lntemp+itest: refactor testInvoiceSubscriptions

lntemp/harness.go

@@ -1442,3 +1442,36 @@ func (h *HarnessTest) OpenMultiChannelsAsync(
 
 	return channelPoints
 }
+
+// ReceiveInvoiceUpdate waits until a message is received on the subscribe
+// invoice stream or the timeout is reached.
+func (h *HarnessTest) ReceiveInvoiceUpdate(
+	stream rpc.InvoiceUpdateClient) *lnrpc.Invoice {
+
+	chanMsg := make(chan *lnrpc.Invoice)
+	errChan := make(chan error)
+	go func() {
+		// Consume one message. This will block until the message is
+		// received.
+		resp, err := stream.Recv()
+		if err != nil {
+			errChan <- err
+			return
+		}
+		chanMsg <- resp
+	}()
+
+	select {
+	case <-time.After(DefaultTimeout):
+		require.Fail(h, "timeout", "timeout receiving invoice update")
+
+	case err := <-errChan:
+		require.Failf(h, "err from stream",
+			"received err from stream: %v", err)
+
+	case updateMsg := <-chanMsg:
+		return updateMsg
+	}
+
+	return nil
+}

lntemp/rpc/lnd.go

@@ -494,3 +494,26 @@ func (h *HarnessRPC) UpdateChannelPolicy(
 
 	return resp
 }
+
+type InvoiceUpdateClient lnrpc.Lightning_SubscribeInvoicesClient
+
+// SubscribeInvoices creates a subscription client for invoice events and
+// asserts its creation.
+//
+// NOTE: make sure to subscribe an invoice as early as possible as it takes
+// some time for the lnd to create the subscription client. If an invoice is
+// added right after the subscription, it may be missed. However, if AddIndex
+// or SettleIndex is used in the request, it will be fine as a backlog will
+// always be sent.
+func (h *HarnessRPC) SubscribeInvoices(
+	req *lnrpc.InvoiceSubscription) InvoiceUpdateClient {
+
+	// SubscribeInvoices needs to have the context alive for the
+	// entire test case as the returned client will be used for send and
+	// receive events stream. Thus we use runCtx here instead of a timeout
+	// context.
+	client, err := h.LN.SubscribeInvoices(h.runCtx, req)
+	require.NoError(h, err, "unable to create invoice subscription client")
+
+	return client
+}

lntest/itest/list_on_test.go

@@ -187,4 +187,8 @@ var allTestCasesTemp = []*lntemp.TestCase{
 		Name:     "immediate payment after channel opened",
 		TestFunc: testPaymentFollowingChannelOpen,
 	},
+	{
+		Name:     "invoice update subscription",
+		TestFunc: testInvoiceSubscriptions,
+	},
 }

lntest/itest/lnd_payment_test.go

@@ -511,182 +511,86 @@ func testBidirectionalAsyncPayments(net *lntest.NetworkHarness, t *harnessTest)
 	closeChannelAndAssert(t, net, net.Alice, chanPoint, false)
 }
 
-func testInvoiceSubscriptions(net *lntest.NetworkHarness, t *harnessTest) {
+func testInvoiceSubscriptions(ht *lntemp.HarnessTest) {
-	ctxb := context.Background()
-
 	const chanAmt = btcutil.Amount(500000)
 
-	// Open a channel with 500k satoshis between Alice and Bob with Alice
+	alice, bob := ht.Alice, ht.Bob
-	// being the sole funder of the channel.
-	chanPoint := openChannelAndAssert(
-		t, net, net.Alice, net.Bob,
-		lntest.OpenChannelParams{
-			Amt: chanAmt,
-		},
-	)
-
-	// Next create a new invoice for Bob requesting 1k satoshis.
-	// TODO(roasbeef): make global list of invoices for each node to re-use
-	// and avoid collisions
-	const paymentAmt = 1000
-	invoice := &lnrpc.Invoice{
-		Memo:      "testing",
-		RPreimage: makeFakePayHash(t),
-		Value:     paymentAmt,
-	}
-	ctxt, _ := context.WithTimeout(ctxb, defaultTimeout)
-	invoiceResp, err := net.Bob.AddInvoice(ctxt, invoice)
-	if err != nil {
-		t.Fatalf("unable to add invoice: %v", err)
-	}
-	lastAddIndex := invoiceResp.AddIndex
 
