The wire protocol uses this, in the assumption that we'll never see feerates
in excess of 4294967 satoshi per kiloweight.
So let's use that consistently internally as well.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Depending on what we're doing, we can want different ones. So use
IMMEDIATE (estimatesmartfee 2 CONSERVATIVE), NORMAL (estimatesmartfee
4 ECONOMICAL) and SLOW (estimatesmartfee 100 ECONOMICAL).
If one isn't available, we try making each one half the previous.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means we convert it when retrieving from bitcoind; internally it's
always satoshi-per-1000-weight aka millisatoshi-per-weight.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Test objects must be added to $(ALL_OBJS) so they correctly depend on
CCAN headers etc.
Also, each test in a subdir must depend on headers and src in the parent
directory, as it will often #include them directly.
Reported-by: Christian Decker
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Our testsuite uses --dev-fail-on-subdaemon-fail, so I didn't notice this
until I turned that off to chase a bug.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently scan through HTLCs: this isn't enough if we've only got a
feechange in the commitment, so use a flag (but keep both for now for
debugging).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Used by the JSON-RPC for the listtransfers call. Currently does not
support any form of paging.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
There were two bugs here. First, grind_feerate() needs to check the
actual range of feerates, not the same rate over and over! Secondly,
we need to grind the feerate for the HTLC-success tx, too.
These were masked by the fact that our tests always use the same feerate!
"Untested code is buggy code"
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means we'll find anywhere still using the payment key,
even though we still expose the private payment key to channeld.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
All the callers need to pass it in: currently channeld and openingd just
fake it by copying the payment point.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There were two bugs: we weren't returning the next from the given
label but the one matching the label, and we were appending new
invoices to the head instead of the tail, which meant we'd be
traversing in the wrong order.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We were sending the announcement_signatures as soon as we locally
locked and got the announcement_depth, this doesn't make the channel
usable any sooner and forces the other side to stash the
signature. This defers the announcement_signature until the channel
really is usable.
This is done by adding an additional check for the remote locked
message and adding a trigger on remote lock.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
