lnd/peer/brontide_test.go

1006 lines
28 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

package peer
import (
"bytes"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/chaincfg"
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/txscript"
2018-07-31 09:17:17 +02:00
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/wire"
"github.com/btcsuite/btcutil"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/chainntnfs"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/channeldb"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/htlcswitch"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lntest/mock"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwallet/chancloser"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwire"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pool"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
)
var (
// p2SHAddress is a valid pay to script hash address.
p2SHAddress = "2NBFNJTktNa7GZusGbDbGKRZTxdK9VVez3n"
// p2wshAddress is a valid pay to witness script hash address.
p2wshAddress = "bc1qrp33g0q5c5txsp9arysrx4k6zdkfs4nce4xj0gdcccefvpysxf3qccfmv3"
)
// TestPeerChannelClosureAcceptFeeResponder tests the shutdown responder's
// behavior if we can agree on the fee immediately.
func TestPeerChannelClosureAcceptFeeResponder(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
notifier := &mock.ChainNotifier{
SpendChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.SpendDetail),
EpochChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.BlockEpoch),
ConfChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.TxConfirmation),
}
broadcastTxChan := make(chan *wire.MsgTx)
alicePeer, bobChan, cleanUp, err := createTestPeer(
notifier, broadcastTxChan, noUpdate, nil,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
chanID := lnwire.NewChanIDFromOutPoint(bobChan.ChannelPoint())
// We send a shutdown request to Alice. She will now be the responding
// node in this shutdown procedure. We first expect Alice to answer
// this shutdown request with a Shutdown message.
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
cid: chanID,
msg: lnwire.NewShutdown(chanID, dummyDeliveryScript),
}
var msg lnwire.Message
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive shutdown message")
}
shutdownMsg, ok := msg.(*lnwire.Shutdown)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected Shutdown message, got %T", msg)
}
respDeliveryScript := shutdownMsg.Address
2020-06-27 01:21:48 +02:00
// Alice will then send a ClosingSigned message, indicating her proposed
// closing transaction fee. Alice sends the ClosingSigned message as she is
// the initiator of the channel.
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive ClosingSigned message")
}
respClosingSigned, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
}
// We accept the fee, and send a ClosingSigned with the same fee back,
// so she knows we agreed.
aliceFee := respClosingSigned.FeeSatoshis
bobSig, _, _, err := bobChan.CreateCloseProposal(
aliceFee, dummyDeliveryScript, respDeliveryScript,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error creating close proposal: %v", err)
}
parsedSig, err := lnwire.NewSigFromSignature(bobSig)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error parsing signature: %v", err)
}
closingSigned := lnwire.NewClosingSigned(chanID, aliceFee, parsedSig)
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
cid: chanID,
msg: closingSigned,
}
2020-06-27 01:21:48 +02:00
// Alice should now see that we agreed on the fee, and should broadcast the
// closing transaction.
select {
case <-broadcastTxChan:
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("closing tx not broadcast")
}
// Need to pull the remaining message off of Alice's outgoing queue.
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive ClosingSigned message")
}
if _, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned); !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
}
// Alice should be waiting in a goroutine for a confirmation.
notifier.ConfChan <- &chainntnfs.TxConfirmation{}
}
// TestPeerChannelClosureAcceptFeeInitiator tests the shutdown initiator's
// behavior if we can agree on the fee immediately.
func TestPeerChannelClosureAcceptFeeInitiator(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
notifier := &mock.ChainNotifier{
SpendChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.SpendDetail),
EpochChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.BlockEpoch),
ConfChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.TxConfirmation),
}
broadcastTxChan := make(chan *wire.MsgTx)
alicePeer, bobChan, cleanUp, err := createTestPeer(
notifier, broadcastTxChan, noUpdate, nil,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
2020-06-27 01:21:48 +02:00
// We make Alice send a shutdown request.
updateChan := make(chan interface{}, 1)
errChan := make(chan error, 1)
closeCommand := &htlcswitch.ChanClose{
CloseType: htlcswitch.CloseRegular,
ChanPoint: bobChan.ChannelPoint(),
Updates: updateChan,
2018-02-21 14:02:28 +01:00
TargetFeePerKw: 12500,
Err: errChan,
}
alicePeer.localCloseChanReqs <- closeCommand
2020-06-27 01:21:48 +02:00
// We can now pull a Shutdown message off of Alice's outgoingQueue.
var msg lnwire.Message
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive shutdown request")
}
shutdownMsg, ok := msg.(*lnwire.Shutdown)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected Shutdown message, got %T", msg)
}
aliceDeliveryScript := shutdownMsg.Address
2020-06-27 01:21:48 +02:00
// Bob will respond with his own Shutdown message.
chanID := shutdownMsg.ChannelID
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
cid: chanID,
msg: lnwire.NewShutdown(chanID,
dummyDeliveryScript),
}
// Alice will reply with a ClosingSigned here.
