mirror of
https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning.git
synced 2025-02-24 23:08:36 +01:00
Merge pull request #2008 from valentinewallace/2023-02-remove-manual-retries
Abandon payments on behalf of the user and remove manual retries
This commit is contained in:
commit
30b9d9fbea
11 changed files with 318 additions and 364 deletions
|
@ -914,6 +914,7 @@ pub fn do_test<Out: Output>(data: &[u8], underlying_out: Out) {
|
|||
events::Event::PaymentClaimed { .. } => {},
|
||||
events::Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } => {},
|
||||
events::Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } => {},
|
||||
events::Event::PaymentFailed { .. } => {},
|
||||
events::Event::ProbeSuccessful { .. } | events::Event::ProbeFailed { .. } => {
|
||||
// Even though we don't explicitly send probes, because probes are
|
||||
// detected based on hashing the payment hash+preimage, its rather
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1752,12 +1752,18 @@ fn test_monitor_update_on_pending_forwards() {
|
|||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], bs_updates.commitment_signed, false, true);
|
||||
|
||||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
|
||||
if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, payment_failed_permanently, .. } = events[0] {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_1);
|
||||
assert!(payment_failed_permanently);
|
||||
} else { panic!("Unexpected event!"); }
|
||||
match events[1] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_1);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
match events[2] {
|
||||
Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1190,9 +1190,9 @@ pub enum RecentPaymentDetails {
|
|||
/// made before LDK version 0.0.104.
|
||||
payment_hash: Option<PaymentHash>,
|
||||
},
|
||||
/// After a payment is explicitly abandoned by calling [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`], it
|
||||
/// is marked as abandoned until an [`Event::PaymentFailed`] is generated. A payment could also
|
||||
/// be marked as abandoned if pathfinding fails repeatedly or retries have been exhausted.
|
||||
/// After a payment's retries are exhausted per the provided [`Retry`], or it is explicitly
|
||||
/// abandoned via [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`], it is marked as abandoned until all
|
||||
/// pending HTLCs for this payment resolve and an [`Event::PaymentFailed`] is generated.
|
||||
Abandoned {
|
||||
/// Hash of the payment that we have given up trying to send.
|
||||
payment_hash: PaymentHash,
|
||||
|
@ -1718,7 +1718,7 @@ where
|
|||
///
|
||||
/// This can be useful for payments that may have been prepared, but ultimately not sent, as a
|
||||
/// result of a crash. If such a payment exists, is not listed here, and an
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentSent`] has not been received, you may consider retrying the payment.
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentSent`] has not been received, you may consider resending the payment.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentSent`]: events::Event::PaymentSent
|
||||
pub fn list_recent_payments(&self) -> Vec<RecentPaymentDetails> {
|
||||
|
@ -2475,8 +2475,8 @@ where
|
|||
/// If a pending payment is currently in-flight with the same [`PaymentId`] provided, this
|
||||
/// method will error with an [`APIError::InvalidRoute`]. Note, however, that once a payment
|
||||
/// is no longer pending (either via [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`], or handling of an
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentSent`]) LDK will not stop you from sending a second payment with the same
|
||||
/// [`PaymentId`].
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentSent`] or [`Event::PaymentFailed`]) LDK will not stop you from sending a
|
||||
/// second payment with the same [`PaymentId`].
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Thus, in order to ensure duplicate payments are not sent, you should implement your own
|
||||
/// tracking of payments, including state to indicate once a payment has completed. Because you
|
||||
|
@ -2521,6 +2521,7 @@ where
|
|||
/// [`Route`], we assume the invoice had the basic_mpp feature set.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentSent`]: events::Event::PaymentSent
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentFailed`]: events::Event::PaymentFailed
|
||||
/// [`PeerManager::process_events`]: crate::ln::peer_handler::PeerManager::process_events
|
||||
/// [`ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress`]: crate::chain::ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::InProgress
|
||||
pub fn send_payment(&self, route: &Route, payment_hash: PaymentHash, payment_secret: &Option<PaymentSecret>, payment_id: PaymentId) -> Result<(), PaymentSendFailure> {
|
||||
|
@ -2558,48 +2559,25 @@ where
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/// Retries a payment along the given [`Route`].
|
||||
/// Signals that no further retries for the given payment should occur. Useful if you have a
|
||||
/// pending outbound payment with retries remaining, but wish to stop retrying the payment before
|
||||
/// retries are exhausted.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Errors returned are a superset of those returned from [`send_payment`], so see
|
||||
/// [`send_payment`] documentation for more details on errors. This method will also error if the
|
||||
/// retry amount puts the payment more than 10% over the payment's total amount, if the payment
|
||||
/// for the given `payment_id` cannot be found (likely due to timeout or success), or if
|
||||
/// further retries have been disabled with [`abandon_payment`].
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`send_payment`]: [`ChannelManager::send_payment`]
|
||||
/// [`abandon_payment`]: [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]
|
||||
pub fn retry_payment(&self, route: &Route, payment_id: PaymentId) -> Result<(), PaymentSendFailure> {
|
||||
let best_block_height = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
|
||||
self.pending_outbound_payments.retry_payment_with_route(route, payment_id, &self.entropy_source, &self.node_signer, best_block_height,
|
||||
|path, payment_params, payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height, payment_id, keysend_preimage, session_priv|
|
||||
self.send_payment_along_path(path, payment_params, payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height, payment_id, keysend_preimage, session_priv))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Signals that no further retries for the given payment will occur.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// After this method returns, no future calls to [`retry_payment`] for the given `payment_id`
|
||||
/// are allowed. If no [`Event::PaymentFailed`] event had been generated before, one will be
|
||||
/// generated as soon as there are no remaining pending HTLCs for this payment.
|
||||
/// If no [`Event::PaymentFailed`] event had been generated before, one will be generated as soon
|
||||
/// as there are no remaining pending HTLCs for this payment.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note that calling this method does *not* prevent a payment from succeeding. You must still
|
||||
/// wait until you receive either a [`Event::PaymentFailed`] or [`Event::PaymentSent`] event to
|
||||
/// determine the ultimate status of a payment.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If an [`Event::PaymentFailed`] event is generated and we restart without this
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager`] having been persisted, the payment may still be in the pending state
|
||||
/// upon restart. This allows further calls to [`retry_payment`] (and requiring a second call
|
||||
/// to [`abandon_payment`] to mark the payment as failed again). Otherwise, future calls to
|
||||
/// [`retry_payment`] will fail with [`PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError`].
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager`] having been persisted, another [`Event::PaymentFailed`] may be generated.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`abandon_payment`]: Self::abandon_payment
|
||||
/// [`retry_payment`]: Self::retry_payment
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentFailed`]: events::Event::PaymentFailed
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentSent`]: events::Event::PaymentSent
|
||||
pub fn abandon_payment(&self, payment_id: PaymentId) {
|
||||
let _persistence_guard = PersistenceNotifierGuard::notify_on_drop(&self.total_consistency_lock, &self.persistence_notifier);
|
||||
if let Some(payment_failed_ev) = self.pending_outbound_payments.abandon_payment(payment_id) {
|
||||
self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push(payment_failed_ev);
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.pending_outbound_payments.abandon_payment(payment_id, &self.pending_events);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Send a spontaneous payment, which is a payment that does not require the recipient to have
|
||||
|
@ -3372,7 +3350,8 @@ where
|
|||
|
||||
let best_block_height = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
|
||||
self.pending_outbound_payments.check_retry_payments(&self.router, || self.list_usable_channels(),
|
||||
|| self.compute_inflight_htlcs(), &self.entropy_source, &self.node_signer, best_block_height, &self.logger,
|
||||
|| self.compute_inflight_htlcs(), &self.entropy_source, &self.node_signer, best_block_height,
|
||||
&self.pending_events, &self.logger,
|
||||
|path, payment_params, payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height, payment_id, keysend_preimage, session_priv|
|
||||
self.send_payment_along_path(path, payment_params, payment_hash, payment_secret, total_value, cur_height, payment_id, keysend_preimage, session_priv));
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1800,17 +1800,18 @@ macro_rules! expect_payment_failed {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn expect_payment_failed_conditions_event<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd, 'e>(
|
||||
node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, payment_failed_event: Event, expected_payment_hash: PaymentHash,
|
||||
payment_failed_events: Vec<Event>, expected_payment_hash: PaymentHash,
|
||||
expected_payment_failed_permanently: bool, conditions: PaymentFailedConditions<'e>
|
||||
) {
|
||||
let expected_payment_id = match payment_failed_event {
|
||||
if conditions.expected_mpp_parts_remain { assert_eq!(payment_failed_events.len(), 1); } else { assert_eq!(payment_failed_events.len(), 2); }
|
||||
let expected_payment_id = match &payment_failed_events[0] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, payment_failed_permanently, path, retry, payment_id, network_update, short_channel_id,
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
error_code,
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
error_data, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, expected_payment_hash, "unexpected payment_hash");
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_failed_permanently, expected_payment_failed_permanently, "unexpected payment_failed_permanently value");
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, expected_payment_hash, "unexpected payment_hash");
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_failed_permanently, expected_payment_failed_permanently, "unexpected payment_failed_permanently value");
|
||||
assert!(retry.is_some(), "expected retry.is_some()");
|
||||
assert_eq!(retry.as_ref().unwrap().final_value_msat, path.last().unwrap().fee_msat, "Retry amount should match last hop in path");
|
||||
assert_eq!(retry.as_ref().unwrap().payment_params.payee_pubkey, path.last().unwrap().pubkey, "Retry payee node_id should match last hop in path");
|
||||
|
@ -1839,7 +1840,7 @@ pub fn expect_payment_failed_conditions_event<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd, 'e>(
|
|||
},
|
||||
Some(NetworkUpdate::ChannelFailure { short_channel_id, is_permanent }) if chan_closed => {
|
||||
if let Some(scid) = conditions.expected_blamed_scid {
|
||||
assert_eq!(short_channel_id, scid);
|
||||
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, scid);
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert!(is_permanent);
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
@ -1853,10 +1854,7 @@ pub fn expect_payment_failed_conditions_event<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd, 'e>(
|
|||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
};
|
||||
if !conditions.expected_mpp_parts_remain {
|
||||
node.node.abandon_payment(expected_payment_id);
|
||||
let events = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
match events[0] {
|
||||
match &payment_failed_events[1] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref payment_id } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, expected_payment_hash, "unexpected second payment_hash");
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_id, expected_payment_id);
|
||||
|
@ -1870,9 +1868,8 @@ pub fn expect_payment_failed_conditions<'a, 'b, 'c, 'd, 'e>(
|
|||
node: &'a Node<'b, 'c, 'd>, expected_payment_hash: PaymentHash, expected_payment_failed_permanently: bool,
|
||||
conditions: PaymentFailedConditions<'e>
|
||||
) {
|
||||
let mut events = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
expect_payment_failed_conditions_event(node, events.pop().unwrap(), expected_payment_hash, expected_payment_failed_permanently, conditions);
|
||||
let events = node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
expect_payment_failed_conditions_event(events, expected_payment_hash, expected_payment_failed_permanently, conditions);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn send_along_route_with_secret<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, route: Route, expected_paths: &[&[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>]], recv_value: u64, our_payment_hash: PaymentHash, our_payment_secret: PaymentSecret) -> PaymentId {
|
||||
|
@ -2157,22 +2154,6 @@ pub fn fail_payment_along_route<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expe
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn pass_failed_payment_back<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_paths_slice: &[&[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>]], skip_last: bool, our_payment_hash: PaymentHash) {
|
||||
let expected_payment_id = pass_failed_payment_back_no_abandon(origin_node, expected_paths_slice, skip_last, our_payment_hash);
|
||||
if !skip_last {
|
||||
origin_node.node.abandon_payment(expected_payment_id.unwrap());
|
||||
let events = origin_node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
match events[0] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref payment_id } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, our_payment_hash, "unexpected second payment_hash");
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_id, expected_payment_id.unwrap());
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected second event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn pass_failed_payment_back_no_abandon<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_paths_slice: &[&[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>]], skip_last: bool, our_payment_hash: PaymentHash) -> Option<PaymentId> {
|
||||
let mut expected_paths: Vec<_> = expected_paths_slice.iter().collect();
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(expected_paths[0].last().unwrap(), expected_paths.len());
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2196,8 +2177,6 @@ pub fn pass_failed_payment_back_no_abandon<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b
|
|||
per_path_msgs.sort_unstable_by(|(_, node_id_a), (_, node_id_b)| node_id_a.cmp(node_id_b));
|
||||
expected_paths.sort_unstable_by(|path_a, path_b| path_a[path_a.len() - 2].node.get_our_node_id().cmp(&path_b[path_b.len() - 2].node.get_our_node_id()));
|
||||
|
||||
let mut expected_payment_id = None;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i, (expected_route, (path_msgs, next_hop))) in expected_paths.iter().zip(per_path_msgs.drain(..)).enumerate() {
|
||||
let mut next_msgs = Some(path_msgs);
|
||||
let mut expected_next_node = next_hop;
|
||||
|
@ -2245,8 +2224,9 @@ pub fn pass_failed_payment_back_no_abandon<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b
|
|||
assert!(origin_node.node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(origin_node, prev_node, next_msgs.as_ref().unwrap().1, false);
|
||||
let events = origin_node.node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
expected_payment_id = Some(match events[0] {
|
||||
if i == expected_paths.len() - 1 { assert_eq!(events.len(), 2); } else { assert_eq!(events.len(), 1); }
|
||||
|
||||
let expected_payment_id = match events[0] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, payment_failed_permanently, all_paths_failed, ref path, ref payment_id, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, our_payment_hash);
|
||||
assert!(payment_failed_permanently);
|
||||
|
@ -2257,7 +2237,16 @@ pub fn pass_failed_payment_back_no_abandon<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b
|
|||
payment_id.unwrap()
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
});
|
||||
};
|
||||
if i == expected_paths.len() - 1 {
|
||||
match events[1] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, ref payment_id } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, our_payment_hash, "unexpected second payment_hash");
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_id, expected_payment_id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected second event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2266,8 +2255,6 @@ pub fn pass_failed_payment_back_no_abandon<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b
|
|||
assert!(expected_paths[0].last().unwrap().node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
||||
assert!(expected_paths[0].last().unwrap().node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(expected_paths[0].last().unwrap(), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
expected_payment_id
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn fail_payment<'a, 'b, 'c>(origin_node: &Node<'a, 'b, 'c>, expected_path: &[&Node<'a, 'b, 'c>], our_payment_hash: PaymentHash) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3170,7 +3170,7 @@ fn do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(deliver_bs_raa: bool, use
|
|||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||||
|
||||
let events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), if deliver_bs_raa { 2 + nodes.len() - 1 } else { 3 + nodes.len() });
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), if deliver_bs_raa { 3 + nodes.len() - 1 } else { 4 + nodes.len() });
|
||||
match events[0] {
|
||||
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, .. } => { },
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexepected event"),
|
||||
|
@ -3181,20 +3181,11 @@ fn do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(deliver_bs_raa: bool, use
|
|||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !deliver_bs_raa {
|
||||
match events[2] {
|
||||
Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => { },
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
};
|
||||
nodes[1].node.abandon_payment(PaymentId(fourth_payment_hash.0));
|
||||
let payment_failed_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_failed_events.len(), 1);
|
||||
match payment_failed_events[0] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, fourth_payment_hash);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
match events[2] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, fourth_payment_hash);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
nodes[1].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
|
||||
|
@ -3242,7 +3233,7 @@ fn do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(deliver_bs_raa: bool, use
|
|||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], commitment_signed, false, true);
|
||||
|
||||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 6);
|
||||
match events[0] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref network_update, .. } => {
|
||||
assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
|
||||
|
@ -3255,9 +3246,8 @@ fn do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(deliver_bs_raa: bool, use
|
|||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
match events[1] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref network_update, .. } => {
|
||||
assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
|
||||
assert!(network_update.is_some());
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, first_payment_hash);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -3268,6 +3258,25 @@ fn do_test_commitment_revoked_fail_backward_exhaustive(deliver_bs_raa: bool, use
|
|||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
match events[3] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, second_payment_hash);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
match events[4] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref network_update, .. } => {
|
||||
assert!(failed_htlcs.insert(payment_hash.0));
|
||||
assert!(network_update.is_some());
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
match events[5] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, third_payment_hash);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -3354,7 +3363,7 @@ fn fail_backward_pending_htlc_upon_channel_failure() {
|
|||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_add_htlc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
|
||||
// Check that Alice fails backward the pending HTLC from the second payment.
