mirror of
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd.git
synced 2024-11-19 18:10:34 +01:00
1343 lines
38 KiB
Go
1343 lines
38 KiB
Go
package peer
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"bytes"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcec/v2"
|
|
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcutil"
|
|
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/chaincfg"
|
|
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/txscript"
|
|
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/wire"
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/chainntnfs"
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/channeldb"
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/channelnotifier"
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/contractcourt"
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/htlcswitch"
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lntest/mock"
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwallet"
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwallet/chancloser"
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwire"
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pool"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
// p2SHAddress is a valid pay to script hash address.
|
|
p2SHAddress = "2NBFNJTktNa7GZusGbDbGKRZTxdK9VVez3n"
|
|
|
|
// p2wshAddress is a valid pay to witness script hash address.
|
|
p2wshAddress = "bc1qrp33g0q5c5txsp9arysrx4k6zdkfs4nce4xj0gdcccefvpysxf3qccfmv3"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// TestPeerChannelClosureAcceptFeeResponder tests the shutdown responder's
|
|
// behavior if we can agree on the fee immediately.
|
|
func TestPeerChannelClosureAcceptFeeResponder(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
notifier := &mock.ChainNotifier{
|
|
SpendChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.SpendDetail),
|
|
EpochChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.BlockEpoch),
|
|
ConfChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.TxConfirmation),
|
|
}
|
|
broadcastTxChan := make(chan *wire.MsgTx)
|
|
|
|
mockSwitch := &mockMessageSwitch{}
|
|
|
|
alicePeer, bobChan, err := createTestPeer(
|
|
t, notifier, broadcastTxChan, noUpdate, mockSwitch,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "unable to create test channels")
|
|
|
|
chanID := lnwire.NewChanIDFromOutPoint(bobChan.ChannelPoint())
|
|
|
|
mockLink := newMockUpdateHandler(chanID)
|
|
mockSwitch.links = append(mockSwitch.links, mockLink)
|
|
|
|
dummyDeliveryScript := genScript(t, p2wshAddress)
|
|
|
|
// We send a shutdown request to Alice. She will now be the responding
|
|
// node in this shutdown procedure. We first expect Alice to answer
|
|
// this shutdown request with a Shutdown message.
|
|
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
|
|
cid: chanID,
|
|
msg: lnwire.NewShutdown(chanID, dummyDeliveryScript),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var msg lnwire.Message
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive shutdown message")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
shutdownMsg, ok := msg.(*lnwire.Shutdown)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected Shutdown message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
respDeliveryScript := shutdownMsg.Address
|
|
|
|
// Alice will then send a ClosingSigned message, indicating her proposed
|
|
// closing transaction fee. Alice sends the ClosingSigned message as she is
|
|
// the initiator of the channel.
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive ClosingSigned message")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
respClosingSigned, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We accept the fee, and send a ClosingSigned with the same fee back,
|
|
// so she knows we agreed.
|
|
aliceFee := respClosingSigned.FeeSatoshis
|
|
bobSig, _, _, err := bobChan.CreateCloseProposal(
|
|
aliceFee, dummyDeliveryScript, respDeliveryScript,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "error creating close proposal")
|
|
|
|
parsedSig, err := lnwire.NewSigFromSignature(bobSig)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "error parsing signature")
|
|
closingSigned := lnwire.NewClosingSigned(chanID, aliceFee, parsedSig)
|
|
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
|
|
cid: chanID,
|
|
msg: closingSigned,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Alice should now see that we agreed on the fee, and should broadcast the
|
|
// closing transaction.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-broadcastTxChan:
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("closing tx not broadcast")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Need to pull the remaining message off of Alice's outgoing queue.
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive ClosingSigned message")
|
|
}
|
|
if _, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned); !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Alice should be waiting in a goroutine for a confirmation.
|
|
notifier.ConfChan <- &chainntnfs.TxConfirmation{}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestPeerChannelClosureAcceptFeeInitiator tests the shutdown initiator's
|
|
// behavior if we can agree on the fee immediately.
|
|
func TestPeerChannelClosureAcceptFeeInitiator(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
notifier := &mock.ChainNotifier{
|
|
SpendChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.SpendDetail),
|
|
EpochChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.BlockEpoch),
|
|
ConfChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.TxConfirmation),
|
|
}
|
|
broadcastTxChan := make(chan *wire.MsgTx)
|
|
|
|
mockSwitch := &mockMessageSwitch{}
|
|
|
|
alicePeer, bobChan, err := createTestPeer(
|
|
t, notifier, broadcastTxChan, noUpdate, mockSwitch,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "unable to create test channels")
|
|
|
|
chanID := lnwire.NewChanIDFromOutPoint(bobChan.ChannelPoint())
|
|
mockLink := newMockUpdateHandler(chanID)
|
|
mockSwitch.links = append(mockSwitch.links, mockLink)
|
|
|
|
dummyDeliveryScript := genScript(t, p2wshAddress)
|
|
|
|
// We make Alice send a shutdown request.