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed message")
}
closingSignedMsg, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected to receive closing signed message, got %T", msg)
}
// Bob should reply with the exact same fee in his next ClosingSigned
// message.
bobFee := closingSignedMsg.FeeSatoshis
bobSig, _, _, err := bobChan.CreateCloseProposal(
bobFee, dummyDeliveryScript, aliceDeliveryScript,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create close proposal: %v", err)
}
parsedSig, err := lnwire.NewSigFromSignature(bobSig)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to parse signature: %v", err)
}
closingSigned := lnwire.NewClosingSigned(shutdownMsg.ChannelID,
bobFee, parsedSig)
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
cid: chanID,
msg: closingSigned,
}
2020-06-27 01:21:48 +02:00
// Alice should accept Bob's fee, broadcast the cooperative close tx, and
// send a ClosingSigned message back to Bob.
// Alice should now broadcast the closing transaction.
select {
case <-broadcastTxChan:
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("closing tx not broadcast")
}
// Alice should respond with the ClosingSigned they both agreed upon.
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed message")
}
closingSignedMsg, ok = msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
}
if closingSignedMsg.FeeSatoshis != bobFee {
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned fee to be %v, instead got %v",
bobFee, closingSignedMsg.FeeSatoshis)
}
// Alice should be waiting on a single confirmation for the coop close tx.
notifier.ConfChan <- &chainntnfs.TxConfirmation{}
}
// TestPeerChannelClosureFeeNegotiationsResponder tests the shutdown
// responder's behavior in the case where we must do several rounds of fee
// negotiation before we agree on a fee.
func TestPeerChannelClosureFeeNegotiationsResponder(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
notifier := &mock.ChainNotifier{
SpendChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.SpendDetail),
EpochChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.BlockEpoch),
ConfChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.TxConfirmation),
}
broadcastTxChan := make(chan *wire.MsgTx)
alicePeer, bobChan, cleanUp, err := createTestPeer(
notifier, broadcastTxChan, noUpdate, nil,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
chanID := lnwire.NewChanIDFromOutPoint(bobChan.ChannelPoint())
// Bob sends a shutdown request to Alice. She will now be the responding
// node in this shutdown procedure. We first expect Alice to answer this
// Shutdown request with a Shutdown message.
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
cid: chanID,
msg: lnwire.NewShutdown(chanID,
dummyDeliveryScript),
}
var msg lnwire.Message
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive shutdown message")
}
shutdownMsg, ok := msg.(*lnwire.Shutdown)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected Shutdown message, got %T", msg)
}
aliceDeliveryScript := shutdownMsg.Address
2020-06-27 01:21:48 +02:00
// As Alice is the channel initiator, she will send her ClosingSigned
// message.
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed message")
}
aliceClosingSigned, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
}
2020-06-27 01:21:48 +02:00
// Bob doesn't agree with the fee and will send one back that's 2.5x.
preferredRespFee := aliceClosingSigned.FeeSatoshis
increasedFee := btcutil.Amount(float64(preferredRespFee) * 2.5)
bobSig, _, _, err := bobChan.CreateCloseProposal(
increasedFee, dummyDeliveryScript, aliceDeliveryScript,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error creating close proposal: %v", err)
}
parsedSig, err := lnwire.NewSigFromSignature(bobSig)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error parsing signature: %v", err)
}
closingSigned := lnwire.NewClosingSigned(chanID, increasedFee, parsedSig)
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
cid: chanID,
msg: closingSigned,
}
2020-06-27 01:21:48 +02:00
// Alice will now see the new fee we propose, but with current settings it
// won't accept it immediately as it differs too much by its ideal fee. We
// should get a new proposal back, which should have the average fee rate
// proposed.
