2021-07-31 03:34:16 +00:00
|
|
|
// This file is Copyright its original authors, visible in version control
|
|
|
|
// history.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// This file is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE
|
|
|
|
// or http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
|
|
|
|
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your option.
|
|
|
|
// You may not use this file except in accordance with one or both of these
|
|
|
|
// licenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//! Further functional tests which test blockchain reorganizations.
|
|
|
|
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
use chain::channelmonitor::{ANTI_REORG_DELAY, Balance};
|
|
|
|
use chain::transaction::OutPoint;
|
2021-10-17 21:23:51 +00:00
|
|
|
use ln::channel;
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
use ln::channelmanager::BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT;
|
2021-07-31 03:34:16 +00:00
|
|
|
use ln::features::InitFeatures;
|
2021-10-17 21:23:51 +00:00
|
|
|
use ln::msgs::ChannelMessageHandler;
|
2021-09-21 12:25:38 -04:00
|
|
|
use util::events::{Event, MessageSendEvent, MessageSendEventsProvider, ClosureReason};
|
2021-07-31 03:34:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
use bitcoin::blockdata::script::Builder;
|
|
|
|
use bitcoin::blockdata::opcodes;
|
|
|
|
use bitcoin::secp256k1::Secp256k1;
|
|
|
|
|
2021-07-31 03:34:16 +00:00
|
|
|
use prelude::*;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use ln::functional_test_utils::*;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn chanmon_fail_from_stale_commitment() {
|
|
|
|
// If we forward an HTLC to our counterparty, but we force-closed the channel before our
|
|
|
|
// counterparty provides us an updated commitment transaction, we'll end up with a commitment
|
|
|
|
// transaction that does not contain the HTLC which we attempted to forward. In this case, we
|
|
|
|
// need to wait `ANTI_REORG_DELAY` blocks and then fail back the HTLC as there is no way for us
|
|
|
|
// to learn the preimage and the confirmed commitment transaction paid us the value of the
|
|
|
|
// HTLC.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// However, previously, we did not do this, ignoring the HTLC entirely.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// This could lead to channel closure if the sender we received the HTLC from decides to go on
|
|
|
|
// chain to get their HTLC back before it times out.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Here, we check exactly this case, forwarding a payment from A, through B, to C, before B
|
|
|
|
// broadcasts its latest commitment transaction, which should result in it eventually failing
|
|
|
|
// the HTLC back off-chain to A.
|
|
|
|
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(3);
|
|
|
|
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(3, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
|
|
|
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(3, &node_cfgs, &[None, None, None]);
|
|
|
|
let mut nodes = create_network(3, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
|
|
|
|
let (update_a, _, chan_id_2, _) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 1, 2, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[2], 1_000_000);
|
|
|
|
nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let bs_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_id_2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
|
|
|
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
|
|
|
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], updates.commitment_signed, false);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
|
|
|
get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[2].node.get_our_node_id());
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Don't bother delivering the new HTLC add/commits, instead confirming the pre-HTLC commitment
|
|
|
|
// transaction for nodes[1].
|
|
|
|
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &bs_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
|
|
|
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
2021-09-21 12:25:38 -04:00
|
|
|
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
|
2021-07-31 03:34:16 +00:00
|
|
|
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
|
|
|
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
|
|
|
let fail_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fail_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &fail_updates.update_fail_htlcs[0]);
|
|
|
|
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], fail_updates.commitment_signed, true, true);
|
2021-08-12 15:30:53 -05:00
|
|
|
expect_payment_failed_with_update!(nodes[0], payment_hash, false, update_a.contents.short_channel_id, true);
|
2021-07-31 03:34:16 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn chanmon_claim_value_coop_close() {
|
|
|
|
// Tests `get_claimable_balances` returns the correct values across a simple cooperative claim.
|
|
|
|
// Specifically, this tests that the channel non-HTLC balances show up in
|
|
|
|
// `get_claimable_balances` until the cooperative claims have confirmed and generated a
|
|
|
|
// `SpendableOutputs` event, and no longer.