|
|
updateChan := make(chan interface{}, 1)
|
|
errChan := make(chan error, 1)
|
|
closeCommand := &htlcswitch.ChanClose{
|
|
CloseType: contractcourt.CloseRegular,
|
|
ChanPoint: bobChan.ChannelPoint(),
|
|
Updates: updateChan,
|
|
TargetFeePerKw: 12500,
|
|
Err: errChan,
|
|
}
|
|
alicePeer.localCloseChanReqs <- closeCommand
|
|
|
|
// We can now pull a Shutdown message off of Alice's outgoingQueue.
|
|
var msg lnwire.Message
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive shutdown request")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
shutdownMsg, ok := msg.(*lnwire.Shutdown)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected Shutdown message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
aliceDeliveryScript := shutdownMsg.Address
|
|
|
|
// Bob will respond with his own Shutdown message.
|
|
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
|
|
cid: chanID,
|
|
msg: lnwire.NewShutdown(chanID,
|
|
dummyDeliveryScript),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Alice will reply with a ClosingSigned here.
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed message")
|
|
}
|
|
closingSignedMsg, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected to receive closing signed message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Bob should reply with the exact same fee in his next ClosingSigned
|
|
// message.
|
|
bobFee := closingSignedMsg.FeeSatoshis
|
|
bobSig, _, _, err := bobChan.CreateCloseProposal(
|
|
bobFee, dummyDeliveryScript, aliceDeliveryScript,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "unable to create close proposal")
|
|
parsedSig, err := lnwire.NewSigFromSignature(bobSig)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "unable to parse signature")
|
|
|
|
closingSigned := lnwire.NewClosingSigned(shutdownMsg.ChannelID,
|
|
bobFee, parsedSig)
|
|
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
|
|
cid: chanID,
|
|
msg: closingSigned,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Alice should accept Bob's fee, broadcast the cooperative close tx, and
|
|
// send a ClosingSigned message back to Bob.
|
|
|
|
// Alice should now broadcast the closing transaction.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-broadcastTxChan:
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("closing tx not broadcast")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Alice should respond with the ClosingSigned they both agreed upon.
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed message")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
closingSignedMsg, ok = msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if closingSignedMsg.FeeSatoshis != bobFee {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned fee to be %v, instead got %v",
|
|
bobFee, closingSignedMsg.FeeSatoshis)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Alice should be waiting on a single confirmation for the coop close tx.
|
|
notifier.ConfChan <- &chainntnfs.TxConfirmation{}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestPeerChannelClosureFeeNegotiationsResponder tests the shutdown
|
|
// responder's behavior in the case where we must do several rounds of fee
|
|
// negotiation before we agree on a fee.
|
|
func TestPeerChannelClosureFeeNegotiationsResponder(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
notifier := &mock.ChainNotifier{
|
|
SpendChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.SpendDetail),
|
|
EpochChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.BlockEpoch),
|
|
ConfChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.TxConfirmation),
|
|
}
|
|
broadcastTxChan := make(chan *wire.MsgTx)
|
|
|
|
mockSwitch := &mockMessageSwitch{}
|
|
|
|
alicePeer, bobChan, err := createTestPeer(
|
|
t, notifier, broadcastTxChan, noUpdate, mockSwitch,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "unable to create test channels")
|
|
|
|
chanID := lnwire.NewChanIDFromOutPoint(bobChan.ChannelPoint())
|
|
|
|
mockLink := newMockUpdateHandler(chanID)
|
|
mockSwitch.links = append(mockSwitch.links, mockLink)
|
|
|
|
// Bob sends a shutdown request to Alice. She will now be the responding
|
|
// node in this shutdown procedure. We first expect Alice to answer this
|
|
// Shutdown request with a Shutdown message.
|
|
dummyDeliveryScript := genScript(t, p2wshAddress)
|
|
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
|
|
cid: chanID,
|
|
msg: lnwire.NewShutdown(chanID,
|
|
dummyDeliveryScript),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var msg lnwire.Message
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive shutdown message")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
shutdownMsg, ok := msg.(*lnwire.Shutdown)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected Shutdown message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
aliceDeliveryScript := shutdownMsg.Address
|
|
|
|
// As Alice is the channel initiator, she will send her ClosingSigned
|
|
// message.
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed message")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
aliceClosingSigned, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Bob doesn't agree with the fee and will send one back that's 2.5x.
|
|
preferredRespFee := aliceClosingSigned.FeeSatoshis
|
|
increasedFee := btcutil.Amount(float64(preferredRespFee) * 2.5)
|
|
bobSig, _, _, err := bobChan.CreateCloseProposal(
|
|
increasedFee, dummyDeliveryScript, aliceDeliveryScript,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "error creating close proposal")
|
|
|
|
parsedSig, err := lnwire.NewSigFromSignature(bobSig)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "error parsing signature")
|
|
closingSigned := lnwire.NewClosingSigned(chanID, increasedFee, parsedSig)
|
|
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
|
|
cid: chanID,
|
|
msg: closingSigned,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Alice will now see the new fee we propose, but with current settings it
|
|
// won't accept it immediately as it differs too much by its ideal fee. We
|
|
// should get a new proposal back, which should have the average fee rate
|
|
// proposed.
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed message")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
aliceClosingSigned, ok = msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The fee sent by Alice should be less than the fee Bob just sent as Alice
|
|
// should attempt to compromise.
|
|
aliceFee := aliceClosingSigned.FeeSatoshis
|
|
if aliceFee > increasedFee {
|
|
t.Fatalf("new fee should be less than our fee: new=%v, "+
|
|
"prior=%v", aliceFee, increasedFee)
|
|
}
|
|
lastFeeResponder := aliceFee
|
|
|
|
// We try negotiating a 2.1x fee, which should also be rejected.
|
|
increasedFee = btcutil.Amount(float64(preferredRespFee) * 2.1)
|
|
bobSig, _, _, err = bobChan.CreateCloseProposal(
|
|
increasedFee, dummyDeliveryScript, aliceDeliveryScript,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "error creating close proposal")
|
|
|
|
parsedSig, err = lnwire.NewSigFromSignature(bobSig)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "error parsing signature")
|
|
closingSigned = lnwire.NewClosingSigned(chanID, increasedFee, parsedSig)
|
|
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
|
|
cid: chanID,
|
|
msg: closingSigned,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Bob's latest proposal still won't be accepted and Alice should send over
|
|
// a new ClosingSigned message. It should be the average of what Bob and
|
|
// Alice each proposed last time.
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed message")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
aliceClosingSigned, ok = msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Alice should inch towards Bob's fee, in order to compromise.
|
|
// Additionally, this fee should be less than the fee Bob sent before.
|
|
aliceFee = aliceClosingSigned.FeeSatoshis
|
|
if aliceFee < lastFeeResponder {
|
|
t.Fatalf("new fee should be greater than prior: new=%v, "+
|
|
"prior=%v", aliceFee, lastFeeResponder)
|
|
}
|
|
if aliceFee > increasedFee {
|
|
t.Fatalf("new fee should be less than Bob's fee: new=%v, "+
|
|
"prior=%v", aliceFee, increasedFee)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Finally, Bob will accept the fee by echoing back the same fee that Alice
|
|
// just sent over.
|
|
bobSig, _, _, err = bobChan.CreateCloseProposal(
|
|
aliceFee, dummyDeliveryScript, aliceDeliveryScript,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "error creating close proposal")
|
|
|
|
parsedSig, err = lnwire.NewSigFromSignature(bobSig)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "error parsing signature")
|
|
closingSigned = lnwire.NewClosingSigned(chanID, aliceFee, parsedSig)
|
|
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
|
|
cid: chanID,
|
|
msg: closingSigned,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Alice will now see that Bob agreed on the fee, and broadcast the coop
|
|
// close transaction.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-broadcastTxChan:
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("closing tx not broadcast")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Alice should respond with the ClosingSigned they both agreed upon.
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed message")
|
|
}
|
|
if _, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned); !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected to receive closing signed message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Alice should be waiting on a single confirmation for the coop close tx.
|
|
notifier.ConfChan <- &chainntnfs.TxConfirmation{}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestPeerChannelClosureFeeNegotiationsInitiator tests the shutdown
|
|
// initiator's behavior in the case where we must do several rounds of fee
|
|
// negotiation before we agree on a fee.
|
|
func TestPeerChannelClosureFeeNegotiationsInitiator(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
notifier := &mock.ChainNotifier{
|
|
SpendChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.SpendDetail),
|
|
EpochChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.BlockEpoch),
|
|
ConfChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.TxConfirmation),
|
|
}
|
|
broadcastTxChan := make(chan *wire.MsgTx)
|
|
|
|
mockSwitch := &mockMessageSwitch{}
|
|
|
|
alicePeer, bobChan, err := createTestPeer(
|
|
t, notifier, broadcastTxChan, noUpdate, mockSwitch,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "unable to create test channels")
|
|
|
|
chanID := lnwire.NewChanIDFromOutPoint(bobChan.ChannelPoint())
|
|
mockLink := newMockUpdateHandler(chanID)
|
|
mockSwitch.links = append(mockSwitch.links, mockLink)
|
|
|
|
// We make the initiator send a shutdown request.
|
|
updateChan := make(chan interface{}, 1)
|
|
errChan := make(chan error, 1)
|
|
closeCommand := &htlcswitch.ChanClose{
|
|
CloseType: contractcourt.CloseRegular,
|
|
ChanPoint: bobChan.ChannelPoint(),
|
|
Updates: updateChan,
|
|
TargetFeePerKw: 12500,
|
|
Err: errChan,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
alicePeer.localCloseChanReqs <- closeCommand
|
|
|
|
// Alice should now send a Shutdown request to Bob.
|
|
var msg lnwire.Message
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive shutdown request")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
shutdownMsg, ok := msg.(*lnwire.Shutdown)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected Shutdown message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
aliceDeliveryScript := shutdownMsg.Address
|
|
|
|
// Bob will answer the Shutdown message with his own Shutdown.
|
|
dummyDeliveryScript := genScript(t, p2wshAddress)
|
|
respShutdown := lnwire.NewShutdown(chanID, dummyDeliveryScript)
|
|
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
|
|
cid: chanID,
|
|
msg: respShutdown,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Alice should now respond with a ClosingSigned message with her ideal
|
|
// fee rate.
