Update Offers Test to Verify BOLT12 Invoice Reply Paths

1. Updated the Offers Test to check the reply paths in BOLT12 Invoices.
2. Changed the `extract_invoice` return type from `Option<BlindedMessagePath>`
   to `BlindedMessagePath` since all BOLT12Invoices now have a corresponding
   reply path by default.
This commit is contained in:
shaavan 2024-08-29 17:06:18 +05:30
parent a4bf936101
commit 7b49993101

View file

@ -219,12 +219,12 @@ fn extract_invoice_request<'a, 'b, 'c>(
}
}
fn extract_invoice<'a, 'b, 'c>(node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, message: &OnionMessage) -> (Bolt12Invoice, Option<BlindedMessagePath>) {
fn extract_invoice<'a, 'b, 'c>(node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, message: &OnionMessage) -> (Bolt12Invoice, BlindedMessagePath) {
match node.onion_messenger.peel_onion_message(message) {
Ok(PeeledOnion::Receive(message, _, reply_path)) => match message {
ParsedOnionMessageContents::Offers(offers_message) => match offers_message {
OffersMessage::InvoiceRequest(invoice_request) => panic!("Unexpected invoice_request: {:?}", invoice_request),
OffersMessage::Invoice(invoice) => (invoice, reply_path),
OffersMessage::Invoice(invoice) => (invoice, reply_path.unwrap()),
#[cfg(async_payments)]
OffersMessage::StaticInvoice(invoice) => panic!("Unexpected static invoice: {:?}", invoice),
OffersMessage::InvoiceError(error) => panic!("Unexpected invoice_error: {:?}", error),
@ -580,13 +580,22 @@ fn creates_and_pays_for_offer_using_two_hop_blinded_path() {
let onion_message = charlie.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(david_id).unwrap();
david.onion_messenger.handle_onion_message(&charlie_id, &onion_message);
let (invoice, _) = extract_invoice(david, &onion_message);
let (invoice, reply_path) = extract_invoice(david, &onion_message);
assert_eq!(invoice.amount_msats(), 10_000_000);
assert_ne!(invoice.signing_pubkey(), alice_id);
assert!(!invoice.payment_paths().is_empty());
for path in invoice.payment_paths() {
assert_eq!(path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(bob_id));
}
// Both Bob and Charlie have an equal number of channels and need to be connected
// to Alice when she's handling the message. Therefore, either Bob or Charlie could
// serve as the introduction node for the reply path back to Alice.
assert!(
matches!(
reply_path.introduction_node(),
&IntroductionNode::NodeId(node_id) if node_id == bob_id || node_id == charlie_id,
)
);
route_bolt12_payment(david, &[charlie, bob, alice], &invoice);
expect_recent_payment!(david, RecentPaymentDetails::Pending, payment_id);
@ -659,7 +668,7 @@ fn creates_and_pays_for_refund_using_two_hop_blinded_path() {
let onion_message = charlie.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(david_id).unwrap();
david.onion_messenger.handle_onion_message(&charlie_id, &onion_message);
let (invoice, _) = extract_invoice(david, &onion_message);
let (invoice, reply_path) = extract_invoice(david, &onion_message);
assert_eq!(invoice, expected_invoice);
assert_eq!(invoice.amount_msats(), 10_000_000);
@ -668,6 +677,8 @@ fn creates_and_pays_for_refund_using_two_hop_blinded_path() {
for path in invoice.payment_paths() {
assert_eq!(path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(bob_id));
}
assert_eq!(reply_path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(bob_id));
route_bolt12_payment(david, &[charlie, bob, alice], &invoice);
expect_recent_payment!(david, RecentPaymentDetails::Pending, payment_id);
@ -726,13 +737,14 @@ fn creates_and_pays_for_offer_using_one_hop_blinded_path() {
let onion_message = alice.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(bob_id).unwrap();
bob.onion_messenger.handle_onion_message(&alice_id, &onion_message);
let (invoice, _) = extract_invoice(bob, &onion_message);
let (invoice, reply_path) = extract_invoice(bob, &onion_message);
assert_eq!(invoice.amount_msats(), 10_000_000);
assert_ne!(invoice.signing_pubkey(), alice_id);
assert!(!invoice.payment_paths().is_empty());
for path in invoice.payment_paths() {
assert_eq!(path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(alice_id));
}
assert_eq!(reply_path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(alice_id));
route_bolt12_payment(bob, &[alice], &invoice);
expect_recent_payment!(bob, RecentPaymentDetails::Pending, payment_id);
@ -779,7 +791,7 @@ fn creates_and_pays_for_refund_using_one_hop_blinded_path() {
let onion_message = alice.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(bob_id).unwrap();
bob.onion_messenger.handle_onion_message(&alice_id, &onion_message);
let (invoice, _) = extract_invoice(bob, &onion_message);
let (invoice, reply_path) = extract_invoice(bob, &onion_message);
assert_eq!(invoice, expected_invoice);
assert_eq!(invoice.amount_msats(), 10_000_000);
@ -788,6 +800,7 @@ fn creates_and_pays_for_refund_using_one_hop_blinded_path() {
for path in invoice.payment_paths() {
assert_eq!(path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(alice_id));
}
assert_eq!(reply_path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(alice_id));
route_bolt12_payment(bob, &[alice], &invoice);
expect_recent_payment!(bob, RecentPaymentDetails::Pending, payment_id);
@ -1044,7 +1057,7 @@ fn send_invoice_for_refund_with_distinct_reply_path() {
let onion_message = bob.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(alice_id).unwrap();
let (_, reply_path) = extract_invoice(alice, &onion_message);
assert_eq!(reply_path.unwrap().introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(charlie_id));
assert_eq!(reply_path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(charlie_id));
// Send, extract and verify the second Invoice Request message
let onion_message = david.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(bob_id).unwrap();
@ -1053,7 +1066,7 @@ fn send_invoice_for_refund_with_distinct_reply_path() {
let onion_message = bob.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(alice_id).unwrap();
let (_, reply_path) = extract_invoice(alice, &onion_message);
assert_eq!(reply_path.unwrap().introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(nodes[6].node.get_our_node_id()));
assert_eq!(reply_path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(nodes[6].node.get_our_node_id()));
}
/// Checks that a deferred invoice can be paid asynchronously from an Event::InvoiceReceived.
@ -1190,12 +1203,13 @@ fn creates_offer_with_blinded_path_using_unannounced_introduction_node() {
let onion_message = alice.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(bob_id).unwrap();
bob.onion_messenger.handle_onion_message(&alice_id, &onion_message);
let (invoice, _) = extract_invoice(bob, &onion_message);
let (invoice, reply_path) = extract_invoice(bob, &onion_message);
assert_ne!(invoice.signing_pubkey(), alice_id);
assert!(!invoice.payment_paths().is_empty());
for path in invoice.payment_paths() {
assert_eq!(path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(bob_id));
}
assert_eq!(reply_path.introduction_node(), &IntroductionNode::NodeId(bob_id));
route_bolt12_payment(bob, &[alice], &invoice);
expect_recent_payment!(bob, RecentPaymentDetails::Pending, payment_id);
@ -1239,7 +1253,7 @@ fn creates_refund_with_blinded_path_using_unannounced_introduction_node() {
let onion_message = alice.onion_messenger.next_onion_message_for_peer(bob_id).unwrap();
let (invoice, _) = extract_invoice(bob, &onion_message);
let (invoice, _reply_path) = extract_invoice(bob, &onion_message);
assert_eq!(invoice, expected_invoice);
assert_ne!(invoice.signing_pubkey(), alice_id);
assert!(!invoice.payment_paths().is_empty());