mirrors/lnd
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd.git synced 2024-11-19 18:10:34 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

multi: remove breach tx arg from NewBreachRetribution args

Browse Source 
This commit removes the breach transaction from the
arguments passed to NewBreachRetribution. We already
keep all prior remote commitments on disk in the
commitment log, and load that transaction from disk
inside the method. In practice, the one loaded from
disk will be the same one that is passed in by the
caller, so there should be no change in behavior
as we've already derived the appropriate state number.

This changes makes integration with the watchtower
client simpler, since we no longer need to acquire
the breaching commitment transaction to be able to
construct the BreachRetribution. This simplifies
not only the logic surrounding transient backsups,
but also on startup (and later, retroactively
backing up historic updates).
This commit is contained in:
Conner Fromknecht 2018-12-19 21:50:46 -08:00
parent 9f7d2f6cbc
commit eb2f5cecf6
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: E7D737B67FA592C7
4 changed files with 8 additions and 14 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
breacharbiter_test.go
View File

@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ func TestBreachSecondLevelTransfer(t *testing.T) {
// Notify the breach arbiter about the breach.
retribution, err := lnwallet.NewBreachRetribution(
alice.State(), height, forceCloseTx, 1)
alice.State(), height, 1)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create breach retribution: %v", err)
}

8
contractcourt/chain_watcher.go
View File

@ -725,18 +725,14 @@ func (c *chainWatcher) dispatchContractBreach(spendEvent *chainntnfs.SpendDetail
return fmt.Errorf("unable to mark channel as borked: %v", err)
}
var (
commitTxBroadcast = spendEvent.SpendingTx
spendHeight = uint32(spendEvent.SpendingHeight)
)
spendHeight := uint32(spendEvent.SpendingHeight)
// Create a new reach retribution struct which contains all the data
// needed to swiftly bring the cheating peer to justice.
//
// TODO(roasbeef): move to same package
retribution, err := lnwallet.NewBreachRetribution(
c.cfg.chanState, broadcastStateNum, commitTxBroadcast,
spendHeight,
c.cfg.chanState, broadcastStateNum, spendHeight,
)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("unable to create breach retribution: %v", err)

9
lnwallet/channel.go
View File

@ -1897,11 +1897,8 @@ type BreachRetribution struct {
// passed channel, at a particular revoked state number, and one which targets
// the passed commitment transaction.
func NewBreachRetribution(chanState *channeldb.OpenChannel, stateNum uint64,
broadcastCommitment *wire.MsgTx,
breachHeight uint32) (*BreachRetribution, error) {
commitHash := broadcastCommitment.TxHash()
// Query the on-disk revocation log for the snapshot which was recorded
// at this particular state num.
revokedSnapshot, err := chanState.FindPreviousState(stateNum)
@ -1909,6 +1906,8 @@ func NewBreachRetribution(chanState *channeldb.OpenChannel, stateNum uint64,
return nil, err
}
commitHash := revokedSnapshot.CommitTx.TxHash()
// With the state number broadcast known, we can now derive/restore the
// proper revocation preimage necessary to sweep the remote party's
// output.
@ -1952,7 +1951,7 @@ func NewBreachRetribution(chanState *channeldb.OpenChannel, stateNum uint64,
remoteOutpoint := wire.OutPoint{
Hash: commitHash,
}
for i, txOut := range broadcastCommitment.TxOut {
for i, txOut := range revokedSnapshot.CommitTx.TxOut {
switch {
case bytes.Equal(txOut.PkScript, localPkScript):
localOutpoint.Index = uint32(i)
@ -2090,7 +2089,7 @@ func NewBreachRetribution(chanState *channeldb.OpenChannel, stateNum uint64,
// swiftly bring justice to the cheating remote party.
return &BreachRetribution{
ChainHash: chanState.ChainHash,
BreachTransaction: broadcastCommitment,
BreachTransaction: revokedSnapshot.CommitTx,
BreachHeight: breachHeight,
RevokedStateNum: stateNum,
PendingHTLCs: revokedSnapshot.Htlcs,

3
lnwallet/channel_test.go
View File

@ -5389,7 +5389,6 @@ func TestNewBreachRetributionSkipsDustHtlcs(t *testing.T) {
// At this point, we'll capture the current state number, as well as
// the current commitment.
revokedCommit := bobChannel.channelState.LocalCommitment.CommitTx
revokedStateNum := aliceChannel.channelState.LocalCommitment.CommitHeight
// We'll now have Bob settle those HTLC's to Alice and then advance
@ -5411,7 +5410,7 @@ func TestNewBreachRetributionSkipsDustHtlcs(t *testing.T) {
// At this point, we'll now simulate a contract breach by Bob using the
// NewBreachRetribution method.
breachRet, err := NewBreachRetribution(
aliceChannel.channelState, revokedStateNum, revokedCommit, 100,
aliceChannel.channelState, revokedStateNum, 100,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create breach retribution: %v", err)