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed")
|
|
}
|
|
closingSignedMsg, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
idealFeeRate := closingSignedMsg.FeeSatoshis
|
|
lastReceivedFee := idealFeeRate
|
|
|
|
increasedFee := btcutil.Amount(float64(idealFeeRate) * 2.1)
|
|
lastSentFee := increasedFee
|
|
|
|
bobSig, _, _, err := bobChan.CreateCloseProposal(
|
|
increasedFee, dummyDeliveryScript, aliceDeliveryScript,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "error creating close proposal")
|
|
|
|
parsedSig, err := lnwire.NewSigFromSignature(bobSig)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "unable to parse signature")
|
|
|
|
closingSigned := lnwire.NewClosingSigned(chanID, increasedFee, parsedSig)
|
|
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
|
|
cid: chanID,
|
|
msg: closingSigned,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// It still won't be accepted, and we should get a new proposal, the
|
|
// average of what we proposed, and what they proposed last time.
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed")
|
|
}
|
|
closingSignedMsg, ok = msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
aliceFee := closingSignedMsg.FeeSatoshis
|
|
if aliceFee < lastReceivedFee {
|
|
t.Fatalf("new fee should be greater than prior: new=%v, old=%v",
|
|
aliceFee, lastReceivedFee)
|
|
}
|
|
if aliceFee > lastSentFee {
|
|
t.Fatalf("new fee should be less than our fee: new=%v, old=%v",
|
|
aliceFee, lastSentFee)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
lastReceivedFee = aliceFee
|
|
|
|
// We'll try negotiating a 1.5x fee, which should also be rejected.
|
|
increasedFee = btcutil.Amount(float64(idealFeeRate) * 1.5)
|
|
lastSentFee = increasedFee
|
|
|
|
bobSig, _, _, err = bobChan.CreateCloseProposal(
|
|
increasedFee, dummyDeliveryScript, aliceDeliveryScript,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "error creating close proposal")
|
|
|
|
parsedSig, err = lnwire.NewSigFromSignature(bobSig)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "error parsing signature")
|
|
|
|
closingSigned = lnwire.NewClosingSigned(chanID, increasedFee, parsedSig)
|
|
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
|
|
cid: chanID,
|
|
msg: closingSigned,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Alice won't accept Bob's new proposal, and Bob should receive a new
|
|
// proposal which is the average of what Bob proposed and Alice proposed
|
|
// last time.
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed")
|
|
}
|
|
closingSignedMsg, ok = msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
aliceFee = closingSignedMsg.FeeSatoshis
|
|
if aliceFee < lastReceivedFee {
|
|
t.Fatalf("new fee should be greater than prior: new=%v, old=%v",
|
|
aliceFee, lastReceivedFee)
|
|
}
|
|
if aliceFee > lastSentFee {
|
|
t.Fatalf("new fee should be less than Bob's fee: new=%v, old=%v",
|
|
aliceFee, lastSentFee)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Bob will now accept their fee by sending back a ClosingSigned message
|
|
// with an identical fee.
|
|
bobSig, _, _, err = bobChan.CreateCloseProposal(
|
|
aliceFee, dummyDeliveryScript, aliceDeliveryScript,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "error creating close proposal")
|
|
|
|
parsedSig, err = lnwire.NewSigFromSignature(bobSig)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "error parsing signature")
|
|
closingSigned = lnwire.NewClosingSigned(chanID, aliceFee, parsedSig)
|
|
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
|
|
cid: chanID,
|
|
msg: closingSigned,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Wait for closing tx to be broadcasted.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-broadcastTxChan:
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("closing tx not broadcast")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Alice should respond with the ClosingSigned they both agreed upon.
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed message")
|
|
}
|
|
if _, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned); !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected to receive closing signed message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Alice should be waiting on a single confirmation for the coop close tx.
|
|
notifier.ConfChan <- &chainntnfs.TxConfirmation{}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestChooseDeliveryScript tests that chooseDeliveryScript correctly errors
|
|
// when upfront and user set scripts that do not match are provided, allows
|
|
// matching values and returns appropriate values in the case where one or none
|
|
// are set.
|
|
func TestChooseDeliveryScript(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// generate non-zero scripts for testing.
|
|
script1 := genScript(t, p2SHAddress)
|
|
script2 := genScript(t, p2wshAddress)
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
userScript lnwire.DeliveryAddress
|
|
shutdownScript lnwire.DeliveryAddress
|
|
expectedScript lnwire.DeliveryAddress
|
|
expectedError error
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Neither set",
|
|
userScript: nil,
|
|
shutdownScript: nil,
|
|
expectedScript: nil,
|
|
expectedError: nil,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Both set and equal",
|
|
userScript: script1,
|
|
shutdownScript: script1,
|
|
expectedScript: script1,
|
|
expectedError: nil,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Both set and not equal",
|
|
userScript: script1,
|
|
shutdownScript: script2,
|
|
expectedScript: nil,
|
|
expectedError: chancloser.ErrUpfrontShutdownScriptMismatch,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Only upfront script",
|
|
userScript: nil,
|
|
shutdownScript: script1,
|
|
expectedScript: script1,
|
|
expectedError: nil,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Only user script",
|
|
userScript: script2,
|
|
shutdownScript: nil,
|
|
expectedScript: script2,
|
|
expectedError: nil,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, test := range tests {
|
|
test := test
|
|
|
|
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
script, err := chooseDeliveryScript(
|
|
test.shutdownScript, test.userScript,
|
|
)
|
|
if err != test.expectedError {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Expected: %v, got: %v", test.expectedError, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !bytes.Equal(script, test.expectedScript) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Expected: %x, got: %x", test.expectedScript, script)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestCustomShutdownScript tests that the delivery script of a shutdown
|
|
// message can be set to a specified address. It checks that setting a close
|
|
// script fails for channels which have an upfront shutdown script already set.
