mirror of
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd.git
synced 2025-02-24 06:47:44 +01:00
discovery: add detailed comment.
Describe why it is ok to resurrect zombie channels based on the timestamp of the `ReplyChannelRange` msg although its not verifiable data.
This commit is contained in:
parent
44413868c7
commit
d906010508
1 changed files with 15 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -2143,6 +2143,21 @@ func (c *ChannelGraph) FilterKnownChanIDs(chansInfo []ChannelUpdateInfo,
|
|||
zombieIndex, scid,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO(ziggie): Make sure that for the strict
|
||||
// pruning case we compare the pubkeys and
|
||||
// whether the right timestamp is not older than
|
||||
// the `ChannelPruneExpiry`.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// NOTE: The timestamp data has no verification
|
||||
// attached to it in the `ReplyChannelRange` msg
|
||||
// so we are trusting this data at this point.
|
||||
// However it is not critical because we are
|
||||
// just removing the channel from the db when
|
||||
// the timestamps are more recent. During the
|
||||
// querying of the gossip msg verification
|
||||
// happens as usual.
|
||||
// However we should start punishing peers when
|
||||
// they don't provide us honest data ?
|
||||
isStillZombie := isZombieChan(
|
||||
info.Node1UpdateTimestamp,
|
||||
info.Node2UpdateTimestamp,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue