref> NetworkGraph<L> where L::Target: Logger {
});
}
{
let channels = self.channels.read().unwrap();
if let Some(chan) = channels.get(&msg.short_channel_id) {
if chan.capacity_sats.is_some() {
// If we'd previously looked up the channel on-chain and checked the script
// against what appears on-chain, ignore the duplicate announcement.
//
// Because a reorg could replace one channel with another at the same SCID, if
// the channel appears to be different, we re-validate. This doesn't expose us
// to any more DoS risk than not, as a peer can always flood us with
// randomly-generated SCID values anyway.
//
// We use the Node IDs rather than the bitcoin_keys to check for "equivalence"
// as we didn't (necessarily) store the bitcoin keys, and we only really care
// if the peers on the channel changed anyway.
if msg.node_id_1 == chan.node_one && msg.node_id_2 == chan.node_two {
return Err(LightningError {
err: "Already have chain-validated channel".to_owned(),
action: ErrorAction::IgnoreDuplicateGossip
});
}
} else if utxo_lookup.is_none() {
// Similarly, if we can't check the chain right now anyway, ignore the
// duplicate announcement without bothering to take the channels write lock.
return Err(LightningError {
err: "Already have non-chain-validated channel".to_owned(),
action: ErrorAction::IgnoreDuplicateGossip
});
}
}
}
{
let removed_channels = self.removed_channels.lock().unwrap();
let removed_nodes = self.removed_nodes.lock().unwrap();
@ -2562,11 +2586,6 @@ pub(crate) mod tests {
};
}
match gossip_sync.handle_node_announcement(&valid_announcement) {
Ok(res) => assert!(res),
Err(_) => panic!()
};
let fake_msghash = hash_to_message!(zero_hash.as_byte_array());
match gossip_sync.handle_node_announcement(
&NodeAnnouncement {
@ -2577,6 +2596,11 @@ pub(crate) mod tests {
Err(e) => assert_eq!(e.err, "Invalid signature on node_announcement message")
};
match gossip_sync.handle_node_announcement(&valid_announcement) {
Ok(res) => assert!(res),
Err(_) => panic!()
};
let announcement_with_data = get_signed_node_announcement(|unsigned_announcement| {
unsigned_announcement.timestamp += 1000;
unsigned_announcement.excess_data.resize(MAX_EXCESS_BYTES_FOR_RELAY + 1, 0);
@ -2698,23 +2722,24 @@ pub(crate) mod tests {
}
}
// Don't relay valid channels with excess data
let valid_announcement = get_signed_channel_announcement(|unsigned_announcement| {
let valid_excess_data_announcement = get_signed_channel_announcement(|unsigned_announcement| {
unsigned_announcement.short_channel_id += 4;
unsigned_announcement.excess_data.resize(MAX_EXCESS_BYTES_FOR_RELAY + 1, 0);
}, node_1_privkey, node_2_privkey, &secp_ctx);
match gossip_sync.handle_channel_announcement(&valid_announcement) {
Ok(res) => assert!(!res),
_ => panic!()
};
let mut invalid_sig_announcement = valid_announcement.clone();
let mut invalid_sig_announcement = valid_excess_data_announcement.clone();
invalid_sig_announcement.contents.excess_data = Vec::new();
match gossip_sync.handle_channel_announcement(&invalid_sig_announcement) {
Ok(_) => panic!(),
Err(e) => assert_eq!(e.err, "Invalid signature on channel_announcement message")
};
// Don't relay valid channels with excess data
match gossip_sync.handle_channel_announcement(&valid_excess_data_announcement) {
Ok(res) => assert!(!res),
_ => panic!()
};
let channel_to_itself_announcement = get_signed_channel_announcement(|_| {}, node_1_privkey, node_1_privkey, &secp_ctx);
match gossip_sync.handle_channel_announcement(&channel_to_itself_announcement) {
Ok(_) => panic!(),