|
|
func TestCustomShutdownScript(t *testing.T) {
|
|
script := genScript(t, p2SHAddress)
|
|
|
|
// setShutdown is a function which sets the upfront shutdown address for
|
|
// the local channel.
|
|
setShutdown := func(a, b *channeldb.OpenChannel) {
|
|
a.LocalShutdownScript = script
|
|
b.RemoteShutdownScript = script
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
|
|
// update is a function used to set values on the channel set up for the
|
|
// test. It is used to set values for upfront shutdown addresses.
|
|
update func(a, b *channeldb.OpenChannel)
|
|
|
|
// userCloseScript is the address specified by the user.
|
|
userCloseScript lnwire.DeliveryAddress
|
|
|
|
// expectedScript is the address we expect to be set on the shutdown
|
|
// message.
|
|
expectedScript lnwire.DeliveryAddress
|
|
|
|
// expectedError is the error we expect, if any.
|
|
expectedError error
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "User set script",
|
|
update: noUpdate,
|
|
userCloseScript: script,
|
|
expectedScript: script,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "No user set script",
|
|
update: noUpdate,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Shutdown set, no user script",
|
|
update: setShutdown,
|
|
expectedScript: script,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Shutdown set, user script matches",
|
|
update: setShutdown,
|
|
userCloseScript: script,
|
|
expectedScript: script,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "Shutdown set, user script different",
|
|
update: setShutdown,
|
|
userCloseScript: []byte("different addr"),
|
|
expectedError: chancloser.ErrUpfrontShutdownScriptMismatch,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, test := range tests {
|
|
test := test
|
|
|
|
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
notifier := &mock.ChainNotifier{
|
|
SpendChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.SpendDetail),
|
|
EpochChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.BlockEpoch),
|
|
ConfChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.TxConfirmation),
|
|
}
|
|
broadcastTxChan := make(chan *wire.MsgTx)
|
|
|
|
mockSwitch := &mockMessageSwitch{}
|
|
|
|
// Open a channel.
|
|
alicePeer, bobChan, err := createTestPeer(
|
|
t, notifier, broadcastTxChan, test.update,
|
|
mockSwitch,
|
|
)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
chanPoint := bobChan.ChannelPoint()
|
|
chanID := lnwire.NewChanIDFromOutPoint(chanPoint)
|
|
mockLink := newMockUpdateHandler(chanID)
|
|
mockSwitch.links = append(mockSwitch.links, mockLink)
|
|
|
|
// Request initiator to cooperatively close the channel, with
|
|
// a specified delivery address.
|
|
updateChan := make(chan interface{}, 1)
|
|
errChan := make(chan error, 1)
|
|
closeCommand := htlcswitch.ChanClose{
|
|
CloseType: contractcourt.CloseRegular,
|
|
ChanPoint: chanPoint,
|
|
Updates: updateChan,
|
|
TargetFeePerKw: 12500,
|
|
DeliveryScript: test.userCloseScript,
|
|
Err: errChan,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Send the close command for the correct channel and check that a
|
|
// shutdown message is sent.
|
|
alicePeer.localCloseChanReqs <- &closeCommand
|
|
|
|
var msg lnwire.Message
|
|
select {
|
|
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
|
|
msg = outMsg.msg
|
|
case <-time.After(timeout):
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not receive shutdown message")
|
|
case err := <-errChan:
|
|
// Fail if we do not expect an error.
|
|
if err != test.expectedError {
|
|
t.Fatalf("error closing channel: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Terminate the test early if have received an error, no
|
|
// further action is expected.
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check that we have received a shutdown message.
|
|
shutdownMsg, ok := msg.(*lnwire.Shutdown)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected shutdown message, got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If the test has not specified an expected address, do not check
|
|
// whether the shutdown address matches. This covers the case where
|
|
// we expect shutdown to a random address and cannot match it.
|
|
if len(test.expectedScript) == 0 {
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check that the Shutdown message includes the expected delivery
|
|
// script.
|
|
if !bytes.Equal(test.expectedScript, shutdownMsg.Address) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected delivery script: %x, got: %x",
|
|
test.expectedScript, shutdownMsg.Address)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestStaticRemoteDowngrade tests that we downgrade our static remote feature
|
|
// bit to optional if we have legacy channels with a peer. This ensures that
|
|
// we can stay connected to peers that don't support the feature bit that we
|
|
// have channels with.