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed message")
}
aliceClosingSigned, ok = msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
}
// The fee sent by Alice should be less than the fee Bob just sent as Alice
// should attempt to compromise.
aliceFee := aliceClosingSigned.FeeSatoshis
if aliceFee > increasedFee {
t.Fatalf("new fee should be less than our fee: new=%v, "+
"prior=%v", aliceFee, increasedFee)
}
lastFeeResponder := aliceFee
// We try negotiating a 2.1x fee, which should also be rejected.
increasedFee = btcutil.Amount(float64(preferredRespFee) * 2.1)
bobSig, _, _, err = bobChan.CreateCloseProposal(
increasedFee, dummyDeliveryScript, aliceDeliveryScript,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error creating close proposal: %v", err)
}
parsedSig, err = lnwire.NewSigFromSignature(bobSig)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error parsing signature: %v", err)
}
closingSigned = lnwire.NewClosingSigned(chanID, increasedFee, parsedSig)
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
cid: chanID,
msg: closingSigned,
}
2020-06-27 01:21:48 +02:00
// Bob's latest proposal still won't be accepted and Alice should send over
// a new ClosingSigned message. It should be the average of what Bob and
// Alice each proposed last time.
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed message")
}
aliceClosingSigned, ok = msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
}
// Alice should inch towards Bob's fee, in order to compromise.
// Additionally, this fee should be less than the fee Bob sent before.
aliceFee = aliceClosingSigned.FeeSatoshis
if aliceFee < lastFeeResponder {
t.Fatalf("new fee should be greater than prior: new=%v, "+
"prior=%v", aliceFee, lastFeeResponder)
}
if aliceFee > increasedFee {
t.Fatalf("new fee should be less than Bob's fee: new=%v, "+
"prior=%v", aliceFee, increasedFee)
}
// Finally, Bob will accept the fee by echoing back the same fee that Alice
// just sent over.
bobSig, _, _, err = bobChan.CreateCloseProposal(
aliceFee, dummyDeliveryScript, aliceDeliveryScript,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error creating close proposal: %v", err)
}
parsedSig, err = lnwire.NewSigFromSignature(bobSig)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error parsing signature: %v", err)
}
closingSigned = lnwire.NewClosingSigned(chanID, aliceFee, parsedSig)
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
cid: chanID,
msg: closingSigned,
}
2020-06-27 01:21:48 +02:00
// Alice will now see that Bob agreed on the fee, and broadcast the coop
// close transaction.
select {
case <-broadcastTxChan:
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("closing tx not broadcast")
}
// Alice should respond with the ClosingSigned they both agreed upon.
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed message")
}
if _, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned); !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected to receive closing signed message, got %T", msg)
}
// Alice should be waiting on a single confirmation for the coop close tx.
notifier.ConfChan <- &chainntnfs.TxConfirmation{}
}
// TestPeerChannelClosureFeeNegotiationsInitiator tests the shutdown
// initiator's behavior in the case where we must do several rounds of fee
// negotiation before we agree on a fee.
func TestPeerChannelClosureFeeNegotiationsInitiator(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
notifier := &mock.ChainNotifier{
SpendChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.SpendDetail),
EpochChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.BlockEpoch),
ConfChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.TxConfirmation),
}
broadcastTxChan := make(chan *wire.MsgTx)
alicePeer, bobChan, cleanUp, err := createTestPeer(
notifier, broadcastTxChan, noUpdate, nil,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
// We make the initiator send a shutdown request.
updateChan := make(chan interface{}, 1)
errChan := make(chan error, 1)
closeCommand := &htlcswitch.ChanClose{
CloseType: htlcswitch.CloseRegular,
ChanPoint: bobChan.ChannelPoint(),
Updates: updateChan,
2018-02-21 14:02:28 +01:00
TargetFeePerKw: 12500,
Err: errChan,
}
alicePeer.localCloseChanReqs <- closeCommand
// Alice should now send a Shutdown request to Bob.
var msg lnwire.Message
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive shutdown request")
}
shutdownMsg, ok := msg.(*lnwire.Shutdown)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected Shutdown message, got %T", msg)
}
aliceDeliveryScript := shutdownMsg.Address
// Bob will answer the Shutdown message with his own Shutdown.
chanID := lnwire.NewChanIDFromOutPoint(bobChan.ChannelPoint())
respShutdown := lnwire.NewShutdown(chanID, dummyDeliveryScript)
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
cid: chanID,
msg: respShutdown,
}
// Alice should now respond with a ClosingSigned message with her ideal
// fee rate.
