This is yet another commit that packs a symmetric structure into
a Dual. This is the last one needed for the time being to consolidate
Num{X}UpdatesPendingOn{Y} functions into a single one.
This commit, like the last one packs the update logs into a symmetric
Dual structure. This will allow us to index into them more concisely
in higher order logic.
This commit packs the LightningChannel's localCommitmentChain and
remoteCommitmentChain into a Dual structure for better symmetric
access. This will be leveraged by an upcoming commit where we want
to more concisely express how we compute the number of pending
updates.
In this commit, we start to thread thru the new aux tap leaf structures to all relevant areas. This includes: commitment outputs, resolution creation, breach handling, and also HTLC scripts.
In this commit, we add a TLV blob to the PaymentDescriptor struct. We also now thread through this value from the UpdateAddHTLC message to the PaymentDescriptor mapping, and the other way around.
In this commit, we add a new AuxLeafStore which can be used to dynamically fetch the latest aux leaves for a given state. This is useful for custom channel types that will store some extra information in the form of a custom blob, then will use that information to derive the new leaf tapscript leaves that may be attached to reach state.
In this commit, we also add the custom TLV blob to the internal commitment struct that we use within the in-memory commitment linked list.
This'll be useful to ensure that we're tracking the current blob for our in memory commitment for when we need to write it to disk.
In this commit, we update all the taproot scripts to also accept an
optional aux leaf. This aux leaf can be used to add more redemption
paths for advanced channels, or just as an extra commitment space.
With this commit, the channel is now aware of if it's a musig2 channel, that also has a tapscript root. We'll need to always pass in the tapscript root each time we: make the funding output, sign a new state, and also verify a new state.
This isn't hooked up yet to the funding manager, but with this commit, we can now start to write internal unit tests that handle musig2 channels with a tapscript root.
In this commit, we rename the files as assembler.go houses the primary
interfaces/abstractions of the package. In the rest of the codebase,
this file is near uniformly called interface.go, so we rename the file
to make the repo more digestible at a scan.
In this commit, we expand some of the existing chan sync tests to cover
taproot channels (the others already did). Along the way, we always
assert that the `PartialSig` is populated on retransmission. In
addition, we now send the new commit sig rather than the existing
in-memory one to test the new logic that re-signs the commitment.
In this commit, we fix an existing bug with the taproot channel type
that can cause force closes if a peer disconnects while attempting to
send the commitment signature.
Before this commit, since the `PartialSig` we send is never committed to
disk, the version read wouldn't contain the musig2 partial sig. We never
write these signatures to disk, as each time we make a new session, we
need to generate fresh nonces to avoid nonce-reuse.
Due to the above interaction, if we went to re-send a signature after a
disconnection, the `CommitSig` message we sent wouldn't actually contain
a `PartialSigWithNonce`, causing a protocol error.
This commit fixes the instantiation of the BlindingPoint member of
PaymentDescriptor during the conversion from persisted LogUpdates.
Previously, the blinding point was not set correctly. The test from the
previous commit is also updated to now assert that this behaviour is now
correct.
This commit introduces a new API to return information on which party opened
the channel using the new ChannelParty type. It does not change the underlying
structure of how we store this information.
This commit breaks the ChannelConstraints structure into two
sub-structures that reflect the fundamental differences in how
these parameters are used. On its face it may not seem necessary,
however the distinction introduced here is relevant for how we
will be implementing the Dynamic Commitments proposal.
With this PR we might call the stop method even when the start
method of a subsystem did not successfully finish therefore we
need to make sure we guard the stop methods for potential panics
if some variables are not initialized in the contructors of the
subsystems.