|
|
func TestStaticRemoteDowngrade(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
// We set the same legacy feature bits for all tests, since
|
|
// these are not relevant to our test scenario
|
|
rawLegacy = lnwire.NewRawFeatureVector(
|
|
lnwire.UpfrontShutdownScriptOptional,
|
|
)
|
|
legacy = lnwire.NewFeatureVector(rawLegacy, nil)
|
|
|
|
legacyCombinedOptional = lnwire.NewRawFeatureVector(
|
|
lnwire.UpfrontShutdownScriptOptional,
|
|
lnwire.StaticRemoteKeyOptional,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
rawFeatureOptional = lnwire.NewRawFeatureVector(
|
|
lnwire.StaticRemoteKeyOptional,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
featureOptional = lnwire.NewFeatureVector(
|
|
rawFeatureOptional, nil,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
rawFeatureRequired = lnwire.NewRawFeatureVector(
|
|
lnwire.StaticRemoteKeyRequired,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
featureRequired = lnwire.NewFeatureVector(
|
|
rawFeatureRequired, nil,
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
legacy bool
|
|
features *lnwire.FeatureVector
|
|
expectedInit *lnwire.Init
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "no legacy channel, static optional",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
features: featureOptional,
|
|
expectedInit: &lnwire.Init{
|
|
GlobalFeatures: rawLegacy,
|
|
Features: rawFeatureOptional,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "legacy channel, static optional",
|
|
legacy: true,
|
|
features: featureOptional,
|
|
expectedInit: &lnwire.Init{
|
|
GlobalFeatures: rawLegacy,
|
|
Features: rawFeatureOptional,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "no legacy channel, static required",
|
|
legacy: false,
|
|
features: featureRequired,
|
|
expectedInit: &lnwire.Init{
|
|
GlobalFeatures: rawLegacy,
|
|
Features: rawFeatureRequired,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
// In this case we need to flip our required bit to optional,
|
|
// this should also propagate to the legacy set of feature bits
|
|
// so we have proper consistency: a bit isn't set to optional
|
|
// in one field and required in the other.
|
|
{
|
|
name: "legacy channel, static required",
|
|
legacy: true,
|
|
features: featureRequired,
|
|
expectedInit: &lnwire.Init{
|
|
GlobalFeatures: legacyCombinedOptional,
|
|
Features: rawFeatureOptional,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, test := range tests {
|
|
test := test
|
|
|
|
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
writeBufferPool := pool.NewWriteBuffer(
|
|
pool.DefaultWriteBufferGCInterval,
|
|
pool.DefaultWriteBufferExpiryInterval,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
writePool := pool.NewWrite(
|
|
writeBufferPool, 1, timeout,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, writePool.Start())
|
|
|
|
mockConn := newMockConn(t, 1)
|
|
|
|
p := Brontide{
|
|
cfg: Config{
|
|
LegacyFeatures: legacy,
|
|
Features: test.features,
|
|
Conn: mockConn,
|
|
WritePool: writePool,
|
|
PongBuf: make([]byte, lnwire.MaxPongBytes),
|
|
},
|
|
log: peerLog,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var b bytes.Buffer
|
|
_, err := lnwire.WriteMessage(&b, test.expectedInit, 0)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// Send our init message, assert that we write our expected message
|
|
// and shutdown our write pool.
|
|
require.NoError(t, p.sendInitMsg(test.legacy))
|
|
mockConn.assertWrite(b.Bytes())
|
|
require.NoError(t, writePool.Stop())
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// genScript creates a script paying out to the address provided, which must
|
|
// be a valid address.
|
|
func genScript(t *testing.T, address string) lnwire.DeliveryAddress {
|
|
// Generate an address which can be used for testing.
|
|
deliveryAddr, err := btcutil.DecodeAddress(
|
|
address,
|
|
&chaincfg.TestNet3Params,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "invalid delivery address")
|
|
|
|
script, err := txscript.PayToAddrScript(deliveryAddr)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "cannot create script")
|
|
|
|
return script
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestPeerCustomMessage tests custom message exchange between peers.
|
|
func TestPeerCustomMessage(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// Set up node Alice.
|
|
dbAlice, err := channeldb.Open(t.TempDir())
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
aliceKey, err := btcec.NewPrivateKey()
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
writeBufferPool := pool.NewWriteBuffer(
|
|
pool.DefaultWriteBufferGCInterval,
|
|
pool.DefaultWriteBufferExpiryInterval,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
writePool := pool.NewWrite(
|
|
writeBufferPool, 1, timeout,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, writePool.Start())
|
|
|
|
readBufferPool := pool.NewReadBuffer(
|
|
pool.DefaultReadBufferGCInterval,
|
|
pool.DefaultReadBufferExpiryInterval,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
readPool := pool.NewRead(
|
|
readBufferPool, 1, timeout,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, readPool.Start())
|
|
|
|
mockConn := newMockConn(t, 1)
|
|
|
|
receivedCustomChan := make(chan *customMsg)
|
|
|
|
remoteKey := [33]byte{8}
|
|
|
|
notifier := &mock.ChainNotifier{
|
|
SpendChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.SpendDetail),
|
|
EpochChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.BlockEpoch),
|
|
ConfChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.TxConfirmation),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TODO(yy): change ChannelNotifier to be an interface.