|
||||
match events[0] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
|
@ -3363,6 +3372,12 @@ fn fail_backward_pending_htlc_upon_channel_failure() {
|
|||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
match events[1] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, failed_payment_hash);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
match events[2] {
|
||||
Event::ChannelClosed { reason: ClosureReason::ProcessingError { ref err }, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(err, "Remote side tried to send a 0-msat HTLC");
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
@ -3594,7 +3609,7 @@ fn test_simple_peer_disconnect() {
|
|||
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (1, 0), (1, 0), (false, false));
|
||||
{
|
||||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
|
||||
match events[0] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentSent { payment_preimage, payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_preimage, payment_preimage_3);
|
||||
|
@ -3610,6 +3625,12 @@ fn test_simple_peer_disconnect() {
|
|||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
match events[2] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_5);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
match events[3] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { .. } => {},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -5123,7 +5144,7 @@ fn do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(deliver_last_raa: bool, anno
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let as_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(as_events.len(), if announce_latest { 5 } else { 3 });
|
||||
assert_eq!(as_events.len(), if announce_latest { 10 } else { 6 });
|
||||
let mut as_failds = HashSet::new();
|
||||
let mut as_updates = 0;
|
||||
for event in as_events.iter() {
|
||||
|
@ -5137,6 +5158,7 @@ fn do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(deliver_last_raa: bool, anno
|
|||
if network_update.is_some() {
|
||||
as_updates += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if let &Event::PaymentFailed { .. } = event {
|
||||
} else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_1));
|
||||
|
@ -5148,7 +5170,7 @@ fn do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(deliver_last_raa: bool, anno
|
|||
assert!(as_failds.contains(&payment_hash_6));
|
||||
|
||||
let bs_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(bs_events.len(), if announce_latest { 4 } else { 3 });
|
||||
assert_eq!(bs_events.len(), if announce_latest { 8 } else { 6 });
|
||||
let mut bs_failds = HashSet::new();
|
||||
let mut bs_updates = 0;
|
||||
for event in bs_events.iter() {
|
||||
|
@ -5162,6 +5184,7 @@ fn do_test_fail_backwards_unrevoked_remote_announce(deliver_last_raa: bool, anno
|
|||
if network_update.is_some() {
|
||||
bs_updates += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if let &Event::PaymentFailed { .. } = event {
|
||||
} else { panic!("Unexpected event"); }
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert!(bs_failds.contains(&payment_hash_1));
|
||||
|
@ -5670,7 +5693,7 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() {
|
|||
|
||||
// Check that the payment failed to be sent out.
|
||||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||||
match &events[0] {
|
||||
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_id, ref payment_hash, ref payment_failed_permanently, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, ref short_channel_id, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(PaymentId(our_payment_hash.0), *payment_id.as_ref().unwrap());
|
||||
|
@ -5682,6 +5705,12 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() {
|
|||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
match &events[1] {
|
||||
&Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Test that if multiple HTLCs are released from the holding cell and one is
|
||||
|
@ -5755,7 +5784,7 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() {
|
|||
|
||||
// Check that the second payment failed to be sent out.
|
||||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||||
match &events[0] {
|
||||
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_id, ref payment_hash, ref payment_failed_permanently, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, ref short_channel_id, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_id_2, *payment_id.as_ref().unwrap());
|
||||
|
@ -5767,6 +5796,12 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() {
|
|||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
match &events[1] {
|
||||
&Event::PaymentFailed { ref payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Complete the first payment and the RAA from the fee update.
|
||||
let (payment_event, send_raa_event) = {
|
||||
|
@ -6649,7 +6684,7 @@ fn test_channel_failed_after_message_with_badonion_node_perm_bits_set() {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let events_5 = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events_5.len(), 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(events_5.len(), 2);
|
||||
|
||||
// Expect a PaymentPathFailed event with a ChannelFailure network update for the channel between
|
||||
// the node originating the error to its next hop.
|
||||
|
@ -6663,6 +6698,12 @@ fn test_channel_failed_after_message_with_badonion_node_perm_bits_set() {
|
|||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
match events_5[1] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, our_payment_hash);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: Test actual removal of channel from NetworkGraph when it's implemented.
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -6734,7 +6775,7 @@ fn do_test_failure_delay_dust_htlc_local_commitment(announce_latest: bool) {
|
|||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
// Only 2 PaymentPathFailed events should show up, over-dust HTLC has to be failed by timeout tx
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
|
||||
let mut first_failed = false;
|
||||
for event in events {
|
||||
match event {
|
||||
|
@ -6745,7 +6786,8 @@ fn do_test_failure_delay_dust_htlc_local_commitment(announce_latest: bool) {
|
|||
} else {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, payment_hash_2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { .. } => {}
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -9034,9 +9076,11 @@ fn do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(test_for_second_fail_panic: bool) {
|
|||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
|
||||
|
||||
let failure_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(failure_events.len(), 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(failure_events.len(), 4);
|
||||
if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[0] {} else { panic!(); }
|
||||
if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[1] {} else { panic!(); }
|
||||
if let Event::PaymentFailed { .. } = failure_events[1] {} else { panic!(); }
|
||||
if let Event::PaymentPathFailed { .. } = failure_events[2] {} else { panic!(); }
|
||||
if let Event::PaymentFailed { .. } = failure_events[3] {} else { panic!(); }
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Let the second HTLC fail and claim the first
|
||||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: our_payment_hash }]);
|
||||
|
@ -9047,7 +9091,7 @@ fn do_test_dup_htlc_second_rejected(test_for_second_fail_panic: bool) {
|
|||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates_1.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates_1.commitment_signed, false);
|
||||
|
||||
expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain());
|
||||
expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], our_payment_hash, true, PaymentFailedConditions::new());
|
||||
|
||||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], our_payment_preimage);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -9169,7 +9213,27 @@ fn test_inconsistent_mpp_params() {
|
|||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]], 15_000_000, our_payment_hash, Some(our_payment_secret), events.pop().unwrap(), true, None);
|
||||
|
||||
claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, our_payment_preimage);
|
||||
do_claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, our_payment_preimage);
|
||||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 3);
|
||||
match events[0] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentSent { payment_hash, .. } => { // The payment was abandoned earlier, so the fee paid will be None
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, our_payment_hash);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event")
|
||||
}
|
||||
match events[1] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash.unwrap(), our_payment_hash);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event")
|
||||
}
|
||||
match events[2] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentPathSuccessful { payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash.unwrap(), our_payment_hash);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1241,11 +1241,10 @@ fn do_test_revoked_counterparty_commitment_balances(confirm_htlc_spend_first: bo
|
|||
test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &as_revoked_txn[0]);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut payment_failed_events = nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
expect_payment_failed_conditions_event(&nodes[1], payment_failed_events.pop().unwrap(),
|
||||
dust_payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new());
|
||||
expect_payment_failed_conditions_event(&nodes[1], payment_failed_events.pop().unwrap(),
|
||||
expect_payment_failed_conditions_event(payment_failed_events[..2].to_vec(),
|
||||
missing_htlc_payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new());
|
||||
assert!(payment_failed_events.is_empty());
|
||||
expect_payment_failed_conditions_event(payment_failed_events[2..].to_vec(),
|
||||
dust_payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new());
|
||||
|
||||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], 1);
|
||||
test_spendable_output(&nodes[1], &claim_txn[if confirm_htlc_spend_first { 2 } else { 3 }]);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ fn run_onion_failure_test_with_fail_intercept<F1,F2,F3>(_name: &str, test_case:
|
|||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], update_1_0.commitment_signed, false, true);
|
||||
|
||||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||||
if let &Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_failed_permanently, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, .. } = &events[0] {
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_failed_permanently, !expected_retryable);
|
||||
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
|
||||
|
@ -212,10 +212,7 @@ fn run_onion_failure_test_with_fail_intercept<F1,F2,F3>(_name: &str, test_case:
|
|||
} else {
|
||||
panic!("Unexpected event");
|
||||
}
|
||||
nodes[0].node.abandon_payment(payment_id);
|
||||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
match events[0] {
|
||||
match events[1] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash: ev_payment_hash, payment_id: ev_payment_id } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(*payment_hash, ev_payment_hash);
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_id, ev_payment_id);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -163,13 +163,13 @@ impl PendingOutboundPayment {
|
|||
let our_payment_hash;
|
||||
core::mem::swap(&mut session_privs, match self {
|
||||
PendingOutboundPayment::Legacy { .. } |
|
||||
PendingOutboundPayment::Fulfilled { .. } =>
|
||||
PendingOutboundPayment::Fulfilled { .. } =>
|
||||
return Err(()),
|
||||
PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable { session_privs, payment_hash, .. } |
|
||||
PendingOutboundPayment::Abandoned { session_privs, payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
our_payment_hash = *payment_hash;
|
||||
session_privs
|
||||
},
|
||||
PendingOutboundPayment::Retryable { session_privs, payment_hash, .. } |
|
||||
PendingOutboundPayment::Abandoned { session_privs, payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
our_payment_hash = *payment_hash;
|
||||
session_privs
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
*self = PendingOutboundPayment::Abandoned { session_privs, payment_hash: our_payment_hash };
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
|
@ -323,68 +323,58 @@ pub enum PaymentSendFailure {
|
|||
///
|
||||
/// You can freely resend the payment in full (with the parameter error fixed).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Because the payment failed outright, no payment tracking is done, you do not need to call
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`] and [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`] will *not* work
|
||||
/// for this payment.
|
||||
/// Because the payment failed outright, no payment tracking is done and no
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`] or [`Event::PaymentFailed`] events will be generated.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::abandon_payment
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::retry_payment
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentFailed
|
||||
ParameterError(APIError),
|
||||
/// A parameter in a single path which was passed to send_payment was invalid, preventing us
|
||||
/// from attempting to send the payment at all.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// You can freely resend the payment in full (with the parameter error fixed).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Because the payment failed outright, no payment tracking is done and no
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`] or [`Event::PaymentFailed`] events will be generated.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The results here are ordered the same as the paths in the route object which was passed to
|
||||
/// send_payment.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Because the payment failed outright, no payment tracking is done, you do not need to call
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`] and [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`] will *not* work
|
||||
/// for this payment.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::abandon_payment
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::retry_payment
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentFailed
|
||||
PathParameterError(Vec<Result<(), APIError>>),
|
||||
/// All paths which were attempted failed to send, with no channel state change taking place.
|
||||
/// You can freely resend the payment in full (though you probably want to do so over different
|
||||
/// paths than the ones selected).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Because the payment failed outright, no payment tracking is done, you do not need to call
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`] and [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`] will *not* work
|
||||
/// for this payment.
|
||||
/// Because the payment failed outright, no payment tracking is done and no
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`] or [`Event::PaymentFailed`] events will be generated.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::abandon_payment
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::retry_payment
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentFailed
|
||||
AllFailedResendSafe(Vec<APIError>),
|
||||
/// Indicates that a payment for the provided [`PaymentId`] is already in-flight and has not
|
||||
/// yet completed (i.e. generated an [`Event::PaymentSent`]) or been abandoned (via
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]).
|
||||
/// yet completed (i.e. generated an [`Event::PaymentSent`] or [`Event::PaymentFailed`]).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`PaymentId`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::PaymentId
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentSent`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentSent
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::abandon_payment
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentFailed
|
||||
DuplicatePayment,
|
||||
/// Some paths which were attempted failed to send, though possibly not all. At least some
|
||||
/// paths have irrevocably committed to the HTLC and retrying the payment in full would result
|
||||
/// in over-/re-payment.
|
||||
/// Some paths that were attempted failed to send, though some paths may have succeeded. At least
|
||||
/// some paths have irrevocably committed to the HTLC.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The results here are ordered the same as the paths in the route object which was passed to
|
||||
/// send_payment, and any `Err`s which are not [`APIError::MonitorUpdateInProgress`] can be
|
||||
/// safely retried via [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`].
|
||||
/// The results here are ordered the same as the paths in the route object that was passed to
|
||||
/// send_payment.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Any entries which contain `Err(APIError::MonitorUpdateInprogress)` or `Ok(())` MUST NOT be
|
||||
/// retried as they will result in over-/re-payment. These HTLCs all either successfully sent
|
||||
/// (in the case of `Ok(())`) or will send once a [`MonitorEvent::Completed`] is provided for
|
||||
/// the next-hop channel with the latest update_id.
|
||||
/// Any entries that contain `Err(APIError::MonitorUpdateInprogress)` will send once a
|
||||
/// [`MonitorEvent::Completed`] is provided for the next-hop channel with the latest update_id.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::retry_payment
|
||||
/// [`MonitorEvent::Completed`]: crate::chain::channelmonitor::MonitorEvent::Completed
|
||||
PartialFailure {
|
||||
/// The errors themselves, in the same order as the route hops.
|
||||
/// The errors themselves, in the same order as the paths from the route.
|
||||
results: Vec<Result<(), APIError>>,
|
||||
/// If some paths failed without irrevocably committing to the new HTLC(s), this will
|
||||
/// contain a [`RouteParameters`] object which can be used to calculate a new route that
|
||||
/// will pay all remaining unpaid balance.
|
||||
/// contain a [`RouteParameters`] object for the failing paths.
|
||||
failed_paths_retry: Option<RouteParameters>,
|
||||
/// The payment id for the payment, which is now at least partially pending.
|
||||
payment_id: PaymentId,
|
||||
|
@ -491,7 +481,8 @@ impl OutboundPayments {
|
|||
|
||||
pub(super) fn check_retry_payments<R: Deref, ES: Deref, NS: Deref, SP, IH, FH, L: Deref>(
|
||||
&self, router: &R, first_hops: FH, inflight_htlcs: IH, entropy_source: &ES, node_signer: &NS,
|
||||
best_block_height: u32, logger: &L, send_payment_along_path: SP,
|
||||
best_block_height: u32, pending_events: &Mutex<Vec<events::Event>>, logger: &L,
|
||||
send_payment_along_path: SP,
|
||||
)
|
||||
where
|
||||
R::Target: Router,
|
||||
|
@ -525,15 +516,34 @@ impl OutboundPayments {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
core::mem::drop(outbounds);
|
||||
if let Some((payment_id, route_params)) = retry_id_route_params {
|
||||
core::mem::drop(outbounds);
|
||||
if let Err(e) = self.pay_internal(payment_id, None, route_params, router, first_hops(), &inflight_htlcs, entropy_source, node_signer, best_block_height, logger, &send_payment_along_path) {
|
||||
log_info!(logger, "Errored retrying payment: {:?}", e);
|
||||
// If we error on retry, there is no chance of the payment succeeding and no HTLCs have
|
||||
// been irrevocably committed to, so we can safely abandon.