|
|
|
|
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
|
|
|
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
|
|
|
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
|
|
|
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) =
|
|
|
|
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 1_000_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
|
|
|
|
let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(funding_outpoint.to_channel_id(), chan_id);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan_id) as u64;
|
2022-01-04 15:54:54 -08:00
|
|
|
let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], chan_id);
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
|
2022-01-04 15:54:54 -08:00
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 1_000 - chan_feerate * channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) / 1000
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
}],
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose { claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000, }],
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-12 22:31:29 +02:00
|
|
|
nodes[0].node.close_channel(&chan_id, &nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()).unwrap();
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
let node_0_shutdown = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendShutdown, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
|
|
|
nodes[1].node.handle_shutdown(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &node_0_shutdown);
|
|
|
|
let node_1_shutdown = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendShutdown, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
|
|
|
nodes[0].node.handle_shutdown(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &InitFeatures::known(), &node_1_shutdown);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let node_0_closing_signed = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendClosingSigned, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
|
|
|
nodes[1].node.handle_closing_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_0_closing_signed);
|
|
|
|
let node_1_closing_signed = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendClosingSigned, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
|
|
|
nodes[0].node.handle_closing_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_1_closing_signed);
|
|
|
|
let (_, node_0_2nd_closing_signed) = get_closing_signed_broadcast!(nodes[0].node, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
|
|
|
nodes[1].node.handle_closing_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &node_0_2nd_closing_signed.unwrap());
|
|
|
|
let (_, node_1_none) = get_closing_signed_broadcast!(nodes[1].node, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
|
|
|
assert!(node_1_none.is_none());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let shutdown_tx = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(shutdown_tx, nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(shutdown_tx.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &shutdown_tx[0]);
|
|
|
|
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &shutdown_tx[0]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
2022-01-04 15:54:54 -08:00
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 1_000 - chan_feerate * channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) / 1000,
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
|
|
|
|
}],
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 1000,
|
|
|
|
confirmation_height: nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
|
|
|
|
}],
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
|
|
|
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Vec::<Balance>::new(),
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Vec::<Balance>::new(),
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut node_a_spendable = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(node_a_spendable.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs } = node_a_spendable.pop().unwrap() {
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(outputs.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
let spend_tx = nodes[0].keys_manager.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&[&outputs[0]], Vec::new(),
|
|
|
|
Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, &Secp256k1::new()).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(spend_tx, shutdown_tx[0]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut node_b_spendable = nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(node_b_spendable.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs } = node_b_spendable.pop().unwrap() {
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(outputs.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
let spend_tx = nodes[1].keys_manager.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&[&outputs[0]], Vec::new(),
|
|
|
|
Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, &Secp256k1::new()).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(spend_tx, shutdown_tx[0]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-09-21 12:25:38 -04:00
|
|
|
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
|
|
|
|
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure);
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn sorted_vec<T: Ord>(mut v: Vec<T>) -> Vec<T> {
|
|
|
|
v.sort_unstable();
|
|
|
|
v
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn do_test_claim_value_force_close(prev_commitment_tx: bool) {
|
|
|
|
// Tests `get_claimable_balances` with an HTLC across a force-close.
|
|
|
|
// We build a channel with an HTLC pending, then force close the channel and check that the
|
|
|
|
// `get_claimable_balances` return value is correct as transactions confirm on-chain.
|
|
|
|
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
|
|
|
if prev_commitment_tx {
|
|
|
|
// We broadcast a second-to-latest commitment transaction, without providing the revocation
|
|
|
|
// secret to the counterparty. However, because we always immediately take the revocation
|
|
|
|
// secret from the keys_manager, we would panic at broadcast as we're trying to sign a
|
|
|
|
// transaction which, from the point of view of our keys_manager, is revoked.
|
|
|
|
chanmon_cfgs[1].keys_manager.disable_revocation_policy_check = true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
|
|
|
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
|
|
|
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) =
|
|
|
|
create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 1_000_000, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
|
|
|
|
let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(funding_outpoint.to_channel_id(), chan_id);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This HTLC is immediately claimed, giving node B the preimage
|
|
|
|
let payment_preimage = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000_000).0;
|
|
|
|
// This HTLC is allowed to time out, letting A claim it. However, in order to test claimable
|
|
|
|
// balances more fully we also give B the preimage for this HTLC.
|
|
|
|
let (timeout_payment_preimage, timeout_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 4_000_000);
|
|
|
|
// This HTLC will be dust, and not be claimable at all:
|
|
|
|
let (dust_payment_preimage, dust_payment_hash, _) = route_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 3_000);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let htlc_cltv_timeout = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1; // Note ChannelManager adds one to CLTV timeouts for safety
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan_id) as u64;
|
2022-01-04 15:54:54 -08:00
|
|
|
let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], chan_id);
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let remote_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[1], chan_id);
|
|
|
|
// Before B receives the payment preimage, it only suggests the push_msat value of 1_000 sats
|
|
|
|
// as claimable. A lists both its to-self balance and the (possibly-claimable) HTLCs.
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 3_000 - 4_000 - 1_000 - 3 - chan_feerate *
|
2022-01-04 15:54:54 -08:00
|
|
|
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
}, Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}]),
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
|
|
|
|
}],
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage);
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
|
|
|
let b_htlc_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(&nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
|
|
|
// We claim the dust payment here as well, but it won't impact our claimable balances as its
|
|
|
|
// dust and thus doesn't appear on chain at all.
|
|
|
|
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(dust_payment_preimage);
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
|
|
|
nodes[1].node.claim_funds(timeout_payment_preimage);
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if prev_commitment_tx {
|
|
|
|
// To build a previous commitment transaction, deliver one round of commitment messages.
|
|
|
|
nodes[0].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &b_htlc_msgs.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
|
2021-11-18 16:24:14 -06:00
|
|
|
expect_payment_sent_without_paths!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &b_htlc_msgs.commitment_signed);
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
|
|
|
let (as_raa, as_cs) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
|
|
|
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_raa);
|
|
|
|
let _htlc_updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(&nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
|
|
|
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_cs);
|
|
|
|
let _bs_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Once B has received the payment preimage, it includes the value of the HTLC in its
|
|
|
|
// "claimable if you were to close the channel" balance.
|
|
|
|
let mut a_expected_balances = vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - // Channel funding value in satoshis
|
|
|
|
4_000 - // The to-be-failed HTLC value in satoshis
|
|
|
|
3_000 - // The claimed HTLC value in satoshis
|
|
|
|
1_000 - // The push_msat value in satoshis
|
|
|
|
3 - // The dust HTLC value in satoshis
|
|
|
|
// The commitment transaction fee with two HTLC outputs:
|
2022-01-04 15:54:54 -08:00
|
|
|
chan_feerate * (channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) +
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
if prev_commitment_tx { 1 } else { 2 } *
|
|
|
|
channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}];
|
|
|
|
if !prev_commitment_tx {
|
|
|
|
a_expected_balances.push(Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(a_expected_balances),
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableOnChannelClose {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000 + 3_000 + 4_000,
|
|
|
|
}],
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Broadcast the closing transaction (which has both pending HTLCs in it) and get B's
|
|
|
|
// broadcasted HTLC claim transaction with preimage.
|
|
|
|
let node_b_commitment_claimable = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32;
|
|
|
|
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &remote_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &remote_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let b_broadcast_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn.len(), if prev_commitment_tx { 4 } else { 5 });
|
|
|
|
if prev_commitment_tx {
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(b_broadcast_txn[3], b_broadcast_txn[2]);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn[0], b_broadcast_txn[3]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn[1], b_broadcast_txn[4]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// b_broadcast_txn[0] should spend the HTLC output of the commitment tx for 3_000 sats
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(b_broadcast_txn[0], remote_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(b_broadcast_txn[1], remote_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn[0].input.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(b_broadcast_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[b_broadcast_txn[0].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 3_000);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[b_broadcast_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 4_000);
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(b_broadcast_txn[2], funding_tx);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
2021-09-21 12:25:38 -04:00
|
|
|
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
assert!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
2021-09-21 12:25:38 -04:00
|
|
|
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Once the commitment transaction confirms, we will wait until ANTI_REORG_DELAY until we
|
|
|
|
// generate any `SpendableOutputs` events. Thus, the same balances will still be listed
|
|
|
|
// available in `get_claimable_balances`. However, both will swap from `ClaimableOnClose` to
|
|
|
|
// other Balance variants, as close has already happened.
|
|
|
|
assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 3_000 - 4_000 - 1_000 - 3 - chan_feerate *
|
2022-01-04 15:54:54 -08:00
|
|
|
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}]),
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
// The main non-HTLC balance is just awaiting confirmations, but the claimable height is the
|
|
|
|
// CSV delay, not ANTI_REORG_DELAY.
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
|
|
|
|
confirmation_height: node_b_commitment_claimable,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
// Both HTLC balances are "contentious" as our counterparty could claim them if we wait too
|
|
|
|
// long.
|
|
|
|
Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
|
|
|
|
timeout_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
|
|
|
timeout_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}]),
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
|
|
|
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], dust_payment_hash, true);
|
|
|
|
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// After ANTI_REORG_DELAY, A will consider its balance fully spendable and generate a
|
|
|
|
// `SpendableOutputs` event. However, B still has to wait for the CSV delay.
