mirror of
https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning.git
synced 2024-11-19 18:11:28 +01:00
55d962046b
We usually did this, but sometimes they were named after what they did, rather than what they cleaned up. There are still a few exceptions: 1. I didn't bother creating destroy_xxx wrappers for htable routines which already existed. 2. Sometimes destructors really are used for side-effects (eg. to simply mark that something was freed): these are clearer with boutique names. 3. Generally destructors are static, but they don't need to be: in some cases we attach a destructor then remove it later, or only attach to *some* cases. These are best with qualifiers in the destroy_<type> name. Suggested-by: @ZmnSCPxj Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| test | ||
| broadcast.c | ||
| broadcast.h | ||
| gossip_wire.csv | ||
| gossip.c | ||
| handshake.c | ||
| handshake.h | ||
| Makefile | ||
| routing.c | ||
| routing.h | ||