|
||||
self.abandon_payment(payment_id, pending_events);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else { break }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let mut outbounds = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
|
||||
outbounds.retain(|pmt_id, pmt| {
|
||||
let mut retain = true;
|
||||
if !pmt.is_auto_retryable_now() && pmt.remaining_parts() == 0 {
|
||||
if pmt.mark_abandoned().is_ok() {
|
||||
pending_events.lock().unwrap().push(events::Event::PaymentFailed {
|
||||
payment_id: *pmt_id,
|
||||
payment_hash: pmt.payment_hash().expect("PendingOutboundPayments::Retryable always has a payment hash set"),
|
||||
});
|
||||
retain = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
retain
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Will return `Ok(())` iff at least one HTLC is sent for the payment.
|
||||
fn pay_internal<R: Deref, NS: Deref, ES: Deref, IH, SP, L: Deref>(
|
||||
&self, payment_id: PaymentId,
|
||||
initial_send_info: Option<(PaymentHash, &Option<PaymentSecret>, Option<PaymentPreimage>, Retry)>,
|
||||
|
@ -876,8 +886,8 @@ impl OutboundPayments {
|
|||
.map_err(|e| { self.remove_outbound_if_all_failed(payment_id, &e); e })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If we failed to send any paths, we should remove the new PaymentId from the
|
||||
// `pending_outbound_payments` map, as the user isn't expected to `abandon_payment`.
|
||||
// If we failed to send any paths, remove the new PaymentId from the `pending_outbound_payments`
|
||||
// map as the payment is free to be resent.
|
||||
fn remove_outbound_if_all_failed(&self, payment_id: PaymentId, err: &PaymentSendFailure) {
|
||||
if let &PaymentSendFailure::AllFailedResendSafe(_) = err {
|
||||
let removed = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap().remove(&payment_id).is_some();
|
||||
|
@ -1004,6 +1014,7 @@ impl OutboundPayments {
|
|||
#[cfg(not(test))]
|
||||
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_error.decode_onion_failure(secp_ctx, logger, &source);
|
||||
|
||||
let payment_is_probe = payment_is_probe(payment_hash, &payment_id, probing_cookie_secret);
|
||||
let mut session_priv_bytes = [0; 32];
|
||||
session_priv_bytes.copy_from_slice(&session_priv[..]);
|
||||
let mut outbounds = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
|
||||
|
@ -1020,7 +1031,7 @@ impl OutboundPayments {
|
|||
log_trace!(logger, "Received failure of HTLC with payment_hash {} after payment completion", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
let is_retryable_now = payment.get().is_auto_retryable_now();
|
||||
let mut is_retryable_now = payment.get().is_auto_retryable_now();
|
||||
if let Some(scid) = short_channel_id {
|
||||
payment.get_mut().insert_previously_failed_scid(scid);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1051,6 +1062,10 @@ impl OutboundPayments {
|
|||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if !payment_is_probe && (!is_retryable_now || !payment_retryable || retry.is_none()) {
|
||||
let _ = payment.get_mut().mark_abandoned(); // we'll only Err if it's a legacy payment
|
||||
is_retryable_now = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if payment.get().remaining_parts() == 0 {
|
||||
all_paths_failed = true;
|
||||
if payment.get().abandoned() {
|
||||
|
@ -1070,7 +1085,7 @@ impl OutboundPayments {
|
|||
log_trace!(logger, "Failing outbound payment HTLC with payment_hash {}", log_bytes!(payment_hash.0));
|
||||
|
||||
let path_failure = {
|
||||
if payment_is_probe(payment_hash, &payment_id, probing_cookie_secret) {
|
||||
if payment_is_probe {
|
||||
if !payment_retryable {
|
||||
events::Event::ProbeSuccessful {
|
||||
payment_id: *payment_id,
|
||||
|
@ -1092,7 +1107,9 @@ impl OutboundPayments {
|
|||
if let Some(scid) = short_channel_id {
|
||||
retry.as_mut().map(|r| r.payment_params.previously_failed_channels.push(scid));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if payment_retryable && attempts_remaining && retry.is_some() {
|
||||
// If we miss abandoning the payment above, we *must* generate an event here or else the
|
||||
// payment will sit in our outbounds forever.
|
||||
if attempts_remaining {
|
||||
debug_assert!(full_failure_ev.is_none());
|
||||
pending_retry_ev = Some(events::Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable {
|
||||
time_forwardable: Duration::from_millis(MIN_HTLC_RELAY_HOLDING_CELL_MILLIS),
|
||||
|
@ -1120,13 +1137,14 @@ impl OutboundPayments {
|
|||
if let Some(ev) = pending_retry_ev { pending_events.push(ev); }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub(super) fn abandon_payment(&self, payment_id: PaymentId) -> Option<events::Event> {
|
||||
let mut failed_ev = None;
|
||||
pub(super) fn abandon_payment(
|
||||
&self, payment_id: PaymentId, pending_events: &Mutex<Vec<events::Event>>
|
||||
) {
|
||||
let mut outbounds = self.pending_outbound_payments.lock().unwrap();
|
||||
if let hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut payment) = outbounds.entry(payment_id) {
|
||||
if let Ok(()) = payment.get_mut().mark_abandoned() {
|
||||
if payment.get().remaining_parts() == 0 {
|
||||
failed_ev = Some(events::Event::PaymentFailed {
|
||||
pending_events.lock().unwrap().push(events::Event::PaymentFailed {
|
||||
payment_id,
|
||||
payment_hash: payment.get().payment_hash().expect("PendingOutboundPayments::RetriesExceeded always has a payment hash set"),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
@ -1134,7 +1152,6 @@ impl OutboundPayments {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
failed_ev
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -43,60 +43,6 @@ use {
|
|||
std::time::{SystemTime, Duration}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn retry_single_path_payment() {
|
||||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||||
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||||
|
||||
let _chan_0 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 1);
|
||||
// Rebalance to find a route
|
||||
send_payment(&nodes[2], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3_000_000);
|
||||
|
||||
let (route, payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 100_000);
|
||||
|
||||
// Rebalance so that the first hop fails.
|
||||
send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[2])[..], 2_000_000);
|
||||
|
||||
// Make sure the payment fails on the first hop.
|
||||
let payment_id = PaymentId(payment_hash.0);
|
||||
nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), payment_id).unwrap();
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
|
||||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(&nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_1.2 }]);
|
||||
let htlc_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||||
assert!(htlc_updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||||
assert_eq!(htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||||
assert!(htlc_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||||
assert!(htlc_updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], htlc_updates.commitment_signed, false);
|
||||
expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain());
|
||||
|
||||
// Rebalance the channel so the retry succeeds.
|
||||
send_payment(&nodes[2], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3_000_000);
|
||||
|
||||
// Mine two blocks (we expire retries after 3, so this will check that we don't expire early)
|
||||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 2);
|
||||
|
||||
// Retry the payment and make sure it succeeds.
|
||||
nodes[0].node.retry_payment(&route, payment_id).unwrap();
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
pass_along_path(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 100_000, payment_hash, Some(payment_secret), events.pop().unwrap(), true, None);
|
||||
claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]], false, payment_preimage);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn mpp_failure() {
|
||||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(4);
|
||||
|
@ -136,7 +82,8 @@ fn mpp_retry() {
|
|||
// Rebalance
|
||||
send_payment(&nodes[3], &vec!(&nodes[2])[..], 1_500_000);
|
||||
|
||||
let (mut route, payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[3], 1_000_000);
|
||||
let amt_msat = 1_000_000;
|
||||
let (mut route, payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[3], amt_msat);
|
||||
let path = route.paths[0].clone();
|
||||
route.paths.push(path);
|
||||
route.paths[0][0].pubkey = nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id();
|
||||
|
@ -148,7 +95,14 @@ fn mpp_retry() {
|
|||
|
||||
// Initiate the MPP payment.
|
||||
let payment_id = PaymentId(payment_hash.0);
|
||||
nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), payment_id).unwrap();
|
||||
let mut route_params = RouteParameters {
|
||||
payment_params: route.payment_params.clone().unwrap(),
|
||||
final_value_msat: amt_msat,
|
||||
final_cltv_expiry_delta: TEST_FINAL_CLTV,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
nodes[0].router.expect_find_route(route_params.clone(), Ok(route.clone()));
|
||||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_retry(payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), payment_id, route_params.clone(), Retry::Attempts(1)).unwrap();
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 2); // one monitor per path
|
||||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||||
|
@ -184,25 +138,23 @@ fn mpp_retry() {
|
|||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id(), &htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[2], htlc_updates.commitment_signed, false);
|
||||
expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain());
|
||||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
match events[1] {
|
||||
Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => {},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event")
|
||||
}
|
||||
events.remove(1);
|
||||
expect_payment_failed_conditions_event(events, payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain());
|
||||
|
||||
// Rebalance the channel so the second half of the payment can succeed.
|
||||
send_payment(&nodes[3], &vec!(&nodes[2])[..], 1_500_000);
|
||||
|
||||
// Make sure it errors as expected given a too-large amount.
|
||||
if let Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::APIMisuseError { err })) = nodes[0].node.retry_payment(&route, payment_id) {
|
||||
assert!(err.contains("over total_payment_amt_msat"));
|
||||
} else { panic!("Unexpected error"); }
|
||||
|
||||
// Make sure it errors as expected given the wrong payment_id.
|
||||
if let Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::APIMisuseError { err })) = nodes[0].node.retry_payment(&route, PaymentId([0; 32])) {
|
||||
assert!(err.contains("not found"));
|
||||
} else { panic!("Unexpected error"); }
|
||||
|
||||
// Retry the second half of the payment and make sure it succeeds.
|
||||
let mut path = route.clone();
|
||||
path.paths.remove(0);
|
||||
nodes[0].node.retry_payment(&path, payment_id).unwrap();
|
||||
route.paths.remove(0);
|
||||
route_params.final_value_msat = 1_000_000;
|
||||
route_params.payment_params.previously_failed_channels.push(chan_4_update.contents.short_channel_id);
|
||||
nodes[0].router.expect_find_route(route_params, Ok(route));
|
||||
nodes[0].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
|
@ -284,55 +236,6 @@ fn mpp_receive_timeout() {
|
|||
do_mpp_receive_timeout(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn retry_expired_payment() {
|
||||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
||||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
||||
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
||||
|
||||
let _chan_0 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1);
|
||||
let chan_1 = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 2, 1);
|
||||
// Rebalance to find a route
|
||||
send_payment(&nodes[2], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], 3_000_000);
|
||||
|
||||
let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 100_000);
|
||||
|
||||
// Rebalance so that the first hop fails.
|
||||
send_payment(&nodes[1], &vec!(&nodes[2])[..], 2_000_000);
|
||||
|
||||
// Make sure the payment fails on the first hop.
|
||||
nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
let mut payment_event = SendEvent::from_event(events.pop().unwrap());
|
||||
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &payment_event.msgs[0]);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 0);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], payment_event.commitment_msg, false);
|
||||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
||||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(&nodes[1], vec![HTLCDestination::NextHopChannel { node_id: Some(nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id()), channel_id: chan_1.2 }]);
|
||||
let htlc_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
||||
assert!(htlc_updates.update_add_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||||
assert_eq!(htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs.len(), 1);
|
||||
assert!(htlc_updates.update_fulfill_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||||
assert!(htlc_updates.update_fail_malformed_htlcs.is_empty());
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &htlc_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], htlc_updates.commitment_signed, false);
|
||||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false);
|
||||
|
||||
// Mine blocks so the payment will have expired.
|
||||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], 3);
|
||||
|
||||
// Retry the payment and make sure it errors as expected.
|
||||
if let Err(PaymentSendFailure::ParameterError(APIError::APIMisuseError { err })) = nodes[0].node.retry_payment(&route, PaymentId(payment_hash.0)) {
|
||||
assert!(err.contains("not found"));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
panic!("Unexpected error");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn no_pending_leak_on_initial_send_failure() {
|
||||
// In an earlier version of our payment tracking, we'd have a retry entry even when the initial
|
||||
|
@ -388,9 +291,15 @@ fn do_retry_with_no_persist(confirm_before_reload: bool) {
|
|||
|
||||
// Send two payments - one which will get to nodes[2] and will be claimed, one which we'll time
|
||||
// out and retry.
|
||||
let (route, payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 1_000_000);
|
||||
let amt_msat = 1_000_000;
|
||||
let (route, payment_hash, payment_preimage, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], amt_msat);
|
||||
let (payment_preimage_1, payment_hash_1, _, payment_id_1) = send_along_route(&nodes[0], route.clone(), &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], 1_000_000);
|
||||
nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||||
let route_params = RouteParameters {
|
||||
payment_params: route.payment_params.clone().unwrap(),
|
||||
final_value_msat: amt_msat,
|
||||
final_cltv_expiry_delta: TEST_FINAL_CLTV,
|
||||
};
|
||||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_retry(payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0), route_params, Retry::Attempts(1)).unwrap();
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||||
|
@ -499,7 +408,7 @@ fn do_retry_with_no_persist(confirm_before_reload: bool) {
|
|||
confirm_transaction(&nodes[0], &first_htlc_timeout_tx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clear();
|
||||
expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain());
|
||||
expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new());
|
||||
|
||||
// Finally, retry the payment (which was reloaded from the ChannelMonitor when nodes[0] was
|
||||
// reloaded) via a route over the new channel, which work without issue and eventually be
|
||||
|
@ -525,8 +434,8 @@ fn do_retry_with_no_persist(confirm_before_reload: bool) {
|
|||
nodes[1].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(nodes[0].node.retry_payment(&new_route, payment_id_1).is_err()); // Shouldn't be allowed to retry a fulfilled payment
|
||||
nodes[0].node.retry_payment(&new_route, PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||||
assert!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&new_route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), payment_id_1).is_err()); // Shouldn't be allowed to retry a fulfilled payment
|
||||
nodes[0].node.send_payment(&new_route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0)).unwrap();
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
|
@ -660,7 +569,10 @@ fn do_test_completed_payment_not_retryable_on_reload(use_dust: bool) {
|
|||
// If we attempt to retry prior to the HTLC-Timeout (or commitment transaction, for dust HTLCs)
|
||||
// confirming, we will fail as it's considered still-pending...
|
||||
let (new_route, _, _, _) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], if use_dust { 1_000 } else { 1_000_000 });
|
||||
assert!(nodes[0].node.retry_payment(&new_route, payment_id).is_err());
|
||||
match nodes[0].node.send_payment(&new_route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), payment_id) {
|
||||
Err(PaymentSendFailure::DuplicatePayment) => {},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected error")
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||||
|
||||
// After ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations, the HTLC should be failed and we can try the payment
|
||||
|
@ -668,14 +580,14 @@ fn do_test_completed_payment_not_retryable_on_reload(use_dust: bool) {
|
|||
// (which should also still work).