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed")
}
closingSignedMsg, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
}
idealFeeRate := closingSignedMsg.FeeSatoshis
lastReceivedFee := idealFeeRate
increasedFee := btcutil.Amount(float64(idealFeeRate) * 2.1)
lastSentFee := increasedFee
bobSig, _, _, err := bobChan.CreateCloseProposal(
increasedFee, dummyDeliveryScript, aliceDeliveryScript,
)
if err != nil {
2020-06-27 01:21:48 +02:00
t.Fatalf("error creating close proposal: %v", err)
}
parsedSig, err := lnwire.NewSigFromSignature(bobSig)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to parse signature: %v", err)
}
closingSigned := lnwire.NewClosingSigned(chanID, increasedFee, parsedSig)
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
cid: chanID,
msg: closingSigned,
}
// It still won't be accepted, and we should get a new proposal, the
// average of what we proposed, and what they proposed last time.
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed")
}
closingSignedMsg, ok = msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
}
aliceFee := closingSignedMsg.FeeSatoshis
if aliceFee < lastReceivedFee {
t.Fatalf("new fee should be greater than prior: new=%v, old=%v",
aliceFee, lastReceivedFee)
}
if aliceFee > lastSentFee {
t.Fatalf("new fee should be less than our fee: new=%v, old=%v",
aliceFee, lastSentFee)
}
lastReceivedFee = aliceFee
// We'll try negotiating a 1.5x fee, which should also be rejected.
increasedFee = btcutil.Amount(float64(idealFeeRate) * 1.5)
lastSentFee = increasedFee
bobSig, _, _, err = bobChan.CreateCloseProposal(
increasedFee, dummyDeliveryScript, aliceDeliveryScript,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error creating close proposal: %v", err)
}
parsedSig, err = lnwire.NewSigFromSignature(bobSig)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error parsing signature: %v", err)
}
closingSigned = lnwire.NewClosingSigned(chanID, increasedFee, parsedSig)
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
cid: chanID,
msg: closingSigned,
}
2020-06-27 01:21:48 +02:00
// Alice won't accept Bob's new proposal, and Bob should receive a new
// proposal which is the average of what Bob proposed and Alice proposed
// last time.
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed")
}
closingSignedMsg, ok = msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected ClosingSigned message, got %T", msg)
}
aliceFee = closingSignedMsg.FeeSatoshis
if aliceFee < lastReceivedFee {
t.Fatalf("new fee should be greater than prior: new=%v, old=%v",
aliceFee, lastReceivedFee)
}
if aliceFee > lastSentFee {
t.Fatalf("new fee should be less than Bob's fee: new=%v, old=%v",
aliceFee, lastSentFee)
}
// Bob will now accept their fee by sending back a ClosingSigned message
// with an identical fee.
bobSig, _, _, err = bobChan.CreateCloseProposal(
aliceFee, dummyDeliveryScript, aliceDeliveryScript,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error creating close proposal: %v", err)
}
parsedSig, err = lnwire.NewSigFromSignature(bobSig)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error parsing signature: %v", err)
}
closingSigned = lnwire.NewClosingSigned(chanID, aliceFee, parsedSig)
alicePeer.chanCloseMsgs <- &closeMsg{
cid: chanID,
msg: closingSigned,
}
// Wait for closing tx to be broadcasted.
select {
case <-broadcastTxChan:
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("closing tx not broadcast")
}
// Alice should respond with the ClosingSigned they both agreed upon.
