mirror of
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd.git
synced 2024-11-19 18:10:34 +01:00
fbfc9a53af
Since the constraints are no longer something the heuristic needs to be aware of, we move the test.
167 lines
3.6 KiB
Go
167 lines
3.6 KiB
Go
package autopilot
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
prand "math/rand"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/btcsuite/btcutil"
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwire"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestConstraintsChannelBudget(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
prand.Seed(time.Now().Unix())
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
minChanSize = 0
|
|
maxChanSize = btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin)
|
|
|
|
chanLimit = 3
|
|
|
|
threshold = 0.5
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
constraints := NewConstraints(
|
|
minChanSize,
|
|
maxChanSize,
|
|
chanLimit,
|
|
0,
|
|
threshold,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
randChanID := func() lnwire.ShortChannelID {
|
|
return lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(uint64(prand.Int63()))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
testCases := []struct {
|
|
channels []Channel
|
|
walletAmt btcutil.Amount
|
|
|
|
needMore bool
|
|
amtAvailable btcutil.Amount
|
|
numMore uint32
|
|
}{
|
|
// Many available funds, but already have too many active open
|
|
// channels.
|
|
{
|
|
[]Channel{
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Capacity: btcutil.Amount(prand.Int31()),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Capacity: btcutil.Amount(prand.Int31()),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Capacity: btcutil.Amount(prand.Int31()),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin * 10),
|
|
false,
|
|
0,
|
|
0,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
// Ratio of funds in channels and total funds meets the
|
|
// threshold.
|
|
{
|
|
[]Channel{
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Capacity: btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Capacity: btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin * 2),
|
|
false,
|
|
0,
|
|
0,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
// Ratio of funds in channels and total funds is below the
|
|
// threshold. We have 10 BTC allocated amongst channels and
|
|
// funds, atm. We're targeting 50%, so 5 BTC should be
|
|
// allocated. Only 1 BTC is atm, so 4 BTC should be
|
|
// recommended. We should also request 2 more channels as the
|
|
// limit is 3.
|
|
{
|
|
[]Channel{
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Capacity: btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin * 9),
|
|
true,
|
|
btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin * 4),
|
|
2,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
// Ratio of funds in channels and total funds is below the
|
|
// threshold. We have 14 BTC total amongst the wallet's
|
|
// balance, and our currently opened channels. Since we're
|
|
// targeting a 50% allocation, we should commit 7 BTC. The
|
|
// current channels commit 4 BTC, so we should expected 3 BTC
|
|
// to be committed. We should only request a single additional
|
|
// channel as the limit is 3.
|
|
{
|
|
[]Channel{
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Capacity: btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Capacity: btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin * 3),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin * 10),
|
|
true,
|
|
btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin * 3),
|
|
1,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
// Ratio of funds in channels and total funds is above the
|
|
// threshold.
|
|
{
|
|
[]Channel{
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Capacity: btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Capacity: btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin),
|
|
false,
|
|
0,
|
|
0,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i, testCase := range testCases {
|
|
amtToAllocate, numMore := constraints.ChannelBudget(
|
|
testCase.channels, testCase.walletAmt,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if amtToAllocate != testCase.amtAvailable {
|
|
t.Fatalf("test #%v: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
i, testCase.amtAvailable, amtToAllocate)
|
|
}
|
|
if numMore != testCase.numMore {
|
|
t.Fatalf("test #%v: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
i, testCase.numMore, numMore)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|