Our handling of SIGPIPE was incoherent and inconsistent, and we had much
cut & paste between the daemons. They should *ALL* ignore SIGPIPE, and
much of the rest of the boilerplate can be shared, so should be.
Reported-by: @ZmnSCPxj
Fixes: #528
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is the only case in which we don't respend to a simple keyindex'd
pubkey, so we need to handle this for future spends.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
I was examining a test_onchain_timeout failure, and realized that we
were forgetting a peer even though we'd just spent the HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX!
This reveals that we weren't resolving an output when we stole the preimage
from it, like we should.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
OUR_HTLC_TIMEOUT_TO_US = normal tx, used to timeout htlc in their commit tx.
OUR_HTLC_TIMEOUT_TX = dual-sig tx with delay, used to timeout htlc in our commit tx.
Only one test looks at that string, so fix that too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's just a sha256_double, but importantly when we convert it to a
string (in type_to_string, which is used in logging) we use
bitcoin_txid_to_hex() so it's reversed as people expect.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We create a temporary tx which is a child of the real tx, for simplicity of
marshalling. That's OK.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The wire protocol uses this, in the assumption that we'll never see feerates
in excess of 4294967 satoshi per kiloweight.
So let's use that consistently internally as well.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There were two bugs here. First, grind_feerate() needs to check the
actual range of feerates, not the same rate over and over! Secondly,
we need to grind the feerate for the HTLC-success tx, too.
These were masked by the fact that our tests always use the same feerate!
"Untested code is buggy code"
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently rely on a zero exit status. That's the only difference between
onchain finished handling and other per-peer daemons, so instead we should
have an explicit "done" message. This is both clearer, and allows us to
unify.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We were sending a channeld message to onchaind, which was v. confusing
due to overlap. We make all the numbers distinct, which means we can
also add an assert() that it's valid for that daemon, which catches
such errors immediately.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We re-use the value for reasonable_depth given by the master, and we
tell it when our timeout transactions reach that depth.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When we sent out an HTLC-Timeout or HTLC-Success tx, we need to spend
it after the timeout so it's safely in our wallet.
We generalize the tx_type OUR_UNILATERAL_TO_US_RETURN_TO_WALLET to
OUR_DELAYED_RETURN_TO_WALLET, since we use it for HTLC transactions too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When we see an offered HTLC onchain, we need to use the preimage if we
know it. So we dump all the known HTLC preimages at startup, and send
new ones as we discover them.
This doesn't cover preimages we know because we're the final
recipient; that can happen if an HTLC hasn't been irrevocably
committed yet. We'll do that in a followup patch.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For non-delayed HTLC success spends, we have a similar pattern ("<sig>
<preimage> <wscript>") so a we want to use the same function.
The other routines don't say "witness" in them, and should.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This change is really to allow us to have a --dev-fail-on-subdaemon-fail option
so we can handle failures from subdaemons generically.
It also neatens handling so we can have an explicit callback for "peer
did something wrong" (which matters if we want to close the channel in
that case).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This was causing some compilation trouble on 32bit systems, see #256.
Reported-by: @shsmith
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