 	// Create a new invoice subscription client for Bob, the notification
 	// should be dispatched shortly below.
 	req := &lnrpc.InvoiceSubscription{}
-	ctx, cancelInvoiceSubscription := context.WithCancel(ctxb)
+	bobInvoiceSubscription := bob.RPC.SubscribeInvoices(req)
-	bobInvoiceSubscription, err := net.Bob.SubscribeInvoices(ctx, req)
+
-	if err != nil {
+	// Open a channel with 500k satoshis between Alice and Bob with Alice
-		t.Fatalf("unable to subscribe to bob's invoice updates: %v", err)
+	// being the sole funder of the channel.
+	chanPoint := ht.OpenChannel(
+		alice, bob, lntemp.OpenChannelParams{Amt: chanAmt},
+	)
+
+	// Next create a new invoice for Bob requesting 1k satoshis.
+	const paymentAmt = 1000
+	invoice := &lnrpc.Invoice{
+		Memo:      "testing",
+		RPreimage: ht.Random32Bytes(),
+		Value:     paymentAmt,
 	}
+	invoiceResp := bob.RPC.AddInvoice(invoice)
+	lastAddIndex := invoiceResp.AddIndex
 
-	var settleIndex uint64
+	// With the above invoice added, we should receive an update event.
-	quit := make(chan struct{})
+	invoiceUpdate := ht.ReceiveInvoiceUpdate(bobInvoiceSubscription)
-	updateSent := make(chan struct{})
+	require.NotEqual(ht, lnrpc.Invoice_SETTLED, invoiceUpdate.State,
-	go func() {
+		"invoice should not be settled")
-		invoiceUpdate, err := bobInvoiceSubscription.Recv()
-		select {
-		case <-quit:
-			// Received cancellation
-			return
-		default:
-		}
-
-		if err != nil {
-			t.Fatalf("unable to recv invoice update: %v", err)
-		}
-
-		// The invoice update should exactly match the invoice created
-		// above, but should now be settled and have SettleDate
-		if !invoiceUpdate.Settled { // nolint:staticcheck
-			t.Fatalf("invoice not settled but should be")
-		}
-		if invoiceUpdate.SettleDate == 0 {
-			t.Fatalf("invoice should have non zero settle date, but doesn't")
-		}
-
-		if !bytes.Equal(invoiceUpdate.RPreimage, invoice.RPreimage) {
-			t.Fatalf("payment preimages don't match: expected %v, got %v",
-				invoice.RPreimage, invoiceUpdate.RPreimage)
-		}
-
-		if invoiceUpdate.SettleIndex == 0 {
-			t.Fatalf("invoice should have settle index")
-		}
-
-		settleIndex = invoiceUpdate.SettleIndex
-
-		close(updateSent)
-	}()
-
-	// Wait for the channel to be recognized by both Alice and Bob before
-	// continuing the rest of the test.
-	err = net.Alice.WaitForNetworkChannelOpen(chanPoint)
-	if err != nil {
-		// TODO(roasbeef): will need to make num blocks to advertise a
-		// node param
-		close(quit)
-		t.Fatalf("channel not seen by alice before timeout: %v", err)
-	}
 