|
|
channelNotifier := channelnotifier.New(dbAlice.ChannelStateDB())
|
|
require.NoError(t, channelNotifier.Start())
|
|
t.Cleanup(func() {
|
|
require.NoError(t, channelNotifier.Stop(),
|
|
"stop channel notifier failed")
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
alicePeer := NewBrontide(Config{
|
|
PubKeyBytes: remoteKey,
|
|
ChannelDB: dbAlice.ChannelStateDB(),
|
|
Addr: &lnwire.NetAddress{
|
|
IdentityKey: aliceKey.PubKey(),
|
|
},
|
|
PrunePersistentPeerConnection: func([33]byte) {},
|
|
Features: lnwire.EmptyFeatureVector(),
|
|
LegacyFeatures: lnwire.EmptyFeatureVector(),
|
|
WritePool: writePool,
|
|
ReadPool: readPool,
|
|
Conn: mockConn,
|
|
ChainNotifier: notifier,
|
|
HandleCustomMessage: func(
|
|
peer [33]byte, msg *lnwire.Custom) error {
|
|
|
|
receivedCustomChan <- &customMsg{
|
|
peer: peer,
|
|
msg: *msg,
|
|
}
|
|
return nil
|
|
},
|
|
PongBuf: make([]byte, lnwire.MaxPongBytes),
|
|
ChannelNotifier: channelNotifier,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Set up the init sequence.
|
|
go func() {
|
|
// Read init message.
|
|
<-mockConn.writtenMessages
|
|
|
|
// Write the init reply message.
|
|
initReplyMsg := lnwire.NewInitMessage(
|
|
lnwire.NewRawFeatureVector(
|
|
lnwire.DataLossProtectRequired,
|
|
),
|
|
lnwire.NewRawFeatureVector(),
|
|
)
|
|
var b bytes.Buffer
|
|
_, err = lnwire.WriteMessage(&b, initReplyMsg, 0)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
mockConn.readMessages <- b.Bytes()
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
// Start the peer.
|
|
require.NoError(t, alicePeer.Start())
|
|
|
|
// Send a custom message.
|
|
customMsg, err := lnwire.NewCustom(
|
|
lnwire.MessageType(40000), []byte{1, 2, 3},
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, alicePeer.SendMessageLazy(false, customMsg))
|
|
|
|
// Verify that it is passed down to the noise layer correctly.
|
|
writtenMsg := <-mockConn.writtenMessages
|
|
require.Equal(t, []byte{0x9c, 0x40, 0x1, 0x2, 0x3}, writtenMsg)
|
|
|
|
// Receive a custom message.
|
|
receivedCustomMsg, err := lnwire.NewCustom(
|
|
lnwire.MessageType(40001), []byte{4, 5, 6},
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
receivedData := []byte{0x9c, 0x41, 0x4, 0x5, 0x6}
|
|
mockConn.readMessages <- receivedData
|
|
|
|
// Verify that it is propagated up to the custom message handler.
|
|
receivedCustom := <-receivedCustomChan
|
|
require.Equal(t, remoteKey, receivedCustom.peer)
|
|
require.Equal(t, receivedCustomMsg, &receivedCustom.msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestUpdateNextRevocation checks that the method `updateNextRevocation` is
|
|
// behave as expected.
|
|
func TestUpdateNextRevocation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
require := require.New(t)
|
|
|
|
// TODO(yy): create interface for lnwallet.LightningChannel so we can
|
|
// easily mock it without the following setups.
|
|
notifier := &mock.ChainNotifier{
|
|
SpendChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.SpendDetail),
|
|
EpochChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.BlockEpoch),
|
|
ConfChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.TxConfirmation),
|
|
}
|
|
broadcastTxChan := make(chan *wire.MsgTx)
|
|
mockSwitch := &mockMessageSwitch{}
|
|
|
|
alicePeer, bobChan, err := createTestPeer(
|
|
t, notifier, broadcastTxChan, noUpdate, mockSwitch,
|
|
)
|
|
require.NoError(err, "unable to create test channels")
|
|
|
|
// testChannel is used to test the updateNextRevocation function.
|
|
testChannel := bobChan.State()
|
|
|
|
// Update the next revocation for a known channel should give us no
|
|
// error.
|
|
err = alicePeer.updateNextRevocation(testChannel)
|
|
require.NoError(err, "expected no error")
|
|
|
|
// Test an error is returned when the chanID cannot be found in
|
|
// `activeChannels` map.
|
|
testChannel.FundingOutpoint = wire.OutPoint{Index: 0}
|
|
err = alicePeer.updateNextRevocation(testChannel)
|
|
require.Error(err, "expected an error")
|
|
|
|
// Test an error is returned when the chanID's corresponding channel is
|
|
// nil.