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}]),
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
|
|
|
|
confirmation_height: node_b_commitment_claimable,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
|
|
|
|
timeout_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
|
|
|
timeout_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}]),
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut node_a_spendable = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(node_a_spendable.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs } = node_a_spendable.pop().unwrap() {
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(outputs.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
let spend_tx = nodes[0].keys_manager.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&[&outputs[0]], Vec::new(),
|
|
|
|
Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, &Secp256k1::new()).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(spend_tx, remote_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// After broadcasting the HTLC claim transaction, node A will still consider the HTLC
|
|
|
|
// possibly-claimable up to ANTI_REORG_DELAY, at which point it will drop it.
|
|
|
|
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &b_broadcast_txn[0]);
|
2021-11-18 16:24:14 -06:00
|
|
|
if prev_commitment_tx {
|
|
|
|
expect_payment_path_successful!(nodes[0]);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}]),
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}],
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// When the HTLC timeout output is spendable in the next block, A should broadcast it
|
|
|
|
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], htlc_cltv_timeout - nodes[0].best_block_info().1 - 1);
|
|
|
|
let a_broadcast_txn = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(a_broadcast_txn.len(), 3);
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(a_broadcast_txn[0], funding_tx);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(a_broadcast_txn[1].input.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(a_broadcast_txn[1], remote_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(a_broadcast_txn[2].input.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(a_broadcast_txn[2], remote_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
assert_ne!(a_broadcast_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout,
|
|
|
|
a_broadcast_txn[2].input[0].previous_output.vout);
|
|
|
|
// a_broadcast_txn [1] and [2] should spend the HTLC outputs of the commitment tx
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[a_broadcast_txn[1].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 3_000);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(remote_txn[0].output[a_broadcast_txn[2].input[0].previous_output.vout as usize].value, 4_000);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Once the HTLC-Timeout transaction confirms, A will no longer consider the HTLC
|
|
|
|
// "MaybeClaimable", but instead move it to "AwaitingConfirmations".
|
|
|
|
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &a_broadcast_txn[2]);
|
|
|
|
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
|
|
|
confirmation_height: nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1,
|
|
|
|
}],
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
// After ANTI_REORG_DELAY, A will generate a SpendableOutputs event and drop the claimable
|
|
|
|
// balance entry.
|
|
|
|
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Vec::<Balance>::new(),
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], timeout_payment_hash, true);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut node_a_spendable = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(node_a_spendable.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs } = node_a_spendable.pop().unwrap() {
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(outputs.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
let spend_tx = nodes[0].keys_manager.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&[&outputs[0]], Vec::new(),
|
|
|
|
Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, &Secp256k1::new()).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(spend_tx, a_broadcast_txn[2]);
|
|
|
|
} else { panic!(); }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Node B will no longer consider the HTLC "contentious" after the HTLC claim transaction
|
|
|
|
// confirms, and consider it simply "awaiting confirmations". Note that it has to wait for the
|
|
|
|
// standard revocable transaction CSV delay before receiving a `SpendableOutputs`.
|
|
|
|
let node_b_htlc_claimable = nodes[1].best_block_info().1 + BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32;
|
|
|
|
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &b_broadcast_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000,
|
|
|
|
confirmation_height: node_b_commitment_claimable,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
|
|
|
|
confirmation_height: node_b_htlc_claimable,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
|
|
|
timeout_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}]),
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// After reaching the commitment output CSV, we'll get a SpendableOutputs event for it and have
|
|
|
|
// only the HTLCs claimable on node B.
|
|
|
|
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_b_commitment_claimable - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut node_b_spendable = nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(node_b_spendable.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs } = node_b_spendable.pop().unwrap() {
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(outputs.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
let spend_tx = nodes[1].keys_manager.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&[&outputs[0]], Vec::new(),
|
|
|
|
Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, &Secp256k1::new()).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(spend_tx, remote_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 3_000,
|
|
|
|
confirmation_height: node_b_htlc_claimable,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
|
|
|
timeout_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}]),
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
sorted_vec(nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// After reaching the claimed HTLC output CSV, we'll get a SpendableOutptus event for it and
|
|
|
|
// have only one HTLC output left spendable.
|
|
|
|
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], node_b_htlc_claimable - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut node_b_spendable = nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(node_b_spendable.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs } = node_b_spendable.pop().unwrap() {
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(outputs.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
let spend_tx = nodes[1].keys_manager.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&[&outputs[0]], Vec::new(),
|
|
|
|
Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, &Secp256k1::new()).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(spend_tx, b_broadcast_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
} else { panic!(); }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
|
|
|
timeout_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}],
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Finally, mine the HTLC timeout transaction that A broadcasted (even though B should be able
|
|
|
|
// to claim this HTLC with the preimage it knows!). It will remain listed as a claimable HTLC
|
|
|
|
// until ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations on the spend.
|
|
|
|
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &a_broadcast_txn[2]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ContentiousClaimable {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 4_000,
|
|
|
|
timeout_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}],
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(Vec::<Balance>::new(),
|
2021-10-08 19:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes[1].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
2021-08-04 16:10:38 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_claim_value_force_close() {
|
|
|
|
do_test_claim_value_force_close(true);
|
|
|
|
do_test_claim_value_force_close(false);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-02-25 05:14:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_balances_on_local_commitment_htlcs() {
|
|
|
|
// Previously, when handling the broadcast of a local commitment transactions (with associated
|
|
|
|
// CSV delays prior to spendability), we incorrectly handled the CSV delays on HTLC
|
|
|
|
// transactions. This caused us to miss spendable outputs for HTLCs which were awaiting a CSV
|
|
|
|
// delay prior to spendability.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Further, because of this, we could hit an assertion as `get_claimable_balances` asserted
|
|
|
|
// that HTLCs were resolved after the funding spend was resolved, which was not true if the
|
|
|
|
// HTLC did not have a CSV delay attached (due to the above bug or due to it being an HTLC
|
|
|
|
// claim by our counterparty).
|
|
|
|
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
|
|
|
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
|
|
|
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
|
|
|
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create a single channel with two pending HTLCs from nodes[0] to nodes[1], one which nodes[1]
|
|
|
|
// knows the preimage for, one which it does not.
|
|
|
|
let (_, _, chan_id, funding_tx) = create_announced_chan_between_nodes_with_value(&nodes, 0, 1, 1_000_000, 0, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
|
|
|
|
let funding_outpoint = OutPoint { txid: funding_tx.txid(), index: 0 };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let (route, payment_hash, _, payment_secret) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 10_000_000);
|
|
|
|
let htlc_cltv_timeout = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + TEST_FINAL_CLTV + 1; // Note ChannelManager adds one to CLTV timeouts for safety
|
|
|
|
nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route, payment_hash, &Some(payment_secret)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
|
|
|
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
|
|
|
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], updates.commitment_signed, false);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
|
|
|
expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash, payment_secret, 10_000_000);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let (route_2, payment_hash_2, payment_preimage_2, payment_secret_2) = get_route_and_payment_hash!(nodes[0], nodes[1], 20_000_000);
|
|
|
|
nodes[0].node.send_payment(&route_2, payment_hash_2, &Some(payment_secret_2)).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let updates = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
|
|
|
|
nodes[1].node.handle_update_add_htlc(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_add_htlcs[0]);
|
|
|
|
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], updates.commitment_signed, false);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable!(nodes[1]);
|
|
|
|
expect_payment_received!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, payment_secret_2, 20_000_000);
|
|
|
|
assert!(nodes[1].node.claim_funds(payment_preimage_2));
|
|
|
|
get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let chan_feerate = get_feerate!(nodes[0], chan_id) as u64;
|
|
|
|
let opt_anchors = get_opt_anchors!(nodes[0], chan_id);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get nodes[0]'s commitment transaction and HTLC-Timeout transactions
|
|
|
|
let as_txn = get_local_commitment_txn!(nodes[0], chan_id);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(as_txn.len(), 3);
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(as_txn[1], as_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(as_txn[2], as_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(as_txn[0], funding_tx);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First confirm the commitment transaction on nodes[0], which should leave us with three
|
|
|
|
// claimable balances.
|
|
|
|
let node_a_commitment_claimable = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32;
|
|
|
|
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
|
|
|
|
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
|
|
|
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
|
|
|
|
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
|
|
|
|
confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 20_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}]),
|
|
|
|
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get nodes[1]'s HTLC claim tx for the second HTLC
|
|
|
|
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &as_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
|
|
|
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
|
|
|
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed);
|
|
|
|
let bs_htlc_claim_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(bs_htlc_claim_txn.len(), 3);
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(bs_htlc_claim_txn[0], as_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(bs_htlc_claim_txn[1], funding_tx);
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(bs_htlc_claim_txn[2], bs_htlc_claim_txn[1]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Connect blocks until the HTLCs expire, allowing us to (validly) broadcast the HTLC-Timeout
|
|
|
|
// transaction.
|
|
|
|
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - 1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
|
|
|
|
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
|
|
|
|
confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 20_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}]),
|
|
|
|
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(as_txn[1].lock_time, nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + 1); // as_txn[1] can be included in the next block
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now confirm nodes[0]'s HTLC-Timeout transaction, which changes the claimable balance to an
|
|
|
|
// "awaiting confirmations" one.
|
|
|
|
let node_a_htlc_claimable = nodes[0].best_block_info().1 + BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT as u32;
|
|
|
|
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &as_txn[1]);
|
|
|
|
// Note that prior to the fix in the commit which introduced this test, this (and the next
|
|
|
|
// balance) check failed. With this check removed, the code panicked in the `connect_blocks`
|
|
|
|
// call, as described, two hunks down.
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
|
|
|
|
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
|
|
|
|
confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
|
|
|
|
confirmation_height: node_a_htlc_claimable,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 20_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}]),
|
|
|
|
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now confirm nodes[1]'s HTLC claim, giving nodes[0] the preimage. Note that the "maybe
|
|
|
|
// claimable" balance remains until we see ANTI_REORG_DELAY blocks.
|
|
|
|
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &bs_htlc_claim_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
expect_payment_sent!(nodes[0], payment_preimage_2);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
|
|
|
|
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
|
|
|
|
confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
|
|
|
|
confirmation_height: node_a_htlc_claimable,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::MaybeClaimableHTLCAwaitingTimeout {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 20_000,
|
|
|
|
claimable_height: htlc_cltv_timeout,
|
|
|
|
}]),
|
|
|
|
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Finally make the HTLC transactions have ANTI_REORG_DELAY blocks. This call previously
|
|
|
|
// panicked as described in the test introduction. This will remove the "maybe claimable"
|
|
|
|
// spendable output as nodes[1] has fully claimed the second HTLC.
|
|
|
|
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
|
|
|
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[0], payment_hash, true);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(sorted_vec(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 1_000_000 - 10_000 - 20_000 - chan_feerate *
|
|
|
|
(channel::commitment_tx_base_weight(opt_anchors) + 2 * channel::COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT_PER_HTLC) / 1000,
|
|
|
|
confirmation_height: node_a_commitment_claimable,
|
|
|
|
}, Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
|
|
|
|
confirmation_height: node_a_htlc_claimable,
|
|
|
|
}]),
|
|
|
|
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Connect blocks until the commitment transaction's CSV expires, providing us the relevant
|
|
|
|
// `SpendableOutputs` event and removing the claimable balance entry.
|
|
|
|
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_a_commitment_claimable - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(vec![Balance::ClaimableAwaitingConfirmations {
|
|
|
|
claimable_amount_satoshis: 10_000,
|
|
|
|
confirmation_height: node_a_htlc_claimable,
|
|
|
|
}],
|
|
|
|
nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances());
|
|
|
|
let mut node_a_spendable = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(node_a_spendable.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs } = node_a_spendable.pop().unwrap() {
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(outputs.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
let spend_tx = nodes[0].keys_manager.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&[&outputs[0]], Vec::new(),
|
|
|
|
Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, &Secp256k1::new()).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(spend_tx, as_txn[0]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Connect blocks until the HTLC-Timeout's CSV expires, providing us the relevant
|
|
|
|
// `SpendableOutputs` event and removing the claimable balance entry.
|
|
|
|
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], node_a_htlc_claimable - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
|
|
|
|
assert!(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances().is_empty());
|
|
|
|
let mut node_a_spendable = nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_and_clear_pending_events();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(node_a_spendable.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
if let Event::SpendableOutputs { outputs } = node_a_spendable.pop().unwrap() {
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(outputs.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
let spend_tx = nodes[0].keys_manager.backing.spend_spendable_outputs(&[&outputs[0]], Vec::new(),
|
|
|
|
Builder::new().push_opcode(opcodes::all::OP_RETURN).into_script(), 253, &Secp256k1::new()).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
check_spends!(spend_tx, as_txn[1]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|