 	// With the assertion above set up, send a payment from Alice to Bob
 	// which should finalize and settle the invoice.
-	sendReq := &routerrpc.SendPaymentRequest{
+	ht.CompletePaymentRequests(alice, []string{invoiceResp.PaymentRequest})
-		PaymentRequest: invoiceResp.PaymentRequest,
-		TimeoutSeconds: 60,
-		FeeLimitMsat:   noFeeLimitMsat,
-	}
-	ctxt, _ = context.WithTimeout(ctxb, defaultTimeout)
-	stream, err := net.Alice.RouterClient.SendPaymentV2(ctxt, sendReq)
-	if err != nil {
-		close(quit)
-		t.Fatalf("unable to send payment: %v", err)
-	}
-	result, err := getPaymentResult(stream)
-	if err != nil {
-		close(quit)
-		t.Fatalf("cannot get payment result: %v", err)
-	}
-	if result.Status != lnrpc.Payment_SUCCEEDED {
-		close(quit)
-		t.Fatalf("error when attempting recv: %v", result.Status)
-	}
 
-	select {
+	// The invoice update should exactly match the invoice created
-	case <-time.After(time.Second * 10):
+	// above, but should now be settled and have SettleDate
-		close(quit)
+	invoiceUpdate = ht.ReceiveInvoiceUpdate(bobInvoiceSubscription)
-		t.Fatalf("update not sent after 10 seconds")
+	require.Equal(ht, lnrpc.Invoice_SETTLED, invoiceUpdate.State,
-	case <-updateSent: // Fall through on success
+		"invoice not settled but should be")
-	}
+	require.NotZero(ht, invoiceUpdate.SettleDate,
-
+		"invoice should have non zero settle date, but doesn't")
-	// With the base case working, we'll now cancel Bob's current
+	require.Equal(ht, invoice.RPreimage, invoiceUpdate.RPreimage,
-	// subscription in order to exercise the backlog fill behavior.
+		"payment preimages don't match")
-	cancelInvoiceSubscription()
+	require.NotZero(ht, invoiceUpdate.SettleIndex,
+		"invoice should have settle index")
+	settleIndex := invoiceUpdate.SettleIndex
 
 	// We'll now add 3 more invoices to Bob's invoice registry.
 	const numInvoices = 3
-	payReqs, _, newInvoices, err := createPayReqs(
+	payReqs, _, newInvoices := ht.CreatePayReqs(
-		net.Bob, paymentAmt, numInvoices,
+		bob, paymentAmt, numInvoices,
 	)
-	if err != nil {
-		t.Fatalf("unable to create pay reqs: %v", err)
-	}
 
 	// Now that the set of invoices has been added, we'll re-register for
 	// streaming invoice notifications for Bob, this time specifying the
 	// add invoice of the last prior invoice.
-	req = &lnrpc.InvoiceSubscription{
+	req = &lnrpc.InvoiceSubscription{AddIndex: lastAddIndex}
-		AddIndex: lastAddIndex,
+	bobInvoiceSubscription = bob.RPC.SubscribeInvoices(req)
-	}
-	ctx, cancelInvoiceSubscription = context.WithCancel(ctxb)
-	bobInvoiceSubscription, err = net.Bob.SubscribeInvoices(ctx, req)
-	if err != nil {
-		t.Fatalf("unable to subscribe to bob's invoice updates: %v", err)
-	}
 
 	// Since we specified a value of the prior add index above, we should
 	// now immediately get the invoices we just added as we should get the
 	// backlog of notifications.
 	for i := 0; i < numInvoices; i++ {
-		invoiceUpdate, err := bobInvoiceSubscription.Recv()
+		invoiceUpdate := ht.ReceiveInvoiceUpdate(bobInvoiceSubscription)
-		if err != nil {
-			t.Fatalf("unable to receive subscription")
-		}
 
 		// We should now get the ith invoice we added, as they should
 		// be returned in order.
-		if invoiceUpdate.Settled { // nolint:staticcheck
+		require.NotEqual(ht, lnrpc.Invoice_SETTLED, invoiceUpdate.State,
-			t.Fatalf("should have only received add events")
+			"should have only received add events")
-		}
+
 		originalInvoice := newInvoices[i]
 		rHash := sha256.Sum256(originalInvoice.RPreimage)
-		if !bytes.Equal(invoiceUpdate.RHash, rHash[:]) {
+		require.Equal(ht, rHash[:], invoiceUpdate.RHash,
-			t.Fatalf("invoices have mismatched payment hashes: "+
+			"invoices have mismatched payment hashes")
-				"expected %x, got %x", rHash[:],
-				invoiceUpdate.RHash)
-		}
 	}
 
-	cancelInvoiceSubscription()
-
 	// We'll now have Bob settle out the remainder of these invoices so we
 	// can test that all settled invoices are properly notified.
-	err = completePaymentRequests(
+	ht.CompletePaymentRequests(alice, payReqs)
-		net.Alice, net.Alice.RouterClient, payReqs, true,
-	)
-	if err != nil {
-		t.Fatalf("unable to send payment: %v", err)
-	}
 
 	// With the set of invoices paid, we'll now cancel the old
 	// subscription, and create a new one for Bob, this time using the
@@ -694,13 +598,7 @@ func testInvoiceSubscriptions(net *lntest.NetworkHarness, t *harnessTest) {
 	req = &lnrpc.InvoiceSubscription{
 		SettleIndex: settleIndex,
 	}
-	ctx, cancelInvoiceSubscription = context.WithCancel(ctxb)
+	bobInvoiceSubscription = bob.RPC.SubscribeInvoices(req)
-	bobInvoiceSubscription, err = net.Bob.SubscribeInvoices(ctx, req)
-	if err != nil {
-		t.Fatalf("unable to subscribe to bob's invoice updates: %v", err)
-	}
-
-	defer cancelInvoiceSubscription()
 
 	// As we specified the index of the past settle index, we should now
 	// receive notifications for the three HTLCs that we just settled. As
@@ -712,30 +610,31 @@ func testInvoiceSubscriptions(net *lntest.NetworkHarness, t *harnessTest) {
 		settledInvoices[rHash] = struct{}{}
 	}
 	for i := 0; i < numInvoices; i++ {
-		invoiceUpdate, err := bobInvoiceSubscription.Recv()
+		invoiceUpdate := ht.ReceiveInvoiceUpdate(bobInvoiceSubscription)
-		if err != nil {
-			t.Fatalf("unable to receive subscription")
-		}
 
 		// We should now get the ith invoice we added, as they should
 		// be returned in order.
-		if !invoiceUpdate.Settled { // nolint:staticcheck
+		require.Equal(ht, lnrpc.Invoice_SETTLED, invoiceUpdate.State,
-			t.Fatalf("should have only received settle events")
+			"should have only received settle events")
-		}
 
 		var rHash [32]byte
 		copy(rHash[:], invoiceUpdate.RHash)
-		if _, ok := settledInvoices[rHash]; !ok {
+		require.Contains(ht, settledInvoices, rHash,
-			t.Fatalf("unknown invoice settled: %x", rHash)
+			"unknown invoice settled")
-		}
 
 		delete(settledInvoices, rHash)
 	}
 
 	// At this point, all the invoices should be fully settled.
-	if len(settledInvoices) != 0 {
+	require.Empty(ht, settledInvoices, "not all invoices settled")
-		t.Fatalf("not all invoices settled")
-	}
 
-	closeChannelAndAssert(t, net, net.Alice, chanPoint, false)
+	// TODO(yy): remove the sleep once the following bug is fixed.
+	// When the invoice is reported settled, the commitment dance is not
+	// yet finished, which can cause an error when closing the channel,
+	// saying there's active HTLCs. We need to investigate this issue and
+	// reverse the order to, first finish the commitment dance, then report
+	// the invoice as settled.
+	time.Sleep(2 * time.Second)
+
+	ht.CloseChannel(alice, chanPoint)
 }

lntest/itest/lnd_test_list_on_test.go

@@ -56,10 +56,6 @@ var allTestCases = []*testCase{
 		name: "multiple channel creation and update subscription",
 		test: testBasicChannelCreationAndUpdates,
 	},
-	{
-		name: "invoice update subscription",
-		test: testInvoiceSubscriptions,
-	},
 	{
 		name: "multi-hop htlc error propagation",
 		test: testHtlcErrorPropagation,