|
|
testChannel.FundingOutpoint = wire.OutPoint{Index: 1}
|
|
chanID := lnwire.NewChanIDFromOutPoint(&testChannel.FundingOutpoint)
|
|
alicePeer.activeChannels.Store(chanID, nil)
|
|
|
|
err = alicePeer.updateNextRevocation(testChannel)
|
|
require.Error(err, "expected an error")
|
|
|
|
// TODO(yy): should also test `InitNextRevocation` is called on
|
|
// `lnwallet.LightningWallet` once it's interfaced.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TODO(yy): add test for `addActiveChannel` and `handleNewActiveChannel` once
|
|
// we have interfaced `lnwallet.LightningChannel` and
|
|
// `*contractcourt.ChainArbitrator`.
|
|
|
|
// TestHandleNewPendingChannel checks the method `handleNewPendingChannel`
|
|
// behaves as expected.
|
|
func TestHandleNewPendingChannel(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// Create three channel IDs for testing.
|
|
chanIDActive := lnwire.ChannelID{0}
|
|
chanIDNotExist := lnwire.ChannelID{1}
|
|
chanIDPending := lnwire.ChannelID{2}
|
|
|
|
// Create a test brontide.
|
|
dummyConfig := Config{}
|
|
peer := NewBrontide(dummyConfig)
|
|
|
|
// Create the test state.
|
|
peer.activeChannels.Store(chanIDActive, &lnwallet.LightningChannel{})
|
|
peer.activeChannels.Store(chanIDPending, nil)
|
|
|
|
// Assert test state, we should have two channels store, one active and
|
|
// one pending.
|
|
require.Equal(t, 2, peer.activeChannels.Len())
|
|
|
|
testCases := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
chanID lnwire.ChannelID
|
|
|
|
// expectChanAdded specifies whether this chanID will be added
|
|
// to the peer's state.
|
|
expectChanAdded bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "noop on active channel",
|
|
chanID: chanIDActive,
|
|
expectChanAdded: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "noop on pending channel",
|
|
chanID: chanIDPending,
|
|
expectChanAdded: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "new channel should be added",
|
|
chanID: chanIDNotExist,
|
|
expectChanAdded: true,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tc := range testCases {
|
|
tc := tc
|
|
|
|
// Create a request for testing.
|
|
errChan := make(chan error, 1)
|
|
req := &newChannelMsg{
|
|
channelID: tc.chanID,
|
|
err: errChan,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
require := require.New(t)
|
|
|
|
// Get the number of channels before mutating the
|
|
// state.
|
|
numChans := peer.activeChannels.Len()
|
|
|
|
// Call the method.
|
|
peer.handleNewPendingChannel(req)
|
|
|
|
// Add one if we expect this channel to be added.
|
|
if tc.expectChanAdded {
|
|
numChans++
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Assert the number of channels is correct.
|
|
require.Equal(numChans, peer.activeChannels.Len())
|
|
|
|
// Assert the request's error chan is closed.
|
|
err, ok := <-req.err
|
|
require.False(ok, "expect err chan to be closed")
|
|
require.NoError(err, "expect no error")
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestHandleRemovePendingChannel checks the method
|
|
// `handleRemovePendingChannel` behaves as expected.
|
|
func TestHandleRemovePendingChannel(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// Create three channel IDs for testing.
|
|
chanIDActive := lnwire.ChannelID{0}
|
|
chanIDNotExist := lnwire.ChannelID{1}
|
|
chanIDPending := lnwire.ChannelID{2}
|
|
|
|
// Create a test brontide.
|
|
dummyConfig := Config{}
|
|
peer := NewBrontide(dummyConfig)
|
|
|
|
// Create the test state.
|
|
peer.activeChannels.Store(chanIDActive, &lnwallet.LightningChannel{})
|
|
peer.activeChannels.Store(chanIDPending, nil)
|
|
|
|
// Assert test state, we should have two channels store, one active and
|
|
// one pending.
|
|
require.Equal(t, 2, peer.activeChannels.Len())
|
|
|
|
testCases := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
chanID lnwire.ChannelID
|
|
|
|
// expectDeleted specifies whether this chanID will be removed
|
|
// from the peer's state.
|
|
expectDeleted bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "noop on active channel",
|
|
chanID: chanIDActive,
|
|
expectDeleted: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "pending channel should be removed",
|
|
chanID: chanIDPending,
|
|
expectDeleted: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "noop on non-exist channel",
|
|
chanID: chanIDNotExist,
|
|
expectDeleted: false,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tc := range testCases {
|
|
tc := tc
|
|
|
|
// Create a request for testing.
|
|
errChan := make(chan error, 1)
|
|
req := &newChannelMsg{
|
|
channelID: tc.chanID,
|
|
err: errChan,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
require := require.New(t)
|
|
|
|
// Get the number of channels before mutating the
|
|
// state.
|
|
numChans := peer.activeChannels.Len()
|
|
|
|
// Call the method.
|
|
peer.handleRemovePendingChannel(req)
|
|
|
|
// Minus one if we expect this channel to be removed.
|
|
if tc.expectDeleted {
|
|
numChans--
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Assert the number of channels is correct.
|
|
require.Equal(numChans, peer.activeChannels.Len())
|
|
|
|
// Assert the request's error chan is closed.
|
|
err, ok := <-req.err
|
|
require.False(ok, "expect err chan to be closed")
|
|
require.NoError(err, "expect no error")
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|