It's undocumented and only used in one place, so we can change it (it
was new in 24.08).
We really want to be able to just handle a raw onionmessage: this allows
oblivious sending of messages, but also, in combination with the coming
onionmessage_forward_fail notification, allows us to connect then
reinject.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `cln_rpc::model::requests::AskrenereserveRequest: From<pb::AskrenereserveRequest>` is not satisfied
--> cln-grpc/src/server.rs:3994:56
|
3994 | let req: requests::AskrenereserveRequest = req.into();
| ^^^^ the trait `From<pb::AskrenereserveRequest>` is not implemented for `cln_rpc::model::requests::AskrenereserveRequest`, which is required by `pb::AskrenereserveRequest: Into<_>`
|
= note: required for `pb::AskrenereserveRequest` to implement `Into<cln_rpc::model::requests::AskrenereserveRequest>`
error[E0277]: the trait bound `cln_rpc::model::requests::AskreneageRequest: From<pb::AskreneageRequest>` is not satisfied
--> cln-grpc/src/server.rs:4026:52
|
4026 | let req: requests::AskreneageRequest = req.into();
| ^^^^ the trait `From<pb::AskreneageRequest>` is not implemented for `cln_rpc::model::requests::AskreneageRequest`, which is required by `pb::AskreneageRequest: Into<_>`
|
= note: required for `pb::AskreneageRequest` to implement `Into<cln_rpc::model::requests::AskreneageRequest>`
error[E0277]: the trait bound `cln_rpc::model::requests::GetroutesRequest: From<pb::GetroutesRequest>` is not satisfied
--> cln-grpc/src/server.rs:4058:51
|
4058 | let req: requests::GetroutesRequest = req.into();
| ^^^^ the trait `From<pb::GetroutesRequest>` is not implemented for `cln_rpc::model::requests::GetroutesRequest`, which is required by `pb::GetroutesRequest: Into<_>`
|
= note: required for `pb::GetroutesRequest` to implement `Into<cln_rpc::model::requests::GetroutesRequest>`
error[E0277]: the trait bound `cln_rpc::model::requests::AskrenedisablenodeRequest: From<pb::AskrenedisablenodeRequest>` is not satisfied
--> cln-grpc/src/server.rs:4090:60
|
4090 | let req: requests::AskrenedisablenodeRequest = req.into();
| ^^^^ the trait `From<pb::AskrenedisablenodeRequest>` is not implemented for `cln_rpc::model::requests::AskrenedisablenodeRequest`, which is required by `pb::AskrenedisablenodeRequest: Into<_>`
|
= note: required for `pb::AskrenedisablenodeRequest` to implement `Into<cln_rpc::model::requests::AskrenedisablenodeRequest>`
error[E0277]: the trait bound `cln_rpc::model::requests::AskreneinformchannelRequest: From<pb::AskreneinformchannelRequest>` is not satisfied
--> cln-grpc/src/server.rs:4122:62
|
4122 | let req: requests::AskreneinformchannelRequest = req.into();
| ^^^^ the trait `From<pb::AskreneinformchannelRequest>` is not implemented for `cln_rpc::model::requests::AskreneinformchannelRequest`, which is required by `pb::AskreneinformchannelRequest: Into<_>`
|
= note: required for `pb::AskreneinformchannelRequest` to implement `Into<cln_rpc::model::requests::AskreneinformchannelRequest>`
error[E0277]: the trait bound `cln_rpc::model::requests::AskrenecreatechannelRequest: From<pb::AskrenecreatechannelRequest>` is not satisfied
--> cln-grpc/src/server.rs:4154:62
|
4154 | let req: requests::AskrenecreatechannelRequest = req.into();
| ^^^^ the trait `From<pb::AskrenecreatechannelRequest>` is not implemented for `cln_rpc::model::requests::AskrenecreatechannelRequest`, which is required by `pb::AskrenecreatechannelRequest: Into<_>`
|
= note: required for `pb::AskrenecreatechannelRequest` to implement `Into<cln_rpc::model::requests::AskrenecreatechannelRequest>`
error[E0277]: the trait bound `cln_rpc::model::requests::AskreneupdatechannelRequest: From<pb::AskreneupdatechannelRequest>` is not satisfied
--> cln-grpc/src/server.rs:4186:62
|
4186 | let req: requests::AskreneupdatechannelRequest = req.into();
| ^^^^ the trait `From<pb::AskreneupdatechannelRequest>` is not implemented for `cln_rpc::model::requests::AskreneupdatechannelRequest`, which is required by `pb::AskreneupdatechannelRequest: Into<_>`
|
= note: required for `pb::AskreneupdatechannelRequest` to implement `Into<cln_rpc::model::requests::AskreneupdatechannelRequest>`
error[E0277]: the trait bound `cln_rpc::model::requests::AskrenebiaschannelRequest: From<pb::AskrenebiaschannelRequest>` is not satisfied
--> cln-grpc/src/server.rs:4218:60
|
4218 | let req: requests::AskrenebiaschannelRequest = req.into();
| ^^^^ the trait `From<pb::AskrenebiaschannelRequest>` is not implemented for `cln_rpc::model::requests::AskrenebiaschannelRequest`, which is required by `pb::AskrenebiaschannelRequest: Into<_>`
|
= note: required for `pb::AskrenebiaschannelRequest` to implement `Into<cln_rpc::model::requests::AskrenebiaschannelRequest>`
error[E0277]: the trait bound `cln_rpc::model::requests::AskrenelistreservationsRequest: From<pb::AskrenelistreservationsRequest>` is not satisfied
--> cln-grpc/src/server.rs:4250:65
|
4250 | let req: requests::AskrenelistreservationsRequest = req.into();
| ^^^^ the trait `From<pb::AskrenelistreservationsRequest>` is not implemented for `cln_rpc::model::requests::AskrenelistreservationsRequest`, which is required by `pb::AskrenelistreservationsRequest: Into<_>`
|
= note: required for `pb::AskrenelistreservationsRequest` to implement `Into<cln_rpc::model::requests::AskrenelistreservationsRequest>`
error[E0277]: the trait bound `cln_rpc::model::requests::InjectpaymentonionRequest: From<pb::InjectpaymentonionRequest>` is not satisfied
--> cln-grpc/src/server.rs:4282:60
|
4282 | let req: requests::InjectpaymentonionRequest = req.into();
| ^^^^ the trait `From<pb::InjectpaymentonionRequest>` is not implemented for `cln_rpc::model::requests::InjectpaymentonionRequest`, which is required by `pb::InjectpaymentonionRequest: Into<_>`
|
= note: required for `pb::InjectpaymentonionRequest` to implement `Into<cln_rpc::model::requests::InjectpaymentonionRequest>`
error[E0277]: the trait bound `cln_rpc::model::requests::XpayRequest: From<pb::XpayRequest>` is not satisfied
--> cln-grpc/src/server.rs:4314:46
|
4314 | let req: requests::XpayRequest = req.into();
| ^^^^ the trait `From<pb::XpayRequest>` is not implemented for `cln_rpc::model::requests::XpayRequest`, which is required by `pb::XpayRequest: Into<_>`
|
= note: required for `pb::XpayRequest` to implement `Into<cln_rpc::model::requests::XpayRequest>`
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The `send_outreq` function is a good place to suspend and resume
traces, since these are usually the places where we hand off control
back to the `io_loop`. This assumes that we do not continue doing
heavy liftin after we have queued an `outreq` call, but that is most
likely the case anyway. This frees us from having to track suspensions
whenever we call the RPC from a plugin.
Being able to back up the hsm_secret is critical, but you cannot do
this through a UI, because of course we do not allow such access.
People have lost funds because they didn't back up.
This allows access to the hsm_secret if you use a password set in the
config file. (If it's not set, the command does not work). This is a
compromise, of course.
Changelog-Added: `exposesecret` command for encouraging hsm_secret backups.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The command called “splice” can take a json payload or a ‘splice script’, process it into a list of ‘actions’ and then execute those actions.
These actions include or will include everything you would want to do with a splice:
* Splice into a channel
* Splice out of a channel
* Fund from wallet
* Deposit to wallet
* Send funds to bitcoin address
Changelog-Added: A new magic “splice” command is added that can take a ‘splice script’ or json payload and perform any complex splice across multiple channels merging the result into a single transaction. Some features are disabled and will be added in time.
invoice_path_id is actually a generic path_id thing, so rename it.
We're going to use the same scheme for path secrets and the tweak to
node_id when we create a fake pubkey for invoice_requests, so a new
header is appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This will obsolete the existing calls to RPC "sendonionmessage", but
we transition by introducing it separately. It's designed to work with
the common/onion_message routines and "injectonionmessage".
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means only a single gossmap, and they already share the fetchinvoice-noconnect option
and autoconnect code.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: Plugins: the `fetchinvoice` plugin has been combined into the `offers` plugin.
Currently make a plugin that do reportings of logs on
a services like graphana is not possible. So this commit
include the possibility to write a plugin that do the report
of this analisys.
Changelog-Added: core: notify plugins when a log line is emitted.
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: offers: we now understand blinded paths which use a short-channel-id(+direction) as entry point.
We don't actually support it yet, but this threads through the type change,
puts it in "decode" etc.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Creates an example package that subscribes to all notifications and logs
them. This is useful for testing the behavior of subscribing to "*".
I've also edited the Makefile to ensure that `make` builds the example
and that `make clean` removes the example
Apparently NixOS didn't have Python (sometimes!) so let's not assume.
By reusing the JSON "parsing" code from cowsay, we can self-disable
to handle this case.
Reported-by: Shahana Farooqui <shahana.farooqui@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: Plugins: `clnrest` now correctly self-disables if Python not present at all.
And add a request schema for multifundchannel.
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `fundchannel` and `multifundchannel` now take an optional `channel_type` parameter.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
and stash in the database.
Rusty: I added the bad gossip message so we would see unknown updates in CI, and made sure we don't send our own generated updates to lightningd.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This was pointed out by Daywalker [1]: we are synchronously processing
events from `lightningd` which means that if processing one of the
hooks or requests was slow or delayed, we would not get notifications,
hooks, or RPC requests, massively impacting the flexbility.
This highlights the issue with a failing test (it times out), and in
the next commit we will isolate event processing into their own task,
so to free the event loop from having to wait for an eventual
response.
[1] https://community.corelightning.org/c/developers/hold-invoice-plugin#comment_wrapper_16754493
This *would* be a 1-line change (add it to Makefile) except that we
previously assumed a "list" prefix on commands.
These use the default refreshing, but they could be done better using
the time-range parameters.
Suggested-by: @niftynei
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
