mirror of
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd.git
synced 2024-11-19 09:53:54 +01:00
dbeafe8832
We rename the field Capacity on local channels to Balance, define a new method ChannelInfo on the manager config that let us query the database for our latest channels state. Using this we will use the current local balance instead of the channel capacity when doing allocation calculations.
167 lines
3.6 KiB
Go
167 lines
3.6 KiB
Go
package autopilot
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
prand "math/rand"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/btcsuite/btcutil"
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwire"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestConstraintsChannelBudget(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
prand.Seed(time.Now().Unix())
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
minChanSize = 0
|
|
maxChanSize = btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin)
|
|
|
|
chanLimit = 3
|
|
|
|
threshold = 0.5
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
constraints := NewConstraints(
|
|
minChanSize,
|
|
maxChanSize,
|
|
chanLimit,
|
|
0,
|
|
threshold,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
randChanID := func() lnwire.ShortChannelID {
|
|
return lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(uint64(prand.Int63()))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
testCases := []struct {
|
|
channels []LocalChannel
|
|
walletAmt btcutil.Amount
|
|
|
|
needMore bool
|
|
amtAvailable btcutil.Amount
|
|
numMore uint32
|
|
}{
|
|
// Many available funds, but already have too many active open
|
|
// channels.
|
|
{
|
|
[]LocalChannel{
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Balance: btcutil.Amount(prand.Int31()),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Balance: btcutil.Amount(prand.Int31()),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Balance: btcutil.Amount(prand.Int31()),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin * 10),
|
|
false,
|
|
0,
|
|
0,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
// Ratio of funds in channels and total funds meets the
|
|
// threshold.
|
|
{
|
|
[]LocalChannel{
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Balance: btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Balance: btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin * 2),
|
|
false,
|
|
0,
|
|
0,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
// Ratio of funds in channels and total funds is below the
|
|
// threshold. We have 10 BTC allocated amongst channels and
|
|
// funds, atm. We're targeting 50%, so 5 BTC should be
|
|
// allocated. Only 1 BTC is atm, so 4 BTC should be
|
|
// recommended. We should also request 2 more channels as the
|
|
// limit is 3.
|
|
{
|
|
[]LocalChannel{
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Balance: btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin * 9),
|
|
true,
|
|
btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin * 4),
|
|
2,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
// Ratio of funds in channels and total funds is below the
|
|
// threshold. We have 14 BTC total amongst the wallet's
|
|
// balance, and our currently opened channels. Since we're
|
|
// targeting a 50% allocation, we should commit 7 BTC. The
|
|
// current channels commit 4 BTC, so we should expected 3 BTC
|
|
// to be committed. We should only request a single additional
|
|
// channel as the limit is 3.
|
|
{
|
|
[]LocalChannel{
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Balance: btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Balance: btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin * 3),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin * 10),
|
|
true,
|
|
btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin * 3),
|
|
1,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
// Ratio of funds in channels and total funds is above the
|
|
// threshold.
|
|
{
|
|
[]LocalChannel{
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Balance: btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ChanID: randChanID(),
|
|
Balance: btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin),
|
|
false,
|
|
0,
|
|
0,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i, testCase := range testCases {
|
|
amtToAllocate, numMore := constraints.ChannelBudget(
|
|
testCase.channels, testCase.walletAmt,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if amtToAllocate != testCase.amtAvailable {
|
|
t.Fatalf("test #%v: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
i, testCase.amtAvailable, amtToAllocate)
|
|
}
|
|
if numMore != testCase.numMore {
|
|
t.Fatalf("test #%v: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
i, testCase.numMore, numMore)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|