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive closing signed message")
}
if _, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ClosingSigned); !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected to receive closing signed message, got %T", msg)
}
// Alice should be waiting on a single confirmation for the coop close tx.
notifier.ConfChan <- &chainntnfs.TxConfirmation{}
}
// TestChooseDeliveryScript tests that chooseDeliveryScript correctly errors
// when upfront and user set scripts that do not match are provided, allows
// matching values and returns appropriate values in the case where one or none
// are set.
func TestChooseDeliveryScript(t *testing.T) {
// generate non-zero scripts for testing.
script1 := genScript(t, p2SHAddress)
script2 := genScript(t, p2wshAddress)
tests := []struct {
name string
userScript lnwire.DeliveryAddress
shutdownScript lnwire.DeliveryAddress
expectedScript lnwire.DeliveryAddress
expectedError error
}{
{
name: "Neither set",
userScript: nil,
shutdownScript: nil,
expectedScript: nil,
expectedError: nil,
},
{
name: "Both set and equal",
userScript: script1,
shutdownScript: script1,
expectedScript: script1,
expectedError: nil,
},
{
name: "Both set and not equal",
userScript: script1,
shutdownScript: script2,
expectedScript: nil,
expectedError: chancloser.ErrUpfrontShutdownScriptMismatch,
},
{
name: "Only upfront script",
userScript: nil,
shutdownScript: script1,
expectedScript: script1,
expectedError: nil,
},
{
name: "Only user script",
userScript: script2,
shutdownScript: nil,
expectedScript: script2,
expectedError: nil,
},
}
for _, test := range tests {
test := test
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
script, err := chooseDeliveryScript(
test.shutdownScript, test.userScript,
)
if err != test.expectedError {
t.Fatalf("Expected: %v, got: %v", test.expectedError, err)
}
if !bytes.Equal(script, test.expectedScript) {
t.Fatalf("Expected: %x, got: %x", test.expectedScript, script)
}
})
}
}
// TestCustomShutdownScript tests that the delivery script of a shutdown
// message can be set to a specified address. It checks that setting a close
// script fails for channels which have an upfront shutdown script already set.
func TestCustomShutdownScript(t *testing.T) {
script := genScript(t, p2SHAddress)
// setShutdown is a function which sets the upfront shutdown address for
// the local channel.
setShutdown := func(a, b *channeldb.OpenChannel) {
a.LocalShutdownScript = script
b.RemoteShutdownScript = script
}
tests := []struct {
name string
// update is a function used to set values on the channel set up for the
// test. It is used to set values for upfront shutdown addresses.
update func(a, b *channeldb.OpenChannel)
// userCloseScript is the address specified by the user.
userCloseScript lnwire.DeliveryAddress
// expectedScript is the address we expect to be set on the shutdown
// message.
expectedScript lnwire.DeliveryAddress
// expectedError is the error we expect, if any.
expectedError error
}{
{
name: "User set script",
update: noUpdate,
userCloseScript: script,
expectedScript: script,
},
{
name: "No user set script",
update: noUpdate,
},
{
name: "Shutdown set, no user script",
update: setShutdown,
expectedScript: script,
},
{
name: "Shutdown set, user script matches",
update: setShutdown,
userCloseScript: script,
expectedScript: script,
},
{
name: "Shutdown set, user script different",
update: setShutdown,
userCloseScript: []byte("different addr"),
expectedError: chancloser.ErrUpfrontShutdownScriptMismatch,
},
}
for _, test := range tests {
test := test
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
notifier := &mock.ChainNotifier{
SpendChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.SpendDetail),
EpochChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.BlockEpoch),
ConfChan: make(chan *chainntnfs.TxConfirmation),
}
broadcastTxChan := make(chan *wire.MsgTx)
// Open a channel.
alicePeer, bobChan, cleanUp, err := createTestPeer(
notifier, broadcastTxChan, test.update, nil,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
// Request initiator to cooperatively close the channel, with
// a specified delivery address.
updateChan := make(chan interface{}, 1)
errChan := make(chan error, 1)
chanPoint := bobChan.ChannelPoint()
closeCommand := htlcswitch.ChanClose{
CloseType: htlcswitch.CloseRegular,
ChanPoint: chanPoint,
Updates: updateChan,
TargetFeePerKw: 12500,
DeliveryScript: test.userCloseScript,
Err: errChan,
}
// Send the close command for the correct channel and check that a
// shutdown message is sent.
alicePeer.localCloseChanReqs <- &closeCommand
var msg lnwire.Message
select {
case outMsg := <-alicePeer.outgoingQueue:
msg = outMsg.msg
case <-time.After(timeout):
t.Fatalf("did not receive shutdown message")
case err := <-errChan:
// Fail if we do not expect an error.
if err != test.expectedError {
t.Fatalf("error closing channel: %v", err)
}
// Terminate the test early if have received an error, no
// further action is expected.
return
}
// Check that we have received a shutdown message.
shutdownMsg, ok := msg.(*lnwire.Shutdown)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected shutdown message, got %T", msg)
}
// If the test has not specified an expected address, do not check
// whether the shutdown address matches. This covers the case where
// we epect shutdown to a random address and cannot match it.
if len(test.expectedScript) == 0 {
return
}
// Check that the Shutdown message includes the expected delivery
// script.
if !bytes.Equal(test.expectedScript, shutdownMsg.Address) {
t.Fatalf("expected delivery script: %x, got: %x",
test.expectedScript, shutdownMsg.Address)
}
})
}
}
// TestStaticRemoteDowngrade tests that we downgrade our static remote feature
// bit to optional if we have legacy channels with a peer. This ensures that
// we can stay connected to peers that don't support the feature bit that we
// have channels with.
func TestStaticRemoteDowngrade(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
var (
// We set the same legacy feature bits for all tests, since
// these are not relevant to our test scenario
rawLegacy = lnwire.NewRawFeatureVector(
lnwire.UpfrontShutdownScriptOptional,
)
legacy = lnwire.NewFeatureVector(rawLegacy, nil)
legacyCombinedOptional = lnwire.NewRawFeatureVector(
lnwire.UpfrontShutdownScriptOptional,
lnwire.StaticRemoteKeyOptional,
)
rawFeatureOptional = lnwire.NewRawFeatureVector(
lnwire.StaticRemoteKeyOptional,
)
featureOptional = lnwire.NewFeatureVector(
rawFeatureOptional, nil,
)
rawFeatureRequired = lnwire.NewRawFeatureVector(
lnwire.StaticRemoteKeyRequired,
)
featureRequired = lnwire.NewFeatureVector(
rawFeatureRequired, nil,
)
)
tests := []struct {
name string
legacy bool
features *lnwire.FeatureVector
expectedInit *lnwire.Init
}{
{
name: "no legacy channel, static optional",
legacy: false,
features: featureOptional,
expectedInit: &lnwire.Init{
GlobalFeatures: rawLegacy,
Features: rawFeatureOptional,
},
},
{
name: "legacy channel, static optional",
legacy: true,
features: featureOptional,
expectedInit: &lnwire.Init{
GlobalFeatures: rawLegacy,
Features: rawFeatureOptional,
},
},
{
name: "no legacy channel, static required",
legacy: false,
features: featureRequired,
expectedInit: &lnwire.Init{
GlobalFeatures: rawLegacy,
Features: rawFeatureRequired,
},
},
// In this case we need to flip our required bit to optional,
// this should also propagate to the legacy set of feature bits
// so we have proper consistency: a bit isn't set to optional
// in one field and required in the other.
{
name: "legacy channel, static required",
legacy: true,
features: featureRequired,
expectedInit: &lnwire.Init{
GlobalFeatures: legacyCombinedOptional,
Features: rawFeatureOptional,
},
},
}
for _, test := range tests {
test := test
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
writeBufferPool := pool.NewWriteBuffer(
pool.DefaultWriteBufferGCInterval,
pool.DefaultWriteBufferExpiryInterval,
)
writePool := pool.NewWrite(
writeBufferPool, 1, timeout,
)
require.NoError(t, writePool.Start())
mockConn := newMockConn(t, 1)
p := Brontide{
cfg: Config{
LegacyFeatures: legacy,
Features: test.features,
Conn: mockConn,
WritePool: writePool,
},
}
var b bytes.Buffer
_, err := lnwire.WriteMessage(&b, test.expectedInit, 0)
require.NoError(t, err)
// Send our init message, assert that we write our expected message
// and shutdown our write pool.
require.NoError(t, p.sendInitMsg(test.legacy))
mockConn.assertWrite(b.Bytes())
require.NoError(t, writePool.Stop())
})
}
}
// genScript creates a script paying out to the address provided, which must
// be a valid address.
func genScript(t *testing.T, address string) lnwire.DeliveryAddress {
// Generate an address which can be used for testing.
deliveryAddr, err := btcutil.DecodeAddress(
address,
&chaincfg.TestNet3Params,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("invalid delivery address: %v", err)
}
script, err := txscript.PayToAddrScript(deliveryAddr)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("cannot create script: %v", err)
}
return script
}