#include "config.h" #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include /* # Optimal payments * * In this module we reduce the routing optimization problem to a linear * cost optimization problem and find a solution using MCF algorithms. * The optimization of the routing itself doesn't need a precise numerical * solution, since we can be happy near optimal results; e.g. paying 100 msat or * 101 msat for fees doesn't make any difference if we wish to deliver 1M sats. * On the other hand, we are now also considering Pickhard's * [1] model to improve payment reliability, * hence our optimization moves to a 2D space: either we like to maximize the * probability of success of a payment or minimize the routing fees, or * alternatively we construct a function of the two that gives a good compromise. * * Therefore from now own, the definition of optimal is a matter of choice. * To simplify the API of this module, we think the best way to state the * problem is: * * Find a routing solution that pays the least of fees while keeping * the probability of success above a certain value `min_probability`. * * * # Fee Cost * * Routing fees is non-linear function of the payment flow x, that's true even * without the base fee: * * fee_msat = base_msat + floor(millionths*x_msat / 10^6) * * We approximate this fee into a linear function by computing a slope `c_fee` such * that: * * fee_microsat = c_fee * x_sat * * Function `linear_fee_cost` computes `c_fee` based on the base and * proportional fees of a channel. * The final product if microsat because if only * the proportional fee was considered we can have c_fee = millionths. * Moving to costs based in msats means we have to either truncate payments * below 1ksats or estimate as 0 cost for channels with less than 1000ppm. * * TODO(eduardo): shall we build a linear cost function in msats? * * # Probability cost * * The probability of success P of the payment is the product of the prob. of * success of forwarding parts of the payment over all routing channels. This * problem is separable if we log it, and since we would like to increase P, * then we can seek to minimize -log(P), and that's our prob. cost function [1]. * * - log P = sum_{i} - log P_i * * The probability of success `P_i` of sending some flow `x` on a channel with * liquidity l in the range a<=l a * = 1. ; for x <= a * * Notice that unlike the similar formula in [1], the one we propose does not * contain the quantization shot noise for counting states. The formula remains * valid independently of the liquidity units (sats or msats). * * The cost associated to probability P is then -k log P, where k is some * constant. For k=1 we get the following table: * * prob | cost * ----------- * 0.01 | 4.6 * 0.02 | 3.9 * 0.05 | 3.0 * 0.10 | 2.3 * 0.20 | 1.6 * 0.50 | 0.69 * 0.80 | 0.22 * 0.90 | 0.10 * 0.95 | 0.05 * 0.98 | 0.02 * 0.99 | 0.01 * * Clearly -log P(x) is non-linear; we try to linearize it piecewise: * split the channel into 4 arcs representing 4 liquidity regions: * * arc_0 -> [0, a) * arc_1 -> [a, a+(b-a)*f1) * arc_2 -> [a+(b-a)*f1, a+(b-a)*f2) * arc_3 -> [a+(b-a)*f2, a+(b-a)*f3) * * where f1 = 0.5, f2 = 0.8, f3 = 0.95; * We fill arc_0's capacity with complete certainty P=1, then if more flow is * needed we start filling the capacity in arc_1 until the total probability * of success reaches P=0.5, then arc_2 until P=1-0.8=0.2, and finally arc_3 until * P=1-0.95=0.05. We don't go further than 5% prob. of success per channel. * TODO(eduardo): this channel linearization is hard coded into * `CHANNEL_PIVOTS`, maybe we can parametrize this to take values from the config file. * * With this choice, the slope of the linear cost function becomes: * * m_0 = 0 * m_1 = 1.38 k /(b-a) * m_2 = 3.05 k /(b-a) * m_3 = 9.24 k /(b-a) * * Notice that one of the assumptions in [2] for the MCF problem is that flows * and the slope of the costs functions are integer numbers. The only way we * have at hand to make it so, is to choose a universal value of `k` that scales * up the slopes so that floor(m_i) is not zero for every arc. * * # Combine fee and prob. costs * * We attempt to solve the original problem of finding the solution that * pays the least fees while keeping the prob. of success above a certain value, * by constructing a cost function which is a linear combination of fee and * prob. costs. * TODO(eduardo): investigate how this procedure is justified, * possibly with the use of Lagrange optimization theory. * * At first, prob. and fee costs live in different dimensions, they cannot be * summed, it's like comparing apples and oranges. * However we propose to scale the prob. cost by a global factor k that * translates into the monetization of prob. cost. * * This was chosen empirically from examination of typical network values. * * # References * * [1] Pickhardt and Richter, https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.05322 * [2] R.K. Ahuja, T.L. Magnanti, and J.B. Orlin. Network Flows: * Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Prentice Hall, 1993. * * * TODO(eduardo) it would be interesting to see: * how much do we pay for reliability? * Cost_fee(most reliable solution) - Cost_fee(cheapest solution) * * TODO(eduardo): it would be interesting to see: * how likely is the most reliable path with respect to the cheapest? * Prob(reliable)/Prob(cheapest) = Exp(Cost_prob(cheapest)-Cost_prob(reliable)) * * */ #define PARTS_BITS 2 #define CHANNEL_PARTS (1 << PARTS_BITS) // These are the probability intervals we use to decompose a channel into linear // cost function arcs. static const double CHANNEL_PIVOTS[]={0,0.5,0.8,0.95}; static const s64 INFINITE = INT64_MAX; static const s64 MU_MAX = 100; /* Let's try this encoding of arcs: * Each channel `c` has two possible directions identified by a bit * `half` or `!half`, and each one of them has to be * decomposed into 4 liquidity parts in order to * linearize the cost function, but also to solve MCF * problem we need to keep track of flows in the * residual network hence we need for each directed arc * in the network there must be another arc in the * opposite direction refered to as it's dual. In total * 1+2+1 additional bits of information: * * (chan_idx)(half)(part)(dual) * * That means, for each channel we need to store the * information of 16 arcs. If we implement a convex-cost * solver then we can reduce that number to size(half)size(dual)=4. * * In the adjacency of a `node` we are going to store * the outgoing arcs. If we ever need to loop over the * incoming arcs then we will define a reverse adjacency * API. * Then for each outgoing channel `(c,half)` there will * be 4 parts for the actual residual capacity, hence * with the dual bit set to 0: * * (c,half,0,0) * (c,half,1,0) * (c,half,2,0) * (c,half,3,0) * * and also we need to consider the dual arcs * corresponding to the channel direction `(c,!half)` * (the dual has reverse direction): * * (c,!half,0,1) * (c,!half,1,1) * (c,!half,2,1) * (c,!half,3,1) * * These are the 8 outgoing arcs relative to `node` and * associated with channel `c`. The incoming arcs will * be: * * (c,!half,0,0) * (c,!half,1,0) * (c,!half,2,0) * (c,!half,3,0) * * (c,half,0,1) * (c,half,1,1) * (c,half,2,1) * (c,half,3,1) * * but they will be stored as outgoing arcs on the peer * node `next`. * * I hope this will clarify my future self when I forget. * * */ /* * We want to use the whole number here for convenience, but * we can't us a union, since bit order is implementation-defined and * we want chanidx on the highest bits: * * [ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 31 ] * dual part chandir chanidx */ #define ARC_DUAL_BITOFF (0) #define ARC_PART_BITOFF (1) #define ARC_CHANDIR_BITOFF (1 + PARTS_BITS) #define ARC_CHANIDX_BITOFF (1 + PARTS_BITS + 1) #define ARC_CHANIDX_BITS (32 - ARC_CHANIDX_BITOFF) /* How many arcs can we have for a single channel? * linearization parts, both directions, and dual */ #define ARCS_PER_CHANNEL ((size_t)1 << (PARTS_BITS + 1 + 1)) static inline void arc_to_parts(struct arc arc, u32 *chanidx, int *chandir, u32 *part, bool *dual) { if (chanidx) *chanidx = (arc.idx >> ARC_CHANIDX_BITOFF); if (chandir) *chandir = (arc.idx >> ARC_CHANDIR_BITOFF) & 1; if (part) *part = (arc.idx >> ARC_PART_BITOFF) & ((1 << PARTS_BITS)-1); if (dual) *dual = (arc.idx >> ARC_DUAL_BITOFF) & 1; } static inline struct arc arc_from_parts(u32 chanidx, int chandir, u32 part, bool dual) { struct arc arc; assert(part < CHANNEL_PARTS); assert(chandir == 0 || chandir == 1); assert(chanidx < (1U << ARC_CHANIDX_BITS)); arc.idx = ((u32)dual << ARC_DUAL_BITOFF) | (part << ARC_PART_BITOFF) | ((u32)chandir << ARC_CHANDIR_BITOFF) | (chanidx << ARC_CHANIDX_BITOFF); return arc; } #define MAX(x, y) (((x) > (y)) ? (x) : (y)) #define MIN(x, y) (((x) < (y)) ? (x) : (y)) struct pay_parameters { const struct route_query *rq; const struct gossmap_node *source; const struct gossmap_node *target; // how much we pay struct amount_msat amount; /* base unit for computation, ie. accuracy */ struct amount_msat accuracy; // channel linearization parameters double cap_fraction[CHANNEL_PARTS], cost_fraction[CHANNEL_PARTS]; double delay_feefactor; double base_fee_penalty; }; /* Representation of the linear MCF network. * This contains the topology of the extended network (after linearization and * addition of arc duality). * This contains also the arc probability and linear fee cost, as well as * capacity; these quantities remain constant during MCF execution. */ struct linear_network { struct graph *graph; // probability and fee cost associated to an arc double *arc_prob_cost; s64 *arc_fee_cost; s64 *capacity; }; /* This is the structure that keeps track of the network properties while we * seek for a solution. */ struct residual_network { /* residual capacity on arcs */ s64 *cap; /* some combination of prob. cost and fee cost on arcs */ s64 *cost; /* potential function on nodes */ s64 *potential; /* auxiliary data, the excess of flow on nodes */ s64 *excess; }; /* Helper function. * Given an arc of the network (not residual) give me the flow. */ static s64 get_arc_flow( const struct residual_network *network, const struct graph *graph, const struct arc arc) { assert(!arc_is_dual(graph, arc)); struct arc dual = arc_dual(graph, arc); assert(dual.idx < tal_count(network->cap)); return network->cap[dual.idx]; } /* Set *capacity to value, up to *cap_on_capacity. Reduce cap_on_capacity */ static void set_capacity(s64 *capacity, u64 value, u64 *cap_on_capacity) { *capacity = MIN(value, *cap_on_capacity); *cap_on_capacity -= *capacity; } // TODO(eduardo): unit test this /* Split a directed channel into parts with linear cost function. */ static void linearize_channel(const struct pay_parameters *params, const struct gossmap_chan *c, const int dir, s64 *capacity, double *cost) { struct amount_msat mincap, maxcap; /* This takes into account any payments in progress. */ get_constraints(params->rq, c, dir, &mincap, &maxcap); /* Assume if min > max, min is wrong */ if (amount_msat_greater(mincap, maxcap)) mincap = maxcap; u64 a = amount_msat_ratio_floor(mincap, params->accuracy), b = 1 + amount_msat_ratio_floor(maxcap, params->accuracy); /* An extra bound on capacity, here we use it to reduce the flow such * that it does not exceed htlcmax. */ u64 cap_on_capacity = amount_msat_ratio_floor(gossmap_chan_htlc_max(c, dir), params->accuracy); set_capacity(&capacity[0], a, &cap_on_capacity); cost[0]=0; for(size_t i=1;icap_fraction[i]*(b-a), &cap_on_capacity); cost[i] = params->cost_fraction[i] * 1000 * amount_msat_ratio(params->amount, params->accuracy) / (b - a); } } static struct residual_network * alloc_residual_network(const tal_t *ctx, const size_t max_num_nodes, const size_t max_num_arcs) { struct residual_network *residual_network = tal(ctx, struct residual_network); residual_network->cap = tal_arrz(residual_network, s64, max_num_arcs); residual_network->cost = tal_arrz(residual_network, s64, max_num_arcs); residual_network->potential = tal_arrz(residual_network, s64, max_num_nodes); residual_network->excess = tal_arrz(residual_network, s64, max_num_nodes); return residual_network; } static void init_residual_network( const struct linear_network * linear_network, struct residual_network* residual_network) { const struct graph *graph = linear_network->graph; const size_t max_num_arcs = graph_max_num_arcs(graph); const size_t max_num_nodes = graph_max_num_nodes(graph); for (struct arc arc = {.idx = 0}; arc.idx < max_num_arcs; ++arc.idx) { if (arc_is_dual(graph, arc) || !arc_enabled(graph, arc)) continue; struct arc dual = arc_dual(graph, arc); residual_network->cap[arc.idx] = linear_network->capacity[arc.idx]; residual_network->cap[dual.idx] = 0; residual_network->cost[arc.idx] = residual_network->cost[dual.idx] = 0; } for (u32 i = 0; i < max_num_nodes; ++i) { residual_network->potential[i] = 0; residual_network->excess[i] = 0; } } static int cmp_u64(const u64 *a, const u64 *b, void *unused) { if (*a < *b) return -1; if (*a > *b) return 1; return 0; } static int cmp_double(const double *a, const double *b, void *unused) { if (*a < *b) return -1; if (*a > *b) return 1; return 0; } static double get_median_ratio(const tal_t *working_ctx, const struct linear_network* linear_network) { const struct graph *graph = linear_network->graph; const size_t max_num_arcs = graph_max_num_arcs(graph); u64 *u64_arr = tal_arr(working_ctx, u64, max_num_arcs); double *double_arr = tal_arr(working_ctx, double, max_num_arcs); size_t n = 0; for (struct arc arc = {.idx=0};arc.idx < max_num_arcs; ++arc.idx) { /* scan real arcs, not unused id slots or dual arcs */ if (arc_is_dual(graph, arc) || !arc_enabled(graph, arc)) continue; assert(n < max_num_arcs/2); u64_arr[n] = linear_network->arc_fee_cost[arc.idx]; double_arr[n] = linear_network->arc_prob_cost[arc.idx]; n++; } asort(u64_arr, n, cmp_u64, NULL); asort(double_arr, n, cmp_double, NULL); /* Empty network, or tiny probability, nobody cares */ if (n == 0 || double_arr[n/2] < 0.001) return 1; /* You need to scale arc_prob_cost by this to match arc_fee_cost */ return u64_arr[n/2] / double_arr[n/2]; } static void combine_cost_function( const tal_t *working_ctx, const struct linear_network* linear_network, struct residual_network *residual_network, const s8 *biases, s64 mu) { /* probabilty and fee costs are not directly comparable! * Scale by ratio of (positive) medians. */ const double k = 1000 * get_median_ratio(working_ctx, linear_network); const double ln_30 = log(30); const struct graph *graph = linear_network->graph; const size_t max_num_arcs = graph_max_num_arcs(graph); for(struct arc arc = {.idx=0};arc.idx < max_num_arcs; ++arc.idx) { if (arc_is_dual(graph, arc) || !arc_enabled(graph, arc)) continue; const double pcost = linear_network->arc_prob_cost[arc.idx]; const s64 fcost = linear_network->arc_fee_cost[arc.idx]; double combined; u32 chanidx; int chandir; s32 bias; assert(fcost != INFINITE); assert(pcost != DBL_MAX); combined = fcost*mu + (MU_MAX-mu)*pcost*k; /* Bias is in human scale, where "bigger is better" */ arc_to_parts(arc, &chanidx, &chandir, NULL, NULL); bias = biases[(chanidx << 1) | chandir]; if (bias != 0) { /* After some trial and error, this gives a nice * dynamic range (25 seems to be "infinite" in * practice): * e^(-bias / (100/ln(30))) */ double bias_factor = exp(-bias / (100 / ln_30)); residual_network->cost[arc.idx] = combined * bias_factor; } else { residual_network->cost[arc.idx] = combined; } /* and the respective dual */ struct arc dual = arc_dual(graph, arc); residual_network->cost[dual.idx] = -combined; } } /* Get the fee cost associated to this directed channel. * Cost is expressed as PPM of the payment. * * Choose and integer `c_fee` to linearize the following fee function * * fee_msat = base_msat + floor(millionths*x_msat / 10^6) * * into * * fee = c_fee/10^6 * x * * use `base_fee_penalty` to weight the base fee and `delay_feefactor` to * weight the CLTV delay. * */ static s64 linear_fee_cost(u32 base_fee, u32 proportional_fee, u16 cltv_delta, double base_fee_penalty, double delay_feefactor) { s64 pfee = proportional_fee, bfee = base_fee, delay = cltv_delta; return pfee + bfee* base_fee_penalty+ delay*delay_feefactor; } /* This is inversely proportional to the amount we expect to send. Let's * assume we will send ~10th of the total amount per path. But note * that it converts to parts per million! */ static double base_fee_penalty_estimate(struct amount_msat amount) { return amount_msat_ratio(AMOUNT_MSAT(10000000), amount); } struct amount_msat linear_flow_cost(const struct flow *flow, struct amount_msat total_amount, double delay_feefactor) { struct amount_msat msat_cost; s64 cost_ppm = 0; double base_fee_penalty = base_fee_penalty_estimate(total_amount); for (size_t i = 0; i < tal_count(flow->path); i++) { const struct half_chan *h = &flow->path[i]->half[flow->dirs[i]]; cost_ppm += linear_fee_cost(h->base_fee, h->proportional_fee, h->delay, base_fee_penalty, delay_feefactor); } if (!amount_msat_fee(&msat_cost, flow->delivers, 0, cost_ppm)) abort(); return msat_cost; } /* FIXME: Instead of mapping one-to-one the indexes in the gossmap, try to * reduce the number of nodes and arcs used by taking only those that are * enabled. We might save some cpu if the work with a pruned network. */ static struct linear_network * init_linear_network(const tal_t *ctx, const struct pay_parameters *params) { struct linear_network * linear_network = tal(ctx, struct linear_network); const struct gossmap *gossmap = params->rq->gossmap; const size_t max_num_chans = gossmap_max_chan_idx(gossmap); const size_t max_num_arcs = max_num_chans * ARCS_PER_CHANNEL; const size_t max_num_nodes = gossmap_max_node_idx(gossmap); linear_network->graph = graph_new(ctx, max_num_nodes, max_num_arcs, ARC_DUAL_BITOFF); linear_network->arc_prob_cost = tal_arr(linear_network,double,max_num_arcs); for(size_t i=0;iarc_prob_cost[i]=DBL_MAX; linear_network->arc_fee_cost = tal_arr(linear_network,s64,max_num_arcs); for(size_t i=0;iarc_fee_cost[i]=INFINITE; linear_network->capacity = tal_arrz(linear_network,s64,max_num_arcs); for(struct gossmap_node *node = gossmap_first_node(gossmap); node; node=gossmap_next_node(gossmap,node)) { const u32 node_id = gossmap_node_idx(gossmap,node); for(size_t j=0;jnum_chans;++j) { int half; const struct gossmap_chan *c = gossmap_nth_chan(gossmap, node, j, &half); if (!gossmap_chan_set(c, half) || !c->half[half].enabled) continue; const u32 chan_id = gossmap_chan_idx(gossmap, c); const struct gossmap_node *next = gossmap_nth_node(gossmap, c,!half); const u32 next_id = gossmap_node_idx(gossmap,next); if(node_id==next_id) continue; // `cost` is the word normally used to denote cost per // unit of flow in the context of MCF. double prob_cost[CHANNEL_PARTS]; s64 capacity[CHANNEL_PARTS]; // split this channel direction to obtain the arcs // that are outgoing to `node` linearize_channel(params, c, half, capacity, prob_cost); /* linear fee_cost per unit of flow */ const s64 fee_cost = linear_fee_cost( c->half[half].base_fee, c->half[half].proportional_fee, c->half[half].delay, params->base_fee_penalty, params->delay_feefactor); // let's subscribe the 4 parts of the channel direction // (c,half), the dual of these guys will be subscribed // when the `i` hits the `next` node. for(size_t k=0;kgraph, arc, node_obj(node_id), node_obj(next_id)); linear_network->capacity[arc.idx] = capacity[k]; linear_network->arc_prob_cost[arc.idx] = prob_cost[k]; linear_network->arc_fee_cost[arc.idx] = fee_cost; // + the respective dual struct arc dual = arc_dual(linear_network->graph, arc); linear_network->capacity[dual.idx] = 0; linear_network->arc_prob_cost[dual.idx] = -prob_cost[k]; linear_network->arc_fee_cost[dual.idx] = -fee_cost; } } } return linear_network; } // flow on directed channels struct chan_flow { s64 half[2]; }; /* Search in the network a path of positive flow until we reach a node with * positive balance (returns a node idx with positive balance) * or we discover a cycle (returns a node idx with 0 balance). * */ static struct node find_path_or_cycle( const tal_t *working_ctx, const struct gossmap *gossmap, const struct chan_flow *chan_flow, const struct node source, const s64 *balance, const struct gossmap_chan **prev_chan, int *prev_dir, u32 *prev_idx) { const size_t max_num_nodes = gossmap_max_node_idx(gossmap); bitmap *visited = tal_arrz(working_ctx, bitmap, BITMAP_NWORDS(max_num_nodes)); u32 final_idx = source.idx; bitmap_set_bit(visited, final_idx); /* It is guaranteed to halt, because we either find a node with * balance[]>0 or we hit a node twice and we stop. */ while (balance[final_idx] <= 0) { u32 updated_idx = INVALID_INDEX; struct gossmap_node *cur = gossmap_node_byidx(gossmap, final_idx); for (size_t i = 0; i < cur->num_chans; ++i) { int dir; const struct gossmap_chan *c = gossmap_nth_chan(gossmap, cur, i, &dir); if (!gossmap_chan_set(c, dir) || !c->half[dir].enabled) continue; const u32 c_idx = gossmap_chan_idx(gossmap, c); /* follow the flow */ if (chan_flow[c_idx].half[dir] > 0) { const struct gossmap_node *n = gossmap_nth_node(gossmap, c, !dir); u32 next_idx = gossmap_node_idx(gossmap, n); prev_dir[next_idx] = dir; prev_chan[next_idx] = c; prev_idx[next_idx] = final_idx; updated_idx = next_idx; break; } } assert(updated_idx != INVALID_INDEX); assert(updated_idx != final_idx); final_idx = updated_idx; if (bitmap_test_bit(visited, updated_idx)) { /* We have seen this node before, we've found a cycle. */ assert(balance[updated_idx] <= 0); break; } bitmap_set_bit(visited, updated_idx); } return node_obj(final_idx); } struct list_data { struct list_node list; struct flow *flow_path; }; /* Given a path from a node with negative balance to a node with positive * balance, compute the bigest flow and substract it from the nodes balance and * the channels allocation. */ static struct flow *substract_flow(const tal_t *ctx, const struct pay_parameters *params, const struct node source, const struct node sink, s64 *balance, struct chan_flow *chan_flow, const u32 *prev_idx, const int *prev_dir, const struct gossmap_chan *const *prev_chan) { const struct gossmap *gossmap = params->rq->gossmap; assert(balance[source.idx] < 0); assert(balance[sink.idx] > 0); s64 delta = -balance[source.idx]; size_t length = 0; delta = MIN(delta, balance[sink.idx]); /* We can only walk backwards, now get me the legth of the path and the * max flow we can send through this route. */ for (u32 cur_idx = sink.idx; cur_idx != source.idx; cur_idx = prev_idx[cur_idx]) { assert(cur_idx != INVALID_INDEX); const int dir = prev_dir[cur_idx]; const struct gossmap_chan *const chan = prev_chan[cur_idx]; /* we could optimize here by caching the idx of the channels in * the path, but the bottleneck of the algorithm is the MCF * computation not here. */ const u32 chan_idx = gossmap_chan_idx(gossmap, chan); delta = MIN(delta, chan_flow[chan_idx].half[dir]); length++; } struct flow *f = tal(ctx, struct flow); f->path = tal_arr(f, const struct gossmap_chan *, length); f->dirs = tal_arr(f, int, length); /* Walk again and substract the flow value (delta). */ assert(delta > 0); balance[source.idx] += delta; balance[sink.idx] -= delta; for (u32 cur_idx = sink.idx; cur_idx != source.idx; cur_idx = prev_idx[cur_idx]) { const int dir = prev_dir[cur_idx]; const struct gossmap_chan *const chan = prev_chan[cur_idx]; const u32 chan_idx = gossmap_chan_idx(gossmap, chan); length--; /* f->path and f->dirs contain the channels in the path in the * correct order. */ f->path[length] = chan; f->dirs[length] = dir; chan_flow[chan_idx].half[dir] -= delta; } if (!amount_msat_mul(&f->delivers, params->accuracy, delta)) abort(); return f; } /* Substract a flow cycle from the channel allocation. */ static void substract_cycle(const struct gossmap *gossmap, const struct node sink, struct chan_flow *chan_flow, const u32 *prev_idx, const int *prev_dir, const struct gossmap_chan *const *prev_chan) { s64 delta = INFINITE; u32 cur_idx; /* Compute greatest flow in this cycle. */ for (cur_idx = sink.idx; cur_idx!=INVALID_INDEX;) { const int dir = prev_dir[cur_idx]; const struct gossmap_chan *const chan = prev_chan[cur_idx]; const u32 chan_idx = gossmap_chan_idx(gossmap, chan); delta = MIN(delta, chan_flow[chan_idx].half[dir]); cur_idx = prev_idx[cur_idx]; if (cur_idx == sink.idx) /* we have come back full circle */ break; } assert(cur_idx==sink.idx); /* Walk again and substract the flow value (delta). */ assert(delta < INFINITE); assert(delta > 0); for (cur_idx = sink.idx;cur_idx!=INVALID_INDEX;) { const int dir = prev_dir[cur_idx]; const struct gossmap_chan *const chan = prev_chan[cur_idx]; const u32 chan_idx = gossmap_chan_idx(gossmap, chan); chan_flow[chan_idx].half[dir] -= delta; cur_idx = prev_idx[cur_idx]; if (cur_idx == sink.idx) /* we have come back full circle */ break; } assert(cur_idx==sink.idx); } /* Given a flow in the residual network, build a set of payment flows in the * gossmap that corresponds to this flow. */ static struct flow ** get_flow_paths(const tal_t *ctx, const tal_t *working_ctx, const struct pay_parameters *params, const struct linear_network *linear_network, const struct residual_network *residual_network) { struct flow **flows = tal_arr(ctx,struct flow*,0); const size_t max_num_chans = gossmap_max_chan_idx(params->rq->gossmap); struct chan_flow *chan_flow = tal_arrz(working_ctx,struct chan_flow,max_num_chans); const size_t max_num_nodes = gossmap_max_node_idx(params->rq->gossmap); s64 *balance = tal_arrz(working_ctx,s64,max_num_nodes); const struct gossmap_chan **prev_chan = tal_arr(working_ctx,const struct gossmap_chan *,max_num_nodes); int *prev_dir = tal_arr(working_ctx,int,max_num_nodes); u32 *prev_idx = tal_arr(working_ctx, u32, max_num_nodes); for (u32 node_idx = 0; node_idx < max_num_nodes; node_idx++) prev_idx[node_idx] = INVALID_INDEX; // Convert the arc based residual network flow into a flow in the // directed channel network. // Compute balance on the nodes. const struct graph *graph = linear_network->graph; for (struct node n = {.idx = 0}; n.idx < max_num_nodes; n.idx++) { for(struct arc arc = node_adjacency_begin(graph,n); !node_adjacency_end(arc); arc = node_adjacency_next(graph,arc)) { if(arc_is_dual(graph, arc)) continue; struct node m = arc_head(graph,arc); s64 flow = get_arc_flow(residual_network, graph, arc); u32 chanidx; int chandir; balance[n.idx] -= flow; balance[m.idx] += flow; arc_to_parts(arc, &chanidx, &chandir, NULL, NULL); chan_flow[chanidx].half[chandir] +=flow; } } // Select all nodes with negative balance and find a flow that reaches a // positive balance node. for (struct node source = {.idx = 0}; source.idx < max_num_nodes; source.idx++) { // this node has negative balance, flows leaves from here while (balance[source.idx] < 0) { prev_chan[source.idx] = NULL; struct node sink = find_path_or_cycle( working_ctx, params->rq->gossmap, chan_flow, source, balance, prev_chan, prev_dir, prev_idx); if (balance[sink.idx] > 0) /* case 1. found a path */ { struct flow *fp = substract_flow( flows, params, source, sink, balance, chan_flow, prev_idx, prev_dir, prev_chan); tal_arr_expand(&flows, fp); } else /* case 2. found a cycle */ { substract_cycle(params->rq->gossmap, sink, chan_flow, prev_idx, prev_dir, prev_chan); } } } return flows; } // TODO(eduardo): choose some default values for the minflow parameters /* eduardo: I think it should be clear that this module deals with linear * flows, ie. base fees are not considered. Hence a flow along a path is * described with a sequence of directed channels and one amount. * In the `pay_flow` module there are dedicated routes to compute the actual * amount to be forward on each hop. * * TODO(eduardo): notice that we don't pay fees to forward payments with local * channels and we can tell with absolute certainty the liquidity on them. * Check that local channels have fee costs = 0 and bounds with certainty (min=max). */ // TODO(eduardo): we should LOG_DBG the process of finding the MCF while // adjusting the frugality factor. struct flow **minflow(const tal_t *ctx, const struct route_query *rq, const struct gossmap_node *source, const struct gossmap_node *target, struct amount_msat amount, u32 mu, double delay_feefactor) { struct flow **flow_paths; /* We allocate everything off this, and free it at the end, * as we can be called multiple times without cleaning tmpctx! */ tal_t *working_ctx = tal(NULL, char); struct pay_parameters *params = tal(working_ctx, struct pay_parameters); params->rq = rq; params->source = source; params->target = target; params->amount = amount; params->accuracy = AMOUNT_MSAT(1000); /* FIXME: params->accuracy = amount_msat_max(amount_msat_div(amount, * 1000), AMOUNT_MSAT(1)); * */ // template the channel partition into linear arcs params->cap_fraction[0]=0; params->cost_fraction[0]=0; for(size_t i =1;icap_fraction[i]=CHANNEL_PIVOTS[i]-CHANNEL_PIVOTS[i-1]; params->cost_fraction[i]= log((1-CHANNEL_PIVOTS[i-1])/(1-CHANNEL_PIVOTS[i])) /params->cap_fraction[i]; } params->delay_feefactor = delay_feefactor; params->base_fee_penalty = base_fee_penalty_estimate(amount); // build the uncertainty network with linearization and residual arcs struct linear_network *linear_network= init_linear_network(working_ctx, params); const struct graph *graph = linear_network->graph; const size_t max_num_arcs = graph_max_num_arcs(graph); const size_t max_num_nodes = graph_max_num_nodes(graph); struct residual_network *residual_network = alloc_residual_network(working_ctx, max_num_nodes, max_num_arcs); const struct node dst = {.idx = gossmap_node_idx(rq->gossmap, target)}; const struct node src = {.idx = gossmap_node_idx(rq->gossmap, source)}; init_residual_network(linear_network,residual_network); /* Since we have constraint accuracy, ask to find a payment solution * that can pay a bit more than the actual value rathen than undershoot it. * That's why we use the ceil function here. */ const u64 pay_amount = amount_msat_ratio_ceil(params->amount, params->accuracy); if (!simple_feasibleflow(working_ctx, linear_network->graph, src, dst, residual_network->cap, pay_amount)) { rq_log(tmpctx, rq, LOG_INFORM, "%s failed: unable to find a feasible flow.", __func__); goto fail; } combine_cost_function(working_ctx, linear_network, residual_network, rq->biases, mu); /* We solve a linear MCF problem. */ if (!mcf_refinement(working_ctx, linear_network->graph, residual_network->excess, residual_network->cap, residual_network->cost, residual_network->potential)) { rq_log(tmpctx, rq, LOG_BROKEN, "%s: MCF optimization step failed", __func__); goto fail; } /* We dissect the solution of the MCF into payment routes. * Actual amounts considering fees are computed for every * channel in the routes. */ flow_paths = get_flow_paths(ctx, working_ctx, params, linear_network, residual_network); if(!flow_paths){ rq_log(tmpctx, rq, LOG_BROKEN, "%s: failed to extract flow paths from the MCF solution", __func__); goto fail; } tal_free(working_ctx); return flow_paths; fail: tal_free(working_ctx); return NULL; }