lnd/channeldb/invoice_test.go

671 lines
18 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

package channeldb
import (
"crypto/rand"
"reflect"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/davecgh/go-spew/spew"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwire"
)
func randInvoice(value lnwire.MilliSatoshi) (*Invoice, error) {
var pre [32]byte
if _, err := rand.Read(pre[:]); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
i := &Invoice{
// Use single second precision to avoid false positive test
// failures due to the monotonic time component.
CreationDate: time.Unix(time.Now().Unix(), 0),
Terms: ContractTerm{
PaymentPreimage: pre,
Value: value,
},
}
i.Memo = []byte("memo")
i.Receipt = []byte("receipt")
// Create a random byte slice of MaxPaymentRequestSize bytes to be used
// as a dummy paymentrequest, and determine if it should be set based
// on one of the random bytes.
var r [MaxPaymentRequestSize]byte
if _, err := rand.Read(r[:]); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
if r[0]&1 == 0 {
i.PaymentRequest = r[:]
} else {
i.PaymentRequest = []byte("")
}
return i, nil
}
func TestInvoiceWorkflow(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
db, cleanUp, err := makeTestDB()
defer cleanUp()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to make test db: %v", err)
}
// Create a fake invoice which we'll use several times in the tests
// below.
fakeInvoice := &Invoice{
// Use single second precision to avoid false positive test
// failures due to the monotonic time component.
CreationDate: time.Unix(time.Now().Unix(), 0),
}
fakeInvoice.Memo = []byte("memo")
fakeInvoice.Receipt = []byte("receipt")
fakeInvoice.PaymentRequest = []byte("")
copy(fakeInvoice.Terms.PaymentPreimage[:], rev[:])
fakeInvoice.Terms.Value = lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(10000)
2018-10-05 10:14:56 +02:00
paymentHash := fakeInvoice.Terms.PaymentPreimage.Hash()
// Add the invoice to the database, this should succeed as there aren't
// any existing invoices within the database with the same payment
// hash.
2018-10-05 10:14:56 +02:00
if _, err := db.AddInvoice(fakeInvoice, paymentHash); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to find invoice: %v", err)
}
// Attempt to retrieve the invoice which was just added to the
// database. It should be found, and the invoice returned should be
// identical to the one created above.
dbInvoice, err := db.LookupInvoice(paymentHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to find invoice: %v", err)
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(*fakeInvoice, dbInvoice) {
t.Fatalf("invoice fetched from db doesn't match original %v vs %v",
spew.Sdump(fakeInvoice), spew.Sdump(dbInvoice))
}
// The add index of the invoice retrieved from the database should now
// be fully populated. As this is the first index written to the DB,
// the addIndex should be 1.
if dbInvoice.AddIndex != 1 {
t.Fatalf("wrong add index: expected %v, got %v", 1,
dbInvoice.AddIndex)
}
// Settle the invoice, the version retrieved from the database should
// now have the settled bit toggle to true and a non-default
// SettledDate
payAmt := fakeInvoice.Terms.Value * 2
_, err = db.AcceptOrSettleInvoice(
paymentHash, payAmt, checkHtlcParameters,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to settle invoice: %v", err)
}
dbInvoice2, err := db.LookupInvoice(paymentHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to fetch invoice: %v", err)
}
if dbInvoice2.Terms.State != ContractSettled {
t.Fatalf("invoice should now be settled but isn't")
}
if dbInvoice2.SettleDate.IsZero() {
t.Fatalf("invoice should have non-zero SettledDate but isn't")
}
// Our 2x payment should be reflected, and also the settle index of 1
// should also have been committed for this index.
if dbInvoice2.AmtPaid != payAmt {
t.Fatalf("wrong amt paid: expected %v, got %v", payAmt,
dbInvoice2.AmtPaid)
}
if dbInvoice2.SettleIndex != 1 {
t.Fatalf("wrong settle index: expected %v, got %v", 1,
dbInvoice2.SettleIndex)
}
// Attempt to insert generated above again, this should fail as
// duplicates are rejected by the processing logic.
2018-10-05 10:14:56 +02:00
if _, err := db.AddInvoice(fakeInvoice, paymentHash); err != ErrDuplicateInvoice {
t.Fatalf("invoice insertion should fail due to duplication, "+
"instead %v", err)
}
2017-09-25 20:25:58 +02:00
// Attempt to look up a non-existent invoice, this should also fail but
// with a "not found" error.
var fakeHash [32]byte
if _, err := db.LookupInvoice(fakeHash); err != ErrInvoiceNotFound {
t.Fatalf("lookup should have failed, instead %v", err)
}
// Add 10 random invoices.
const numInvoices = 10
amt := lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(1000)
invoices := make([]*Invoice, numInvoices+1)
invoices[0] = &dbInvoice2
for i := 1; i < len(invoices)-1; i++ {
invoice, err := randInvoice(amt)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create invoice: %v", err)
}
2018-10-05 10:14:56 +02:00
hash := invoice.Terms.PaymentPreimage.Hash()
if _, err := db.AddInvoice(invoice, hash); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to add invoice %v", err)
}
invoices[i] = invoice
}
// Perform a scan to collect all the active invoices.
dbInvoices, err := db.FetchAllInvoices(false)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to fetch all invoices: %v", err)
}
// The retrieve list of invoices should be identical as since we're
// using big endian, the invoices should be retrieved in ascending
// order (and the primary key should be incremented with each
// insertion).
for i := 0; i < len(invoices)-1; i++ {
if !reflect.DeepEqual(*invoices[i], dbInvoices[i]) {
t.Fatalf("retrieved invoices don't match %v vs %v",
spew.Sdump(invoices[i]),
spew.Sdump(dbInvoices[i]))
}
}
}
// TestInvoiceTimeSeries tests that newly added invoices invoices, as well as
// settled invoices are added to the database are properly placed in the add
// add or settle index which serves as an event time series.
func TestInvoiceAddTimeSeries(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
db, cleanUp, err := makeTestDB()
defer cleanUp()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to make test db: %v", err)
}
// We'll start off by creating 20 random invoices, and inserting them
// into the database.
const numInvoices = 20
amt := lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(1000)
invoices := make([]Invoice, numInvoices)
for i := 0; i < len(invoices); i++ {
invoice, err := randInvoice(amt)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create invoice: %v", err)
}
2018-10-05 10:14:56 +02:00
paymentHash := invoice.Terms.PaymentPreimage.Hash()
if _, err := db.AddInvoice(invoice, paymentHash); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to add invoice %v", err)
}
invoices[i] = *invoice
}
// With the invoices constructed, we'll now create a series of queries
// that we'll use to assert expected return values of
// InvoicesAddedSince.
addQueries := []struct {
sinceAddIndex uint64
resp []Invoice
}{
// If we specify a value of zero, we shouldn't get any invoices
// back.
{
sinceAddIndex: 0,
},
// If we specify a value well beyond the number of inserted
// invoices, we shouldn't get any invoices back.
{
sinceAddIndex: 99999999,
},
// Using an index of 1 should result in all values, but the
// first one being returned.
{
sinceAddIndex: 1,
resp: invoices[1:],
},
// If we use an index of 10, then we should retrieve the
// reaming 10 invoices.
{
sinceAddIndex: 10,
resp: invoices[10:],
},
}
for i, query := range addQueries {
resp, err := db.InvoicesAddedSince(query.sinceAddIndex)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to query: %v", err)
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(query.resp, resp) {
t.Fatalf("test #%v: expected %v, got %v", i,
spew.Sdump(query.resp), spew.Sdump(resp))
}
}
// We'll now only settle the latter half of each of those invoices.
for i := 10; i < len(invoices); i++ {
invoice := &invoices[i]
2018-10-05 10:14:56 +02:00
paymentHash := invoice.Terms.PaymentPreimage.Hash()
_, err := db.AcceptOrSettleInvoice(
paymentHash, 0, checkHtlcParameters,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to settle invoice: %v", err)
}
}
invoices, err = db.FetchAllInvoices(false)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to fetch invoices: %v", err)
}
// We'll slice off the first 10 invoices, as we only settled the last
// 10.
invoices = invoices[10:]
// We'll now prepare an additional set of queries to ensure the settle
// time series has properly been maintained in the database.
settleQueries := []struct {
sinceSettleIndex uint64
resp []Invoice
}{
// If we specify a value of zero, we shouldn't get any settled
// invoices back.
{
sinceSettleIndex: 0,
},
// If we specify a value well beyond the number of settled
// invoices, we shouldn't get any invoices back.
{
sinceSettleIndex: 99999999,
},
// Using an index of 1 should result in the final 10 invoices
// being returned, as we only settled those.
{
sinceSettleIndex: 1,
resp: invoices[1:],
},
}
for i, query := range settleQueries {
resp, err := db.InvoicesSettledSince(query.sinceSettleIndex)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to query: %v", err)
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(query.resp, resp) {
t.Fatalf("test #%v: expected %v, got %v", i,
spew.Sdump(query.resp), spew.Sdump(resp))
}
}
}
// TestDuplicateSettleInvoice tests that if we add a new invoice and settle it
// twice, then the second time we also receive the invoice that we settled as a
// return argument.
func TestDuplicateSettleInvoice(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
db, cleanUp, err := makeTestDB()
defer cleanUp()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to make test db: %v", err)
}
// We'll start out by creating an invoice and writing it to the DB.
amt := lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(1000)
invoice, err := randInvoice(amt)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create invoice: %v", err)
}
2018-10-05 10:14:56 +02:00
payHash := invoice.Terms.PaymentPreimage.Hash()
if _, err := db.AddInvoice(invoice, payHash); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to add invoice %v", err)
}
// With the invoice in the DB, we'll now attempt to settle the invoice.
dbInvoice, err := db.AcceptOrSettleInvoice(
payHash, amt, checkHtlcParameters,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to settle invoice: %v", err)
}
// We'll update what we expect the settle invoice to be so that our
// comparison below has the correct assumption.
invoice.SettleIndex = 1
invoice.Terms.State = ContractSettled
invoice.AmtPaid = amt
invoice.SettleDate = dbInvoice.SettleDate
// We should get back the exact same invoice that we just inserted.
if !reflect.DeepEqual(dbInvoice, invoice) {
t.Fatalf("wrong invoice after settle, expected %v got %v",
spew.Sdump(invoice), spew.Sdump(dbInvoice))
}
// If we try to settle the invoice again, then we should get the very
// same invoice back, but with an error this time.
dbInvoice, err = db.AcceptOrSettleInvoice(
payHash, amt, checkHtlcParameters,
)
if err != ErrInvoiceAlreadySettled {
t.Fatalf("expected ErrInvoiceAlreadySettled")
}
if dbInvoice == nil {
t.Fatalf("invoice from db is nil after settle!")
}
invoice.SettleDate = dbInvoice.SettleDate
if !reflect.DeepEqual(dbInvoice, invoice) {
t.Fatalf("wrong invoice after second settle, expected %v got %v",
spew.Sdump(invoice), spew.Sdump(dbInvoice))
}
}
// TestQueryInvoices ensures that we can properly query the invoice database for
// invoices using different types of queries.
func TestQueryInvoices(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
db, cleanUp, err := makeTestDB()
defer cleanUp()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to make test db: %v", err)
}
// To begin the test, we'll add 50 invoices to the database. We'll
// assume that the index of the invoice within the database is the same
// as the amount of the invoice itself.
const numInvoices = 50
for i := lnwire.MilliSatoshi(1); i <= numInvoices; i++ {
invoice, err := randInvoice(i)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create invoice: %v", err)
}
2018-10-05 10:14:56 +02:00
paymentHash := invoice.Terms.PaymentPreimage.Hash()
if _, err := db.AddInvoice(invoice, paymentHash); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to add invoice: %v", err)
}
// We'll only settle half of all invoices created.
if i%2 == 0 {
_, err := db.AcceptOrSettleInvoice(
paymentHash, i, checkHtlcParameters,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to settle invoice: %v", err)
}
}
}
// We'll then retrieve the set of all invoices and pending invoices.
// This will serve useful when comparing the expected responses of the
// query with the actual ones.
invoices, err := db.FetchAllInvoices(false)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to retrieve invoices: %v", err)
}
pendingInvoices, err := db.FetchAllInvoices(true)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to retrieve pending invoices: %v", err)
}
// The test will consist of several queries along with their respective
// expected response. Each query response should match its expected one.
testCases := []struct {
query InvoiceQuery
expected []Invoice
}{
// Fetch all invoices with a single query.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
NumMaxInvoices: numInvoices,
},
expected: invoices,
},
// Fetch all invoices with a single query, reversed.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
Reversed: true,
NumMaxInvoices: numInvoices,
},
expected: invoices,
},
// Fetch the first 25 invoices.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
NumMaxInvoices: numInvoices / 2,
},
expected: invoices[:numInvoices/2],
},
// Fetch the first 10 invoices, but this time iterating
// backwards.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
IndexOffset: 11,
Reversed: true,
NumMaxInvoices: numInvoices,
},
expected: invoices[:10],
},
// Fetch the last 40 invoices.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
IndexOffset: 10,
NumMaxInvoices: numInvoices,
},
expected: invoices[10:],
},
// Fetch all but the first invoice.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
IndexOffset: 1,
NumMaxInvoices: numInvoices,
},
expected: invoices[1:],
},
// Fetch one invoice, reversed, with index offset 3. This
// should give us the second invoice in the array.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
IndexOffset: 3,
Reversed: true,
NumMaxInvoices: 1,
},
expected: invoices[1:2],
},
// Same as above, at index 2.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
IndexOffset: 2,
Reversed: true,
NumMaxInvoices: 1,
},
expected: invoices[0:1],
},
// Fetch one invoice, at index 1, reversed. Since invoice#1 is
// the very first, there won't be any left in a reverse search,
// so we expect no invoices to be returned.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
IndexOffset: 1,
Reversed: true,
NumMaxInvoices: 1,
},
expected: nil,
},
// Same as above, but don't restrict the number of invoices to
// 1.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
IndexOffset: 1,
Reversed: true,
NumMaxInvoices: numInvoices,
},
expected: nil,
},
// Fetch one invoice, reversed, with no offset set. We expect
// the last invoice in the response.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
Reversed: true,
NumMaxInvoices: 1,
},
expected: invoices[numInvoices-1:],
},
// Fetch one invoice, reversed, the offset set at numInvoices+1.
// We expect this to return the last invoice.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
IndexOffset: numInvoices + 1,
Reversed: true,
NumMaxInvoices: 1,
},
expected: invoices[numInvoices-1:],
},
// Same as above, at offset numInvoices.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
IndexOffset: numInvoices,
Reversed: true,
NumMaxInvoices: 1,
},
expected: invoices[numInvoices-2 : numInvoices-1],
},
// Fetch one invoice, at no offset (same as offset 0). We
// expect the first invoice only in the response.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
NumMaxInvoices: 1,
},
expected: invoices[:1],
},
// Same as above, at offset 1.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
IndexOffset: 1,
NumMaxInvoices: 1,
},
expected: invoices[1:2],
},
// Same as above, at offset 2.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
IndexOffset: 2,
NumMaxInvoices: 1,
},
expected: invoices[2:3],
},
// Same as above, at offset numInvoices-1. Expect the last
// invoice to be returned.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
IndexOffset: numInvoices - 1,
NumMaxInvoices: 1,
},
expected: invoices[numInvoices-1:],
},
// Same as above, at offset numInvoices. No invoices should be
// returned, as there are no invoices after this offset.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
IndexOffset: numInvoices,
NumMaxInvoices: 1,
},
expected: nil,
},
// Fetch all pending invoices with a single query.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
PendingOnly: true,
NumMaxInvoices: numInvoices,
},
expected: pendingInvoices,
},
// Fetch the first 12 pending invoices.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
PendingOnly: true,
NumMaxInvoices: numInvoices / 4,
},
expected: pendingInvoices[:len(pendingInvoices)/2],
},
// Fetch the first 5 pending invoices, but this time iterating
// backwards.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
IndexOffset: 10,
PendingOnly: true,
Reversed: true,
NumMaxInvoices: numInvoices,
},
// Since we seek to the invoice with index 10 and
// iterate backwards, there should only be 5 pending
// invoices before it as every other invoice within the
// index is settled.
expected: pendingInvoices[:5],
},
// Fetch the last 15 invoices.
{
query: InvoiceQuery{
IndexOffset: 20,
PendingOnly: true,
NumMaxInvoices: numInvoices,
},
// Since we seek to the invoice with index 20, there are
// 30 invoices left. From these 30, only 15 of them are
// still pending.
expected: pendingInvoices[len(pendingInvoices)-15:],
},
}
for i, testCase := range testCases {
response, err := db.QueryInvoices(testCase.query)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to query invoice database: %v", err)
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(response.Invoices, testCase.expected) {
t.Fatalf("test #%d: query returned incorrect set of "+
"invoices: expcted %v, got %v", i,
spew.Sdump(response.Invoices),
spew.Sdump(testCase.expected))
}
}
}
func checkHtlcParameters(invoice *Invoice) error {
if invoice.Terms.State == ContractSettled {
return ErrInvoiceAlreadySettled
}
return nil
}