1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/lightning/bolts.git synced 2025-03-10 09:10:07 +01:00

bolt07: remove trailing tabs

Tabs or spaces ? Spaces seems to largely beat tabs in this files (and more globally in the repo).
This commit is contained in:
darosior 2019-10-01 21:00:28 +02:00 committed by Rusty Russell
parent 3a0a7fd064
commit b84d09e076

View file

@ -458,15 +458,15 @@ The origin node:
- otherwise:
- MUST set the `direction` bit of `channel_flags` to 1.
- if the `htlc_maximum_msat` field is present:
- MUST set the `option_channel_htlc_max` bit of `message_flags` to 1.
- MUST set `htlc_maximum_msat` to the maximum value it will send through this channel for a single HTLC.
- MUST set this to less than or equal to the channel capacity.
- MUST set this to less than or equal to `max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat`
it received from the peer.
- for channels with `chain_hash` identifying the Bitcoin blockchain:
- MUST set this to less than 2^32.
- MUST set the `option_channel_htlc_max` bit of `message_flags` to 1.
- MUST set `htlc_maximum_msat` to the maximum value it will send through this channel for a single HTLC.
- MUST set this to less than or equal to the channel capacity.
- MUST set this to less than or equal to `max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat`
it received from the peer.
- for channels with `chain_hash` identifying the Bitcoin blockchain:
- MUST set this to less than 2^32.
- otherwise:
- MUST set the `option_channel_htlc_max` bit of `message_flags` to 0.
- MUST set the `option_channel_htlc_max` bit of `message_flags` to 0.
- MUST set bits in `channel_flags` and `message_flags `that are not assigned a meaning to 0.
- MAY create and send a `channel_update` with the `disable` bit set to 1, to
signal a channel's temporary unavailability (e.g. due to a loss of
@ -522,10 +522,10 @@ The receiving node:
- MUST consider `htlc_maximum_msat` not to be present.
- otherwise:
- if `htlc_maximum_msat` is not present or greater than channel capacity:
- MAY blacklist this `node_id`
- SHOULD ignore this channel during route considerations.
- otherwise:
- SHOULD consider the `htlc_maximum_msat` when routing.
- MAY blacklist this `node_id`
- SHOULD ignore this channel during route considerations.
- otherwise:
- SHOULD consider the `htlc_maximum_msat` when routing.
### Rationale
@ -676,13 +676,13 @@ The receiver:
- MUST reply with the latest `node_announcement` for `node_id_1`
- if bit 4 of `query_flag` is set and it has received a `node_announcement` from `node_id_2`:
- MUST reply with the latest `node_announcement` for `node_id_2`
- SHOULD NOT wait for the next outgoing gossip flush to send these.
- SHOULD NOT wait for the next outgoing gossip flush to send these.
- SHOULD avoid sending duplicate `node_announcements` in response to a single `query_short_channel_ids`.
- MUST follow these responses with `reply_short_channel_ids_end`.
- if does not maintain up-to-date channel information for `chain_hash`:
- MUST set `complete` to 0.
- MUST set `complete` to 0.
- otherwise:
- SHOULD set `complete` to 1.
- SHOULD set `complete` to 1.
#### Rationale
@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ Though it is possible, it would not be very useful to ask for checksums without
2. types:
1. type: 1 (`timestamps_tlv`)
2. data:
* [`u8`:`encoding_type`]
* [`u8`:`encoding_type`]
* [`...*byte`:`encoded_timestamps`]
1. type: 3 (`checksums_tlv`)
2. data:
@ -779,8 +779,7 @@ The receiver of `query_channel_range`:
- if it has not sent all `reply_channel_range` to a previously received `query_channel_range` from this sender:
- MAY fail the connection.
- MUST respond with one or more `reply_channel_range` whose combined range
cover the requested `first_blocknum` to `first_blocknum` plus
`number_of_blocks` minus one.
cover the requested `first_blocknum` to `first_blocknum` plus `number_of_blocks` minus one.
- For each `reply_channel_range`:
- MUST set with `chain_hash` equal to that of `query_channel_range`,
- MUST encode a `short_channel_id` for every open channel it knows in blocks `first_blocknum` to `first_blocknum` plus `number_of_blocks` minus one.
@ -830,17 +829,17 @@ The receiver:
- SHOULD send all gossip messages whose `timestamp` is greater or
equal to `first_timestamp`, and less than `first_timestamp` plus
`timestamp_range`.
- MAY wait for the next outgoing gossip flush to send these.
- MAY wait for the next outgoing gossip flush to send these.
- SHOULD restrict future gossip messages to those whose `timestamp`
is greater or equal to `first_timestamp`, and less than
`first_timestamp` plus `timestamp_range`.
- If a `channel_announcement` has no corresponding `channel_update`s:
- MUST NOT send the `channel_announcement`.
- MUST NOT send the `channel_announcement`.
- Otherwise:
- MUST consider the `timestamp` of the `channel_announcement` to be the `timestamp` of a corresponding `channel_update`.
- MUST consider whether to send the `channel_announcement` after receiving the first corresponding `channel_update`.
- MUST consider the `timestamp` of the `channel_announcement` to be the `timestamp` of a corresponding `channel_update`.
- MUST consider whether to send the `channel_announcement` after receiving the first corresponding `channel_update`.
- If a `channel_announcement` is sent:
- MUST send the `channel_announcement` prior to any corresponding `channel_update`s and `node_announcement`s.
- MUST send the `channel_announcement` prior to any corresponding `channel_update`s and `node_announcement`s.
#### Rationale
@ -875,7 +874,7 @@ interactions with them.
A node:
- if the `gossip_queries` feature is negotiated:
- MUST NOT relay any gossip messages unless explicitly requested.
- MUST NOT relay any gossip messages unless explicitly requested.
- otherwise:
- if it requires a full copy of the peer's routing state:
- SHOULD set the `initial_routing_sync` flag to 1.
@ -907,7 +906,7 @@ A receiving node:
A node:
- if the `gossip_queries` feature is negotiated:
- MUST not send gossip until it receives `gossip_timestamp_filter`.
- MUST not send gossip until it receives `gossip_timestamp_filter`.
- SHOULD flush outgoing gossip messages once every 60 seconds, independently of
the arrival times of the messages.
- Note: this results in staggered announcements that are unique (not
@ -1072,7 +1071,7 @@ per [HTLC Fees](#htlc-fees):
fee_base_msat + ( amount_to_forward * fee_proportional_millionths / 1000000 )
200 + ( 4999999 * 2000 / 1000000 ) = 10199
200 + ( 4999999 * 2000 / 1000000 ) = 10199
Similarly, it would need to add B->C's `channel_update` `cltv_expiry` (20), C's
requested `min_final_cltv_expiry` (9), and the cost for the _shadow route_ (42).
@ -1092,7 +1091,7 @@ A->D's `update_add_htlc` message would be:
* `amount_msat`: 5020398
* `cltv_expiry`: current-block-height + 40 + 9 + 42
* `onion_routing_packet`:
* `amt_to_forward` = 4999999
* `amt_to_forward` = 4999999
* `outgoing_cltv_value` = current-block-height + 9 + 42
And D->C's `update_add_htlc` would again be the same as B->C's direct payment