Add additional comment to `lnclic addinvoice`'s `--private` flag warning
about including a large number of private channel hints when using zero
ammounts.
Also added a comment to the `private` field in the `Invoice` proto
message.
This updates the RPCAcceptor to send the correct commitment type
even if the zero-conf or scid-alias channel types are set. This also
adds two bools to the ChannelAcceptRequest struct that denotes whether
the funder set the zero-conf and scid-alias channel types.
In this commit, we change the flow of the rpc middleware registration
a bit. In order to allow a client to add rpc middleware interceptors in
a deterministic order, we now make the server send a "registration
complete" message to the client after compeleting the registration
process so that the client knows when it can go ahead and register the
next client.
feature-bit channels
This allows opening zero-conf chan-type, scid-alias chan-type, and
scid-alias feature-bit channels. scid-alias chan-type channels are
required to be private. Two paths are available for opening a zero-conf
channel:
* explicit chan-type negotiation
* LDK carve-out where chan-types are not used, LND is on the
receiving end, and a ChannelAcceptor is used to enable zero-conf
When a zero-conf channel is negotiated, the funding manager:
* sends a FundingLocked with an alias
* waits for a FundingLocked from the remote peer
* calls addToRouterGraph to persist the channel using our alias in
the graph. The peer's alias is used to send them a ChannelUpdate.
* wait for six confirmations. If public, the alias edge in the
graph is deleted and replaced (not atomically) with the confirmed
edge. Our policy is also read-and-replaced, but the counterparty's
policy won't exist until they send it to us.
When a scid-alias-feature channel is negotiated, the funding manager:
* sends a FundingLocked with an alias:
* calls addToRouterGraph, sends ChannelUpdate with the confirmed SCID
since it exists.
* when six confirmations occurs, the edge is deleted and re-inserted
since the peer may have sent us an alias ChannelUpdate that we are
storing in the graph.
Since it is possible for a user to toggle the scid-alias-feature-bit
to on while channels exist in the funding manager, care has been taken
to ensure that an alias is ALWAYS sent in the funding_locked message
if this happens.
In this commit, we start to ignore the option to allow the caller to use
the legacy onion payload. The new payload is much more flexible and
efficient, so there's really no reason to still use it, other than for
backwards compatibility tests. Our existing tests that exercise the
legacy feature uses a build tag, which forces nodes to not advertise the
new payload format, which then forces path finding to include the legacy
payload, so we can be confident that route is still being tested.
The existence of this option (which actually makes the TLV payload
opt-in for `SendToRoute` users) makes it harder to remove it from the
protocol all together. With this PR, we take a step forward to allowing
such a change which is being tracked on the spec level at:
https://github.com/lightning/bolts/pull/962.
In a future release, we'll move to remove the field all together.
Ignoring the field today doesn't seem to have any clear downsides, as
most payments always include the MPP payload (due to payment secrets),
so this shouldn't impact users in a significant way.
In this commit, we add a new field to the WalletBalance call that
permits users to account for the set of outputs that may be locked due
to a pending transaction. Without this field any time users locked
outputs for things like PSBT signing, then they disappear from the
WalletBalance call, which may cause a panic.
In this commit, we increase the legacy fee limit threshold (the amount
below which we'll allow 100% of funds to go to fees for the non-v2 RPC
calls) from 50 sats to 1k sats.
When updating the channel routing policy, we encounter an inaccurate
precision error when calculating the routing fee. The issue stems from
the way the IEEE 754 standard works.
The solution here is to add a uint64 parameter (as mentioned in the
issue) and keep the float64 fee_rate parameter but rounding the product
of the base and fee rate.
This commit adds a new unique intercept message ID that is different for
each message sent to an RPC middleware. This will allow us to re-purpose
the existing request ID field into its original intention, which was to
have a unique ID for a full gRPC request/response pair or gRPC stream as
a whole.