|
||||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||||
// We set mpp_parts_remain to avoid having abandon_payment called
|
||||
expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new().mpp_parts_remain());
|
||||
expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], payment_hash, false, PaymentFailedConditions::new());
|
||||
|
||||
let chan_0_monitor_serialized = get_monitor!(nodes[0], chan_id).encode();
|
||||
let chan_1_monitor_serialized = get_monitor!(nodes[0], chan_id_3).encode();
|
||||
nodes_0_serialized = nodes[0].node.encode();
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(nodes[0].node.retry_payment(&new_route, payment_id).is_ok());
|
||||
// After the payment failed, we're free to send it again.
|
||||
assert!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&new_route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), payment_id).is_ok());
|
||||
assert!(!nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||||
|
||||
reload_node!(nodes[0], test_default_channel_config(), nodes_0_serialized, &[&chan_0_monitor_serialized, &chan_1_monitor_serialized], second_persister, second_new_chain_monitor, second_nodes_0_deserialized);
|
||||
|
@ -685,25 +597,32 @@ fn do_test_completed_payment_not_retryable_on_reload(use_dust: bool) {
|
|||
|
||||
// Now resend the payment, delivering the HTLC and actually claiming it this time. This ensures
|
||||
// the payment is not (spuriously) listed as still pending.
|
||||
assert!(nodes[0].node.retry_payment(&new_route, payment_id).is_ok());
|
||||
assert!(nodes[0].node.send_payment(&new_route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), payment_id).is_ok());
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||||
pass_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]]], if use_dust { 1_000 } else { 1_000_000 }, payment_hash, payment_secret);
|
||||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1], &nodes[2]], payment_preimage);
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(nodes[0].node.retry_payment(&new_route, payment_id).is_err());
|
||||
match nodes[0].node.send_payment(&new_route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), payment_id) {
|
||||
Err(PaymentSendFailure::DuplicatePayment) => {},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected error")
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||||
|
||||
let chan_0_monitor_serialized = get_monitor!(nodes[0], chan_id).encode();
|
||||
let chan_1_monitor_serialized = get_monitor!(nodes[0], chan_id_3).encode();
|
||||
nodes_0_serialized = nodes[0].node.encode();
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure that after reload we cannot retry the payment.
|
||||
// Check that after reload we can send the payment again (though we shouldn't, since it was
|
||||
// claimed previously).
|
||||
reload_node!(nodes[0], test_default_channel_config(), nodes_0_serialized, &[&chan_0_monitor_serialized, &chan_1_monitor_serialized], third_persister, third_new_chain_monitor, third_nodes_0_deserialized);
|
||||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
|
||||
|
||||
reconnect_nodes(&nodes[0], &nodes[1], (false, false), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (0, 0), (false, false));
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(nodes[0].node.retry_payment(&new_route, payment_id).is_err());
|
||||
match nodes[0].node.send_payment(&new_route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), payment_id) {
|
||||
Err(PaymentSendFailure::DuplicatePayment) => {},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected error")
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1233,20 +1152,17 @@ fn abandoned_send_payment_idempotent() {
|
|||
nodes[1].node.fail_htlc_backwards(&first_payment_hash);
|
||||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed!(nodes[1], [HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: first_payment_hash }]);
|
||||
|
||||
pass_failed_payment_back_no_abandon(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1]]], false, first_payment_hash);
|
||||
check_send_rejected!();
|
||||
|
||||
// Until we abandon the payment, no matter how many timer ticks pass, we still cannot reuse the
|
||||
// Until we abandon the payment upon path failure, no matter how many timer ticks pass, we still cannot reuse the
|
||||
// PaymentId.
|
||||
for _ in 0..=IDEMPOTENCY_TIMEOUT_TICKS {
|
||||
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
|
||||
}
|
||||
check_send_rejected!();
|
||||
|
||||
nodes[0].node.abandon_payment(payment_id);
|
||||
get_event!(nodes[0], Event::PaymentFailed);
|
||||
pass_failed_payment_back(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1]]], false, first_payment_hash);
|
||||
|
||||
// However, we can reuse the PaymentId immediately after we `abandon_payment`.
|
||||
// However, we can reuse the PaymentId immediately after we `abandon_payment` upon passing the
|
||||
// failed payment back.
|
||||
nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, second_payment_hash, &Some(second_payment_secret), payment_id).unwrap();
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
||||
pass_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1]]], 100_000, second_payment_hash, second_payment_secret);
|
||||
|
@ -1615,6 +1531,7 @@ enum AutoRetry {
|
|||
FailAttempts,
|
||||
FailTimeout,
|
||||
FailOnRestart,
|
||||
FailOnRetry,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
@ -1624,6 +1541,7 @@ fn automatic_retries() {
|
|||
do_automatic_retries(AutoRetry::FailAttempts);
|
||||
do_automatic_retries(AutoRetry::FailTimeout);
|
||||
do_automatic_retries(AutoRetry::FailOnRestart);
|
||||
do_automatic_retries(AutoRetry::FailOnRetry);
|
||||
}
|
||||
fn do_automatic_retries(test: AutoRetry) {
|
||||
// Test basic automatic payment retries in ChannelManager. See individual `test` variant comments
|
||||
|
@ -1680,12 +1598,12 @@ fn do_automatic_retries(test: AutoRetry) {
|
|||
check_added_monitors!(&nodes[1], 1);
|
||||
assert!(update_1.update_fail_htlcs.len() == 1);
|
||||
let fail_msg = update_1.update_fail_htlcs[0].clone();
|
||||
|
||||
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_msg);
|
||||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], update_1.commitment_signed, false);
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure the attempt fails and a new PendingHTLCsForwardable event is generated for the retry
|
||||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||||
match events[0] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash: ev_payment_hash, payment_failed_permanently, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, ev_payment_hash);
|
||||
|
@ -1694,12 +1612,18 @@ fn do_automatic_retries(test: AutoRetry) {
|
|||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
if $expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable {
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||||
match events[1] {
|
||||
Event::PendingHTLCsForwardable { .. } => {},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else { assert_eq!(events.len(), 1) }
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
match events[1] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash: ev_payment_hash, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, ev_payment_hash);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1751,17 +1675,6 @@ fn do_automatic_retries(test: AutoRetry) {
|
|||
nodes[0].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
|
||||
let mut msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
nodes[0].node.abandon_payment(PaymentId(payment_hash.0));
|
||||
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
match events[0] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash: ref ev_payment_hash, payment_id: ref ev_payment_id } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, *ev_payment_hash);
|
||||
assert_eq!(PaymentId(payment_hash.0), *ev_payment_id);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if test == AutoRetry::FailTimeout {
|
||||
#[cfg(not(feature = "no-std"))] {
|
||||
// Ensure ChannelManager will not retry a payment if it times out due to Retry::Timeout.
|
||||
|
@ -1776,7 +1689,6 @@ fn do_automatic_retries(test: AutoRetry) {
|
|||
let mut msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
nodes[0].node.abandon_payment(PaymentId(payment_hash.0));
|
||||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
match events[0] {
|
||||
|
@ -1811,7 +1723,25 @@ fn do_automatic_retries(test: AutoRetry) {
|
|||
let mut msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
nodes[0].node.abandon_payment(PaymentId(payment_hash.0));
|
||||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
match events[0] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash: ref ev_payment_hash, payment_id: ref ev_payment_id } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, *ev_payment_hash);
|
||||
assert_eq!(PaymentId(payment_hash.0), *ev_payment_id);
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if test == AutoRetry::FailOnRetry {
|
||||
nodes[0].node.send_payment_with_retry(payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret), PaymentId(payment_hash.0), route_params, Retry::Attempts(1)).unwrap();
|
||||
pass_failed_attempt_with_retry_along_path!(channel_id_2, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// We retry payments in `process_pending_htlc_forwards`. Since our channel closed, we should
|
||||
// fail to find a route.
