We previously registered hooks up in who-replies-to-getmanifest-first
order, but then if any had dependencies it would scatter that order.
This allows users to manually set dependencies developers have
forgotten by specifying the plugins manually in their configuration or
cmdline. This was an excellent consideration by @mschmook.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're rarely in a hurry here, and bitcoind is aggressive with fees.
You can always spend this output if you really have to, using CPFP.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: Protocol: mutual closing feerate reduced to "slow" to avoid overpaying.
We added a conversion of failcodes that do not have sufficient information in
faac4b28ad. That means that a failcode that'd require additional information
in order to be a correct error to return in an onion is mapped to a generic
one since we can't backfill the information.
This tests that the mapping is performed correctly and replicates the
situation in #4070
Hooks do not tolerate failures at all. If we return a JSON-RPC error to a hook
call the only thing the main daemon can really do is to crash. This commit
adds a mapping of error to a safe fallback result, including a warning to the
node operator that this should be addressed in the plugin. The warning is
reported as a `**BROKEN**` message, and should therefore fail any testing done
on the plugin.
Changelog-Fixed: pyln: Fixed HTLCs hanging indefinitely if the hook function raises an exception. A safe fallback result is now returned instead.
Changelog-Deprecated: plugin: `bcli` replacements should note that `sendrawtransaction` now has a second required Boolean argument, `allowhighfees`, which if `true`, means ignore any fee limits and just broadcast the transaction. Use `--deprecated-apis` to use older `bcli` replacement plugins that only support a single argument.
First, simplify: amount is set to 1000000, but then we deposit 1000000 + 0.01btc
(i.e. 2000000), and we always use 2 * amount. Just use a single constant to
make it clear.
Secondly, we assume that the wallet considers outputs spent as soon as
we created the tx: this will not be true once withdraw uses sendpsbt.
So, we generate blocks, but now sometimes withdraw will pick up change
txs, so we need to reserve them to avoid that messing our coinmovements.
Finally, we assumed the withdrawl order was BIP69, which becomes
variable.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
With a feerate of 7500perkw and subtracting 660 sats for anchors, a
20,000 sat channel has capacity about 9800 sat, below our default:
You gave bad parameters: channel capacity with funding 20000sat, reserves 546sat/546sat, max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat is 18446744073709551615msat, channel capacity is 9818sat, which is below 10000000msat
So bump channel amounts.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Anchor outputs break many assumptions in our tests:
1. Remove some hardcoded numbers in favor of a fee calc, so we only have to
change in one place.
FIXME: This should also be done for elements!
2. Do binary search to get feerate for a given closing fee.
3. Don't assume output #0: anchor outputs perturb them.
4. Don't assume we can make 1ksat channels (anchors cost 660 sats!).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's currently always 0, but it won't be once we replace txprepare.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `fundchannel` has new `outnum` field indicating which output of the transaction funds the channel.
On my test machine, we queried bitcoind before the close tx was sent:
```
# When output is spent, it should give us null !
txo = l1.rpc.call("getutxout", {"txid": txid, "vout": 0})
> assert txo["amount"] is txo["script"] is None
E AssertionError: assert '20000000msat' is '00205b8cd3b914cf67cdd8fa6273c930353dd36476734fbd962102c2df53b90880cd'
tests/test_plugin.py:1221: AssertionError
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I started replacing all get_node() calls, but got bored, so then just did the
tests which call get_node() 3 times or more.
Ends up not making a measurable speed difference, but it does make some
things neater and more standard.
Times with SLOW_MACHINE=1 (given that's how Travis tests):
Time before (non-valgrind):
393 sec (had 3 failures?)
Time after (non-valgrind):
410 sec
Time before (valgrind):
890 seconds (had 2 failures)
Time after (valgrind):
892 sec
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
While we were unsetting the `payment->cmd` in case of a success to signal that
we should not return to the JSON-RPC command twice, we were not doing that in
the case of failures. This was causing multiple responses to a single incoming
command, and `lightningd` was correctly killing the plugin. This issue was
introduced through early returns (anything setting `payment->abort=true`) and
was caused in Rusty's case through an MPP timeout.
Fixes#3847
Reported-by: Rusty Russell <@rustyrussell>
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <@cdecker>
These are pulled from wallet/wallet.c, with the fix now that we grind sigs.
This reduces the fees we pay slightly, as you can see in the coinmoves changes.
I now print out all the coin moves in suitable format before we match:
you only see this if the test fails, but it's really helpful.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There is a race between `getroute` learning that our peer accepts TLVs and us
initiating the payment. Waiting for announcements ensures we always use TLVs,
matching our expectation in the test / plugin.
There are various places where our tests failed with
--enable-expimental-features. And our plugin test overlapped an
existing feature.
We make our expected_feature functions more generic, and use them
everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
