mirror of
https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning.git
synced 2025-02-24 23:08:36 +01:00
Add anchors coverage to test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims
This commit is contained in:
parent
fe45af62a5
commit
4a393ee540
1 changed files with 130 additions and 38 deletions
|
@ -1672,8 +1672,7 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_htlc_tx_balances() {
|
|||
do_test_revoked_counterparty_htlc_tx_balances(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() {
|
||||
fn do_test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims(anchors: bool) {
|
||||
// Tests `get_claimable_balances` for revoked counterparty commitment transactions when
|
||||
// claiming with an aggregated claim transaction.
|
||||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||||
|
@ -1683,9 +1682,25 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() {
|
|||
// transaction which, from the point of view of our keys_manager, is revoked.
|
||||
chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
|
||||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||||
let mut user_config = test_default_channel_config();
|
||||
if anchors {
|
||||
user_config.channel_handshake_config.negotiate_anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx = true;
|
||||
user_config.manually_accept_inbound_channels = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[Some(user_config), Some(user_config)]);
|
||||
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||||
|
||||
let coinbase_tx = Transaction {
|
||||
version: 2,
|
||||
lock_time: PackedLockTime::ZERO,
|
||||
input: vec![TxIn { ..Default::default() }],
|
||||
output: vec![TxOut {
|
||||
value: Amount::ONE_BTC.to_sat(),
|
||||
script_pubkey: nodes[0].wallet_source.get_change_script().unwrap(),
|
||||
}],
|
||||
};
|
||||
nodes[0].wallet_source.add_utxo(bitcoin::OutPoint { txid: coinbase_tx.txid(), vout: 0 }, coinbase_tx.output[0].value);
|
||||
|
||||
let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) =
|
||||
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 100_000_000);
|
||||
let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
|
||||
|
@ -1708,9 +1723,11 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() {
|
|||
// Now get the latest commitment transaction from A and then update the fee to revoke it
|
||||
let as_revoked_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_id);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(as_revoked_txn.len(), 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(as_revoked_txn.len(), if anchors { 1 } else { 2 });
|
||||
check_spends!(as_revoked_txn[0], funding_tx);
|
||||
if !anchors {
|
||||
check_spends!(as_revoked_txn[1], as_revoked_txn[0]); // The HTLC-Claim transaction
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let channel_type_features = get_channel_type_features!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id);
|
||||
let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], nodes[1], chan_id) as u64;
|
||||
|
@ -1749,22 +1766,38 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() {
|
|||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 1000000);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut claim_txn: Vec<_> = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().drain(..).filter(|tx| tx.input.iter().any(|inp| inp.previous_output.txid == as_revoked_txn[0].txid())).collect();
|
||||
// Currently the revoked commitment outputs are all claimed in one aggregated transaction
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn.len(), 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn[0].input.len(), 3);
|
||||
let mut claim_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn.len(), if anchors { 2 } else { 1 });
|
||||
let revoked_to_self_claim = if anchors {
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout, 5); // Separate to_remote claim
|
||||
check_spends!(claim_txn[0], as_revoked_txn[0]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn[1].input.len(), 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout, 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn[1].input[1].previous_output.vout, 3);
|
||||
check_spends!(claim_txn[1], as_revoked_txn[0]);
|
||||
Some(claim_txn.remove(0))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn[0].input.len(), 3);
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout, 3);
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn[0].input[1].previous_output.vout, 0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn[0].input[2].previous_output.vout, 1);
|
||||
check_spends!(claim_txn[0], as_revoked_txn[0]);
|
||||
None
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let to_remote_maturity = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1;
|
||||
|
||||
let commitment_tx_fee = chan_feerate *
|
||||
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000;
|
||||
let anchor_outputs_value = if anchors { channel::ANCHOR_OUTPUT_VALUE_SATOSHI * 2 } else { 0 };
|
||||
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
||||
// to_remote output in A's revoked commitment
|
||||
amount_satoshis: 100_000 - 4_000 - 3_000,
|
||||
confirmation_height: to_remote_maturity,
|
||||
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
|
||||
// to_self output in A's revoked commitment
|
||||
amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
|
||||
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
|
||||
amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - commitment_tx_fee - anchor_outputs_value,
|
||||
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
|
||||
amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
||||
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
|
||||
|
@ -1772,19 +1805,46 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() {
|
|||
}]),
|
||||
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
||||
|
||||
// Confirm A's HTLC-Success tranasction which presumably raced B's claim, causing B to create a
|
||||
// Confirm A's HTLC-Success transaction which presumably raced B's claim, causing B to create a
|
||||
// new claim.
|
||||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &as_revoked_txn[1]);
|
||||
if anchors {
|
||||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_revoked_txn[0]);
|
||||
check_closed_broadcast(&nodes[0], 1, true);
|
||||
check_added_monitors(&nodes[0], 1);
|
||||
check_closed_event!(&nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, false, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 1_000_000);
|
||||
handle_bump_htlc_event(&nodes[0], 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
let htlc_success_claim = if anchors {
|
||||
let mut txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
|
||||
assert_eq!(txn.len(), 1);
|
||||
check_spends!(txn[0], as_revoked_txn[0], coinbase_tx);
|
||||
txn.pop().unwrap()
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
as_revoked_txn[1].clone()
|
||||
};
|
||||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &htlc_success_claim);
|
||||
expect_payment_sent(&nodes[1], claimed_payment_preimage, None, true, false);
|
||||
let mut claim_txn_2: Vec<_> = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
|
||||
claim_txn_2.sort_unstable_by_key(|tx| if tx.input.iter().any(|inp| inp.previous_output.txid == as_revoked_txn[0].txid()) { 0 } else { 1 });
|
||||
|
||||
let mut claim_txn_2 = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcast();
|
||||
// Once B sees the HTLC-Success transaction it splits its claim transaction into two, though in
|
||||
// theory it could re-aggregate the claims as well.