|
||||
nodes[0].node.process_pending_htlc_forwards();
|
||||
let mut msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
match events[0] {
|
||||
|
@ -2413,7 +2343,7 @@ fn no_extra_retries_on_back_to_back_fail() {
|
|||
// by adding the `PaymentFailed` event.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Because we now retry payments as a batch, we simply return a single-path route in the
|
||||
// second, batched, request, have that fail, then complete the payment via `abandon_payment`.
|
||||
// second, batched, request, have that fail, ensure the payment was abandoned.
|
||||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 4);
|
||||
match events[0] {
|
||||
|
@ -2450,7 +2380,7 @@ fn no_extra_retries_on_back_to_back_fail() {
|
|||
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], &bs_fail_update.commitment_signed, false, true);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 2);
|
||||
match events[0] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentPathFailed { payment_hash: ev_payment_hash, payment_failed_permanently, .. } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, ev_payment_hash);
|
||||
|
@ -2458,10 +2388,7 @@ fn no_extra_retries_on_back_to_back_fail() {
|
|||
},
|
||||
_ => panic!("Unexpected event"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
nodes[0].node.abandon_payment(PaymentId(payment_hash.0));
|
||||
events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
||||
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
|
||||
match events[0] {
|
||||
match events[1] {
|
||||
Event::PaymentFailed { payment_hash: ref ev_payment_hash, payment_id: ref ev_payment_id } => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(payment_hash, *ev_payment_hash);
|
||||
assert_eq!(PaymentId(payment_hash.0), *ev_payment_id);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ impl Readable for Route {
|
|||
/// Parameters needed to find a [`Route`].
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Passed to [`find_route`] and [`build_route_from_hops`], but also provided in
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`] for retrying a failed payment path.
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`].
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentPathFailed`]: crate::util::events::Event::PaymentPathFailed
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -565,11 +565,9 @@ pub enum Event {
|
|||
/// Note for MPP payments: in rare cases, this event may be preceded by a `PaymentPathFailed`
|
||||
/// event. In this situation, you SHOULD treat this payment as having succeeded.
|
||||
PaymentSent {
|
||||
/// The id returned by [`ChannelManager::send_payment`] and used with
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`].
|
||||
/// The id returned by [`ChannelManager::send_payment`].
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::send_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::send_payment
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::retry_payment
|
||||
payment_id: Option<PaymentId>,
|
||||
/// The preimage to the hash given to ChannelManager::send_payment.
|
||||
/// Note that this serves as a payment receipt, if you wish to have such a thing, you must
|
||||
|
@ -594,16 +592,16 @@ pub enum Event {
|
|||
/// provide failure information for each MPP part in the payment.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This event is provided once there are no further pending HTLCs for the payment and the
|
||||
/// payment is no longer retryable due to [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`] having been
|
||||
/// called for the corresponding payment.
|
||||
/// payment is no longer retryable, due either to the [`Retry`] provided or
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`] having been called for the corresponding payment.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`Retry`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::Retry
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::abandon_payment
|
||||
PaymentFailed {
|
||||
/// The id returned by [`ChannelManager::send_payment`] and used with
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`] and [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`].
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`].
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::send_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::send_payment
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::retry_payment
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::abandon_payment
|
||||
payment_id: PaymentId,
|
||||
/// The hash that was given to [`ChannelManager::send_payment`].
|
||||
|
@ -616,11 +614,9 @@ pub enum Event {
|
|||
/// Always generated after [`Event::PaymentSent`] and thus useful for scoring channels. See
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentSent`] for obtaining the payment preimage.
|
||||
PaymentPathSuccessful {
|
||||
/// The id returned by [`ChannelManager::send_payment`] and used with
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`].
|
||||
/// The id returned by [`ChannelManager::send_payment`].
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::send_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::send_payment
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::retry_payment
|
||||
payment_id: PaymentId,
|
||||
/// The hash that was given to [`ChannelManager::send_payment`].
|
||||
///
|
||||
|
@ -631,24 +627,22 @@ pub enum Event {
|
|||
/// May contain a closed channel if the HTLC sent along the path was fulfilled on chain.
|
||||
path: Vec<RouteHop>,
|
||||
},
|
||||
/// Indicates an outbound HTLC we sent failed. Probably some intermediary node dropped
|
||||
/// something. You may wish to retry with a different route.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If you have given up retrying this payment and wish to fail it, you MUST call
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`] at least once for a given [`PaymentId`] or memory
|
||||
/// related to payment tracking will leak.
|
||||
/// Indicates an outbound HTLC we sent failed, likely due to an intermediary node being unable to
|
||||
/// handle the HTLC.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note that this does *not* indicate that all paths for an MPP payment have failed, see
|
||||
/// [`Event::PaymentFailed`] and [`all_paths_failed`].
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// See [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`] for giving up on this payment before its retries have
|
||||
/// been exhausted.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::abandon_payment
|
||||
/// [`all_paths_failed`]: Self::PaymentPathFailed::all_paths_failed
|
||||
PaymentPathFailed {
|
||||
/// The id returned by [`ChannelManager::send_payment`] and used with
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`] and [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`].
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`].
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::send_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::send_payment
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::retry_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::retry_payment
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::abandon_payment
|
||||
payment_id: Option<PaymentId>,
|
||||
/// The hash that was given to [`ChannelManager::send_payment`].
|
||||
|
@ -656,8 +650,8 @@ pub enum Event {
|
|||
/// [`ChannelManager::send_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::send_payment
|
||||
payment_hash: PaymentHash,
|
||||
/// Indicates the payment was rejected for some reason by the recipient. This implies that
|
||||
/// the payment has failed, not just the route in question. If this is not set, you may
|
||||
/// retry the payment via a different route.
|
||||
/// the payment has failed, not just the route in question. If this is not set, the payment may
|
||||
/// be retried via a different route.
|
||||
payment_failed_permanently: bool,
|
||||
/// Any failure information conveyed via the Onion return packet by a node along the failed
|
||||
/// payment route.
|
||||
|
@ -670,20 +664,6 @@ pub enum Event {
|
|||
/// For both single-path and multi-path payments, this is set if all paths of the payment have
|
||||
/// failed. This will be set to false if (1) this is an MPP payment and (2) other parts of the
|
||||
/// larger MPP payment were still in flight when this event was generated.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note that if you are retrying individual MPP parts, using this value to determine if a
|
||||
/// payment has fully failed is race-y. Because multiple failures can happen prior to events
|
||||
/// being processed, you may retry in response to a first failure, with a second failure
|
||||
/// (with `all_paths_failed` set) still pending. Then, when the second failure is processed
|
||||
/// you will see `all_paths_failed` set even though the retry of the first failure still
|
||||
/// has an associated in-flight HTLC. See (1) for an example of such a failure.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If you wish to retry individual MPP parts and learn when a payment has failed, you must
|
||||
/// call [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`] and wait for a [`Event::PaymentFailed`] event.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// (1) <https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/issues/1164>
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`ChannelManager::abandon_payment`]: crate::ln::channelmanager::ChannelManager::abandon_payment
|
||||
all_paths_failed: bool,
|
||||
/// The payment path that failed.
|
||||
path: Vec<RouteHop>,
|
||||
|
@ -696,12 +676,9 @@ pub enum Event {
|
|||
/// If this is `Some`, then the corresponding channel should be avoided when the payment is
|
||||
/// retried. May be `None` for older [`Event`] serializations.
|
||||
short_channel_id: Option<u64>,
|
||||
/// Parameters needed to compute a new [`Route`] when retrying the failed payment path.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// See [`find_route`] for details.
|
||||
/// Parameters used by LDK to compute a new [`Route`] when retrying the failed payment path.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`Route`]: crate::routing::router::Route
|
||||
/// [`find_route`]: crate::routing::router::find_route
|
||||
retry: Option<RouteParameters>,
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
error_code: Option<u16>,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue