mirror of
https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning.git
synced 2025-02-24 23:08:36 +01:00
Add missing break when scoring a path with a missing channel
If we send payments over a path where a channel ended up being closed, we'll remove it before we call `ProbabilisticPaymentScorer::payment_path_failed`. This should be fine, except that `payment_path_failed` does not break out of its scoring loop if a channel is missing, causing it to assign a minimum available-liquidity of the payment amount even to channels which our attempt never arrived at. The fix is simple - add the missing check and break.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6ca49948c1
commit
00607a5286
1 changed files with 83 additions and 33 deletions
|
@ -1143,31 +1143,32 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, T: Time> Score for Probabilis
|
|||
.get(&hop.short_channel_id)
|
||||
.and_then(|channel| channel.as_directed_to(&target));
|
||||
|
||||
if hop.short_channel_id == short_channel_id && hop_idx == 0 {
|
||||
let at_failed_channel = hop.short_channel_id == short_channel_id;
|
||||
if at_failed_channel && hop_idx == 0 {
|
||||
log_warn!(self.logger, "Payment failed at the first hop - we do not attempt to learn channel info in such cases as we can directly observe local state.\n\tBecause we know the local state, we should generally not see failures here - this may be an indication that your channel peer on channel {} is broken and you may wish to close the channel.", hop.short_channel_id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Only score announced channels.
|
||||
if let Some((channel, source)) = channel_directed_from_source {
|
||||
let capacity_msat = channel.effective_capacity().as_msat();
|
||||
if hop.short_channel_id == short_channel_id {
|
||||
if at_failed_channel {
|
||||
self.channel_liquidities
|
||||
.entry(hop.short_channel_id)
|
||||
.or_insert_with(ChannelLiquidity::new)
|
||||
.as_directed_mut(source, &target, capacity_msat, &self.params)
|
||||
.failed_at_channel(amount_msat, format_args!("SCID {}, towards {:?}", hop.short_channel_id, target), &self.logger);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
self.channel_liquidities
|
||||
.entry(hop.short_channel_id)
|
||||
.or_insert_with(ChannelLiquidity::new)
|
||||
.as_directed_mut(source, &target, capacity_msat, &self.params)
|
||||
.failed_downstream(amount_msat, format_args!("SCID {}, towards {:?}", hop.short_channel_id, target), &self.logger);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
self.channel_liquidities
|
||||
.entry(hop.short_channel_id)
|
||||
.or_insert_with(ChannelLiquidity::new)
|
||||
.as_directed_mut(source, &target, capacity_msat, &self.params)
|
||||
.failed_downstream(amount_msat, format_args!("SCID {}, towards {:?}", hop.short_channel_id, target), &self.logger);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
log_debug!(self.logger, "Not able to penalize channel with SCID {} as we do not have graph info for it (likely a route-hint last-hop).",
|
||||
hop.short_channel_id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if at_failed_channel { break; }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1745,32 +1746,22 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
network_graph.update_channel(&signed_update).unwrap();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn path_hop(pubkey: PublicKey, short_channel_id: u64, fee_msat: u64) -> RouteHop {
|
||||
RouteHop {
|
||||
pubkey,
|
||||
node_features: channelmanager::provided_node_features(),
|
||||
short_channel_id,
|
||||
channel_features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(),
|
||||
fee_msat,
|
||||
cltv_expiry_delta: 18,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn payment_path_for_amount(amount_msat: u64) -> Vec<RouteHop> {
|
||||
vec![
|
||||
RouteHop {
|
||||
pubkey: source_pubkey(),
|
||||
node_features: channelmanager::provided_node_features(),
|
||||
short_channel_id: 41,
|
||||
channel_features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(),
|
||||
fee_msat: 1,
|
||||
cltv_expiry_delta: 18,
|
||||
},
|
||||
RouteHop {
|
||||
pubkey: target_pubkey(),
|
||||
node_features: channelmanager::provided_node_features(),
|
||||
short_channel_id: 42,
|
||||
channel_features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(),
|
||||
fee_msat: 2,
|
||||
cltv_expiry_delta: 18,
|
||||
},
|
||||
RouteHop {
|
||||
pubkey: recipient_pubkey(),
|
||||
node_features: channelmanager::provided_node_features(),
|
||||
short_channel_id: 43,
|
||||
channel_features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(),
|
||||
fee_msat: amount_msat,
|
||||
cltv_expiry_delta: 18,
|
||||
},
|
||||
path_hop(source_pubkey(), 41, 1),
|
||||
path_hop(target_pubkey(), 42, 2),
|
||||
path_hop(recipient_pubkey(), 43, amount_msat),
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2145,6 +2136,65 @@ mod tests {
|
|||
assert_eq!(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(42, &source, &target, usage), u64::max_value());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn ignores_channels_after_removed_failed_channel() {
|
||||
// Previously, if we'd tried to send over a channel which was removed from the network
|
||||
// graph before we call `payment_path_failed` (which is the default if the we get a "no
|
||||
// such channel" error in the `InvoicePayer`), we would call `failed_downstream` on all
|
||||
// channels in the route, even ones which they payment never reached. This tests to ensure
|
||||
// we do not score such channels.
|
||||
let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
|
||||
let logger = TestLogger::new();
|
||||
let genesis_hash = genesis_block(Network::Testnet).header.block_hash();
|
||||
let mut network_graph = NetworkGraph::new(genesis_hash, &logger);
|
||||
let secret_a = SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap();
|
||||
let secret_b = SecretKey::from_slice(&[43; 32]).unwrap();
|
||||
let secret_c = SecretKey::from_slice(&[44; 32]).unwrap();
|
||||
let secret_d = SecretKey::from_slice(&[45; 32]).unwrap();
|
||||
add_channel(&mut network_graph, 42, secret_a, secret_b);
|
||||
// Don't add the channel from B -> C.
|
||||
add_channel(&mut network_graph, 44, secret_c, secret_d);
|
||||
|
||||
let pub_a = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &secret_a);
|
||||
let pub_b = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &secret_b);
|
||||
let pub_c = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &secret_c);
|
||||
let pub_d = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &secret_d);
|
||||
|
||||
let path = vec![
|
||||
path_hop(pub_b, 42, 1),
|
||||
path_hop(pub_c, 43, 2),
|
||||
path_hop(pub_d, 44, 100),
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
let node_a = NodeId::from_pubkey(&pub_a);
|
||||
let node_b = NodeId::from_pubkey(&pub_b);
|
||||
let node_c = NodeId::from_pubkey(&pub_c);
|
||||
let node_d = NodeId::from_pubkey(&pub_d);
|
||||
|
||||
let params = ProbabilisticScoringParameters {
|
||||
liquidity_penalty_multiplier_msat: 1_000,
|
||||
..ProbabilisticScoringParameters::zero_penalty()
|
||||
};
|
||||
let mut scorer = ProbabilisticScorer::new(params, &network_graph, &logger);
|
||||
|
||||
let usage = ChannelUsage {
|
||||
amount_msat: 250,
|
||||
inflight_htlc_msat: 0,
|
||||
effective_capacity: EffectiveCapacity::Total { capacity_msat: 1_000, htlc_maximum_msat: 1_000 },
|
||||
};
|
||||
assert_eq!(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(42, &node_a, &node_b, usage), 128);
|
||||
// Note that a default liquidity bound is used for B -> C as no channel exists
|
||||
assert_eq!(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(43, &node_b, &node_c, usage), 128);
|
||||
assert_eq!(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(44, &node_c, &node_d, usage), 128);
|
||||
|
||||
scorer.payment_path_failed(&path.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>(), 43);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(42, &node_a, &node_b, usage), 80);
|
||||
// Note that a default liquidity bound is used for B -> C as no channel exists
|
||||
assert_eq!(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(43, &node_b, &node_c, usage), 128);
|
||||
assert_eq!(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(44, &node_c, &node_d, usage), 128);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn reduces_liquidity_upper_bound_along_path_on_success() {
|
||||
let logger = TestLogger::new();
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue