With this change, transactions created via craftSweepTx will be
standard. Previously, p2wsh/p2pkh scripts passed in via SendCoins would
be weighted as p2wpkh scripts. With a feerate of 1 sat/vbyte,
transactions returned would be non-standard. Luckily, the critical
sweeper subsystem only used p2wpkh scripts so this only affected
callers from the rpcserver.
Also added is an integration test that fails if SendCoins manages
to generate a non-standard transaction. All script types are now
accounted for in getWeightEstimate, which now errors if an unknown
script type is passed in.
In this commit, we add a new option for the existing confirmation
notification system that optionally allows the caller to specify that a
block should be included as well.
The only quirk w/ the implementation here is the neutrino backend:
usually we get filtered blocks, we so need to first fetch the block
again so we can deliver the full block to the notifier. On the notifier
end, it'll only be checking for the transactions we care about, to
sending a full block doesn't affect the correctness.
We also extend the `testBatchConfirmationNotification` test to assert
that a block is only included if the caller specifies it.
Before this commit, we we were trying to sweep an anchor output, and
that output was spent by someone else (not the sweeper), then we would
report this back to the original resolver (allowing it to be cleaned
up), and also remove the set of inputs spent by that transaction from
the set we need to sweep.
However, it's possible that if a user is spending unconfirmed outputs,
then the wallet is holding onto an invalid transaction, as the outputs
that were used as inputs have been double spent elsewhere.
In this commit, we fix this issue by recursively removing all descendant
transactions of our past sweeps that have an intersecting input set as
the spending transaction. In cases where a user spent an unconfirmed
output to funding a channel, and that output was a descendant of the now
swept anchor output, the funds will now properly be marked as available.
Fixes#6241
This commit was previously split into the following parts to ease
review:
- 2d746f68: replace imports
- 4008f0fd: use ecdsa.Signature
- 849e33d1: remove btcec.S256()
- b8f6ebbd: use v2 library correctly
- fa80bca9: bump go modules
This aims to cover an edge case and also serves as an optimization of
what happens when an input that was offered to the Sweeper with an
exclusive group is re-offered without one. This happens every time we
attempt to sweep the different possible anchors of a channel at the time
of broadcast, as we don't know which commitment transaction will end up
confirming in the chain. Once the commitment transaction confirms
however, we know which anchor output to act upon and re-offer it to the
Sweeper without an exclusive group. At this point, the Sweeper will
continue to attempt sweeping the other anchor output versions even know
we know they are not valid.
With go 1.17 a change to the build flags was implemented:
https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/draft-gobuild.md
The formatter now automatically adds the forward-compatible build tag
format and the linter checks for them, so we need to include them in our
code.
This commit updates call-sites to use the proper dust limits for
various script types. This also updates the default dust limit used
in the funding flow to be 354 satoshis instead of 573 satoshis.
This to more easily track mismatches if constants and get more accurate
fee estimates for the two channel types.
The non-anchor weight estimates will now be smaller, this is okay since
these constants are only being used for fee estimation (and will now be
more accurate).
We risked deadlocking on shutdown if a client (in our case a contract
resolver) attempted to schedule a sweep of an input after the
ChainNotifier had been shut down. This would cause the `collector`
goroutine to exit, and not handle incoming requests, causing a deadlock
(since the ChainArbitrator is being stopped before the Sweeper in the
server).
To fix this we could change the order these subsystems are stopped, but
this doesn't ensure there aren't other clients that could end up in the
same deadlock scenario. So instead we keep handling the incoming
requests even after the collector has exited (immediatly returning an
error), until the sweeper is signalled to shutdown.
This add a test for inputs that gets re-ordered because the inputs with
required TxOuts must be added first.
We add a new step to the test that checks that all inputs were signed at
the correct tx input index.
This test would fail without the previous commit.
This commit fixes an issue that would arise if inputs without required
TxOuts would be swept together with inputs with required TxOuts. In this
case we would add the required ones first to the transaction, but did
not change the order we signed the inputs, resulting in signing the
wrong input index.
Now that inputs might have accompanied outputs to be added to the sweep
tx, we add them to the sweep transaction first, and account for it when
calculating the change amount.
If inputs require outputs to be added at the same time, this will
change the weight and amount calculations, so we must account for that.
We wait to get the weight estimator for the sweep tx until needed,
such that we can easily choose whether to include a change output or not
in the estimate. This is needed for the case where the second level
transactions can pay for their own fee, so no change output is needed.
Similarly as with kvdb.View this commits adds a reset closure to the
kvdb.Update call in order to be able to reset external state if the
underlying db backend needs to retry the transaction.
This commit adds a reset() closure to the kvdb.View function which will
be called before each retry (including the first) of the view
transaction. The reset() closure can be used to reset external state
(eg slices or maps) where the view closure puts intermediate results.
Extend the fee estimator to take into account parent transactions with
their weights and fees.
Do not try to cpfp parent transactions that have a higher fee rate than
the sweep tx fee rate.
