lnd/lntest/itest/lnd_max_htlcs_test.go
yyforyongyu 26ed64fa52
itest: manage context within HarnessNode
This commit removes the context as a param needed when calling methods
of HarnessNode. This change moves the context management inside
HarnessNode, aside from saving us a few lines, it makes the context
creation/timeout less error-prone.
2021-12-04 14:54:36 +08:00

226 lines
7.5 KiB
Go

package itest
import (
"context"
"testing"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnrpc"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnrpc/invoicesrpc"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnrpc/routerrpc"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lntest"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lntypes"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
)
// testMaxHtlcPathfind tests the case where we try to send a payment over a
// channel where we have already reached the limit of the number of htlcs that
// we may add to the remote party's commitment. This test asserts that we do
// not attempt to use the full channel at all in our pathfinding.
func testMaxHtlcPathfind(net *lntest.NetworkHarness, t *harnessTest) {
ctxb := context.Background()
// Setup a channel between Alice and Bob where Alice will only allow
// Bob to add a maximum of 5 htlcs to her commitment.
maxHtlcs := 5
chanPoint := openChannelAndAssert(
t, net, net.Alice, net.Bob,
lntest.OpenChannelParams{
Amt: 1000000,
PushAmt: 800000,
RemoteMaxHtlcs: uint16(maxHtlcs),
},
)
// Wait for Alice and Bob to receive the channel edge from the
// funding manager.
err := net.Alice.WaitForNetworkChannelOpen(chanPoint)
require.NoError(t.t, err, "alice does not have open channel")
err = net.Bob.WaitForNetworkChannelOpen(chanPoint)
require.NoError(t.t, err, "bob does not have open channel")
// Alice and bob should have one channel open with each other now.
assertNodeNumChannels(t, net.Alice, 1)
assertNodeNumChannels(t, net.Bob, 1)
// Send our maximum number of htlcs from Bob -> Alice so that we get
// to a point where Alice won't accept any more htlcs on the channel.
subscriptions := make([]*holdSubscription, maxHtlcs)
cancelCtxs := make([]func(), maxHtlcs)
for i := 0; i < maxHtlcs; i++ {
subCtx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(ctxb, defaultTimeout)
cancelCtxs[i] = cancel
subscriptions[i] = acceptHoldInvoice(
subCtx, t.t, i, net.Bob, net.Alice,
)
}
// Cancel all of our subscriptions on exit.
defer func() {
for _, cancel := range cancelCtxs {
cancel()
}
}()
err = assertNumActiveHtlcs([]*lntest.HarnessNode{
net.Alice, net.Bob,
}, maxHtlcs)
require.NoError(t.t, err, "htlcs not active")
// Now we send a payment from Alice -> Bob to sanity check that our
// commitment limit is not applied in the opposite direction.
subCtx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(ctxb, defaultTimeout)
defer cancel()
aliceBobSub := acceptHoldInvoice(
subCtx, t.t, maxHtlcs, net.Alice, net.Bob,
)
err = assertNumActiveHtlcs([]*lntest.HarnessNode{
net.Alice, net.Bob,
}, maxHtlcs+1)
require.NoError(t.t, err, "htlcs not active")
// Now, we're going to try to send another payment from Bob -> Alice.
// We've hit our max remote htlcs, so we expect this payment to spin
// out dramatically with pathfinding.
ctxt, _ := context.WithTimeout(ctxb, defaultTimeout)
payment, err := net.Bob.RouterClient.SendPaymentV2(
ctxt, &routerrpc.SendPaymentRequest{
Amt: 1000,
Dest: net.Alice.PubKey[:],
TimeoutSeconds: 60,
FeeLimitSat: 1000000,
MaxParts: 10,
Amp: true,
},
)
require.NoError(t.t, err, "send payment failed")
update, err := payment.Recv()
require.NoError(t.t, err, "no payment in flight update")
require.Equal(t.t, lnrpc.Payment_IN_FLIGHT, update.Status,
"payment not inflight")
update, err = payment.Recv()
require.NoError(t.t, err, "no payment failed update")
require.Equal(t.t, lnrpc.Payment_FAILED, update.Status)
require.Len(t.t, update.Htlcs, 0, "expected no htlcs dispatched")
// Now that we're done, we cancel all our pending htlcs so that we
// can cleanup the channel with a coop close.
for _, sub := range subscriptions {
ctxt, _ = context.WithTimeout(ctxb, defaultTimeout)
sub.cancel(ctxt, t.t)
}
ctxt, _ = context.WithTimeout(ctxb, defaultTimeout)
aliceBobSub.cancel(ctxt, t.t)
err = assertNumActiveHtlcs([]*lntest.HarnessNode{
net.Alice, net.Bob,
}, 0)
require.NoError(t.t, err, "expected all htlcs canceled")
closeChannelAndAssert(t, net, net.Alice, chanPoint, false)
}
type holdSubscription struct {
recipient invoicesrpc.InvoicesClient
hash lntypes.Hash
invSubscription invoicesrpc.Invoices_SubscribeSingleInvoiceClient
paymentSubscription routerrpc.Router_SendPaymentV2Client
}
// cancel updates a hold invoice to cancel from the recipient and consumes
// updates from the payer until it has reached a final, failed state.
func (h *holdSubscription) cancel(ctx context.Context, t *testing.T) {
_, err := h.recipient.CancelInvoice(ctx, &invoicesrpc.CancelInvoiceMsg{
PaymentHash: h.hash[:],
})
require.NoError(t, err, "invoice cancel failed")
invUpdate, err := h.invSubscription.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err, "cancel invoice subscribe failed")
require.Equal(t, lnrpc.Invoice_CANCELED, invUpdate.State,
"expected invoice canceled")
// We expect one in flight update when our htlc is canceled back, and
// another when we fail the payment as a whole.
payUpdate, err := h.paymentSubscription.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err, "cancel payment subscribe failed")
require.Len(t, payUpdate.Htlcs, 1)
require.Equal(t, lnrpc.Payment_IN_FLIGHT, payUpdate.Status)
payUpdate, err = h.paymentSubscription.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err, "cancel payment subscribe failed")
require.Equal(t, lnrpc.Payment_FAILED, payUpdate.Status,
"expected payment failed")
require.Equal(t, lnrpc.PaymentFailureReason_FAILURE_REASON_INCORRECT_PAYMENT_DETAILS,
payUpdate.FailureReason, "expected unknown details")
}
// acceptHoldInvoice adds a hold invoice to the recipient node, pays it from
// the sender and asserts that we have reached the accepted state where htlcs
// are locked in for the payment.
func acceptHoldInvoice(ctx context.Context, t *testing.T, idx int, sender,
receiver *lntest.HarnessNode) *holdSubscription {
hash := [lntypes.HashSize]byte{byte(idx + 1)}
invoice, err := receiver.AddHoldInvoice(
ctx, &invoicesrpc.AddHoldInvoiceRequest{
ValueMsat: 10000,
Hash: hash[:],
},
)
require.NoError(t, err, "couldn't add invoice")
invStream, err := receiver.InvoicesClient.SubscribeSingleInvoice(
ctx, &invoicesrpc.SubscribeSingleInvoiceRequest{
RHash: hash[:],
},
)
require.NoError(t, err, "could not subscribe to invoice")
inv, err := invStream.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err, "invoice open stream failed")
require.Equal(t, lnrpc.Invoice_OPEN, inv.State,
"expected open")
payStream, err := sender.RouterClient.SendPaymentV2(
ctx, &routerrpc.SendPaymentRequest{
PaymentRequest: invoice.PaymentRequest,
TimeoutSeconds: 60,
FeeLimitSat: 1000000,
},
)
require.NoError(t, err, "send payment failed")
// Finally, assert that we progress to an accepted state. We expect
// the payer to get one update for the creation of the payment, and
// another when a htlc is dispatched.
payment, err := payStream.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err, "payment in flight stream failed")
require.Equal(t, lnrpc.Payment_IN_FLIGHT, payment.Status)
require.Len(t, payment.Htlcs, 0)
payment, err = payStream.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err, "payment in flight stream failed")
require.Equal(t, lnrpc.Payment_IN_FLIGHT, payment.Status)
require.Len(t, payment.Htlcs, 1)
inv, err = invStream.Recv()
require.NoError(t, err, "invoice accepted stream failed")
require.Equal(t, lnrpc.Invoice_ACCEPTED, inv.State,
"expected accepted invoice")
return &holdSubscription{
recipient: receiver.InvoicesClient,
hash: hash,
invSubscription: invStream,
paymentSubscription: payStream,
}
}