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn_2.len(), 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn_2[0].input.len(), 2);
|
||||
check_spends!(claim_txn_2[0], as_revoked_txn[0]);
|
||||
if anchors {
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn_2[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn_2[0].input[0].previous_output.vout, 0);
|
||||
check_spends!(claim_txn_2[0], &htlc_success_claim);
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn_2[1].input.len(), 1);
|
||||
check_spends!(claim_txn_2[1], as_revoked_txn[1]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn_2[1].input[0].previous_output.vout, 3);
|
||||
check_spends!(claim_txn_2[1], as_revoked_txn[0]);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn_2[0].input.len(), 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn_2[0].input[0].previous_output.vout, 0);
|
||||
check_spends!(claim_txn_2[0], as_revoked_txn[1]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn_2[1].input.len(), 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn_2[1].input[0].previous_output.vout, 3);
|
||||
assert_eq!(claim_txn_2[1].input[1].previous_output.vout, 1);
|
||||
check_spends!(claim_txn_2[1], as_revoked_txn[0]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
||||
// to_remote output in A's revoked commitment
|
||||
|
@ -1792,8 +1852,7 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() {
|
|||
confirmation_height: to_remote_maturity,
|
||||
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
|
||||
// to_self output in A's revoked commitment
|
||||
amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
|
||||
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
|
||||
amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - commitment_tx_fee - anchor_outputs_value,
|
||||
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
|
||||
amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
||||
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
|
||||
|
@ -1809,8 +1868,7 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() {
|
|||
|
||||
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
|
||||
// to_self output in A's revoked commitment
|
||||
amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
|
||||
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
|
||||
amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - commitment_tx_fee - anchor_outputs_value,
|
||||
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
|
||||
amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
||||
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 2
|
||||
|
@ -1821,47 +1879,75 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() {
|
|||
}]),
|
||||
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
||||
|
||||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[1]);
|
||||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[0]);
|
||||
let htlc_2_claim_maturity = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1;
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
|
||||
// to_self output in A's revoked commitment
|
||||
amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
|
||||
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
|
||||
amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - commitment_tx_fee - anchor_outputs_value,
|
||||
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
|
||||
amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
||||
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations { // HTLC 2
|
||||
amount_satoshis: claim_txn_2[1].output[0].value,
|
||||
amount_satoshis: claim_txn_2[0].output[0].value,
|
||||
confirmation_height: htlc_2_claim_maturity,
|
||||
}]),
|
||||
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
||||
|
||||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 5);
|
||||
test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[1], false);
|
||||
test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[0], false);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable {
|
||||
// to_self output in A's revoked commitment
|
||||
amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - chan_feerate *
|
||||
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(&channel_type_features) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
|
||||
amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 100_000 - commitment_tx_fee - anchor_outputs_value,
|
||||
}, Balance::CounterpartyRevokedOutputClaimable { // HTLC 1
|
||||
amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
||||
}]),
|
||||
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
||||
|
||||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[0]);
|
||||
if anchors {
|
||||
mine_transactions(&nodes[1], &[&claim_txn_2[1], revoked_to_self_claim.as_ref().unwrap()]);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[1]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
let rest_claim_maturity = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1;
|
||||
|
||||
if anchors {
|
||||
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
||||
amount_satoshis: claim_txn_2[0].output[0].value,
|
||||
amount_satoshis: claim_txn_2[1].output[0].value,
|
||||
confirmation_height: rest_claim_maturity,
|
||||
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
||||
amount_satoshis: revoked_to_self_claim.as_ref().unwrap().output[0].value,
|
||||
confirmation_height: rest_claim_maturity,
|
||||
}],
|
||||
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
||||
amount_satoshis: claim_txn_2[1].output[0].value,
|
||||
confirmation_height: rest_claim_maturity,
|
||||
}],
|
||||
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty()); // We shouldn't fail the payment until we spend the output
|
||||
|
||||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 5);
|
||||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], revoked_payment_hash, false);
|
||||
test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[0], false);
|
||||
if anchors {
|
||||
let events = nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||||
for (i, event) in events.into_iter().enumerate() {
|
||||
if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs, .. } = event {
|
||||
assert_eq!(outputs.len(), 1);
|
||||
let spend_tx = nodes[1].keys_manager.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(
|
||||
&[&outputs[0]], Vec::new(), Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(),
|
||||
253, None, &Secp256k1::new()
|
||||
).unwrap();
|
||||
check_spends!(spend_tx, if i == 0 { &claim_txn_2[1] } else { revoked_to_self_claim.as_ref().unwrap() });
|
||||
} else { panic!(); }
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn_2[1], false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure that even if we connect more blocks, potentially replaying the entire chain if we're
|
||||
|
@ -1873,6 +1959,12 @@ fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() {
|
|||
assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims() {
|
||||
do_test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims(false);
|
||||
do_test_revoked_counterparty_aggregated_claims(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn do_test_restored_packages_retry(check_old_monitor_retries_after_upgrade: bool) {
|
||||
// Tests that we'll retry packages that were previously timelocked after we've restored them.
|
||||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue